78. The peer review provides jurisdictions that encounter difficulties in reaching agreement with another jurisdiction to implement the Action 6 minimum standard with an opportunity to raise concerns with the OECD Secretariat. This process, which is set out in paragraph 35 of the Revised Peer Review Documents, was initially put in place in the 2017 Peer Review Documents (paragraph 19) to identify cases where a jurisdiction is facing a treaty partner that is a member of the Inclusive Framework that is unwilling to respect its commitment to implement the minimum standard. The process was examined as part of the review of the peer review methodology, and it was determined that the process was adequate as it stood and no changes were needed.
Prevention of Tax Treaty Abuse – Fifth Peer Review Report on Treaty Shopping
Inclusive Framework on BEPS: Action 6
OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project