[16] Afif, Z. et al. (2018), Behavioral Science Around the World: Profiles of 10 Countries, World Bank Group, Washington, D.C., http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/710771543609067500/Behavioral-Science-Around-the-World-Profiles-of-10-Countries (accessed on 25 September 2023).
[55] Alfonsi, C. et al. (2022), “Public communication trends after COVID-19: Innovative practices across the OECD and in four Southeast Asian countries”, OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 55, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/cb4de393-en.
[21] Barrows, A. et al. (2018), Behavioral Design Teams: A Model for Integrating Behavioral Design in City Government, ideas42, http://www.ideas42.org/blog/5-tips-launching-sustaining-city-behavioral-design-team/ (accessed on 22 September 2023).
[40] Berryhill, J. et al. (2019), “Hello, World: Artificial intelligence and its use in the public sector”, OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 36, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/726fd39d-en.
[53] Brown, Z., B. Alvarez and N. Johnstone (2015), “Tender instruments: programme participation and impact in australian conservation tenders, grants and volunteer organisations”, OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 85, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5js4k0t30hvc-en.
[52] Brown, Z. et al. (2012), “Testing the Effect of Defaults on the Thermostat Settings of OECD Employees”, OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 51, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5k8xdh41r8jd-en.
[11] Curtis, K., E. Fulton and K. Brown (2018), “Factors influencing application of behavioural science evidence by public health decision-makers and practitioners, and implications for practice”, Preventive Medicine Reports, Vol. 12, pp. 106-115, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.08.012.
[60] Drummond, J., D. Shephard and D. Trnka (2021), “Behavioural insight and regulatory governance: Opportunities and challenges”, OECD Regulatory Policy Working Papers, No. 16, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/ee46b4af-en.
[9] Ewert, B. (2019), “Moving beyond the obsession with nudging individual behaviour: Towards a broader understanding of Behavioural Public Policy”, Public Policy and Administration, Vol. 35/3, pp. 337-360, https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076719889090.
[2] Feitsma, J. and M. Whitehead (2021), Dynamics of Behavioural Expertise under COVID-19, SAGE Publications, https://doi.org/10.31124/advance.13725601.v2.
[17] Feng, B., M. Kim and D. Soman (2021), “CHAPTER TWO Embedding Behavioral Insights in Organizations”, in The Behaviourally Informed Organization, University of Toronto Press, https://doi.org/10.3138/9781487537166-005.
[6] Hallsworth, M. (2023), “A manifesto for applying behavioural science”, Nature Human Behaviour, Vol. 7/3, pp. 310-322, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01555-3.
[10] Jakobsen, M. et al. (2019), “Organisational factors that facilitate research use in public health policy-making: a scoping review”, Health Research Policy and Systems, Vol. 17/1, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0490-6.
[7] Jonkers, P. and W. Tiemeijer (2015), Policymaking Using Behavioural Expertise: Synopsis of WRR-Report 92, The Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy, The Hague, https://english.wrr.nl/topics/choice-behaviour-and-policy-ii/documents/reports/2014/09/10/policymaking-using-behavioural-expertise (accessed on 22 September 2023).
[31] Kaur, M. et al. (2022), “Innovative capacity of governments: A systemic framework”, OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 51, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/52389006-en.
[18] Khan, Z. and L. Newman (eds.) (2021), Building Behavioral Science in an Organization, Action Design Press, Hyattsville, MD.
[4] Kumpf, B. and P. Jhunjhunwala (2023), “The adoption of innovation in international development organisations: Lessons for development co-operation”, OECD Development Co-operation Working Papers, No. 112, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/21f63c69-en.
[30] Langer, L., J. Tripney and D. Gough (2016), The science of using science: researching the use of research evidence in decision-making, EPPI-Centre, https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Portals/0/PDF%20reviews%20and%20summaries/Science%202016%20Langer%20report.pdf?ver=2016-04-18-142701-867 (accessed on 21 December 2023).
[1] Lecouturier, J. et al. (2024), “The critical factors in producing high quality and policy-relevant research: insights from international behavioural science units”, Evidence & Policy, Vol. 20/2, pp. 141-162, https://doi.org/10.1332/17442648y2023d000000001.
[26] Linos, E. (2023), Translating Behavioral Economics Evidence into Policy and Practice, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Report, https://nap.nationalacademies.org/resource/26874/NASEM_Commissioned_Report_Linos.pdf (accessed on 22 September 2023).
[14] Lourenco, J. et al. (2016), “Behavioural Insights Applied to Policy - Country Overviews 2016”, JRC Working Papers February.
[41] Lunn, P. (2014), Regulatory Policy and Behavioural Economics, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264207851-en.
[32] Meade, N. and T. Islam (2006), “Modelling and forecasting the diffusion of innovation – A 25-year review”, International Journal of Forecasting, Vol. 22/3, pp. 519-545, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.01.005.
[27] Michie, S., M. van Stralen and R. West (2011), “The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions”, Implementation Science, Vol. 6/1, https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.
[29] Moffat, A., E. Cook and A. Chater (2022), “Examining the influences on the use of behavioural science within UK local authority public health: Qualitative thematic analysis and deductive mapping to the COM-B model and Theoretical Domains Framework”, Frontiers in Public Health, Vol. 10, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1016076.
[24] Newman, K., C. Fisher and L. Shaxson (2012), “Stimulating Demand for Research Evidence: What Role for Capacity-building?”, IDS Bulletin, Vol. 43/5, pp. 17-24, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2012.00358.x.
[48] OECD (2023), “Confronting the energy crisis: Changing behaviours to reduce energy consumption”, OECD Policy Responses on the Impacts of the War in Ukraine, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5664e8a9-en.
[47] OECD (2023), How Green is Household Behaviour?: Sustainable Choices in a Time of Interlocking Crises, OECD Studies on Environmental Policy and Household Behaviour, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/2bbbb663-en.
[45] OECD (2023), Recommendation of the Council on Access to Justice and People-Centred Justice Systems, OECD Legal Instruments, OECD/LEGAL/0498, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0498 (accessed on 25 September 2023).
[58] OECD (2022), “Dark commercial patterns”, OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 336, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/44f5e846-en.
[56] OECD (2022), Declaration on Building Trust and Reinforcing Democracy, OECD Legal Instruments, OECD/LEGAL/0484, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0484 (accessed on 25 September 2023).
[61] OECD (2022), Enhancing the Oversight Impact of Chile’s Supreme Audit Institution: Applying Behavioural Insights for Public Integrity, OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/1afdc85e-en.
[35] OECD (2022), “Good practice principles for ethical behavioural science in public policy”, OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, No. 20, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/e19a9be9-en.
[54] OECD (2022), “Misinformation and disinformation: An international effort using behavioural science to tackle the spread of misinformation”, OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, No. 21, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/b7709d4f-en.
[42] OECD (2022), Recommendation of the Council on Public Policy Evaluation, OECD Legal Instruments, OECD/LEGAL/0478, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0478 (accessed on 25 September 2023).
[39] OECD (2021), OECD Framework and Good Practice Principles for People-Centred Justice, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/cdc3bde7-en.
[43] OECD (2021), Recommendation of the Council on Enhancing Access to and Sharing of Data, OECD Legal Instruments, OECD/LEGAL/0463, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0463 (accessed on 25 September 2023).
[59] OECD (2020), Behavioural Insights and Organisations: Fostering Safety Culture, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/e6ef217d-en.
[22] OECD (2020), Building Capacity for Evidence-Informed Policy-Making: Lessons from Country Experiences, OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/86331250-en.
[38] OECD (2020), Mobilising Evidence for Good Governance: Taking Stock of Principles and Standards for Policy Design, Implementation and Evaluation, OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/3f6f736b-en.
[3] OECD (2020), Regulatory policy and COVID-19: Behavioural insights for fast-paced decision making, OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19), https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/regulatory-policy-and-covid-19-behavioural-insights-for-fast-paced-decision-making-7a521805/ (accessed on 30 September 2023).
[44] OECD (2019), Declaration on Public Sector Innovation, OECD Legal Instruments, OECD/LEGAL/0450, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0450.
[37] OECD (2019), Delivering Better Policies Through Behavioural Insights: New Approaches, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/6c9291e2-en.
[36] OECD (2019), Tools and Ethics for Applied Behavioural Insights: The BASIC Toolkit, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9ea76a8f-en.
[62] OECD (2018), Behavioural Insights for Public Integrity: Harnessing the Human Factor to Counter Corruption, OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264297067-en.
[15] OECD (2017), Behavioural Insights and Public Policy: Lessons from Around the World, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264270480-en.
[51] OECD (2017), Tackling Environmental Problems with the Help of Behavioural Insights, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264273887-en.
[57] OECD (2017), “Use of Behavioural Insights in Consumer Policy”, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 36, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/c2203c35-en.
[46] OECD (1995), Recommendation of the Council on Improving the Quality of Government Regulation, OECD Legal Instruments, OECD/LEGAL/0278, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0278.
[23] Rantala, K., N. Alasuutari and J. Kuorikoski (2023), “The logic of regulatory impact assessment: From evidence to evidential reasoning”, Regulation & Governance, Vol. 18/2, pp. 534-550, https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12542.
[12] Sanders, M., S. Bhanot and S. O’Flaherty (2023), Behavioral Public Policy in a Global Context: Practical Lessons from Outside the Nudge Unit, Springer International Publishing, https://books.google.fr/books?id=h4PFzwEACAAJ.
[33] Severijnen, F., G. Slob and S. Groot (2022), Behavioural research into evidence-based policy, Ministry of Education, Culture and Science of the Netherlands, https://www.binnl.nl/kennisbank/gedragsanalyses/2406658.aspx (accessed on 25 September 2023).
[25] Stewart, R., L. Langer and Y. Erasmus (2018), “An integrated model for increasing the use of evidence by decision-makers for improved development”, Development Southern Africa, Vol. 36/5, pp. 616-631, https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835x.2018.1543579.
[8] United Nations (2023), UN 2.0: Forward-thinking culture and cutting-edge skills for better United Nations system impact, Our Common Agenda, Policy Brief 11, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/4021171 (accessed on 22 September 2023).
[19] United Nations (2021), Behavioural Science Report, UN Innovation Network, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3929741 (accessed on 25 September 2023).
[49] Varazzani, C., M. Sullivan-Paul and H. Tuomaila (2023), “Behavioural science for sustainable tourism: Insights and policy considerations for greener tourism”, OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 60, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/c2ec4fcf-en.
[34] Varazzani, C. et al. (2023), “Seven routes to experimentation in policymaking: A guide to applied behavioural science methods”, OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 64, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/918b6a04-en.
[50] Vringer, K. et al. (2015), “Sustainable consumption dilemmas”, OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 84, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5js4k112t738-en.
[5] West, R. and A. Gould (2022), Improving health and wellbeing: A guide to using behavioural science in policy and practice, Public Health Wales NHS Trust.
[13] Whitehead, M. et al. (2014), Nudging All Over the World: Assessing the global impact of the behavioural sciences on public policy, Economic and Social Research Council, https://research.aber.ac.uk/cy/publications/nudging-all-over-the-world-assessing-the-global-impact-of-the-beh (accessed on 25 September 2023).
[28] WHO (2023), Use of behavioural science in organizations a workforce survey: A tool for behavioural insights, World Health Organization, https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240071711 (accessed on 22 September 2023).
[20] WHO Regional Office for Europe (2022), Behavioural insights units. Setting up behavioural insights units for improved health outcomes: Considerations for national health authorities, World Health Organization, https://www.who.int/europe/publications/i/item/WHO-EURO-2022-4886-44649-63372 (accessed on 27 September 2023).