[85] AFROSAI-E (2020), Integrating Big Data in Public Sector Audit, African Organisation of English-speaking Supreme Audit Institutions, https://afrosai-e.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Research-Paper-Integrating-Big-Data-in-Public-Sector-Auditing.pdf.
[46] AMA (2023), Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira, https://eportugal.gov.pt/en/entidades/autoridade-tributaria-e-aduaneira (accessed on 11 October 2023).
[93] Anysz, H. (2019), “Comparison of ANN Classifier to the Neuro-Fuzzy System for Collusion Detection in the Tender Procedures of Road Construction Sector”, IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering, https://www.academia.edu/73351847/Comparison_of_ANN_Classifier_to_the_Neuro_Fuzzy_System_for_Collusion_Detection_in_the_Tender_Procedures_of_Road_Construction_Sector (accessed on 20 October 2023).
[13] Autoridade da Concorrência (2023), AdC Mission and Goals, Autoridade da Concorrência, https://www.concorrencia.pt/en/adc-mission-and-goals (accessed on 24 April 2023).
[15] Autoridade da Concorrência (2023), Competition Policy Priorities for 2023, Autoridade da Concorrência, https://www.concorrencia.pt/sites/default/files/Competition%20and%20purchasing%20power%20in%20times%20 (accessed on 24 April 2023).
[25] Autoridade da Concorrência (2022), AdC sanctions bid-rigging cartel in the security sector.
[42] Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (n.d.), Lei Geral Tributária.
[52] Bumann, J. (2019), Action Fields of Digital Transformation - A Review and Comparative Analysis of Digital Transformation Maturity Models and Frameworks, Edition Gesowip, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337167323_Action_Fields_of_Digital_Transformation_-_A_Review_and_Comparative_Analysis_of_Digital_Transformation_Maturity_Models_and_Frameworks.
[69] Cabinet Office (2018), Code of Data Matching Practice, Cabinet Office’s National Fraud Initiative, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/750372/Code_of_Data_Matching_Practice.pdf.
[66] Centers of Excellence (n.d.), IT Change-Readiness Program: Culture Pre-Assessment Guide, GSA’s Center of Excellence (CoE) Innovation Adoption (IA), https://coe.gsa.gov/docs/CulturePreAssessmentGuide.pdf.
[34] Conselho de Prevenção da Corrupção (2019), RECOMMENDATION OF THE CORRUPTION PREVENTION COUNCIL of October 2, 2019 ON PREVENTING CORRUPTION RISKS IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT.
[48] Council of Ministers - Portugal (2021), “Decreto-Lei n.º 109-E/2021”.
[8] Council of Ministers Portugal (2023), Resolução que define critérios ecológicos aplicáveis às compras públicas, https://www.consultalex.gov.pt/ConsultaPublica_Detail.aspx?Consulta_Id=312 (accessed on 11 October 2023).
[70] Court of Auditors of Portugal (2023), Strategic Plan for Digital Transformation.
[95] Dadfarnia, M. et al. (2020), “Incremental collusive fraud detection in large-scale online auction networks”, The Journal of Supercomputing, Vol. 76, pp. 7416–7437, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-020-03170-9 (accessed on 20 October 2023).
[19] EBRD (2015), Are you ready for eProcurement? Guide to Electronic Procurement Reform, https://www.ppi-ebrd-uncitral.com/images/stories/pdf/151208_Are_you_ready_for_eProcurement.pdf (accessed on 13 December 2018).
[74] El Haddadi, T. et al. (2021), “Automatic analysis of the sustainability of public procurement based on Text Mining: The case of the Moroccan ICT markets”, Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, Vol. 3, p. 100037, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2021.100037.
[16] Espap (2023), Rationalisation of costs and simplification of the acquisition of transversal goods and services in Public Administration, https://www.espap.gov.pt/FrontEnd/Paginas/Areas/SP_CP/SP_CP_HomePage_tpl_2.aspx (accessed on 24 April 2023).
[17] European Commission (2023), eInvoicing in Portugal, https://ec.europa.eu/digital-building-blocks/wikis/display/DIGITAL/eInvoicing+in+Portugal (accessed on 24 April 2023).
[33] European Commission (2023), “Portugal Recovery and Resilence Plan”, https://commission.europa.eu/business-economy-euro/economic-recovery/recovery-and-resilience-facility/country-pages/portugals-recovery-and-resilience-plan_en (accessed on 30 November 2023).
[23] European Commission (2022), Access to public procurement | Single Market Scoreboard, https://single-market-scoreboard.ec.europa.eu/business-framework-conditions/public-procurement_en (accessed on 25 April 2023).
[32] European Commission (2022), Special Eurobarometer 523 - corruption.
[24] European Commission (2021), BASE web portal on public contracts, https://antifraud-knowledge-centre.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-03/3.1.20%20BASE%20Web%20Portal%20EN.pdf.
[27] European Commission (2021), Single Market Scoreboard l Portugal.
[39] European Commission (2020), COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Country Report Portugal 2020 Accompanying the document COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK AND THE EUROGROUP 2020 European Semester: Assessment of progress on structural reforms, prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances, and results of in-depth reviews under Regulation (EU) No 1176/2011, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1584543810241&uri=CELEX:52020SC0521 (accessed on 28 April 2023).
[37] European Commission (2020), “ProcurComp EU-Study on professionalisation of public procurement in the EU and selected third countriespublic-procurement/support-tools-public-buyers_en”, https://doi.org/10.2873/1198.
[26] European Commission (2019), 2019 SBA Fact Sheet l Portugal.
[30] European Commission (2016), Public procurement – Study on administrative capacity in the EU - Portugal Country Profile.
[64] European Court of Auditors/U.K National Audit Office/OECD SIGMA (2007), Making Supreme Audit Institution Twinning Successful: A Good Practice Guide, https://www.eca.europa.eu/other%20publications/twinning/twinning_en.pdf.
[44] European Parliament (2015), “Directive 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing”, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32015L0849 (accessed on 11 October 2023).
[61] EUROSAI (2023), “Survey: How European SAIs use data science, Karadağ, Abdulkadir”, EUROSAI Innovations: Data science for investigations and audits 7, https://www.ccomptes.fr/system/files/2023-07/202307-Eurosai-Innovations-7-red.pdf.
[92] Fazekas, M., S. Sberna and A. Vannucci (2022), “The extra-legal governance of corruption: Tracing the organization of corruption in public procurement”, Governance, \_{e}{p}{r}int: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/gove.12648, pp. 1139–1161, https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12648 (accessed on 20 October 2023).
[89] García Rodríguez, M. et al. (2022), “Collusion detection in public procurement auctions with machine learning algorithms”, Automation in Construction, Vol. 133, p. 104047, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104047 (accessed on 20 October 2023).
[6] Government of Portugal (2022), Public Procurement Code, https://www.pgdlisboa.pt/leis/lei_mostra_articulado.php?nid=2063&tabela=leis&so_miolo= (accessed on 21 April 2023).
[51] Government of Portugal (2022), Public Procurement Code, https://diariodarepublica.pt/dr/legislacao-consolidada/decreto-lei/2008-34455475 (accessed on 21 April 2023).
[72] Grünbaum, J., I. Gullichsen and T. Väänänen (2019), “Northern Mythology and its Lessons to SAIs”, EUROSAI: Innovations 4, https://bit.ly/4778egj.
[71] Gullichson, I. (2019), National Audit Office of Finland: Risk Detector Tool, https://bit.ly/3ujv19P.
[90] Huber, M. and D. Imhof (2019), “Machine learning with screens for detecting bid-rigging cartels”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 65, pp. 277–301, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2019.04.002 (accessed on 20 October 2023).
[88] Hyari, K., Z. Tarawneh and H. Katkhuda (2016), “Detection Model for Unbalanced Pricing in Construction Projects: A Risk-Based Approach”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers, p. 04016078, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001203 (accessed on 20 October 2023).
[49] IGF (2021), Gestão dos Riscos na Contratação Pública.
[12] IGF (n.d.), “Institutional presentation”, https://www.igf.gov.pt/institucional1/apresentacao111.aspx.
[43] IMPIC (2022), Base portal, http://www.base.gov.pt/Base4/pt/o-portal/base/ (accessed on 9 October 2023).
[18] IMPIC (2021), Relatório anual de contratação pública em Portugal 2021, https://www.base.gov.pt/Base4/pt/noticias/2022/relatorio-anual-de-contratacao-publica-em-portugal-2021/ (accessed on 14 June 2023).
[11] IMPIC (n.d.), Institutional Information - IMPIC, https://www.impic.pt/impic/pt-pt/informacao-institucional/atribuicoes (accessed on 21 April 2023).
[78] INTOSAI (2022), GUID 5280: Guidance for audits of Public Procurement, https://www.issai.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Guid-5280-Guidance-for-audits-of-public-procurement.pdf.
[87] INTOSAI (2022), Guidance On Conducting Audit Activities With Data Analytics, International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions, Working Group on Big Data, https://www.audit.gov.cn/WGBD/n1525/c10296921/part/10299823.pdf.
[84] INTOSAI (2019), Data Analytics Guideline, International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions, Working Group on IT Audit, https://www.intosaicommunity.net/document/exposure_draft/Exposure_Draft_Data_Analytics_Guideline.pdf.
[83] INTOSAI (2019), GUID - 5290 - Guidance on Audit of the Development and Use of Key National Indicators, International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions, https://www.issai.org/pronouncements/guidance-on-audit-of-the-development-and-use-of-key-national-indicators/.
[79] INTOSAI (2019), GUID 5270: Guideline for the Audit of Corruption Prevention, https://www.issai.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/GUID-5270-Guideline-for-the-Audit-of-Corruption-Prevention.pdf.
[81] INTOSAI (2019), Guidance on Audit of Information Systems, International Organisation of Supreme Audit Institutions, https://www.issai.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Guid-5100-Guidance-on-Audit-of-Information-Systems.pdf.
[77] INTOSAI (2019), ISSAI 4000, Compliance Audit Standard, https://www.issai.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/ISSAI-4000-Compliance-Audit-Standard.pdf.
[80] INTOSAI (2019), “Moscow Declaration”, XXIII INCOSAI 2019, https://www.intosai.org/fileadmin/downloads/news/2019/10/EN_23_Moscow_Decl_300919.pdf.
[82] INTOSAI (2019), Professional Pronouncements, International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions, https://www.issai.org/professional-pronouncements/?n=5000-5999.
[60] INTOSAI (2015), Managing Information Communications Technology: A guide for supreme audit institutions, https://www.intosaicbc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/10675-001-Managing-information-communications_SDP.pdf.
[62] INTOSAI Development Initiative (2020), Strategic Management Handbook for Supreme Audit Institutions.
[76] INTOSAI Working Group on Big Data (2022), Development Overview of Big Data Audits Performed by Supreme Audit Institutions from 2016 to 2021, https://www.audit.gov.cn/WGBD/n1525/c10296921/part/10296937.pdf.
[75] J. (Jolien) Grandia, P. (2020), “Assessing the implementation of sustainable public procurement using quantitative text-analysis tools: A large-scale analysis of Belgian public procurement notices”, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Vol. 26/4, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2020.100627.
[65] Kotter, J. (2018), 8 Steps to Accelerate Change in Your Organisation, https://www.kotterinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/8-Steps-eBook-Kotter-2018.pdf.
[97] Lyra, M. et al. (2022), “Fraud, corruption, and collusion in public procurement activities, a systematic literature review on data-driven methods”, Applied Network Science, Number: 1 Publisher: SpringerOpen, pp. 1–30, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-022-00523-6 (accessed on 20 October 2023).
[68] Mayrbaeur, A. (2023), Innovations: Data science for investigations and audits, EUROSAI, https://www.ccomptes.fr/system/files/2023-07/202307-Eurosai-Innovations-7-red.pdf.
[86] Mehrishi, R. (2022), General capacity building requirements for conducting IT Audits in a Supreme Audit Institution, International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions, https://www.intosaicommunity.net/document/knowledgecenter/WGITA_General_capacity_building_requirements_for_conducting_IT_Audits_in_a_SAI_QC1v.pdf.
[35] MENAC (2023), “Mission of MENAC”, https://mec-anticorrupcao.pt/sobre-o-menac/ (accessed on 4 October 2023).
[1] OECD (2023), Government at a Glance 2023, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/3d5c5d31-en.
[2] OECD (2023), “Managing risks in the public procurement of goods, services and infrastructure”, OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, No. 33, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/45667d2f-en.
[98] OECD (2023), “Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence”, OECD Legal Instruments, OECD/LEGAL/0449, OECD, Paris, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449.
[14] OECD (2022), “Annual Report on Competition Policy Developments in Portugal 2021”.
[73] OECD (2022), Modernising Integrity Risk Assessments in Brazil: Towards a Behavioural-sensitive and Data-driven Approach, OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/ad3804f0-en.
[56] OECD (2022), Strengthening Analytics in Mexico’s Supreme Audit Institution: Considerations and Priorities for Assessing Integrity Risks, OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d4f685b7-en.
[40] OECD (2021), Countering Public Grant Fraud in Spain: Machine Learning for Assessing Risks and Targeting Control Activities, OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/0ea22484-en.
[38] OECD (2021), Government at a Glance 2021, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/1c258f55-en.
[22] OECD (2021), Preventive and Concomitant Control at Colombia’s Supreme Audit Institution: New Strategies for Modern Challenges, OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/a2bdadf3-en.
[50] OECD (2021), “Recommendation of the OECD Council on Enhancing Access to and Sharing of Data”, OECD Legal Instruments, OECD/LEGAL/0463, OECD, Paris, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0463.
[67] OECD (2020), “Building digital workforce capacity and skills for data-intensive science”, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 90, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/e08aa3bb-en.
[55] OECD (2020), Good Practice Principles for Data Ethics in the Public Sector, OECD, Paris, https://www.oecd.org/gov/digital-government/good-practice-principles-for-data-ethics-in-the-public-sector.pdf.
[7] OECD (2020), Integrating Responsible Business Conduct in Public Procurement, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/02682b01-en.
[99] OECD (2020), “The OECD Digital Government Policy Framework: Six dimensions of a Digital Government”, OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, No. 02, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/f64fed2a-en.
[54] OECD (2019), Going Digital: Shaping Policies, Improving Lives, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264312012-en.
[36] OECD (2019), Reforming Public Procurement: Progress in Implementing the 2015 OECD Recommendation, OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/1de41738-en.
[5] OECD (2018), Using Risk Assessment in Multi-year Performance Audit Planning, http://www.oecd.org/gov/ethics/using-risk-assessment.pdf (accessed on 18 October 2023).
[3] OECD (2015), “Recommendation of the Council on Public Procurement”, OECD Legal Instruments, OECD/LEGAL/0411, OECD, Paris, https://www.oecd.org/gov/ethics/OECD-Recommendation-on-Public-Procurement.pdf (accessed on 10 November 2017).
[100] OECD (2014), “Recommendation of the Council on Digital Government Strategies”, OECD Legal Instruments, OECD/LEGAL/0406, OECD, Paris, https://www.oecd.org/gov/digital-government/Recommendation-digital-government-strategies.pdf.
[47] OHCR (n.d.), Resolution 41/9 on the negative impact of corruption on the enjoyment of human rights-challenges faced and best practises applied-portugal, https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Corruption/Challenges/Portugal.pdf (accessed on 6 July 2023).
[45] Open contracting partnership (2023), Strengthening Beneficial Ownership Register (PT0015), https://www.opengovpartnership.org/members/portugal/commitments/PT0015/ (accessed on 11 October 2023).
[28] Open Government Partnership (2021), Transparency of Recovery and Resilience Plan - Portugal, https://www.opengovpartnership.org/members/portugal/commitments/PT0016/.
[53] Otia, J. (2022), “Digital transformation and the public sector auditing: the SAI’s perspective”, Financial Accountability and Management, Vol. 8/32, pp. 252-280, https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12317.
[91] Popa, M. (2019), “Uncovering the structure of public procurement transactions”, Business and Politics, Publisher: Cambridge University Press, pp. 351–384, https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2019.1 (accessed on 20 October 2023).
[94] Rabuzin, K. and N. Modrušan (2019), Prediction of Public Procurement Corruption Indices using Machine Learning Methods:, SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, https://doi.org/10.5220/0008353603330340 (accessed on 20 October 2023).
[9] Republica Portugesa (2020), “Portugal’s Action Plan for Digital Transition”, https://portugaldigital.gov.pt/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Portugal_Action_Plan_for_Digital_Transition.pdf.
[96] Torres-Berru, Y. and V. López Batista (2021), “Data Mining to Identify Anomalies in Public Procurement Rating Parameters”, Electronics, Number: 22 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, p. 2873, https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10222873 (accessed on 20 October 2023).
[31] Transparency International (2022), Our work in Portugal, https://www.transparency.org/en/countries/portugal.
[29] Transparency International Portugal (2019), IMPLEMENTATION COMMENTARY COMMITMENTS #7 and #8 I NATIONAL PLAN FOR OPEN ADMINISTRATION.
[21] Tribunal de Contas (2023), “Annual report 2022”.
[57] Tribunal de Contas (2023), Plano Estratégico para a Transformação, 2023-2025.
[20] Tribunal de Contas (2022), “LEI DE ORGANIZAÇÃO E PROCESSO REGULAMENTO Lisboa 2022”.
[58] Tribunal de Contas (2021), Contributos para um Modelo de Transformação Digital do Tribunal de Contas.
[59] Tribunal de Contas (2021), Regulamento de Organização e Funcionamento da Direção-Geral do Tribunal de Contas-Sede, aprovado pelo despacho do conselheiro presidente n.º 45/2021-GP de 9 de agosto de 2021, Regulamento n.º 739/2021, https://diariodarepublica.pt/dr/detalhe/regulamento/739-2021-169267908.
[41] Tribunal de Contas (2020), “Auditoria às Compras Públicas Ecológicas”, http://www.tcontas.pt/pt-pt/ProdutosTC/Relatorios/RelatoriosAuditoria/Documents/2020/rel07-2020-2s.pdf (accessed on 18 October 2023).
[4] Tribunal de Contas (2019), Strategic Plan of the TdC for 2020- 2022, https://www.tcontas.pt/pt-pt/Transparencia/PlaneamentoGestao/PlanosTrienais/Documents/plano_estrategico_vf_internet_hp_20191106.pdf (accessed on 21 April 2023).
[10] Tribunal de Contas (n.d.), General information, https://erario.tcontas.pt/en-us/content/court/court_of_auditors_today.pdf (accessed on 14 June 2023).
[63] U.S. Government Accountability Office (2021), An Accountability Framework for Federal Agencies and Other Entities, GAO-21-519SP, https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-21-519sp.pdf.