Much variation in per capita health care spending levels can be observed in Asia-Pacific countries and territories in 2015 (Figure 6.1), ranging from Bangladesh health spending per capita of only 88 international dollars (USD PPP) to Australia’s 4 491 international dollars (USD PPP). The average OECD current health spending per capita in 2015 was around twenty times that of the low-income countries and territories in Asia-Pacific (3 800 versus USD PPP 193). The higher the income level of a country the higher the share of health spending per capita funded by government/compulsory sources in Asia-Pacific: 71.6% in high-income countries versus 36.8% in low and lower-middle income countries.
On average, between 2010-15, the growth rate in per capita health spending in real terms was 5.3% per year in Asia-Pacific, higher than the 3.9% observed for gross domestic product (GDP) (Figure 6.2). The growth for China was even more rapid – more than twice the average rate for the region. Brunei Darussalam and New Zealand reported the lowest growth rate in per capita health spending in real terms between 2010-15 at 1.3% and 0.9% respectively. Health spending growth in many Asia-Pacific countries has exceeded economic growth over the past five years, resulting in an increasing share of the economy devoted to health in most countries. All territories above the diagonal line in Figure 6.2 report that health expenditure has grown faster than income. This means that the share of health care expenditure in total expenditure has continued to increase. In all territories below the line, the increase in health spending – on average – was lower than the increase in GDP. Hence the share of health spending in total spending declined in those countries and territories.
How much countries spend on health care over time can be ascribe to overall health spending growth and economic performance. Health expenditure accounted for 4.3% and 7.3% of GDP in low- and middle-income and high-income Asia-Pacific countries respectively in the Asia-Pacific region in 2015, an increase of 0.4 and 0.8 percentage points respectively from 2010. This indicator varied from 2.6% in Bangladesh and Brunei Darussalam to up to 10.9% in Japan (Figure 6.3). Generally, the richer a country is, the more it spends on health. The percentage of GDP spent on health across OECD countries is – on average – twice that of the Asia-Pacific low- and middle-income countries (8.9 versus 4.3). Between 2010 and 2015, the share of health in relation to GDP declined of around one percentage point Cambodia, whereas it increased in Nepal, Singapore and Japan of more than 1 percentage point (Figure 6.3).
Although health systems remain a highly labour-intensive sector, capital has been an increasingly important factor of production of health services over recent decades, as reflected for example by the growing importance of diagnostic and therapeutic equipment or the expansion of information and communications technology (ICT) in health care. Capital investments in health tends to fluctuate more with economic cycles than current spending on health care. However, slowing down investments in health infrastructure and equipment will affect service delivery. As a proportion of GDP, Japan was the highest spender on capital investment in 2015 with more than 1% of its GDP going on construction, equipment and technology in the health and social sector (Figure 6.4). However, capital spending can be significantly lower. On average, it represents 0.3% of GDP across reporting non-OECD Asia-Pacific countries, and accounts for less than 0.2% in Bangladesh, Brunei Darussalam, Malaysia, Cambodia and the Philippines in 2015.
