The crisis due to the COVID-19 pandemic had a devastating impact on Peru’s economy. In 2020, gross domestic product (GDP) fell by 11% annually. In 2020, poverty rates based on the latest international comparable estimations, increased by more than six percentage points, compared to a year earlier, reaching 21.9%; whereas, in the Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) region, the increase was of less than five percentage points, reaching 30.9%. In years preceding the pandemic, public health expenditures stood at 4.9% of GDP, 0.2 percentage points higher than in 2010. This figure is lower than in LAC (6.8%) and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries (8.8%), both of which experienced a similar slight increase. In 2020, 41.3% of Peruvians considered health care to be of good quality, a lower proportion than in LAC (48.2%) and the OECD (70.7%). Between March 2020 and May 2021, schools were fully closed for 26 weeks, the same as in LAC and higher than in the OECD (15 weeks). The disruption to education for children was particularly severe due to the lack of effective online learning, which was present in just 24.0% of schools, compared to 32.5% in LAC and 54.1% in the OECD.
Latin American Economic Outlook 2021
Peru
1. Socio-economic and perceived impacts of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic
2. National and international co-operation initiatives aimed to build forward better
To mitigate the economic and health impacts of COVID-19, Peru has implemented a wide range of support measures for the most vulnerable households, workers and enterprises. Concerning households, Peru implemented cash transfers for those living in poverty or extreme poverty and those located in geographical areas with the highest health risks (Bono Familiar Universal and Bono Yo Me Quedo En Casa). Likewise, Peru enacted a subsidy with a particular target on rural households that were excluded from traditional social assistance programmes during the pandemic (Bono Rural). In addition, Peru implemented the Trabaja Perú programme in 2020, targeting people living in poverty or extreme poverty through the generation of temporary jobs for investment projects and immediate intervention activities. To protect workers, Peru encouraged job preservation and hiring by granting a subsidy to private employers affected during the pandemic. Moreover, Peru authorised workers to withdraw pension funds without penalty and implemented a subsidy for self-employed workers (Bono Independiente).
Concerning the recovery, Peru’s medium- and long-term plans are based on the preservation of productive sustainability. Arranca Perú is a programme for economic resilience and job creation. It consists of subsidies for new jobs and support for business financing (e.g. Reactiva Perú, Fondo de Apoyo Empresarial a las MYPE and Programa de Apoyo Empresarial a las MYPES), which comprises loan portfolio guarantee programmes, promotion of public procurement for MYPE and various tax measures (e.g. investment promotion and tax relief). Peru will also implement the Strategic Plan for National Development to achieve the structural national objectives. The plan aims to tackle livelihoods, productivity, comprehensive social security and dialogue for the country’s integral development.
Peru’s international co-operation projects within and beyond the region respond to national development priorities while facing the adverse effects of COVID-19. Within LAC, Peru has engaged in various co-operation schemes to respond to the pandemic. These include rural migration (in co-operation with the Inter-American Development Bank), regional co-operation for climate management of agricultural ecosystems (with the Food and Agriculture Organization) and earthquake-resistant adobe construction techniques (with Argentina). Beyond LAC, Peru participated in diverse international partnerships to accelerate the response to COVID-19 (e.g. participation in Access to COVID-19 Tools Accelerator, COVID-19 Vaccines Access [COVAX], COVID-19 Technology Access Pool, Support Group for Global Infectious Disease Response, and the international Ministerial Coordination Group on COVID-19). Additionally, Peru engaged in specific co-operation schemes to develop plans for the mitigation of the pandemic in indigenous communities and rural centres in the Amazon with Germany and Switzerland. Lastly, within the framework of the last phase (2020-21) of the EUROsociAL+ co-operation programme with the European Union, support has been provided to the most vulnerable population affected by the pandemic by strengthening the Protection Network for the Elderly and Disabled.
|
Key indicators – Peru1 |
|||||
Socio-environmental |
Peru |
LAC2 |
OECD3 |
|||
|
2019 |
2020 |
2019 |
2020 |
2019 |
2020 |
Extreme poverty4 |
3 |
3.5 |
8.1 |
10.0 |
N/A |
N/A |
|
2019 |
2020 |
2019 |
2020 |
2019 |
2020 |
Poverty5 |
15.4 |
21.9 |
26.8 |
30.9 |
N/A |
N/A |
|
2009 |
2019 |
2009 |
2019 |
2009 |
2018 |
Gini index6 |
0.48 |
0.43 |
0.50 |
0.46 |
0.31 |
0.31 |
|
Bottom 20% |
Top 20% |
Bottom 20% |
Top 20% |
Bottom 20% |
Top 20% |
Total population in informal households by quintile, 20187 |
89.2 |
18.2 |
78.0 |
19.1 |
N/A |
N/A |
|
2010 |
2017 |
2010 |
2017 |
2010 |
2017 |
Health expenditures8 |
4.7 |
4.9 |
6.5 |
6.8 |
8.1 |
8.8 |
|
2010 |
2017 |
2010 |
2017 |
2010 |
2017 |
Out-of-pocket health expenditures9 |
35.9 |
28.9 |
35.6 |
34.1 |
20.2 |
20.6 |
|
03/2020-05/2021 |
|||||
Weeks of full school closure10 |
26 |
26 |
15 |
|||
|
2018 |
|||||
Effective online learning11 |
24.0 |
32.5 |
54.1 |
|||
|
2018 |
|||||
Effective online learning in disadvantaged schools11 |
12.3 |
21.5 |
48.8 |
|||
|
2009 |
2019 |
2009 |
2019 |
2009 |
2019 |
Share of Internet users12 |
31.4 |
60.0 |
29.3 |
67.8 |
68.3 |
85.8 |
|
2015 |
2018 |
2015 |
2018 |
2015 |
2018 |
Number of students per computer13 |
2.2 |
1.4 |
2.4 |
1.6 |
1.8 |
1.1 |
|
2010 |
2019 |
2010 |
2019 |
2010 |
2019 |
Exposure to PM 2.514 |
30.4 |
31.1 |
18.1 |
18.0 |
15.7 |
13.9 |
|
2000-16 |
|||||
% change in intact forest landscape15 |
-7.8 |
-8.8 |
-6.3 |
|||
Competitiveness and innovation |
Peru |
LAC2 |
OECD3 |
|||
|
2009 |
2019 |
2009 |
2019 |
2009 |
2019 |
Labour productivity16 |
18.1 |
24.5 |
29.3 |
26.7 |
72.2 |
70.7 |
|
2009 |
2019 |
2009 |
2019 |
2009 |
2019 |
High-tech exports17 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
8.7 |
8.3 |
19.5 |
17.9 |
|
2009 |
2017 |
2009 |
2017 |
2009 |
2017 |
R&D expenditures18 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
2.4 |
2.5 |
|
2009 |
2017 |
2009 |
2017 |
2009 |
2017 |
ICT patents19 |
6 |
7 |
726 |
521 |
173 440 |
141 358 |
Citizens’ perceptions and institutions |
Peru |
LAC2 |
OECD3 |
|||
|
2009 |
2020 |
2009 |
2020 |
2009 |
2020 |
Citizens’ perceptions of corruption in government20 |
91.9 |
88.7 |
72.0 |
72.4 |
67.5 |
58.8 |
|
2009 |
2018 |
2009 |
2018 |
2009 |
2018 |
Citizens’ perceptions of country governed in the interests of few21 |
84.6 |
87.5 |
64.8 |
82.0 |
N/A |
N/A |
|
2009 |
2020 |
2009 |
2020 |
2009 |
2020 |
Satisfaction with health care22 |
41.1 |
41.3 |
56.9 |
48.2 |
69.2 |
70.7 |
|
2009 |
2020 |
2009 |
2020 |
2009 |
2020 |
Satisfaction with water quality23 |
62.7 |
63.5 |
74.8 |
76.0 |
77.9 |
79.4 |
|
2010 |
2016 |
2010 |
2016 |
2010 |
2016 |
% of people victim of criminality24 |
31.1 |
33.0 |
19.6 |
23.8 |
N/A |
N/A |
|
2021 |
|||||
Rank in the Press Freedom Index25 |
91 |
82 |
36 |
|||
|
2009-18 |
|||||
Change in political polarisation26 |
6.8 |
9.6 |
N/A |
|||
|
2019 |
|||||
SIGI index27 |
24.5 |
25.6 |
16.3 |
|||
Fiscal position |
Peru |
LAC2 |
OECD3 |
|||
|
2009 |
2019 |
2009 |
2019 |
2009 |
2019 |
Total tax revenues28 |
16.9 |
16.6 |
20.6 |
22.9 |
31.6 |
33.8 |
|
2009 |
2019 |
2009 |
2019 |
2009 |
2019 |
Share of VAT in total revenues29 |
38.4 |
38.5 |
25.3 |
27.7 |
19.8 |
20.7 |
|
2009 |
2018 |
2009 |
2018 |
2009 |
2018 |
Social expenditures30 |
10.2 |
11.1 |
11.3 |
11.4 |
21.0 |
19.7 |
Sources, footnotes and technical details can be found at the end of the country notes.
1. As best as possible, the table follows the key areas identified in Latin American Economic Outlook 2021: i) socio-environmental aspects; ii) economic competitiveness and innovation; iii) citizens’ perceptions and institutions; and iv) fiscal position.
2. Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) average is a simple average of the largest set of LAC countries for which data are available in the latest year.
3. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) average is a simple average that includes all OECD member countries as of May 2021.
4. Data refer to the definition of extreme poverty as specified by the United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC, 2021[1]), Social Panorama of Latin America 2020. www.cepal.org/sites/default/files/publication/files/46688/S2100149_en.pdf. Data for 2020 refer to an estimate based on 2019 data, as specified in Annex I.A2 of (ECLAC, 2021). Projections are based on 2017 data for Chile, 2014 for Guatemala and 2018 for Mexico. Applying the same criteria as in previous LEO editions, data selection prioritizes comparability across LAC countries and shows the latest comparable data available at the report’s publication date.
5. Data refer to the definition of poverty as specified by (ECLAC, 2021[1]), Social Panorama of Latin America 2020, www.cepal.org/sites/default/files/publication/files/46688/S2100149_en.pdf. Data for 2020 refer to an estimate based on 2019 data, as specified in Annex I.A2 of ECLAC (2021). Projections are based on 2017 data for Chile, 2014 for Guatemala and 2018 for Mexico. Applying the same criteria as in previous LEO editions, data selection prioritizes comparability across LAC countries and shows the latest comparable data available at the report’s publication date.
6. Data for LAC from ECLAC, CEPALSTAT | Databases and Statistical Publications, https://cepalstat-prod.cepal.org/cepalstat/tabulador/ConsultaIntegrada.asp?idIndicador=3289&idioma=i. Data for Chile refer to 2017, instead of 2019, data for Guatemala refers to 2014.
7. Data for the OECD from OECD Income Distribution Database, www.oecd.org/social/income-distribution-database.htm.
8. Indicator provides the distribution of the total population living in informal households by quintile. An informal household has all of its workers in informal work. Quintiles are based on monthly total household consumption or income. The source of this indicator is the OECD Key Indicators of Informality based on Individuals and their Households database, https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=KIIBIH_B5.
9. Health expenditures as % of gross domestic product (GDP). Data from OECD (2020), Health at a Glance: Latin America and the Caribbean. Share of current expenditure on health. Data are from OECD (2020), Health at a Glance: Latin America and the Caribbean.
10. Data from UNESCO, https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse#schoolclosures.
11. Data from OECD et al. (2020), Latin American Economic Outlook 2020, www.oecd.org/publications/latin-american-economic-outlook-20725140.htm.
12. Data from International Telecommunication Union (2020), www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/stat/default.aspx.
13. Data from OECD et al. (2020), Latin American Economic Outlook 2020, www.oecd.org/publications/latin-american-economic-outlook-20725140.htm.
14. µg/m3. Data refer to population exposure to more than 10 micrograms/m3 and are expressed as annual averages. Data from OECD, https://data.oecd.org/air/air-pollution-exposure.htm.
15. Data from OECD, https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=INTACT_FOREST_LANDSCAPES.
16. Output per employed person as % of United States 2019 output per person employed. Data from the Conference Board, https://conference-board.org/data/economydatabase/total-economy-database-productivity
17. High-technology exports as % of manufactured exports. Data from The World Bank, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/TX.VAL.TECH.MF.ZS.
18. Research and development expenditure as % of GDP. Data from The World Bank, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS.
19. IP5 Patent families. Data from OECD, https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=PATS_IPC.
20. Percentage of people who think that the government is corrupt. “Is corruption widespread throughout the government in (this country), or not?” Data from Gallup 2021.
21. Percentage of people who think that the country is governed in the interests of few. “En términos generales ¿diría usted que (país) está gobernado por unos cuantos grupos poderosos en su propio beneficio, o que está gobernado para el bien de todo el pueblo?” Data from Latinobarómetro, 2020.
22. Percentage of people who think that the health care is of good quality. “In your city of area where you live, are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the availability of quality health care?” Data from Gallup 2021.
23. Percentage of people who think that the water is of good quality. “In your city or area where you live, are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the quality of water?” Data from Gallup 2021.
24. Percentage of people who are victim of criminality, “have you been a victim of any type of crime in the past 12 months?” Data from Latin American Public Opinion Project, www.vanderbilt.edu/lapop/data-access.php.
25. Data from RFS, Reporters without Borders, https://rsf.org/en/ranking_table.
26. Percentage of people who declare being left or right on a 1-10 scale (1=left, 10 = right). “In politics, it is normal to refer to left and right. On a scale where 0 is the left and 10 is the right, where would you place yourself?” Data from Latinobarómetro, 2020.
27. Data from OECD, www.genderindex.org/ranking/.
28. Revenues as % of GDP. Data from OECD et al. (2021), Revenue Statistics in Latin America and the Caribbean (2021).
29. Value added taxes as % of total revenues. Data from OECD et al. (2021), Revenue Statistics in Latin America and the Caribbean (2021).
30. Social protection expenditures as % of GDP. Data from OECD and ECLAC.
References
Conference Board (2015), The Conference Board’s Alternative China GDP, http://www.conference-board.org//retrievefile.cfm?filename=FAQ-for-China-GDP_9nov1511.pdf&type=subsite.
ECLAC (2020), Social Panorama of Latin America, United Nations Publication, http://www.cepal.org/sites/default/files/publication/files/46688/S2100149_en.pdf.
Eurosocial (2021), The roadmap for EU Cooperation on social cohesion, https://eurosocial.eu/en/.
Gallup (2021), Gallup World Poll (database), www.gallup.com/analytics/232838/world-poll.aspx.
ITU (2020), World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database 2020, https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/stat/default.aspx.
Latinobarómetro (2020), Vanderbilt (database), Latin American Public Opinion Project, http://www.vanderbilt.edu/lapop/data-access.php.
OECD (2021), OECD.Stat (database), Social and Economical Indicators, https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx.
OECD et al. (2020), Latin American Economic Outlook 2020: Digital Transformation for Building Back Better, OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/e6e864fb-en.
OECD/The World Bank (2020), Health at a Glance: Latin America and the Caribbean 2020, OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/6089164f-en.
Reporters without Borders (2021), World Press Freedom Index (database), https://rsf.org/en/ranking_table.
SIGI (2019), OECD.Stat (database), Social Institutions & Gender Index (SIGI), http://www.genderindex.org/ranking/.
UNESCO (2020), COVID-19 impact on education school closure, https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse#schoolclosures.
World Bank (2020), “Research and development expenditure (% of GDP)”, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS.
World Bank (2019), “High-technology exports”, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/TX.VAL.TECH.MF.ZS.