The following tables are available in electronic form only – please follow the StatLink after each table below to access them.
Mending the Education Divide
Annex C. List of tables available on line
Table A C.1. Online tables for Chapter 2 – Do students have equitable access to effective teachers and learning environments?
Table 2.3 |
Allocation of experienced teachers |
Table 2.4 |
Total variation in teachers’ work experience as a teacher, and variation between and within schools |
Table 2.5 |
Allocation of teachers with comprehensive formal education or training |
Table 2.6 |
Allocation of teachers with high self-efficacy |
Table 2.7 |
Total variation in teachers’ self-efficacy, and variation between and within schools |
Table 2.8 |
Allocation of teachers who use cognitive activation practices on a regular basis |
Table 2.9 |
Total variation in teachers’ use of cognitive activation practices, and variation between and within schools |
Table 2.10 |
Allocation of teachers who use clarity of instruction practices on a regular basis |
Table 2.11 |
Total variation in teachers’ use of clarity of instruction practices, and variation between and within schools |
Table 2.12 |
Allocation of teachers who spend a large share of class time on actual teaching |
Table 2.13 |
Total variation in time spent on actual teaching and learning, and variation between and within schools |
Table 2.14 |
Principals’ engagement in instructional leadership activities, by school characteristics |
Table 2.15 |
Teachers’ access to mentoring, by school characteristics |
Table 2.16 |
Relationship between the use of cognitive activation practices and teacher characteristics by concentration of students from socio-economically disadvantaged homes |
Table 2.17 |
Relationship between the use of cognitive activation practices and teacher characteristics by school location |
Table 2.18 |
Relationship between the use of cognitive activation practices and teacher characteristics by school type |
Table 2.19 |
Residual variability in teachers’ use of cognitive activation practices after accounting for teacher characteristics |
Table 2.20 |
Relationship between the use of clarity of instruction practices and teacher characteristics by concentration of students from socio-economically disadvantaged homes |
Table 2.21 |
Relationship between the use of clarity of instruction practices and teacher characteristics by school location |
Table 2.22 |
Relationship between the use of clarity of instruction practices and teacher characteristics by school type |
Table 2.23 |
Residual variability in teachers’ use of clarity of instruction practices after accounting for teacher characteristics |
Table 2.24 |
Relationship between time spent on actual teaching and learning and teacher characteristics by concentration of students from socio-economically disadvantaged homes |
Table 2.25 |
Relationship between time spent on actual teaching and learning and teacher characteristics by school location |
Table 2.26 |
Relationship between time spent on actual teaching and learning and teacher characteristics by school type |
Table 2.27 |
Residual variability in time spent on actual teaching and learning after accounting for teacher characteristics |
Table A C.2. Online tables for Chapter 3 – Do students have equitable access to digital learning in school?
Table 3.1 |
Teachers with high self-efficacy in the use of ICT for teaching, by schools’ digital infrastructure |
Table 3.2 |
Teachers who use ICT for teaching on a regular basis, by schools’ digital infrastructure |
Table 3.3 |
Shortage or inadequacy of digital technology for instruction, by school characteristics |
Table 3.4 |
Insufficient Internet access, by school characteristics |
Table 3.5 |
Allocation of teachers who had formal training in the use of ICT for teaching |
Table 3.6 |
Allocation of teachers who felt prepared for the use of ICT for teaching |
Table 3.7 |
Allocation of teachers who participated in professional development in ICT skills |
Table 3.8 |
Allocation of teachers with high level of need for professional development in ICT skills |
Table 3.9 |
Relationship between the extent to which teachers use ICT and teachers’ self-efficacy in the use of ICT, controlling for teacher characteristics, training in the use of ICT and classroom composition |
Table 3.10 |
Relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy in the use of ICT and teachers’ age |
Table 3.11 |
Relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy in the use of ICT and teachers’ age, controlling for teacher characteristics, training in the use of ICT and classroom composition |
Table 3.12 |
Allocation of teachers with high self-efficacy in the use of ICT for teaching |
Table 3.13 |
Relationship between the extent to which teachers use ICT and teachers’ age |
Table 3.14 |
Relationship between the extent to which teachers use ICT and teachers’ age, controlling for teacher characteristics, training in the use of ICT and classroom composition |
Table 3.15 |
Allocation of teachers who use ICT for teaching on a regular basis |
Table 3.16 |
Variation in teachers’ regular use of ICT for teaching, after controlling for teacher and school characteristics and schools’ digital infrastructure |
Table 3.17 |
Relationship between the extent to which teachers use ICT and teachers’ engagement in professional collaboration, controlling for teacher characteristics, training in the use of ICT and classroom composition |
Table A C.3. Online tables for Annex B – Technical notes on analyses in this report
Table A B.2 |
Teachers, by school characteristics |
Table A B.3 |
Principals, by school characteristics |