As part of the project, the OECD team organised several stakeholder engagement activities to ensure that the views of key higher education stakeholder organisations and institutions in Hungary were taken into account for the development of the analysis, recommendations and policy options included in this report. An overview of the different stakeholder engagement activities organised as part of the project is presented in Table A.1. The research tools and stakeholders to be engaged in each activity were developed in close consultation with the Hungarian Ministry of Culture and Innovation (KIM) and the Hungarian Accreditation Committee (MAB). They are presented in the remainder of this Annex.
Ensuring Quality Digital Higher Education in Hungary
Annex A. Stakeholder engagement
Table A.1. Overview of stakeholder engagement activities
Stakeholder engagement activity |
Timing |
---|---|
Individual and institutional stakeholder interviews |
|
Stakeholder interviews (online) |
3-15 February 2022 |
Virtual site visits to higher education institutions (online) |
16-25 March 2022 |
Stakeholder consultation on “Policy Options for Hungary to Assure the Quality of Digital Higher Education” (online) |
11-25 November 2022 |
Peer learning events and activities |
|
Launch event “Supporting Quality Digital Higher Education in Hungary: Findings to Date and What’s Next” (online) |
18 November 2021 |
National roundtable “Best Practices and New Policies for Quality Digital Higher Education in Hungary” (online) |
31 May 2022 |
International conference “International Quality Assurance Standards, Practices and Supports for Digital Higher Education” (online) |
14 June 2022 |
National roundtable “Key Lessons Hungary Might Learn from Other Systems” (Budapest, Hungary) |
4 October 2022 |
Final conference “Ensuring Quality Digital Higher Education in Hungary: The Path to Modernisation” (Györ, Hungary) |
29 March 2023 |
Individual and institutional stakeholder interviews
Stakeholder interviews (online)
In February 2022, the OECD review team carried out interviews with a sample of higher education institutions and stakeholder organisations to gain an in-depth understanding of the key challenges and potential approaches to monitoring and improving the quality of the digital education offered by higher education institutions (HEIs) in Hungary. Stakeholders were also invited to share their views on how they think the existing QA standards, practices and supports could or should be adapted in order to be “fit for purpose” for digital teaching and learning in higher education. They were also invited to share examples of institutional best practice for the QA of digital higher education which they might be familiar with in Hungary.
Table A.2 provides an overview of the higher education stakeholder organisations and institutions interviewed by the OECD review team in February 2022. The list of stakeholder organisations interviewed is based on advice provided by KIM and MAB. In total, the OECD review team interviewed 19 stakeholders across all these organisations.
Table A.2. Overview of higher education stakeholder organisations interviewed by the OECD review team
Higher education stakeholder organisations interviewed by the OECD review team in February 2022 |
---|
|
The interviews were structured along the following four main areas of inquiry:
Key challenges and priorities facing higher education training and digital provision in Hungary today
Policies and practices carried out by stakeholder organisations interviewed
Stakeholder views on the quality assurance standards and procedures currently used by MAB and HEIs for the QA of digital study programmes
Recommendation which the OECD might usefully develop to help improve the quality of digital higher education in Hungary
A. Key challenges and priorities for enhancing the quality of digital higher education in Hungary
In this part, we would like to hear your views on the key challenges facing higher education training and digital provision in Hungary today and, more specifically, in relation to the quality of teaching and learning offered in fully online and/or hybrid courses and programmes.
1. What do you think are the key challenges facing higher education training and digital provision in Hungary today?
a. Please highlight challenges related to the higher education system in general, as well as the higher education training and digital provision system more specifically, elaborating on any contextual factors and/or factors that may help explain these challenges.
b. Please highlight challenges related to the quality of teaching and learning more specifically, both in in-person and in online/hybrid courses and programmes. Reflect in particular on the digital readiness of institutions, instructors and students, and the supports and incentives that are currently available to them in order to ensure high-quality teaching and learning.
c. Which of these do you see as being the most urgent priority areas to be addressed?
2. What do you think is the role or potential of digitalisation in overcoming (some of) these challenges and, more specifically, in improving the quality of their teaching and learning currently offered by HEIs in Hungary?
a. What do you think might be some of the key benefits of digitalisation for tackling systemic challenges and improving the quality of higher education in Hungary?
b. What do you think might be some of the main risks of digitalisation for the future development of Hungary’s higher education system and the quality of teaching and learning?
c. What do you think is the role or importance of quality assurance in overcoming (some of) these challenges, and more specifically, in improving the quality of the teaching and learning currently offered by HEIs in Hungary?
d. Key challenges and priorities for enhancing the quality of digital higher education in Hungary
e. Policies and practices for supporting the quality of digital higher education
f. Standards and practices for the quality assurance of digital higher education
g. Recommendations
i. The role of external quality assurance (as carried out by MAB) to ensure quality digital higher education
ii. The role of HEIs for monitoring and supporting the quality of their digital provision
iii. The role played by the higher education policy field and other actors in the system to support institutions to improve the quality of their digital provision
B. Policies and practices for supporting the quality of digital higher education
a. Please consider the following areas when describing your organisation’s activities
[Title of policy/practice/initiative]
What challenges do you seek to address?
[Please describe]
Which policies, activities or projects are you carrying out to tackle these challenges? What are the (expected) outcomes?
[Please describe]
What are some of the main challenges you are experiencing in relation to digital education?
[Please describe]
1. Please describe relevant policies, practices, or actions of other organisations which you are aware of (e.g., international, European, national, institutional) that you think have been important or could be helpful to improve the quality of digital higher education in Hungary going forward.
a. Please consider the following areas when describing the organisation’s activities
[Title of organisation/policy/practice/initiative for Hungary]
What challenges do they seek to address?
[Please describe]
Which policies, activities or projects are they carrying out to tackle these challenges? What are the (expected) outcomes?
[Please describe]
What are some of the main challenges they are experiencing in relation to digital education?
[Please describe]
2. What do you think are missing actions, policies or initiatives that could be implemented, supported, or strengthened to improve the quality of digital higher education in Hungary?
a. What areas are currently not being addressed and you think are important?
b. How do you think your organisation could contribute to addressing these gaps?
c. How do you think other organisations (e.g., government, Hungarian Accreditation Committee, sector organisations, representative bodies such as Hungarian Rectors’ Conference, the National Union of Students in Hungary, the Association of Hungarian PhD, and DLA Students HEIs themselves, etc.) could contribute to addressing these gaps?
C. Standards and practices for the quality assurance of digital higher education
In this part, we would like to hear your views on how the quality assurance of higher education in Hungary takes place today, and what you see as being helpful/unhelpful processes or gaps in the standards and practices currently implemented by (1) the policy field, (2) the Hungarian Accreditation Committee (MAB) and (3) HEIs themselves for the monitoring and evaluation of the quality of digital higher education. How could they be modified in order to better assess and support the quality of digital higher education?
1. How do you think the standards and procedures used by MAB could be revised in order to make them “fit for purpose” to monitor and evaluate the quality of digital higher education?
a. What do you think would be helpful (minimum) standards or criteria for MAB to adopt to monitor the quality of HEIs’ digital provision? How relevant/useful are the current standards?
b. What do you think would be relevant or helpful procedures to monitor/evaluate these minimum standards? What data would be needed? How relevant/useful are MAB’s current procedures?
c. What are the main challenges experienced by MAB for carrying out assessments of the quality of digital higher education? What additional resources or supports (e.g., funding, human resources, expertise, etc.) do you think they need to effectively carry out quality assessments?
2. How do you think the standards and procedures used by HEIs could be revised in order to make them “fit for purpose” to monitor and evaluate the quality of their digital provision?
a. What do you think are key areas for HEIs to monitor/evaluate to ensure minimum standards of quality are being met? (e.g. quality of teachers, student satisfaction, graduate outcomes, …?)
b. What do you think would be useful procedures for HEIs to monitor/evaluate the quality of their courses, programmes, or teachers? (e.g. surveys, administrative data, self-assessments, …?)
c. What are the main challenges experienced by HEIs for carrying out assessments of the quality of their online provision? What additional resources or supports do you think they would need in order to put in place effective quality assessments and enhancement practices?
3. Going beyond external and internal quality assurance, what other supports and incentives do you feel are important to put in place to support HEIs to improve the quality of digital higher education?
4. How do you think the higher education policy field (Ministry) can support the common framework for quality assurance in Hungarian higher education?
5. How can the current external and internal QA policies be improved, what measures are missing in your view?
D. Recommendations
1. What do you think would be helpful lines of recommendation for the OECD to develop as part of this project to help improve the quality of digital higher education in Hungary?
2. Are there any other questions or initiatives which have not been covered in the interview which you would like to draw the OECD’s attention to?
Virtual site visits to higher education institutions (online)
In March 2022, the OECD review team carried out virtual site visits to six HEIs in Hungary, as part of which a sample of instructors, students and administrators was interviewed in each institution. The purpose of these visits was the following:
Understand in greater depth the views and experiences of HEIs regarding: (1) the quality of digital provision in its online and hybrid forms as it is currently being offered by HEIs in Hungary; (2) key challenges or barriers experienced by current government regulation, external quality assurance standards and procedures for effectively managing the quality of their digital provision; and (3) supports or incentives at institutional, sectoral or national level deemed relevant to support HEIs to more effectively manage and continuously improve the quality of their digital provision;
Collect feedback on the key questions emerging from the analysis to date;
Identify examples of best practice and gaps across institutions in Hungary on how the quality of digital provision can be effectively monitored and supported;
Identify gaps across institutions in Hungary in terms of how they are currently monitoring and/or supporting the quality of their digital provision (in order to fill these gaps with relevant and targeted examples of international practice); and
Promote practice sharing and peer learning among HEI administrators, students, and instructors on the quality of their digital provision, and how it can or should be further improved.
Table A.3 presents an overview of the six HEIs that participated in the virtual site visit programme organised by the OECD review team in March 2022. The selected sample of HEIs is based on advice provided by KIM and MAB. Table A.4 presents the total number of higher education stakeholders interviewed by the OECD review team as part of the virtual site visits.
Table A.3. Participating institutions in the virtual site visits organised by the OECD review team
Institution |
Date of site visit |
Status |
Classification |
Number of Students (2021-2022) |
Location |
Training Profile |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eötvös Loránd University (ELTE) |
16 March 2022 |
Public |
University |
31 775 |
Budapest |
Comprehensive, research-focused |
Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church (KRE) |
21 March 2022 |
Church-owned |
University |
8 049 |
Budapest |
Comprehensive, research-focused |
University of Debrecen (DE) |
22 March 2022 |
Foundation |
University |
29 954 |
Debrecen |
Comprehensive, research-focused |
Budapest Metropolitan University (METU) |
23 March 2022 |
Private |
University of Applied Sciences |
6 378 |
Budapest |
Specialised, applied sciences |
Tomori Pál College (TPF) |
24 March 2022 |
Private |
College |
443 |
Budapest |
Specialised, applied sciences |
University of Szeged (SZTE) |
25 March 2022 |
Foundation |
University |
20 813 |
Szeged |
Comprehensive, research-focused |
Table A.4. Number and type of stakeholders participating in virtual site visits
Higher education institution |
Administrators |
Instructors |
Students |
Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
Eötvös Loránd University (ELTE) |
12 |
5 |
2 |
19 |
Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church (KRE) |
13 |
6 |
2 |
21 |
University of Debrecen (DE) |
7 |
5 |
6 |
18 |
Budapest Metropolitan University (METU) |
12 |
5 |
4 |
21 |
Tomori Pál College (TPF) |
5 |
4 |
5 |
14 |
University of Szeged (SZTE) |
8 |
3 |
3 |
14 |
Total |
57 |
28 |
22 |
107 |
Table A.5 presents a template with sessions which HEIs were asked to prepare for the OECD review team’s virtual visit to their institution. In function of each HEI’s individual context, policies, and practices, some of the sessions proposed below were removed or replaced by other sessions or focus on areas deemed to be most relevant by the institution and OECD team.
Table A.5. Agenda template for virtual site visits to HEIs
Timing |
Topic |
Session 1: Institutional strategy, vision, and mission for digitalisation |
|
---|---|
09:00 – 09:40 |
In this session, the OECD would like the institution to give a short presentation of its vision and strategy for digitalisation, as well as highlight some of the key challenges observed in relation to the quality of teaching and learning offered in digital settings. The institution should also present the actions it is (or is planning to) undertake in order to improve the quality of its digital provision. Short presentation prepared and delivered by institution (10-15 minutes) Discussion with OECD (30 minutes) Possible stakeholders to attend: Rector, staff responsible for HEI’s overall or specific digital strategy, and other relevant staff responsible for institutional or digital strategy. |
09:40 – 09:45 |
Break |
Session 2: Monitoring and evaluating the quality of teaching and learning in online courses |
|
09:45 – 10:25 |
In this session, the OECD would like the office or administrator(s) responsible for monitoring and evaluating the quality of teaching and learning in the institution, and for reporting to MAB, to give a key presentation of its internal QA processes. They should highlight key challenges/barriers observed in relation to (1) the quality of teaching and learning offered in digital settings in the institution and (2) the standards and procedures to be followed by MAB for the quality assessment of digital provision. Short presentation prepared and delivered by institution (10-15 minutes) Discussion with OECD (30 minutes) Possible stakeholders to attend: Staff members of the office responsible for liaison with MAB and carrying out institutional evaluation and monitoring of the quality of teaching and learning (e.g., carrying out or analysing student, staff or course satisfaction surveys). |
10:25 – 10:30 |
Break |
Session 3: Technical, pedagogical and/or other supports provided by the institution |
|
10:30 – 11:10 |
In this session, the OECD would like the institution to give a short presentation of any more specific technical, pedagogical, or other supports provided to instructors and learners to ensure quality online teaching and learning, followed by a discussion on what more could or should be done in this area, and what supports they would need. Short presentation prepared and delivered by institution (10-15 minutes) Discussion with OECD (30 minutes) Possible stakeholders to attend: Staff members of HEI’s teaching and learning centre (if it exists), of centres or staff providing pedagogical and/or technical support to staff, or academic, technical and/or socio-emotional support to students. |
11:10 – 11:15 |
Break |
Session 4: The instructors’ perspective |
|
11:15 – 11:55 |
In this session, the OECD would like to meet with a sample of 3-5 instructors with (1) more and (2) less experience of teaching in digital settings. The goal is to find out more about the types of technical and/or pedagogical supports needed by instructors to support the development of quality teaching and learning in online courses. Possible stakeholders to attend: A sample of 3-5 instructors, ideally from a variety of disciplines and with experience teaching in online settings or developing fully online or hybrid courses. Representative of staff association (if it exists) could also participate in this session. |
11:55 – 12:00 |
Break |
Session 5: The students’ perspective |
|
12:00 – 12:40 |
In this session, the OECD would like to speak with a sample of 3-5 students to hear what they see as being the key challenges to attending and successfully completing online courses, and which supports they feel would be useful to help them overcome some of these challenges. Possible stakeholders to attend: A sample of 3-5 students, as well as a representative of the university’s student office or association (if it exists). |
12:40 – 12:45 |
End of the site visit |
Stakeholder consultation “Policy Options for Hungary to Assure the Quality of Digital Higher Education” (online)
Between 11 and 25 November 2022, the OECD review team invited a carefully selected number of higher education stakeholders (both international experts and experts from Hungary) to anonymously review and comment on an internal Consultation Document “Policy Options for Hungary to Assure the Quality of Digital Higher Education”, developed by the OECD review team. The feedback received from stakeholders on this document has been used to refine the findings and recommendations included in this report. The instructions shared with the stakeholders are presented in Box A.1 below.
Box A.1. Instructions for stakeholder consultation
Invited stakeholders were given the following instructions for their review of the internal Consultation Document “Policy Options for Ensuring Quality Digital Higher Education in Hungary”:
Purpose and focus of your review
The document shared with you presents draft final recommendations and policy options for Hungary to assure the quality of digital higher education and should not be shared with third parties. They are based on the presentations and feedback received from stakeholders during a workshop (see “Lectures for 2022” on MAB’s website) organised on 4 October 2022 in Budapest, Hungary, as well as various stakeholder consultation activities, national and international desk research carried out as part of the project over the past year. The purpose of your review is to ensure that the OECD’s recommendations meet the challenges and needs of the higher education sector and will help to build the capacity of HEIs in Hungary to effectively manage the quality of fully online and hybrid study programmes. You are invited to read the document by highlighting:
Any factual inaccuracies or errors that you believe need to be corrected by the OECD;
Any important additional (quality) considerations which you believe are important to reflect; and
Which recommendations are the most urgent/important for Hungary to implement or support?
Timing for submitting your review
Please return the document with your feedback (in track changes and comments) no later than Friday 25 November 2022 to François Staring (Francois.Staring@oecd.org). Please note that any feedback or comments you submit will be treated fully confidentially by the OECD team and not be shared with others.
Peer learning events and activities
Launch event “Supporting Quality Digital Higher Education in Hungary: Key Findings and What’s Next?”
On 18 November 2022, the OECD review team supported KIM to organise an online webinar to conclude the project “Supporting the Digital Transformation of Higher Education in Hungary”, which took place between July 2020 and October 2021, and introduce the new project “Ensuring quality digital higher education in Hungary”. The event aimed to:
Share the findings and recommendations of the digital transformation project;
Outline the objectives and methods of the quality assurance for digital higher education project;
Present the perspectives and current efforts of higher education stakeholders to support the digitalisation of Hungarian higher education.
Table A.6 presents the agenda for the event, which was organised via Zoom videoconference.
Table A.6. Agenda launch event (18 November 2022)
Timing |
Topic and speakers |
---|---|
9:00 – 9:15 |
Welcome and purpose of meeting
|
9:15 – 9:55 9:15 – 9:30 9:30 – 9:55 |
Session 1: International projects on digital higher education in Hungary Presentations Supporting the digital transformation of higher education in Hungary: findings and recommendations
Ensuring quality digital higher education in Hungary: objectives, key milestones and methods
Discussion and Q&A
|
9:55 – 10:00 |
Break |
10:00 – 10:55 10:00 – 10:40 10:40 – 10:55 |
Session 2: National initiatives on digital higher education in Hungary Presentations Supporting the digital transformation of higher education in Hungary
Ensuring the quality of digital higher education
Discussion and Q&A
|
10:55 – 11:00 |
Closing
|
National roundtable “Best Practices and New Policies for Digital Higher Education in Hungary” (online)
On 31 May 2022, the OECD team supported KIM to organise a public roundtable event on “Best Practices and New Policies for Digital Higher Education in Hungary”. The purpose of this event was to provide HEIs and key stakeholder organisations in Hungary with an opportunity to share and discuss:
best practices of higher education institutions with respect to managing and supporting quality digital higher education; and
how public policies and external quality assurance can support the offer of quality digital higher education by Hungarian higher education institutions.
Table A.7 presents the agenda for the national roundtable event, which was organised via Zoom videoconference and attended by 48 stakeholders from 21 different organisations.
Table A.7. Agenda national roundtable event (31 May 2022)
Timing |
Topic and speakers |
|
---|---|---|
09:30 – 09:40 |
Welcome and introduction
|
|
09:40 – 09:45 |
Project overview and purpose of the event
|
|
Session 1 – PLENARY DISCUSSIONS: What are higher education institutions in Hungary doing to ensure the quality of digital higher education? |
||
09:45 – 10:15 |
Presentations: Institutional vision, mission and measuring digitalisation Representatives from two HEIs in Hungary will share their vision, mission and approach to measuring the quality of digital higher education as part of their overall internal quality assurance system.
Moderation: Mr François Staring, Higher Education Policy Team, Policy Advice and Implementation Division, Directorate for Education and Skills, OECD |
|
10:15 – 10:45 |
Presentations: Internal quality assurance and support for digital teaching and learning Representatives from two HEIs in Hungary will share their approach to supporting students and teachers for digital higher education as part of internal quality assurance strategies.
Moderation: Mr François Staring, Higher Education Policy Team, Policy Advice and Implementation Division, Directorate for Education and Skills, OECD |
|
10:45 – 11:15 |
Discussion: External evaluation and accreditation of digital higher education Representatives from three HEIs in Hungary will reflect on how MAB could revise or adapt its current standards and procedures for institutional and programme accreditation to support institutions in expanding and improving the quality of their digital education offer.
Moderation: Mr Thomas Weko, Head of the Higher Education Policy Team, Policy Advice and Implementation Division, Directorate for Education and Skills, OECD |
|
11:15 – 11:30 |
Break |
|
Session 2 – BREAKOUT GROUPS: What should higher education institutions and MAB do to ensure quality digital higher education? |
||
11:30 – 12:00 |
Purpose of the breakout discussions Participants are invited to join breakout groups, to discuss the questions put to them, and to prepare an answer to be shared with the plenary session.
|
|
Group 1: Higher education leadership
|
||
Group 2: Staff responsible for institutional quality assurance, monitoring, and evaluation
|
||
Group 3: Staff responsible for supporting students and teachers
|
||
Group 4: Instructors
|
||
Group 5: Students
|
||
Session 3 – PLENARY REPORTING: Key take-aways from the group discussions |
||
12:00 – 12:15 |
Key lessons learned by OECD moderators from breakout groups
Moderation: Mr Paulo Santiago, Head of the Policy Advice and Implementation Division, Directorate for Education and Skills, OECD |
|
Session 4 – LOOKING AHEAD: Supporting the quality of digital higher education in Hungary |
||
12:15 – 12:45 |
Reflections from national-level higher education stakeholders National-level higher education stakeholders in Hungary will be invited to share what they are doing to support the quality of digital higher education in Hungary, and their reflections on the national roundtable.
Moderation: Mr Paulo Santiago, Head of the Policy Advice and Implementation Division, Directorate for Education and Skills, OECD |
|
12:45 – 12:50 |
Closing and next steps Dr Laura Sinóros-Szabó, Head of Department for Strategy and Institutional Development, Hungarian Ministry for Culture and Innovation (KIM) |
International conference “International Quality Assurance Standards, Practices and Supports for Digital Higher Education” (online)
On 14 June 2022, the OECD team organised an online conference on “International Quality Assurance Standards, Practices and Supports for Digital Higher Education”. The event was aimed at:
sharing international examples of best practice for the quality assurance of digital higher education with higher education stakeholders in Hungary; and
providing an opportunity to delegates from the OECD’s Group of National Experts for Higher Education (GNE-HE) to attend as observers and learn more about the quality assurance of digital higher education.
Table A.8 provides presents the agenda for the international event, which was organised via Zoom videoconference.
Table A.8. Agenda international conference (14 June 2022)
Timing |
Topic and speakers |
|
---|---|---|
13:00 – 13:15 |
Welcome and introduction
Moderation: Mr Paulo Santiago, Head of the Policy Advice and Implementation Division, Directorate for Education and Skills, OECD |
|
Session 1 – How are quality assurance agencies evaluating and supporting the quality of digital higher education? |
||
13:15 – 13:30 |
Setting the scene: Professor Mark Brown, Director, National Institute for Digital Learning (NIDL), Dublin City University (Ireland) |
|
13:30 – 14:10 |
A closer look at the approach of three European quality assurance agencies
|
|
14:10 – 14:30 |
Reflections from Hungary and Q&A with audience Interlocutor: Dr Péter Levente Lakatos, Deputy Director, Hungarian Accreditation Committee (MAB) Moderator: Mr Paulo Santiago, Head of the Policy Advice and Implementation Division, Directorate for Education and Skills, OECD |
|
14:30 – 14:45 |
Break |
|
Session 2 – How are higher education institutions managing the quality of their digital courses and programmes? |
||
14:45 – 15:00 |
Setting the scene: Dr Paul Bacsich, CEO, Dualversity (United Kingdom) |
|
15:00 – 15:30 |
A closer look at the approach of two European higher education institutions
|
|
15:30 – 15:50 |
Reflections from Hungary and Q&A with audience Interlocutor: Dr Eszter Lukács, Vice-Rector for International Affairs, Széchenyi István University of Győr, Hungary Moderation: Mr Thomas Weko, Head of the Higher Education Policy Team, Policy Advice and Implementation Division, Directorate for Education and Skills, OECD |
|
15:50 – 16:00 |
Break |
|
Session 3 – How to support higher education institutions to deliver high-quality digital education? |
||
16:00 – 16:10 |
Setting the scene: Professor Mark Brown, Director, National Institute for Digital Learning (NIDL), Dublin City University (Ireland) |
|
16:10 – 16:45 |
Presentations: Supporting higher education institutions to deliver high-quality digital education
|
|
16:45 – 17:00 |
Reflections from Hungary and Q&A with audience Interlocutor: Dr Laura Sinóros-Szabó, Head of Department, Hungarian Ministry for Culture and Innovation (KIM) Moderator: Mr Paulo Santiago, Head of the Policy Advice and Implementation Division, Directorate for Education and Skills, OECD |
|
17:00 |
Thanking participants and closing of the conference
|
National roundtable “Policy Options for Hungary to Assure the Quality of Digital Higher Education” (Budapest, Hungary)
On 4 October 2022, the OECD supported the Hungarian Deputy State Secretariat for Higher Education at the Ministry of Culture and Innovation (KIM) and the Hungarian Accreditation Committee (MAB) in organising a one-day national roundtable. The roundtable event was hosted by Hungarian University of Sports Science. The purpose of this event was to:
present an initial diagnosis and discuss preliminary recommendations with key stakeholders from the higher education sector in Hungary about revisions to external QA standards, institutional quality management practices, and supports.
provide Hungarian HEIs and other stakeholders the opportunity to test, debate, validate or contest the OECD review team’s initial findings and diagnosis, and to provide expert feedback on the preliminary recommendations.
Table A.9 presents the agenda for the national roundtable event, which was organised in person in Budapest, Hungary and was attended by 51 stakeholders from 27 different organisations.
Table A.9. Agenda national roundtable event (4 October 2022)
Timing |
Topic and speakers |
---|---|
09:30 – 10:00 |
Welcome coffee |
10:00 – 10:15 |
Welcome and introduction
|
Session 1 – External quality assurance: Policy options for adapting the Hungarian external quality assurance framework for higher education to digital education |
|
10:15 – 10:35 [20 minutes] |
External quality assurance of digital higher education – International practices and policy options for Hungary Presentation of OECD’s initial findings from its analysis of external quality assurance practices for digital higher education internationally, and policy options Hungary might consider.
|
10:35 – 11:15 [40 minutes] |
Discussion with stakeholders Stakeholders are invited to react to the OECD’s presentation.
|
11:15 – 11:30 |
Comfort break |
Session 2 – Internal quality management: Policy options to support greater HEI responsibility for the internal quality management of digital education |
|
11:30 – 11:50 |
Internal quality management of digital higher education – International practices and policy options for Hungary Presentation of the OECD’s initial findings from its analysis of internal quality management practices for digital higher education internationally, and policy options Hungary might consider supporting greater institutional responsibility.
|
11:50 – 12:30 |
Discussion with stakeholders Stakeholders are invited to react to the OECD’s presentation.
|
12:30 – 13:30 |
Lunch break |
Session 3 – Institutional support: Policy options to support Hungarian HEIs in enhancing the quality of their digital higher education offer |
|
13:30 – 13:45 |
Supporting institutions to enhance the quality of digital teaching and learning – International practices and policy options for Hungary Presentation of OECD’s initial findings from its analysis of institutional supports for digital higher education internationally, and policy options Hungary might consider.
|
13:45 – 14:15 |
Discussion with stakeholders Stakeholders are invited to react to the presentation.
|
14:15 – 14:30 |
Comfort break |
Session 4 – Potential standards and indicators: Potential standards and associated indicators for the quality assurance of digital higher education in Hungary |
|
14:30 – 14:50 |
Presentation of potential standards and associated indicators for the quality assurance of digital higher education in Hungary Presentation of a list of potential standards and associated indicators for the quality assurance of digital higher education in Hungary.
|
14:50 – 15:20 |
Discussion with stakeholders Stakeholders are invited to react to the presentation.
|
15:20 – 15:30 |
Closing of the event and next steps Dr Laura Sinóros-Szabó, Head of Department for Strategy and Institutional Development, Hungarian Ministry of Culture and Innovation (KIM) |
Final conference “Ensuring Quality Digital Higher Education in Hungary” (Györ, Hungary)
On 29 March 2023, the OECD team organised a final project conference in Györ (Hungary), hosted by Széchenyi István University (SZE), and organised in cooperation with KIM and MAB. The purpose of the conference was to:
share the findings and recommendations of the project with the higher education sector in Hungary;
discuss concrete steps on how to implement the project recommendations in Hungary.
Table A.10 presents the agenda for the final conference, as agreed between KIM and MAB in February 2023.
Table A.10. Agenda final conference (29 March 2023)
Timing |
Topic and speakers |
---|---|
09:30 – 10:00 |
Welcome coffee |
10:00 – 10:20 |
Welcome and introduction
|
Session 1 – Global and European Trends: Global and European Trends in Higher Education Quality Assurance |
|
10:20 – 10:35 |
Presentation International expert presentation on global trends affecting the quality assurance of higher education in the European Higher Education Area (EHEA).
|
10:35 – 11 05 |
Panel discussion Moderated panel discussion on global trends affecting the quality assurance of higher education in the European Higher Education Area (EHEA).
|
11:05 – 11:15 |
Questions from audience |
Session 2 – Quality Assurance in Hungary: Policy Options for Ensuring Quality Digital Higher Education in Hungary |
|
11:15 – 11:35 |
Presentation Launch of the OECD publication Ensuring Quality Digital Higher Education in Hungary and presentation of key findings and recommendations.
|
11:35 – 11:50 |
Reflections from the Hungarian Accreditation Committee (MAB) Reflections from MAB on the findings and recommendations presented by the OECD and plans for the modernisation of higher education quality assurance in Hungary.
|
11:50 – 12:00 |
Questions from audience |
12:00 – 13:00 |
Lunch break |
Session 3 – Supporting Institutional Reform: Institutional Practices and Supports for the Effective Quality Management of Digital Higher Education |
|
13:00 – 13:15 |
Presentation International expert presentation on key challenges and inspiring practices for the development of digitally enhanced learning and teaching in higher education.
|
13:15 – 13:45 |
Panel discussion Moderated panel discussion on institutional quality management and support for the development of high-quality digital higher education.
|
13:45 – 14:00 |
Questions from audience |
Session 4 – Reflections for the Future: Emergence of Alternative Credentials in Higher Education and Quality Assurance |
|
14:00 – 14:20 |
Presentation International expert presentation on the emergence of alternative credentials in higher education, and key considerations for quality assurance.
|
14:20 – 14:30 |
Reflections from the Hungarian Ministry of Culture and Innovation (KIM) Reflections from KIM on the international expert presentation and plans to support the quality enhancement of digital higher education in Hungary.
|
14:30 – 14:40 |
Questions from audience |
14:40 – 14:45 |
Closing
|