Through regular decision papers, WICS communicates its evolving understanding and expectations for the regulatory process. Between June 2017 and February 2020, WICS published a series of Decision Papers outlining its views on key parameters for the Strategic Review of Charges. The Decision Papers “sought to build a common understanding of the key regulatory inputs and the likely challenges the industry will face in 2020-21 period and long into the future” (WICS, 2020[1]). These papers, published on the regulator’s website, served to provide technical information to the stakeholders involved in the SRC.
The first batch of thirteen Initial Decision Papers was published between August and October 2017. They touched on a wide-ranging set of issues and put forward various options to address them, both in the current SRC and beyond. Initial Decision Paper 2 made clear that Scottish Water would likely have to invest more in future regulatory periods (WICS, 2020[1]). The Initial Decision Paper 7 on sustainable asset maintenance highlighted one of the key issues, discussing the challenge that Scottish Water invests sufficiently in maintaining its asset base both in SRC21 and into the future.
Throughout 2018, the Commission published eight Revised Decision Papers which reaffirmed and codified some of the key principles set out in the Methodology, but also captured the evolution joint stakeholder understanding of the issues as multilateral meetings continued. Based on the feedback received on its Revised Papers and the new Commissioning Letter from June 2019, WICS has adopted a more iterative and consultative approach to the drafting of its Final Decision Papers.
In summary, each of the 2018 revised decision papers addressed the following:
DP1 provided the Commission’s comments to Scottish Water’s Strategic Projections
DP2 confirmed the key macroeconomic assumptions outlined in 2017, while recognising that economic uncertainty may require changes in the Final DP.
DP3 outlined the Commission’s expectations around the new investment planning and prioritisation framework required to appraise new investment
DP4 established a set of expectations in relation to meeting the long-term investment challenge, providing Scottish Water with a list of key questions to think about in relation to developing trust in its new approach to investment
DP5 focused on a coherent financial approach to capital maintenance, noting that it was very positive to see Scottish Water engage with stakeholders regularly on this issue. It asked Scottish Water to consider the possibility of “ring-fencing” a portion of its allowed revenue, setting this aside for investment pending assurance that the investment would be delivered efficiently and effectively and consistent with addressing the long-term asset challenge.
DP6 outlined the Commission’s expectations on performance reporting, highlighting that greater visibility and transparency of performance can enable Scottish Water to build the trust of customers, communities and other stakeholders
DP7 confirmed that the Commission expected Scottish Water to use the financial tramlines approach for its recurring expenditure
DP8 provided a first opportunity for the Commission to write that charges would likely have to increase above the rate of CPI inflation during the following two regulatory control periods
The suite of 2018 decision papers was followed by one 2019 decision paper on asset replacement, and a 2020 final decision paper on prices.