Cleaner air quality, healthier water, effective waste management, and enhanced biodiversity protection not only reduce the vulnerability of communities to pandemics and improve resilience, but have the potential to boost economic activity, generate income, create jobs, and reduce inequalities.
Discover below how green recovery is a win-win strategy and how governments can have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to ensure a sustainable recovery if they:
Step up actions for a green and inclusive recovery.
Speed the transition to a low-emissions economy.
Track progress through pertinent, comparable and timely data.
Leverage finance to invest in the green recovery.
Many governments have included “green” recovery measures in their crisis recovery packages – for example through grants, loans and tax reliefs directed towards green transport, circular economy and clean energy research, development and deployment.
But so far the balance between green and non-green spending is not favourable in terms of the support towards positive environmental outcomes.
Furthermore, recent OECD country analysis of green recovery measures indicates that a number of governments are using the post-COVID measures to roll back existing environmental regulations and taxes, and increase fossil-fuel intensive infrastructure and electricity.
However, green recovery measures can also include new funding and programmes to create jobs and stimulate economic activity through ecosystem restoration, control of invasive alien species and forest conservation.
What can governments do to support a green recovery?
Through a green recovery, governments have the opportunity to unleash innovation, undertake wider reaching and fundamental restructuring of critical sectors, accelerate existing environmental plans, and make use of environmentally sustainable project pipelines. The current outlook for a period of relatively low oil prices also offers an ideal opportunity to scale up carbon pricing and reform fossil fuel subsidies. Delivering a green recovery is vital for tackling the urgent and interconnected challenges of climate change and biodiversity loss.
Initial analysis suggests that governments have so far concentrated their green measures in the energy and surface-transport sectors. But other sectors - such as industry, agriculture, forestry and waste management - are equally important for a green and resilient recovery.
In the midst of the COVID-19 crisis, an increasing number of oil and gas companies have set out ambitious goals to transition to “net-zero” carbon emissions by 2050. What is driving these pledges, even at a time of severe financial stress for the sector? And what implications could they have for governments’ economic recovery measures and, ultimately, for the Paris Agreement ?
Renewable energy is estimated to employ more people per unit of investment and energy than fossil fuel generation, and could potentially employ more than 40 million people by 2050. If the international community utilises its full renewable energy potential, energy sector employment could reach 100 million by 2050, up from around 58 million today.
Investments in infrastructure, notably major transport-related infrastructure, have major implications for the environment. Stimulus packages and investment programmes can ensure that infrastructure resources are aligned with longer-term goals on climate, biodiversity, water and waste management, and resource efficiency.
Monitoring the impact of recovery and stimulus measures on environmental outcomes through measurable, comparable and timely indicators is key to ensuring that the green recovery is well targeted and effective in its execution.
To contribute to this effort, the OECD has identified a list of 13 headline environmental indicators derived from various OECD databases and publications. These include: Carbon intensity; Renewable energy in the energy mix; Effective carbon rates; Fossil fuel support; Land cover change; Protected areas; Economic instruments relevant for biodiversity; Exposure to air pollution; Material productivity; Water stress; Research and Development; Environmentally related tax revenue; Environment Official Development Assistance.
Leveraging investment for infrastructure is a critical pillar of the low-carbon transition. Around USD 6.3 trillion of annual investment is needed until 2030 in energy, transport, water and telecommunications infrastructure, to sustain growth and increase well-being.
In recent years, trillions of dollars in capital have flowed into investments that are assessed using environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria.
ESG criteria have helped raise awareness and strengthen corporate and investor commitments, but more work is urgently needed to ensure that ESG ratings are fit for purpose. Today’s ESG markets contain a huge variety – and at times divergence – in methodologies, performance metrics and product structures. There is still much to be done to make ESG investing fairer, more transparent and more efficient.
The COVID-19 pandemic highlights the urgent need to consider resilience in finance – not just in the financial system itself, but the role of capital and investors in making economic and social systems more dynamic and able to withstand external shocks. These include risks associated with climate change, which, beyond the pandemic, are perhaps the most pressing challenges to financial stability and resilience.
From air and water pollution to climate, agriculture and the circular economy, this collection focuses on all of the dimensions of the environment, environmental health and sustainability. It pulls together OECD analysis and data spanning a multitude of sectors and issues, many of which are being challenged in the context of the COVID-19 crisis.