[33] AMA (n.d.), Administrative Modernization Agency, https://www.ama.gov.pt/web/english.
[45] AMA (n.d.), Citizen Spot, https://www.ama.gov.pt/web/english/citizen-spot.
[25] APEC (2019), APEC Framework for Securing the Digital Economy, https://www.apec.org/Publications/2019/11/APEC-Framework-for-Securing-the-Digital-Economy.
[59] apolitical (2019), Scaling digtial: How Brazil is rewiring government, https://apolitical.co/solution-articles/en/scaling-digital-how-brazil-is-rewiring-government.
[94] Argentina.gob.ar (2019), Decálogo Tecnológico ONTI, https://www.argentina.gob.ar/jefatura/innovacion-publica/ssetic/onti/decalogo-tecnologico.
[69] Australian Government (n.d.), Digital Transformation Strategy, https://www.dta.gov.au/digital-transformation-strategy.
[92] Australian Government (n.d.), Trusted Digital Identity, https://www.digitalidentity.gov.au/privacy-and-security/trusted-digital-identity-framework.
[97] Canada.ca (n.d.), Government of Canada Digital Standards: Playbook, https://www.canada.ca/en/government/system/digital-government/government-canada-digital-standards.html.
[61] CIO.gov (n.d.), CIO Handbook, https://www.cio.gov/cio-handbook/.
[7] Commission of the European Communities (2001), “European governance: A white paper”, Governance: An International Journal Of Policy And Administration, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/DOC_01_10.
[56] CTIE (n.d.), Stratégie Gouvernance électronique 2021-2025, https://ctie.gouvernement.lu/dam-assets/documents/Strategie-gouvernance-electronique-2021-2025-vfin.pdf.
[46] datastore.brussels (n.d.), About, https://datastore.brussels/web/about.
[21] Digital Agency (n.d.), Mission & Vision, https://www.digital.go.jp/about/organization.
[18] Digital Austria (n.d.), Digital Austria, https://www.digitalaustria.gv.at/.
[70] Digital Strategy and Transformation (n.d.), Victorian Government IT Dashboard, https://itdashboard.digital.vic.gov.au/#!/.
[73] DTA (n.d.), Digital Transformation Agency - Developing better business cases, https://businesscaseplaybook.service.gov.au/.
[54] e-Estonia (2021), Estonia’s digital ecosystem is creating a seamless society, https://e-estonia.com/estonias-digital-ecosystem-is-creating-a-seamless-society/.
[22] e-Estonia.com (n.d.), e-Estonia guide, https://e-estonia.com/wp-content/uploads/eas-eestonia-vihik-a5-180404-view.pdf.
[27] egovernment.ch (n.d.), eGovernment Strategy Switzerland, https://www.egovernment.ch/en/umsetzung/e-government-strategie/.
[91] EUR-Lex (2019), Regulation (EU) 2019/881 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on ENISA and on information and communications technology cybersecurity certification and repealing Regulation (EU) No. 526/2013 (Cybersecurity Act), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/881/oj.
[90] EUR-Lex (2016), Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (GDPR), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj.
[23] EUR-Lex (2015), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52015DC0192.
[89] EUR-Lex (2014), Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing Directive 1999/93/EC, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2014.257.01.0073.01.ENG.
[88] EUR-Lex (2006), Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32006L0123.
[49] European Commission (2021), Commission proposes a trusted and secure Digital Identity for all Europeans, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_21_2663.
[67] European Commission (2003), Guidelines for Successful Public-Private Partnership, https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/guides/ppp_en.pdf.
[24] European Commission (n.d.), European eGovernment Action Plan 2016-2020, https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/european-egovernment-action-plan-2016-2020.
[53] European Commission (n.d.), Finland in the Digital Economy and Society Index, https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/desi-finland.
[58] European Commission (n.d.), Recovery and Resilience Facility, https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/recovery-coronavirus/recovery-and-resilience-facility_en.
[34] European Court of Auditors (2017), The Commission’s intervention in the Greek financial crisis, https://op.europa.eu/webpub/eca/special-reports/greek-crisis-17-2017/en/.
[17] Federal Ministry of Digital and Economic Affairs (n.d.), Digital Austria, https://www.bmdw.gv.at/en/Topics/Digitalisation/Strategy/Digital-Austria.html.
[35] Foreign Policy (2020), Greece: A Remarkable Economic Recovery, https://foreignpolicy.com/sponsored/greece-a-remarkable-economic-recovery/.
[1] G20/OECD (2021), G20 Compendium on the use of digital tools for public service continuity, https://assets.innovazione.gov.it/1628073696-g20detfoecdcompendiumdigitaltools.pdf.
[30] Garner, J. (1924), “French Administrative Law”, The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 33/6, https://doi.org/10.2307/787920.
[81] GDS (n.d.), ICT Commissioning Playbook, https://playbook-ict-procurement.herokuapp.com/plays.
[68] gov.br (n.d.), Estratégia de Governo Digital 2020-2022, https://www.gov.br/governodigital/pt-br/EGD2020/.
[63] GOV.SI (2021), The Strategic Council for Digitalisation will operate as six working groups, https://www.gov.si/en/news/2021-04-23-the-strategic-council-for-digitalisation-will-operate-as-six-working-groups/.
[96] GOV.UK (n.d.), Applying to the G-Cloud framework, https://www.gov.uk/guidance/g-cloud-suppliers-guide.
[41] GOV.UK (n.d.), Blog - Government Digital Service: Government as a Platform, https://gds.blog.gov.uk/category/government-as-a-platform/.
[79] GOV.UK (n.d.), Digital Marketplace, https://www.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk/.
[43] GOV.UK (n.d.), Digital, Data and Technology Profession Capability Framework, https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/digital-data-and-technology-profession-capability-framework.
[44] GOV.UK (n.d.), GDS Academy course, https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/gds-academy-course-descriptions.
[95] GOV.UK (n.d.), The technology code of practice, https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-technology-code-of-practice.
[38] Grant Thornton (2021), Summary: Budget 2021, https://www.grantthornton.co.nz/insights/budget-2021-summary/.
[51] Ísland.is (n.d.), All of Iceland’s public services in one place, https://island.is/en.
[8] Martin, C. and A. Downs (1969), “Inside Bureaucracy”, The Western Political Quarterly, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/447012.
[15] Mergel, I. (2021), Digital Transformation of the German State, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53697-8_19.
[36] Ministry of Digital Governance (n.d.), Mission, https://mindigital.gr/to-ypourgeio/apostoli.
[72] Nielsen, M. and M. Yasuoka (2014), An analysis of the Danish approach to eGovernment benefit realisation, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281774408_An_analysis_of_the_Danish_approach_to_eGovernment_benefit_realisation.
[62] OECD (2021), Digital Government Review of Slovenia: Leading the Digital Transformation of the Public Sector, OECD Digital Government Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/954b0e74-en.
[47] OECD (2021), “Good Practice Principles for Data Ethics in the Public Sector”, https://www.oecd.org/gov/digital-government/good-practice-principles-for-data-ethics-in-the-public-sector.pdf.
[75] OECD (2021), Government at a Glance 2021, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/1c258f55-en.
[86] OECD (2021), “Practical Guidance on Agile Regulatory Governance to Harness Innovation”, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0464.
[85] OECD (2021), Recommendation of the Council for Agile Regulatory Governance to Harness Innovation [OECD/LEGAL/0464], https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0464.
[42] OECD (2021), “The OECD Framework for digital talent and skills in the public sector”, OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 45, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/4e7c3f58-en.
[28] OECD (2020), Digital Government in Lebanon: Governance for Coherent and Sustainable Policy Implementation, OECD Digital Government Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/a711b0c1-en.
[14] OECD (2020), “Digital Government Index: 2019 results”, OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, No. 03, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/4de9f5bb-en.
[65] OECD (2020), Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions: Catching the Deliberative Wave, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/339306da-en.
[12] OECD (2020), “The OECD Digital Government Policy Framework: Six dimensions of a Digital Government”, OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, No. 02, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/f64fed2a-en.
[13] OECD (2019), Declaration on Public Sector Innovation [OECD/LEGAL/0450], https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0450.
[60] OECD (2019), Digital Government in Chile – A Strategy to Enable Digital Transformation, OECD Digital Government Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/f77157e4-en.
[39] OECD (2019), Digital Government in Chile – Digital Identity, OECD Digital Government Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9ecba35e-en.
[93] OECD (2019), Digital Government Review of Argentina: Accelerating the Digitalisation of the Public Sector, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/354732cc-en.
[84] OECD (2019), Regulatory effectiveness in the era of digitalisation, https://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/Regulatory-effectiveness-in-the-era-of-digitalisation.pdf.
[31] OECD (2019), The Path to Becoming a Data-Driven Public Sector, OECD Digital Government Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/059814a7-en.
[4] OECD (2018), Digital Government Review of Morocco: Laying the Foundations for the Digital Transformation of the Public Sector in Morocco, OECD Digital Government Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264298729-en.
[82] OECD (2018), Glossary of Key Terms for completing the 2018 OECD Budget Practices and Procedures Survey, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://www.oecd.org/governance/budgeting/OECD-2018-Budget-Practices-and-Procedures-Glossary-of-key-terms.pdf.
[83] OECD (2018), OECD Regulatory Policy Outlook 2018, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264303072-en.
[66] OECD (2017), Preventing Policy Capture: Integrity in Public Decision Making, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264065239-en.
[77] OECD (2017), Public Procurement for Innovation: Good Practices and Strategies, OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264265820-en.
[64] OECD (2017), Recommendation of the Council on Open Government [OECD/LEGAL/0438], https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0438.
[5] OECD (2017), Recommendation of the Council on Public Integrity [OECD/LEGAL/0435], https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0435.
[10] OECD (2016), Digital Government in Chile: Strengthening the Institutional and Governance Framework, OECD Digital Government Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264258013-en.
[98] OECD (2016), Digital Government Strategies for Transforming Public Services in the Welfare Areas, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://www.oecd.org/gov/digital-government/Digital-Government-Strategies-Welfare-Service.pdf.
[52] OECD (2015), OECD Public Governance Reviews: Estonia and Finland: Fostering Strategic Capacity across Governments and Digital Services across Borders, OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264229334-en.
[74] OECD (2015), Recommendation of the Council on Public Procurement [OECD/LEGAL/0411], https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0411.
[48] OECD (2014), “India Policy Brief: e-Governance - The Digital Government Imperative”, OECD Better Policies Series, https://www.oecd.org/india/India-Digital-Government-Imperative.pdf.
[2] OECD (2014), Recommendation of the Council on Digital Government Strategies [OECD/LEGAL/0406], https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0406.
[32] OECD (2013), Reaping the Benefits of ICTs in Spain: Strategic Study on Communication Infrastructure and Paperless Administration, OECD e-Government Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264173224-en.
[87] OECD (2012), Recommendation of the Council on Regulatory Policy and Governance [OECD/LEGAL/0390], https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0390.
[3] OECD (2005), Modernising Government: The Way Forward, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264010505-en.
[20] OECD (n.d.), Digital Government Toolkit - Digital Government Strategies: Good Practices (Japan), https://www.oecd.org/gov/japan-gcio.pdf.
[55] OECD (n.d.), Going Digital Toolkit: Luxembourg, http://goingdigital.oecd.org/countries/lux.
[76] OECD (forthcoming), Towards agile approaches in ICT procurement in the Slovak Republic: Stock-taking report on current practices and recommendations for the way forward.
[78] OGP.GOV.IE (2019), Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS), https://www.etenders.gov.ie/Media/Default/SiteContent/UserGuides/Dynamic_Purchasing_System_DPS_March2019.pdf.
[19] Prime Minister of Japan & His Cabinet (n.d.), Establishment of the IT Strategy Headquarters, https://japan.kantei.go.jp/it/council/establishment_it.html.
[80] Public Procurement Office of Poland (2020), Public Procurement of Innovation, https://www.uzp.gov.pl/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/45503/Zamowienia_publiczne_na_innowacje_EN_WCAG-2021-01-12.pdf.
[26] Red GEALC (n.d.), What is Red GEALC?, https://www.redgealc.org/ministerial2020/en/about-red-gealc/.
[16] Republic of Austria Parliament (n.d.), The Federal Principle, https://www.parlament.gv.at/ENGL/PERK/BOE/PR/index.shtml.
[37] Robertson, G. (2020), Budget 2020 - Summary of Initiatives in the COVID-19 Response & Recovery Fund (CRRF) Foundational Package, http://treasury.govt.nz/publications/summary-intiatives/summaryinitiatives-crrf-budget2020.
[9] Sørensen, E. and J. Torfing (2011), “Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector”, Administration and Society, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0095399711418768.
[50] Statista (2021), Share of households with internet access in rural Iceland from 2011 to 2020, https://www.statista.com/statistics/1236313/share-rural-households-internet-access-iceland/.
[40] Statista (2019), Online shopping market size in 25 countries in Europe in 2019, https://www.statista.com/statistics/1113005/market-size-of-e-commerce-in-europe-by-country/.
[71] The Treasury (n.d.), Better Business Cases (BBC), https://www.treasury.govt.nz/information-and-services/state-sector-leadership/investment-management/better-business-cases-bbc.
[29] Thompson, G. (1931), “Development of the Anglo-American Judicial System”, Cornell Law Review, Vol. 17/1, http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol17/iss1/1.
[6] United Nations (2000), “United Nations: Millenium Development Goals Declaration”, General Assembly, http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/mdgoverview.html.
[57] Vinnova (n.d.), Testbed Sweden, https://www.vinnova.se/en/m/testbed-sweden/.
[11] Welby, B. and E. Tan (forthcoming), Designing and delivering public services in the digital age.