International Programme for Action on Climate

References

[62] Akimoto, K., F. Sano and B. Tehrani (2017), “The analyses on the economic costs for achieving the nationally determined contributions and the expected global emission pathways’”, Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, pp. 193-206.

[115] Arga Jafino, B. et al. (2020), “Revised estimates of the impact of climate change on extreme poverty by 2030”, Policy Research Working Paper, No. 9417, Climate Change Group and Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery, World Bank.

[30] Arga Jafino, B. et al. (2020), “Revised Estimates of the impact of Climate Change on Extreme Poverty by 2030”, No. Policy Research Working Paper 9417, Climate Change Group & Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery. World Bank.

[98] Batini, N. et al. (2021), “Building Back Better: How Big Are Green Spending Multipliers?”, IMF Working Papers, No. 2021/087, IMF, Washington, DC, https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2021/03/19/Building-Back-Better-How-Big-Are-Green-Spending-Multipliers-50264.

[82] Battersby, B. et al. (2021), Green Budgeting: Towards Common Principles, European Union, Luxembourg, https://www.oecd.org/gov/budgeting/green-budgeting-towards-common-principles.pdf.

[79] Bioret, L., A. Dechezleprêtre and P. Sarapatkova (forthcoming), The New Green Economy: Venture Capital, Innovation and Business Success in Cleantech Startups, OECD Publishing, Paris.

[80] Bioret, L., A. Dechezleprêtre and P. Sarapatkova (2022, forthcoming), “The New Green Economy: Venture Capital, Innovation and Business Success in Cleantech Startups”, OECD.

[91] Burstein, P. (2003), “The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: A Review and an Agenda”, Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 56/1, pp. 29-40, https://doi.org/10.2307/3219881.

[26] Circle Economy (2021), The Circularity Gap Report 2021, https://www.circularity-gap.world/2021.

[120] Clement, V. et al. (2021), Groundswell Part 2: Acting on Internal Climate Migration, World Bank, Washington, DC, https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/36248.

[122] Climate Action Tracker (2021), CAT Climate Target Update Tracker, https://climateactiontracker.org/climate-target-update-tracker-2022/.

[9] Climate Watch (2022), “Climate Watch”, World Resources Institute, https://www.climatewatchdata.org/.

[8] Climate Watch (2022), Climate Watch. 2022., World Resources Institute.

[135] Climate Watch (2021), Net-Zero Tracker, https://www.climatewatchdata.org/net-zero-tracker?category=target_scope&indicator=nz_ghg.

[59] CPLC (2017), REPORT OF THE HIGH-LEVEL COMMISSION ON CARBON PRICES, Carbon Pricing Leadership Coalition.

[94] Crowley Kate (2017), Up and down with climate politics 2013-2016: The repeal of carbon pricing in Australia.

[68] Dechezleprêtre, A. et al. (2022), “Fighting climate change: International attitudes toward climate policies”, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1714, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/3406f29a-en.

[32] EEA (2022), Economic losses and fatalities from weather-and-climate-related events in Europe, European Environmental Agency.

[7] Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit (2022), Net Zero Emissions Race, https://eciu.net/netzerotracker.

[92] Erikson, R., M. Mackuen and J. Stimson (2002), The Macro Polity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

[118] European Commission (2020), A New Circular Economy Action Plan, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/strategy/circulareconomy-action-plan_en and eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1583933814386&uri=COM:2020:98.

[17] European Environment Agency (2021), “Improving the climate impact of raw material sourcing”.

[39] Ferris, E. (2020), “Research on climate change and migration where are we and where are we going?”, Migration Studies, Vol. 8/4, pp. 612-625, https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnaa028.

[51] Filkov, A. et al. (2020), “Impact of Australia’s catastrophic 2019/20 bushfire season on communities and environment. Retrospective analysis and current trends”, Journal of Safety Science and Resilience, Vol. 1/1, pp. 44-56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnlssr.2020.06.009.

[63] Fujimori, S. et al. (2016), “Will international emissions trading help achieve the objectives of the Paris Agreement?”, Environmental Research Letter.

[49] Guha-Sapir, D., R. Below and P. Hoyois (2021), EM-DAT: The CRED/OFDA International Disaster Database, Université Catholique de Louvain , Brussels.

[48] Hallegate, S., J. Rentschler and J. Rozenberg (2019), Lifelines. The Resilient Infrastructure Opportunity, World Bank.

[93] Harrison K. (2010), The comparative politics of carbon taxation. Annual Review of Law and Social Science.

[69] Ian W.H. Parry, Victor Mylonas and Nate Vernon (2018), “Mitigation Policies for the Paris Agreement: An Assessment for G20 Countries”, International Monetary Fund.

[16] IEA (2022), Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Energy.

[86] IEA (2022), Renewable Energy Market Update: Outlook for 2022 and 2023, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/faf30e5a-en.

[87] IEA (2022), Renewable Energy Market Update: Outlook for 2022 and 2023, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/faf30e5a-en.

[77] IEA (2021), Energy technology RD&D budgets, https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-product/energy-technology-rd-and-d-budget-database-2.

[83] IEA (2021), “Executive summary”, in The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions, IEA, Paris, https://www.iea.org/reports/the-role-of-critical-minerals-in-clean-energy-transitions/executive-summary (accessed on 22 September 2022).

[76] IEA (2021), Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector, IEA, Paris, https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050 (accessed on 16 July 2021).

[85] IEA (2021), The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions – Analysis - IEA, IEA, Paris, https://www.iea.org/reports/the-role-of-critical-minerals-in-clean-energy-transitions/executive-summary (accessed on 22 September 2022).

[97] IEA (2021), World Energy Outlook 2021, IEA, Paris, https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2021.

[110] IEA (2021a), Net Zero by 2050, IEA, Paris.

[64] IETA (2019), The Economic Potential of Article 6 of the Paris Agreement and Implementation Challenges, University of Maryland and CPLC.

[54] IFRC (2021), Annual Report 2021, International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC).

[99] IMF (2022), World Economic Outlook, April 2022: War Sets Back The Global Recovery, IMF, Washington, DC, https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2022/04/19/world-economic-outlook-april-2022 (accessed on 24 June 2022).

[55] IMF (2021), “World Economic Outlook Database”, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC, https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2021/April.

[44] IPCC (2022), Climate Change 2022: Climate Change Mitigation: Summary for Policymakers, IPCC.

[43] IPCC (2022), Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-working-group-ii/.

[46] IPCC (2022), Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, https://report.ipcc.ch/ar6wg2/pdf/IPCC_AR6_WGII_FinalDraft_FullReport.pdf (accessed on 10 March 2022).

[33] IPCC (2021), Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-working-group-i/.

[13] IPCC (2021), Climate change widespread, rapid and intensifying, https://www.ipcc.ch/2021/08/09/ar6-wg1-20210809-pr/.

[132] IPCC (2021), Climate change widespread, rapid and intensifying, IPCC.

[112] IPCC (2021), “Summary for Policymakers”, in Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/.

[75] IPCC (2019), “Technical Summary”, in Climate Change and Land, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/ (accessed on 21 January 2020).

[38] IPCC (2018), Global Warming of 1.5°C, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/.

[124] IPCC (2014b), Summary for Policymakers. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Work¬ing Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.

[20] IRP (2019), Global Resource Outlook 2019.

[136] ITF (2021), Transport Climate Action Directory, https://www.itf-oecd.org/tcad.

[125] ITF (2021), Transport Climate Action Directory, https://www.itf-oecd.org/tcad.

[95] Kallbekken, S. and H. Saelen (2011), “Public acceptance for environmental taxes: Self-interest, environmental and distributional concerns”, Energy Policy, Vol. 39/5, pp. 2966-2973.

[89] King, B., J. Larsen and H. Kolus (2022), A Congressional Climate Breakthrough, Rhodium Group, https://rhg.com/research/inflation-reduction-act/.

[37] Maes, M. et al. (2022), Monitoring exposure to climate-related hazards: Indicator methodology and key results, OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/19970900.

[47] Mallapaty, S. (2022), Why are Pakistan’s floods so extreme this year?, https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-02813-6.

[70] Marten, M. and K. van Dender (2019), “The use of revenues from carbon pricing”, OECD Taxation Working Papers, No. 43, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/3cb265e4-en.

[24] Material Economics (2018), The Circular Economy: A Powerful Force for Climate Mitigation, https://materialeconomics.com/publications/the-circular-economy-a-powerful-force-for-climate-mitigation-1.

[119] Mehling, M. et al. (2019), “Designing border carbon adjustments for enhanced climate action”, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 113, pp. 433-481.

[42] Mendelsohn, R. (2009), “The Impact of Climate Change on Agriculture in Developing Countries”, Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, Vol. 1/1, pp. 5-19, https://doi.org/10.1080/19390450802495882.

[128] Mendelsohn, R. (2009), “The Impact of Climate Change on Agriculture in Developing Countries”, Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, Vol. 1/1, pp. 5-19, https://doi.org/10.1080/19390450802495882.

[40] Munich RE (2022), Hurricanes, cold waves, tornadoes: Weather disasters in USA dominate natural disaster losses in 2021, Munich RE.

[137] Nachtigall, D. (forthcoming), The climate actions and policies measurement framework: A structured and harmonised climate policy database to monitor countries’ mitigation action, OECD Environment Working Papers, forthcoming.

[56] Nachtigall, D. et al. (forthcoming), The climate actions and policies measurement framework: A structured and harmonised climate policy database to monitor countries’ mitigation action, OECD Environment Working Papers, forthcoming.

[139] Nachtigall, D. (2022), The climate actions and policies measurement framework: A structured and harmonised climate policy database to monitor countries’ mitigation action, OECD Environment Working Papers, forthcoming.

[61] Nachtigall, D. et al. (2021), “The economic and environmental benefits from international co-ordination on carbon pricing: Insights from economic modelling studies”, OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 173, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d4d3e59e-en.

[138] Nachtigall, D. et al. (forthcoming), The climate actions and policies measurement framework: A structured and harmonised climate policy database to monitor countries’ mitigation action, OECD Environment Working Papers, forthcoming.

[126] NOAA (2021), 2021 U.S. Billion-dollar Weather and Climate Disasters in Historical Context Hazard and Socioeconomic Risk Mapping, https://doi.org/www.ncei.noaa.gov/monitoring-content/billions/docs/billions-risk-mapping-2021-ams-forum.pdf.

[103] O’Callaghan, B. and E. Murdock (2021), Are We Building Back Better? Evidence from 2020 and Pathways for Inclusive Green Recovery Spending, United Nations Environment Programme, https://www.unep.org/resources/publication/are-we-building-back-better-evidence-2020-and-pathways-inclusive-green.

[45] OECD (2022), “Aggregate National Accounts, SNA 1993: Gross domestic product”, OECD National Accounts Statistics (database), https://doi.org/10.1787/data-00795-en (accessed on 17 October 2022).

[129] OECD (2022), “Aggregate National Accounts, SNA 1993: Gross domestic product”, OECD National Accounts Statistics (database), https://doi.org/10.1787/data-00795-en (accessed on 17 October  2022).

[104] OECD (2022), Aggregate Trends of Climate Finance Provided and Mobilised by Developed Countries in 2013-2020, Climate Finance and the USD 100 Billion Goal, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d28f963c-en.

[6] OECD (2022), “Air and climate: Greenhouse gas emissions by source”, OECD Environment Statistics (database), https://doi.org/10.1787/data-00594-en (accessed on 17 October 2022).

[130] OECD (2022), “Air and climate: Greenhouse gas emissions by source”, OECD Environment Statistics (database), https://doi.org/10.1787/data-00594-en (accessed on 17 October 2022).

[11] OECD (2022), “Climate change”, in Environment at a Glance Indicators, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5584ad47-en.

[105] OECD (2022), Climate Finance Provided and Mobilised by Developed Countries in 2016-2020: Insights from Disaggregated Analysis, Climate Finance and the USD 100 Billion Goal, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/286dae5d-en.

[106] OECD (2022), Climate-related Official Development Assistance: A snapshot, OECD, Paris, https://www.oecd.org/dac/financing-sustainable-development/development-finance-data/climate-related-official-development-assistance-2019.pdf.

[78] OECD (2022), “Green growth indicators”, OECD Environment Statistics (database), https://doi.org/10.1787/data-00665-en (accessed on 17 October 2022).

[131] OECD (2022), “Green growth indicators”, OECD Environment Statistics (database), https://doi.org/10.1787/data-00665-en (accessed on 17 October 2022).

[10] OECD (2022), “IPAC Climate Action Dashboard”, International Programme for Action on Climate, http://www.oecd.org/climate-action/ipac/dashboard.

[111] OECD (2022), “IPAC Dashboard”, International Programme for Action on Climate, https://www.oecd.org/climate-action/ipac/dashboard.

[15] OECD (2022), “Labour Force Statistics: Population and vital statistics”, OECD Employment and Labour Market Statistics (database), https://doi.org/10.1787/data-00287-en (accessed on 19 October 2022).

[28] OECD (2022), “Material resources: Material resources”, OECD Environment Statistics (database), https://doi.org/10.1787/data-00695-en (accessed on 19 October 2022).

[121] OECD (2022), OECD Inventory of Support Measures for Fossil Fuels: Country Notes, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5a3efe65-en.

[58] OECD (2022), Redesigning Ireland’s Transport for Net Zero: Towards Systems that Work for People and the Planet, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/b798a4c1-en.

[66] OECD (2021), “Climate change” in Environment at a Glance Indicators, OECD, Paris.

[107] OECD (2021), Equitable Framework and Finance for Extractive-based Countries in Transition (EFFECT), OECD, Paris, https://www.oecd.org/dev/Equitable-Framework-Finance-Extractive-based-Countries-Transition-EFFECT.pdf.

[109] OECD (2021), “Green growth indicators (Edition 2021)”, OECD Environment Statistics (database), https://doi.org/10.1787/a16ddc34-en (accessed on 19 October 2022).

[73] OECD (2021), OECD Companion to the Inventory of Support Measures for Fossil Fuels 2021, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/e670c620-en.

[88] OECD (2021), OECD Economic Surveys: Denmark, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/19990219.

[57] OECD (2021), OECD Environmental Performance Reviews: Finland 2021, OECD Environmental Performance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d73547b7-en.

[100] OECD (2021), OECD Regional Outlook 2021: Addressing COVID-19 and Moving to Net Zero Greenhouse Gas Emissions, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/17017efe-en.

[102] OECD (2021), “The OECD Green Recovery Database: Examining the environmental implications of COVID-19 recovery policies”, OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19), OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/47ae0f0d-en.

[52] OECD (2020), The consequences of a more resource efficient and circular economy for international trade patterns, OECD, Paris.

[19] OECD (2019), Global Material Resources Outlook to 2060: Economic Drivers and Environmental Consequences, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264307452-en.

[27] OECD (2017), Investing in Climate, Investing in Growth, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264273528-en.

[81] OECD (2015), Aligning Policies for a Low-carbon Economy, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264233294-en.

[74] OECD (2015), Climate Change Mitigation: Policies and Progress, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264238787-en.

[14] OECD (forthcoming), Decarbonisation Primer: Designing and Monitoring Strategies to Achieve Climate Change Targets while Boosting Growth and Social Cohesion, OECD Publishing, Paris.

[5] OECD (forthcoming), GHG Emissions Trends and Targets (GETT) Indicators: Harmonised Quantification of 2030 NDC GHG Emissions Targets.

[108] OECD/Eurostat (1999), The Environmental Goods and Services Industry: Manual for Data Collection and Analysis, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264173651-en.

[71] OECD-IEA (2022), Support for fossil fuels almost doubled in 2021, slowing progress toward international climate goals, according to new analysis from OECD and IEA - OECD, https://www.oecd.org/environment/support-for-fossil-fuels-almost-doubled-in-2021-slowing-progress-toward-international-climate-goals-according-to-new-analysis-from-oecd-and-iea.htm (accessed on 28 September 2022).

[116] OECD-IEA (2022), Support for fossil fuels almost doubled in 2021, slowing progress toward international climate goals, according to new analysis from OECD and IEA - OECD, https://www.oecd.org/environment/support-for-fossil-fuels-almost-doubled-in-2021-slowing-progress-toward-international-climate-goals-according-to-new-analysis-from-oecd-and-iea.htm (accessed on 28 September 2022).

[60] Parry, I. (2021), Five things to know about carbon pricing, International Monetary Fund. Finance & Development.

[113] Pauwelyn, J. (2013), “Carbon Leakage Measures and Border Tax Adjustments under WTO Law”, in Research Handbook on Environment, Health and the WTO.

[127] Pizzaro, R. (2022), GHG Emission Trends and Target (GETT) Indicators, OECD, Paris.

[21] PWC (2017), The Long View. How will the global economic order change by 2050?, PWC.

[133] Sirini Jeudy-Hugo, Luca Lo Re and Chiara Falduto (2021), Understanding countries’ net-zero emissions targets, OECD, Paris.

[29] Stern, N. (2021), G7 Leadership for Sustainable Resilient and Inclusive Economic Recovery and Growth: An Independent Report Requested by the UK Prime Minister for the G7, London School of Economics, London.

[41] Stern, N. (2006), The Economics of Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, London.

[84] The Economist (2022), Could the EV boom run out of juice before it really gets going?, https://www.economist.com/business/2022/08/14/could-the-ev-boom-run-out-of-juice-before-it-really-gets-going (accessed on 22 September 2022).

[34] Tuholske, C. et al. (2021), “Global urban population exposure to extreme heat”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 118/41, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2024792118.

[96] UN (2021), Handbook on Carbon Taxation for Developing countries, https://www.un.org/development/desa/financing/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.financing/files/2021-10/Carbon%20Taxation.pdf.

[101] UN (2021), Race to Zero Campaign, https://unfccc.int/climate-action/race-to-zero-campaign.

[25] UNDP (2017), Circular Economy strategies for Lao PDR, United Nations Development Programme, https://www.undp.org/publications/circular-economy-strategies-lao-pdr.

[53] UNDRR (2021), Promoting Synergy and Alignment: Between Climate Change Adaptation Risk Reduction in the Context of National Adaptation Plans, United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, Geneva.

[123] UNDRR (2020), Hazard definition & classification review: Technical report, United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, UN, Geneva.

[23] UNEP (2018), The Weight of Cities: Resource Requirements of Future Urbanization, United Nations Environment Programme, https://www.resourcepanel.org/reports/weight-cities.

[18] UNEP (2017), Assessing Global Resource Use: A Systems Approach to Resource Efficiency and Pollution Reduction, United Nations Environment Programme, https://www.resourcepanel.org/reports/assessing-global-resource-use.

[134] UNFCCC (2022), Synthesis report for the technical assessment component of the first global stocktake.

[1] UNFCCC (2022), Synthesis report on the overall effect of Parties’ NDCs and overall progress made by Parties towards the implementation of their NDCs, including the information referred to in Article 13, paragraph 7(b), of the Paris Agreement)..

[4] UNFCCC (2021), End of Coal in Sight at COP26, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, https://unfccc.int/news/end-of-coal-in-sight-at-cop26.

[3] UNFCCC (2016), The Paris Agreement, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement.

[22] United Nations (2019), Green economy could create 24 million new jobs, https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/blog/2019/04/green-economy-could-create-24-million-new-jobs/.

[90] US Government (2022), Inflation Reduction Act, https://www.democrats.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/inflation_reduction_act_of_2022.pdf.

[72] Van Dender, K. et al. (2022), Why governments should target support amidst high energy prices, OECD Policy Responses on the Impacts of the War in Ukraine, https://www.oecd.org/ukraine-hub/policy-responses/why-governments-should-target-support-as-energy-prices-continue-to-soar-40f44f78/ (accessed on 6 July 2022).

[117] Van Dender, K. et al. (2022), “Why governments should target support amidst high energy prices”, OECD Policy Responses on the Impacts of the War in Ukraine, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://www.oecd.org/ukraine-hub/policy-responses/why-governments-should-target-support-as-energy-prices-continue-to-soar-40f44f78/ (accessed on 6 July 2022).

[67] Venmans, F., J. Ellis and D. Nachtigall (2020), “Carbon pricing and competitiveness: Are they at odds?”, Climate Policy, Vol. 20/9, pp. 1070-1091, https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1805291.

[36] WHO (2018), “Heat and Health”, WHO Newsroom Fact sheets, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/climate-change-heat-and-health.

[2] WMO (2021), New climate predictions increase likelihood of temporarily reaching 1.5 °C in next 5 years, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva.

[65] World Bank (2021), State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2021.

[31] World Bank (2021a), ‘Groundswell. Acting on internal climate migration’. Part II..

[114] World Economic Forum (2021), This is how climate change could impact the global economy, https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/06/impact-climate-change-global-gdp/.

[12] Yamano, N. and J. Guilhoto (2020), “CO2 emissions embodied in international trade and domestic final demand: Methodology and results using the OECD Inter-Country Input-Output Database”, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, No. 2020/11, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/8f2963b8-en.

[50] Zegarra, L. (2020), “Living Costs and Real Wages in Nineteenth Century Lima: Levels and International Comparisons”, Australian Economic History Review, Vol. 60/2, pp. 186-219, https://doi.org/10.1111/aehr.12186.

[35] Zhao, Q. et al. (2021), “Global, regional, and national burden of mortality associated with non-optimal ambient temperatures from 2000 to 2019: a three-stage modelling study”, The Lancet Planetary Health, Vol. 5/7, pp. e415-e425, https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00081-4.

TwitterFacebookLinkedInEmail