This chapter proposes a monitoring framework featuring specific indicators for each recommendation developed for the three priority areas for Albania’s Circular Economy Roadmap. This framework will help the effective implementation of the circular economy roadmap, and will be instrumental for evaluating progress towards strategic targets and goals for Albania’s circular transition.
A Roadmap towards Circular Economy of Albania
7. Monitoring framework
Abstract
Defining key indicators and monitoring progress
Establishing a circular economy monitoring framework is crucial for assessing progress towards the targets and goals outlined in the roadmap over time and the circular economy transition in Albania more generally, using a set of indicators. This framework will assist Albanian policy makers in comprehending the country’s performance on selected circular economy indicators and pinpoint areas that require further intervention. The monitoring process should also serve as the foundation for setting new long-term priorities for the circular economy (European Commission, 2023[1]) and offer feedback for strategy and planning development for various actors in the economy (Alaerts et al., 2019[2]). This aligns with the dual purpose of indicators: forward-looking to provide guidance and backward-looking to provide feedback and assess performance (Ekins et al., 2019[3]).
A circular economy monitoring framework can take a variety of forms, drawing upon an extensive array of existing indicators and those under development. Existing circular economy monitoring frameworks encompass a broader collection of relevant indicators, recognising the difficulty of capturing the circular economy through a single indicator due to its cross-cutting and wide-ranging definition. These monitoring frameworks can adopt the structure of a set of individual indicators, not necessarily linked, or they can be organised using a multi-tiered approach with a limited number of headline indicators (for communication purposes), complemented by a dashboard featuring specific thematic indicators. Employing a multi-layered approach allows for incorporating more detailed information at additional levels (e.g. regional, city, sectoral or product groups levels) or concerning specific strategic objectives and recommendations.
Academic literature strongly advocates moving beyond commonly used macro-level indicators to include indicators that offer direct feedback to policy makers on specific products and services, and that address consumer and business behaviour, as well as societal needs, related to the circular economy (Alaerts et al., 2019[2]; Ekins et al., 2019[3]; Giljum et al., 2011[4]; Potting et al., 2018[5]). Moreover, there is a need for supplementary indicators to precisely measure the effects and process of the transition itself, connecting the circular economy to environmental impacts while capturing possible rebound effects (Potting et al., 2018[5]; Alaerts et al., 2019[2]).
Two sets of indicators are proposed for Albania’s monitoring framework
The proposed monitoring framework to support the implementation of the recommendations of the roadmap (Table 7.1) has a two-tier structure:
1. A set of headline indicators to monitor the economy-wide circular transition in Albania (Table 7.2). These indicators are largely based on the European Union’s circular economy monitoring framework (Eurostat, 2023[6]) and are grouped into five categories: 1) production and consumption; 2) waste management; 3) secondary raw materials; 4) competitiveness and innovation; and 5) global sustainability and resilience.
2. Additionally, a set of indicators per priority area to monitor the progress made on specific recommendations (Table 7.3). Some of these indicators could be qualitative, for instance, certain operational indicators monitoring the progress made on a specific recommendation (e.g. the implementation has started, is ongoing or completed). Others are currently at an experimental stage, requiring further development of the indicator or additional data collection (e.g. monitoring the revenues generated from specific environmental taxes).
The proposed sets of indicators intend to provide a comprehensive overview of relevant indicators that can help monitor the implementation of the recommendations as well as Albania’s overall circular economy transition. Albania may want to consider these all-encompassing lists of indicators during the preparation of the future policy framework or an action plan and select those for which data are or might become available. That said, to ensure effective and evidence-based policy making, data collection and co-ordination of the collection process should be improved, and existing gaps in the availability and quality of key circular economy-related data should be addressed, starting with those related to waste generation and waste management. Establishing an impact assessment mechanism is a potential solution to ensure that the monitoring framework is effectively executed and to secure its long-term continuity.
Table 7.1. Complete list of recommendations for each of the three priority areas
Priority area |
Short term |
Medium term |
Long term |
---|---|---|---|
Economic instruments |
Put in place planned extended producer responsibility (EPR) take-back schemes |
Implement landfill taxes with discounts for good sorting/high recycling |
Introduce EPR take-back schemes for new products (e.g. textiles) |
Reform household waste charges (introduce a gradual increase of waste charges with discounts for good waste management practices, promote low-cost pay-as-you-throw schemes and improve enforcement) |
Gradually increase the (mandatory) use of green criteria as award criteria in public procurement |
Consider introducing material taxes on extracted materials/plastics |
|
Introduce green public procurement, with a focus on priority sectors (capacity building, methodology guidelines) |
Consider introducing a tourist tax to account for additional environmental costs related to tourism that are not covered by existing taxation schemes |
Introduce minimum recycled content requirements within green public procurement (paper, plastics) |
|
Introduce reuse and recycling credit schemes that offer payments for the removal of items from municipal waste for recycling and reuse |
|
Strengthen the use of tax relief for a circular economy (e.g. reduced value-added tax for eco-innovation, tax credits for food donations) |
|
|
|
Consider introducing incineration taxes |
|
Circular business models for small and medium-sized enterprises |
Provide awareness-raising campaigns and training programmes on the circular economy for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), including showcasing good practices and access to finance |
Continue facilitating the exchange of practices and learning from peers, including cross-sectoral knowledge development |
Consider additional investment support for SMEs (e.g. accelerated depreciation rate, guarantee schemes, tax incentives) |
Introduce calls for circular business models projects within existing and new funding programmes |
Provide support to SMEs on environmental legislation and obligations to ease their administrative burden |
Organise investor-entrepreneur matchmaking events |
|
Provide financial, combined with technical, assistance to SMEs (business support, access to finance support) |
Support capacity building and entrepreneurship skills as well as vocational training |
|
|
Support collaboration between SMEs and academia, as well as regional and international collaboration on research and development and innovation |
|
||
Establish a circular economy stakeholder/business platform to strengthen collaboration within and across value chains |
|
|
|
Consider establishing a dedicated funding programme for SMEs to scale up circular business models |
|||
Plastics, with a focus on marine litter |
Improve municipal waste management in general |
Introduce eco-modulated fees for plastic packaging within the EPR scheme for packaging |
Support and scale up innovation into more recyclable plastic materials, plastics recycling technologies and processes as well as plastics reuse and reduction |
Improve separate collection of plastic waste and other packaging |
Develop a strategy to curb plastic pollution, including marine plastic litter |
Introduce minimum recycled content requirements for specific plastic waste streams |
|
Raise awareness and educate businesses, public authorities and households on plastic waste prevention, circular design and littering |
Use green public procurement to favour reusable and recycled plastics |
Consider taxes on virgin and non-recycled plastics |
|
Implement an EPR take-back scheme for packaging (including plastic packaging) |
Consider a deposit-refund system for plastic bottles |
||
Introduce taxes and/or bans on certain single-use plastics |
Table 7.2. Proposed headline indicators based on the European Union’s circular economy monitoring framework to monitor the economy-wide circular transition in Albania
No. |
Indicator group |
Name of the indicator |
---|---|---|
Production and consumption |
||
1 |
Material consumption |
Material footprint (tonnes per capita) |
2 |
Resource productivity (Index 2000=100) |
|
3 |
Waste generation |
Total waste generation per capita (kg per capita) |
4 |
Generation of waste excluding major mineral wastes per gross domestic product (GDP) unit (kg per EUR 1 000, chain linked volumes [2010]) |
|
5 |
Generation of municipal waste per capita (kg per capita) |
|
6 |
Food waste (kg per capita) |
|
7 |
Generation of packaging waste per capita (kg per capita) |
|
8 |
Generation of plastic packaging waste per capita (kg per capita) |
|
Waste management |
||
9 |
Overall recycling rate |
Recycling rate of municipal waste (%) |
10 |
Recycling rate of all waste excluding major mineral waste (%) |
|
11 |
Recycling rates for specific waste streams |
Recycling rate of overall packaging waste (%) |
12 |
Recycling rate of plastic packaging waste (%) |
|
13 |
Recycling rate of waste from electrical and electronic equipment separately collected (%) |
|
Secondary raw materials |
||
14 |
Contribution of recycled materials to raw materials demand |
Circular material use rate (%) |
15 |
Trade in recyclable raw materials |
Imports (thousand tonnes) |
16 |
Exports (thousand tonnes) |
|
Competitiveness and innovation |
||
17 |
Private investment, jobs and gross value added related to circular economy sectors |
Private investments (% of GDP at current prices) |
18 |
Persons employed (% of total employment) |
|
19 |
Gross value added (% of GDP at current prices) |
|
20 |
Industrial symbiosis initiatives (number) |
|
21 |
Innovation |
Patents related to waste management and recycling (number) |
Global sustainability and resilience |
||
23 |
Global sustainability from the circular economy |
Greenhouse gas emissions from production activities (kg per capita) |
24 |
Resilience from the circular economy |
Material import dependency (%) |
Table 7.3. Proposed dashboard of specific indicators for the three priority areas
Indicator1 |
Description |
Link to recommendation |
Source2 |
---|---|---|---|
Economic instruments |
|||
Tax revenues or savings generated from circular economy-related tax instruments |
Amount (ALL) |
Applies to all recommendations concerning tax instruments |
Data to be provided by the Ministry of Finance and Economy |
Recovery rate of packaging waste |
Ratio of overall packaging waste prepared for reuse, recycled or subject to material recovery to packaging waste generated (%) |
Effectively implement planned extended producer responsibility (EPR) take-back schemes |
Data to be provided by the Institute of Statistics (INSTAT)/National Environment Agency |
Establishment of a Special Fund for Circular Economy3 |
Action-specific indicator for monitoring the creation of the fund (yes/no) |
Data to be provided by the Ministry of Tourism and Environment/ Ministry of Finance and Economy |
|
Share of income distributed to the Special Fund for Circular Economy3 |
Income raised from the fund for the fulfilment of the EPR Law (%, ALL) |
Data to be provided by the Ministry of Tourism and Environment/ Ministry of Finance and Economy |
|
Establishment of a programme for supporting reuse and recycling credit schemes |
Action-specific indicator for monitoring the creation of the programme (yes/no) |
Introduce reuse and recycling credit schemes that would offer payments for the removal of items from municipal waste for recycling and reuse |
Data to be provided by the Ministry of Finance; municipal authorities |
Illegal landfills |
Change in the number of illegal landfills, amount of illegally discarded municipal waste (m3) |
INSTAT |
|
Landfill tax proceeds |
Amount (ALL) |
Implement landfill tax discounts for good sorting/high recycling |
Data to be provided by the Ministry of Finance and Economy |
Waste collection coverage |
Share of households that have access to a reliable waste collection service |
Reform household waste charges (introduce a gradual increase of waste charges with discounts for good waste management practices, promote low-cost pay-as-you-throw schemes and improve enforcement) |
Data to be provided by the Ministry of Tourism and Environment; municipal authorities |
Campaigns to raise public awareness on waste charges |
Action-specific indicator monitoring the implementation of comprehensive, culturally appropriate public education and awareness-raising initiatives |
Data to be provided by the Ministry of Tourism and Environment; municipal authorities |
|
Waste generation |
Generation of municipal waste per capita (kg per capita); generation of waste excluding major mineral wastes per GDP unit (kg per EUR 1 000, chain linked volumes [2010]) |
INSTAT |
|
Separate collection |
Share of municipal waste collected separately compared to all municipal waste generated (%); separate collection of paper, metal, plastic and glass |
INSTAT |
|
Uptake of home composting |
Measures the extent of home composting |
Indicators to be developed, data to be collected by municipal authorities, would require specific surveys |
|
Tax proceeds earmarked to cover environmental and infrastructure costs during tourism peaks |
Share of tax revenue that covers increased costs in various environmental fields (e.g. water, waste, etc.) |
Consider introducing a tourist tax to account for additional environmental costs related to tourism that are not covered by existing taxation schemes |
Data to be provided by municipal authorities |
Domestic extraction of raw material |
Thousand tonnes |
Consider introducing material taxes on extracted materials/plastics |
INSTAT |
Domestic material consumption of raw material |
Amount of virgin material directly used by the economy (thousand tonnes) |
INSTAT |
|
Green public procurement |
Green public procurement share in public contracts (in volume and value) across all procured products and services (%) |
Introduce green public procurement, with a focus on priority sectors (capacity building, methodology guidelines) |
Data to be provided by the Public Procurement Office |
Products/services covered by minimum recycled content criteria in green public procurement |
Number |
Introduce minimum recycled content requirements within green public procurement (paper, plastics) |
Data to be provided by the Public Procurement Office |
Circular business models for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) |
|||
Budget allocated to circular economy projects under a concrete programme |
Amount (ALL) |
Introduce calls for circular business model projects within existing and new funding programmes that provide grants and soft loans. The financial support in the form of grants and loans should be combined with technical and other assistance to SMEs |
Data to be provided by the Albanian Investment Development Agency (AIDA) |
Training courses on circular business models |
Number of events organised; number of technical modules created as part of funding programmes |
AIDA |
|
SMEs benefitting from financial support for the creation of new circular business models |
Number of SMEs |
AIDA |
|
SMEs benefitting from non-financial support for the creation of new circular business models |
Number of SMEs |
AIDA |
|
SMEs supported by funding programmes to scale up circular business models |
Number of SMEs |
Consider establishing a dedicated funding programme for SMEs to scale up circular business models |
AIDA |
Creation of a circular economy platform4 |
Action-specific indicator for monitoring the creation of the platform (yes/no) |
Establish a circular economy stakeholder/business platform to strengthen collaboration, information exchange and exchange of good practices2 |
Data to be provided by the co-ordinating institution (e.g. Ministry of Tourism and Environment) |
Number of platform members4 |
Number |
Data to be provided by the co-ordinating institution (e.g. Ministry of Tourism and Environment) |
|
Number of events/workshops organised as part of the platform4 |
Number |
Data to be provided by the co-ordinating institution (e.g. Ministry of Tourism and Environment) |
|
Environment-related R&D and innovation expenditure by state and business sectors |
Gross expenditure on research and development (GERD) (%) |
Support collaboration between SMEs and academia, as well as regional and international collaboration on R&D and innovation |
Indicator to be developed based on Eurostat by the Agency for Research, Technology and Innovation. Data to be provided by the National Agency for Scientific Research and Innovation or AIDA |
Matchmaking events organised |
Number of events |
Organise investor-entrepreneur matchmaking events |
AIDA |
Awareness-raising campaigns on the circular economy |
Number of campaigns |
Raise awareness on the circular economy and circular business models for SMEs through additional communication campaigns and training programmes, including showcasing of good practices and access-to-finance possibilities |
Data to be provided by AIDA, chambers of commerce and industry |
Awareness of SMEs on circular business models |
Share of SMEs aware of the circular economy |
Regional Cooperation Council (Balkan Barometer Survey) or nationwide survey |
|
Awareness campaigns to reduce food waste in the tourism sector |
Number of campaigns; number of restaurants/hotels involved |
Continue facilitating the exchange of practices and peer learning, including cross-sectoral knowledge development |
Data to be provided by the Ministry of Tourism and Environment |
Awareness campaigns to reduce textile waste |
Number of campaigns; number of businesses involved |
Data to be provided by AIDA or the Ministry of Finance and Economy |
|
Mainstreaming education for the circular economy into university-level curricula |
Action-specific indicator for monitoring the implementation of the recommendation (yes/no) |
Support capacity building and entrepreneurship skills as well as vocational training on the circular economy |
Data to be provided by the Ministry of Education and Sports |
Plastics |
|||
Introduction of EPR schemes planned by law |
Action-specific indicator for monitoring the implementation of EPR schemes |
Improve waste management in general: separate collection of plastic (and other packaging) waste and implement an EPR take-back scheme for packaging, including plastic packaging |
Data to be provided by the Ministry of Tourism and Environment |
Collection facilities installed |
Number of collection facilities installed |
Consider introducing a deposit-refund system for plastic bottles |
Data to be provided by the Ministry of Tourism and Environment |
Collection of plastic bottles |
Share of separate collection of plastic bottles of all single-use bottles placed on the market (%) |
||
Introduction of a ban on all single-use plastic bags (full alignment with the EU Single-Use Plastics Directive) |
Action-specific indicator for monitoring the introduction of the ban (yes/no) |
Introduce taxes and/or bans on certain single-use plastic products |
Data to be provided by the Ministry of Tourism and Environment |
Eco-modulated fees within EPR for packaging |
Action-specific indicator for monitoring the introduction of the fees (yes/no) |
Introduce eco-modulated fees for plastic packaging |
Data to be provided by Ministry of Tourism and Environment |
Funding and training for new recycling technologies |
Number of programmes for innovation and R&D activities in the field of plastics |
Support and scale up innovation into more recyclable plastics materials, plastics recycling technologies and processes |
Data to be provided by the National Agency for Scientific Research and Innovation, AIDA, Innovation Fund |
Public expenditure on R&D related to plastics recycling |
Amount (ALL) |
Data to be provided by the National Agency for Scientific Research and Innovation |
|
Awareness-raising activities carried out for plastic use reduction, reuse and recycling targeting businesses |
Number of activities |
Raise awareness and educate businesses, public authorities and households on plastic waste prevention, circular design and littering (campaigns, catalogues, online platforms; mainstreaming the circular economy into education programmes in schools) |
Data to be provided by the Ministry of Tourism and Environment |
Public awareness raising and education campaign on plastic waste and marine litter |
Number of campaigns |
Data to be provided by the Ministry of Tourism and Environment |
|
Municipal or regional web catalogues or platforms for information on plastic waste prevention |
Number of established platforms; number of materials and resources accessible on line; level of traffic on the web platform |
Data to be provided by regional or municipal authorities |
|
Circular economy in the educational system |
Number of students educated/trained on circular economy fields of activity; number of events organised in relation to pedagogical circular economy activities |
Data to be provided by the Ministry of Education, Sports and Youth |
|
Strategy with all the necessary elements adopted (timeline, budget, responsible institution, consultation process) |
Action-specific indicator for monitoring the adoption of the strategy (yes/no) |
Develop a strategy to curb plastic pollution, including marine plastic litter |
Data to be provided by the Ministry of Tourism and Environment |
1. Headline indicators outlined in Table 7.2 serve as the main benchmarks for monitoring progress in the implementation of the proposed recommendations. The indicators outlined in this table are complementary to those, capturing additional implementation aspects.
2. The source column refers to institutions already collecting relevant data or those that could be in charge of collecting such data in the future.
3. The establishment of the Special Fund for Circular Economy is a measure envisaged as part of the draft Extended Producer Responsibility Law, under public consultation at the time of drafting, and is hence subject to change.
4. Circular economy stakeholders’ platform-related indicators might differ depending on the format of the platform (on line, physical, hybrid).
Note: ALL: Albanian lek.
References
[2] Alaerts, L. et al. (2019), “Towards a more direct policy feedback in circular economy monitoring via a societal needs perspective”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 149, pp. 363-371, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.06.004.
[3] Ekins, P. et al. (2019), “The circular economy: What, why, how and where”, Background paper for an OECD/EC Workshop on 5 July 2019, https://www.oecd.org/cfe/regionaldevelopment/Ekins-2019-Circular-Economy-What-Why-How-Where.pdf.
[1] European Commission (2023), Communication on a Revised Monitoring Framework for the Circular Economy, European Commission, Brussels, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2023%3A306%3AFIN&qid=1684143860344.
[6] Eurostat (2023), “Circular Economy Monitoring Framework”, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/circular-economy/monitoring-framework (accessed on 27 November 2023).
[4] Giljum, S. et al. (2011), “A comprehensive set of resource use indicators from the micro to the macro level”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 55/3, pp. 300-308, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.09.009.
[7] OECD (2021), The OECD Inventory of Circular Economy indicators, OECD, Paris, https://www.oecd.org/cfe/cities/InventoryCircularEconomyIndicators.pdf.
[5] Potting, J. et al. (2018), Circular Economy: What We Want to Know and Can Measure – Framework and Baseline Assessment for Monitoring the Progress of the Circular Economy in the Netherlands, PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague, https://www.pbl.nl/sites/default/files/downloads/pbl-2018-circular-economy-what-we-want-to-know-and-can-measure-3217.pdf.