Srdan Tatomir
OECD
OECD Economic Surveys: Poland 2023
2. Digitalising the Polish Economy
Abstract
Increasing digitalisation can further boost Poland’s productivity but successful digitalisation requires governments to take a comprehensive policy approach. Adoption of digital technologies is relatively low among firms, particularly SMEs. Expanded consultancy and technical support would help, as would accelerating the deployment of 5G networks. Although ICT innovation has been growing, it is relatively low and should be supported further. Skills are essential to ensuring an inclusive digital transition. Digital skills are particularly low among older adults. There are shortages of ICT specialists. Managerial skills, key to implementing digitalisation in firms, could also be higher. Skills gaps should be addressed by encouraging more students, especially women, to study ICT. Schools need to be better equipped with technology and links between education institutions and industry should be stronger. Effective implementation of the new migration programmes could raise the supply of ICT specialists. Moreover, there is a need to expand training and to make further education more practical and flexible to encourage lifelong learning. The government has been rapidly digitalising, which can facilitate the digital transition in the wider economy. It should continue to do so, and to enhance cybersecurity.
Introduction
Digital technologies have the potential to improve productivity, leading to higher wages and living standards, better public services, and greater well-being (OECD, 2019d; Gal et al., 2019). Successful digitalisation requires a comprehensive approach across a range of structural policy areas because many factors are complementary to each other. A widespread and fast communications infrastructure underpins digitalisation, while advanced managerial and worker skills are essential to the successful adoption of digital technology. A supportive regulatory environment can incentivise digitalisation by increasing returns to investment in technologies and skills. Innovation and e-government can further support and facilitate this process.
Despite significant progress in recent years, Poland is less digitalised than other peer countries. Based on a composite measure of digital skills, digital technology adoption, communication networks, and digital government, Poland ranked 24th out of 27 EU countries in 2022, although it has been catching up over the past five years (Figure 2.1). Digital skills are below average and the level of firms’ integration of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) is behind most advanced economies. Overall, digital innovation is low, but the number of new firms has been growing and finance for digital investment has steadily become more available. Digitalisation within government has improved, but has not yet caught up with OECD best performers and remains below average. Thus, there is substantial scope to further digitalise the economy and increase productivity.
A range of policies can boost digitalisation and increase productivity. For Poland, upgrading managerial and technical (digital) skills could provide a significant boost to productivity. Investing in ICT adoption in firms, notably through higher use of high-speed broadband, would also help. Other factors could further contribute, such as lowering regulatory barriers and increasing competition and providing easier access to finance. Higher use of digital government services is likely to facilitate digitalisation. Estimates based on Sorbe et al. (2019) suggest that closing a quarter of the gap with the best performing countries in these policy areas could increase Poland’s productivity levels by up to 9% after three years (Figure 2.2). Policies specifically boosting digitalisation could raise the long-run level of GDP by around 6%. Complementarities between different factors could increase productivity further.
The digitalisation of the Polish economy should be driven by the private sector, but public policies can support and facilitate the digital transformation. The positive returns to digital investment should provide strong market incentives to firms and workers to digitalise, but it is not always easy in practice for firms to reap the benefits. The government can support this process by providing a regulatory framework that enables investment in communications infrastructure and digital technologies. It can facilitate ICT adoption by boosting the development of general digital and management skills. It can provide basic research and development as well as finance to support innovation. Finally, digitalisation in the private sector can be facilitated by digitalising the public sector.
Notwithstanding the substantial benefits it can bring, digitalisation can entail significant disruptions and costs. Technical changes within firms are likely to favour highly skilled workers whose skills can be complementary in implementing and working with digital technologies (OECD, 2019d). Less skilled workers, particularly those who do routine manual tasks that can easily be automated, are likely to be negatively affected by new technologies such as automation. This can lead to lower wages for less skilled workers and fewer jobs. Consequently, in the absence of policy intervention, income inequality and unemployment could rise, at least in the short term (OECD, 2019d). Regional inequalities could increase as digital activities may concentrate in some regions, although digital technologies can also help people work remotely. The digitalisation of firms and markets can increase competition within countries and between countries for firms and workers. However, the best firms are likely to thrive, while less competitive firms might lag far behind, and competition issues can arise in winner-takes-all markets (OECD, 2019d). To address the impact on workers, flexible learning systems are needed that upgrade and develop digital skills in order to minimise the effects on employment and wages. To ensure vibrant markets, this involves supporting innovation within new and existing firms to boost competitiveness, while ensuring enough flexibility for an efficient allocation of capital and labour resources.
This chapter looks at key digitalisation challenges and associated policies in Poland. It develops policy recommendations to leverage the productive potential of digital technologies and promote a sustainable and inclusive digital society. First, it discusses ICT adoption in firms, innovation and finance while also emphasising the role of infrastructure and the regulatory framework. Second, it covers digital skills and the role of education, both formal and adult learning, in the digital transition. Finally, it describes the importance of digital government in facilitating digitalisation. The chapter draws on the OECD’s Going Digital Policy framework (OECD, 2019d) and previous OECD work on productivity (Gal et al., 2019; Sorbe et al., 2019; Andrews et al., 2018), the OECD Skills Outlook (OECD, 2019c; 2021d) and the OECD Skills Strategy for Poland (OECD, 2019a).
Supporting the adoption of digital technologies in firms
Firms increasingly need to adopt new digital technologies
Aggregate GDP growth in the past was mostly driven by capital accumulation but the capital-driven growth model may be reaching its limits (World Bank, 2021). Given diminishing returns to capital and a decreasing labour force due to an ageing population, productivity growth will be increasingly important in driving long-term growth.
Around two thirds of the Polish economy is based on services while manufacturing accounts for almost a fifth of economic activity (Figure 2.3, Panel A). Most of the manufacturing total factor productivity (TFP) growth in 2009-19 was due to productivity improvements within firms. In services, TFP growth was due to a combination of individual firms becoming more productive, more productive firms entering the market and less productive firms exiting and, to a lesser extent, more productive firms gaining market share (World Bank, 2022). This suggests that policies that boost productivity within firms are the most relevant but ensuring good conditions for new firms and competitive markets is important as well.
Digitalisation has become increasingly important in the economy and for Polish firms. The ICT industry accounts for 3.5% of total employment, below the EU average, but this has been growing (Panel B). Digitally intensive sectors of the economy accounted for half of all jobs and 60% of GDP growth in 2018 (OECD, 2023). Trade has boosted technological adoption. Foreign-owned firms, important drivers of Polish exports in industries such as automotive, transport equipment but also computer programming services and pharmaceuticals, tend to be large and more technologically advanced (World Bank, 2022; OECD, 2020b). Domestic small and medium-size enterprises (SMEs) act as suppliers to foreign affiliates and, as a result, they tend to be more digitally developed (Cadestin et al., 2019). Polish SMEs could benefit from more digitalisation. They account for two thirds of all employment (Panel C) and half of all output. However, they are less productive than in neighbouring European countries and than the OECD average. This is mostly because Poland has a higher share of micro firms, those that hire 9 employees or less (OECD, 2020b).
The diffusion of new technologies depends on both firms’ capabilities and incentives. Organisational capital such as management skills is key to recognising the benefit of new technologies and implementing them in firms. Management quality in Poland is average and it is lower in domestic firms than in foreign-owned firms (see Section Supporting the adoption of digital technologies in firms). Available and effectively employed digitally skilled workers are necessary to operate new technologies successfully (Andrews et al., 2018). Digital skills among older adults still lag well behind other countries and could improve (see Section Supporting the adoption of digital technologies in firms). But dynamic labour and product markets also matter. Greater competition incentivises firms to invest more, subject to good communications infrastructure and freely available capital to finance new ICT investment. Poland could further liberalise some professions (see Section Regulatory barriers to competition can be lowered further). Its communications infrastructure is well developed although it could upgrade to 5G to prepare for the adoption of the latest digital technologies. Direct participation in international trade or integration in global supply chains can lead to higher digital technology adoption.
ICT intensity and adoption is relatively low in Poland, although it is increasing. Total investment in ICT is well below the OECD average (Figure 2.4). Almost all Polish businesses have a broadband connection and the speeds of those connections have improved over time. Around 70% of those businesses have a website and half of their employees have used a computer with internet access. However, only a minority of firms buy and sell online and work with e-invoices. Digital adoption for Polish SMEs appears to be lower than the EU average. Micro enterprises tend to be the least digitally advanced as their skills largely depend on the digital skills of the owner (Lewiatan, 2016). Many smaller Polish firms are online, use computers and operate websites, but they are much less likely to employ advanced technologies or hire dedicated ICT staff than larger firms. Online platforms can help firms find customers in a variety of sectors such as personal transport, accommodation, food services, retail trade, finance, entertainment, and personal services. They can help SMEs export by reducing the sizable entry costs of exporting related to finding foreign buyers and establishing distribution channels (Melitz, 2003). OECD evidence suggests that a strong platform presence can boost productivity, especially in service sectors and for small and medium enterprises (Pisu and von Rüden, 2021; Bailin Rivares et al., 2019).
Adoption of more advanced digital technologies is slightly below the OECD average. Around 30% of firms use Enterprise Resource Planning software, Customer Relations Planning software and cloud computing. The use of big data and artificial intelligence is also somewhat below most other OECD countries (Figure 2.5). Most of the variation in technology adoption occurs within rather than between firms. Most firms tend to use a combination of technologies for different business functions but to varying degrees of intensity (World Bank, 2022). This suggests that digital technology gaps are specific to each firm rather than common within sectors or across the economy.
The level of digitalisation varies by sector. Retail trade, media and professional and business services are some of the most digitally advanced sectors while transportation exhibits lower levels of ICT adoption (CASE, 2020). Even within sectors there can be significant variation. For example, within manufacturing more advanced sub-sectors have digitalised to levels similar to Western European countries while manufacturers of basic goods are much less digitalised and instead prefer to rely on lower cost labour. The appropriate digital technology might also vary by sector. E-commerce may be relevant for firms selling directly to many consumers. For some manufacturing companies, focusing on a small set of customers and selling larger volumes, robotisation and specialised production technology might be more appropriate (CASE, 2020).
The level of robotisation tends to be relatively low. Within the European Union, Poland had 42 robots per 10,000 industry workers, lower than the level of around 130 robots in Czech Republic and Slovakia and below the best performers such as Sweden with 262 robots per 10,000 industry workers (Leśniewicz and Święcicki, 2021). While industrial composition and lower relative wages can partly explain the lower density of robotisation, there is scope for a higher adoption of industrial robots in production.
The use of teleworking has accelerated with the pandemic. This can partly boost productivity as it allows for more efficient and intensive work, although teleworking can have drawbacks as well (Criscuolo et al., 2021). In 2019, around 4.6% of employed people aged 15-64 in Poland reported usually working from home, but this rose to around 8.9% in 2020 (Eurostat, 2022a). Teleworking increased strongly in ICT and knowledge-intensive sectors, but the overall rise was smaller than in most European countries as these sectors account for a comparatively smaller share of total employment (Milasi, Gonzalez-Vazquez and Fernandez-Macias, 2021). Teleworking is likely to persist as the share of advertised vacancies including teleworking has remained higher even as pandemic restrictions have eased (Adrjan et al., 2021). Three quarters of workers who had worked remotely would like to combine remote work with office work (Radziukiewicz, 2021). Teleworking should be encouraged where feasible as it can catalyse digitalisation within firms, particularly SMEs, and it can also widen the pool of workers available to firms, potentially easing local skill shortages.
There are multiple drivers of comparatively lower ICT adoption in Poland. One of the key reasons is firms overestimating their own technological sophistication. According to the Technology Adoption Survey, most Polish firms think they are more advanced than their competitors and the difference between perceptions and actual levels of technological adoption is most pronounced for the least technologically advanced firms (World Bank, 2022). Polish firms tend to overestimate the costs of new technologies and to undervalue the benefits. This is consistent with other studies which suggest that many firms perceive no need for ICT investment. When they do invest in ICT, the main obstacles include insufficient funds and a lack of time (Orłowska and Żołądkiewicz, 2018; Lewandowski and Tomczak, 2017). A study focused on the manufacturing sector suggests insufficient capital expenditure, weak administrative capacity and a lack of skills as driving lower adoption of more advanced technologies. For some firms a perceived lack of government support is also an obstacle (Jankowska et al., 2022).
The government has mostly focused on demand-side policies and introduced various programmes to support digitalisation. In 2019, the “Future Industry Platform” foundation was set up by the Ministry of Economic Development and Technology (MRiT). It is run with the goal of accelerating the digital transformation of industry through promotion of and technical support for new technology adoption. Five digital innovation hubs have been set up to support firms under a pilot programme in 2019-21 in Gdańsk, Kraków, Poznań, Warsaw and Wrocław and some will continue as European digital innovation hubs in 2023. In 2022, the authorities introduced tax relief allowing firms to additionally deduct up to 50% of their robotisation costs. Currently, the Polish Agency for Enterprise Development (PARP) is running several pilot programmes to support digitalisation. One of them offers grants up to EUR 180,000 to help SMEs in the furniture industry to invest in robots. PARP also runs programmes such as “Vouchers for digitalisation”, covering 700 firms, and “Digital Manager”, covering around 850 firms, that provide financial support, training and advisory support to companies investing in digital technology.
To facilitate digital investment in firms further, the authorities should consider expanding targeted technical and advisory support. While many ICT investments can be profitable, SMEs often lack the knowledge and skills to choose the appropriate ICT tools, which results in low demand for ICT investment (World Bank, 2022). There is a need for proactive consultancy and advisory services to stimulate demand. Unfortunately, only a few consultancies focus on smaller firms and, to the extent these exist, SMEs might be financially unable to finance such services. In the manufacturing sector, the Future Industry Platform programme tries to raise awareness by promoting Industry 4.0 technologies, while also offering advisory and technical support for implementing new technology. PARP is another agency that offers advice and support to both new and existing firms, and its programmes often support product or process innovation. One option would be for agencies such as PARP, to expand and broaden stand-alone consulting services to advise SMEs on how to digitalise and provide financial and technical support to those firms that invest in ICT. Another complementary option could be for the Future Industry Platform to widen its reach across sectors and promoted technologies. Given the heterogeneity across and within sectors, such support should be tailored and customised to firms’ specific circumstances. In this respect, widespread use of assessments that determine firms’ ICT needs would be useful. Box 2.1 sets outs different approaches OECD countries have taken to help SMEs digitalise.
Box 2.1. OECD countries use a wide range of policies to help SMEs digitalise
OECD countries offer a wide range of policies to help SMEs digitalise, ranging from grants that subsidise investments in digital technologies to training to help firms implement investments at their own cost.
Australia’s Small Business Digital Champions project supports 100 small businesses. The project has a total budget of AUD 8.9 million and provides up to AUD 18 500 in assistance, with additional support from partner firms. Of these small businesses, 15 were chosen as Digital Champions and received mentoring from high-profile business people to guide them through the digital transformation. This process is then documented and showcased online. The programme is complemented by the “Digital Solutions” programme of the Small Business Advisory Service. SMEs pay a (subsidised) fee for advice on implementing digital technologies, such as websites, e-commerce, social media, and small business software. The programme also offers advice on online security and data privacy.
In Denmark, the Danish Business Authority distributes grants (valued at approximately EUR 1300) to 2000 SMEs under the SMV:Digital programme. The grants are used for private consultancy to help the SMEs identify digital opportunities with a special focus on e-commerce, prepare business cases for digital transformation and implement digital solutions.
Portugal also has a grant scheme to assist SMEs with the use of digital technologies in fields such as e-commerce, online marketing, website development and big data. The grant covers 75% of eligible expenses up to EUR 7 500 for projects that take up to one year to implement.
Austria helps SMEs digitalise through the KMU Digital programme. The programme includes: 1) an online tool to allow firms to assess their level of digital maturity; 2) an individual consultation to examine what can be improved and how; 3) a consultation focused on the specific needs of the firm (in areas such as e-commerce, IT security, data protection and digitalisation of internal processes); and 4) digital skills training courses for entrepreneurs and employees.
Chile’s innovation agency recently launched the Digitalise Your SME (“Digitaliza tu Pyme”) programme to provide e-commerce courses (78 hours of classroom experience), in which small business owners can learn about digital marketing, the use of social networks and electronic commerce. By the end of the programme, participants should understand processes associated with e-commerce such as the use of online platforms.
Source: OECD, Digital Economy Policy Platform (DEPP), edition 12/12/2021, https://depp.oecd.org/
Innovation is essential for a digitalised economy
Poland should boost its ICT innovation capabilities. Although R&D investment has increased steadily since 2015 and has been catching up to neighbouring European countries, it was around 1.4% of GDP in 2020, which remains lower than in the Czech Republic and well below the OECD average (OECD, 2022d). R&D by ICT firms is also relatively low. Poland’s innovation system’s performance is the fourth lowest in the EU, similar to Slovakia’s performance but below the Czech Republic and Estonia (EC, 2022d). While computer science research is relatively prominent, it is less successful in terms of practical innovation. The rate of high-tech patents is similar to other Central and Eastern European countries, but significantly below the EU average (Figure 2.6 – Panel A). ICT patents make up around 10% of overall patents, far below the EU and OECD averages. Collaboration between universities and industry is on par with other countries in the region although a little below the Czech Republic and significantly below top performing countries like South Korea and Germany (Figure 2.6 – Panel B).
Successive reforms by the authorities have removed barriers and markedly increased incentives for R&D investment since 2016 when an enhanced, volume-based R&D tax allowance was introduced (OECD, 2021d). In 2022, a tax package called “Polish Deal”, including a broad range of tax incentives to boost innovation and attract foreign investment, came into effect. More specifically, there are incentives for organisations conducting R&D that lower the cost of collaboration between firms and research institutions, incentives for investing in automation and robotisation, enhancing/developing new products and patents, and expanding businesses. For example, the new law entitles firms to deduct 200% of employees’ costs in R&D from their tax base, up from 100% (EY, 2021). This should boost innovation, but the impact will need to be evaluated over time. The EU Smart Growth programme has helped fund innovation in Poland but the government could also consider boosting direct funding for R&D, focusing the additional funds specifically on ICT (Figure 2.7). In addition, Poland’s “State purchasing policy 2022-25” aims to allocate 20% to innovative solutions (EC, 2022a).
Improving national research capacity and strengthening links between research and the private sector will help drive innovation including in ICT. Poland used to account for only 0.4% of global research and 64% of active researchers have only published with a domestic affiliation (Kamalski and Plume, 2013). In 2022, 10 Polish universities ranked in the Shanghai Top 500, up from two in 2016. However, Poland should continue to improve its academic research output through internationalisation because this tends to be positively correlated with higher scientific quality. It is important to enhance the internationalisation of existing staff further, continue to expand faculty and student exchanges, and bring top foreign academics and researchers to Poland to pursue cross-border collaborative research (EC, 2017). Furthermore, Poland should incentivise universities and research institutes to pursue more collaboration with industry when undertaking R&D and strengthen the role of technology transfer and commercialisation efforts (EC, 2017). Tax relief for cooperation between entrepreneurs and research institutions has been introduced and this should help.
Financing digital investment
Expanding access to finance for new and innovative firms is important for digital innovation, both in the digital sectors and more widely. The system supporting start-ups has been rapidly developing recently. Poland has a higher share of ICT start-ups than the OECD average. Venture capital (VC) funding was relatively low in 2020 (Figure 2.8). However, it has been growing fast and expanded from PLN 2.2bn in 2020 to PLN 3.7bn in 2021, partly supported by the EU-funded “Start in Poland” programme. In 2021, there were 113 active VC funds and a third of the transactions by value came from public-private funds, focusing mostly on smaller transactions (PFR, 2021). Within the Polish Development Fund (PFR), PFR Ventures helps support start-ups through investment across a range of venture capital and private equity funds. Earlier stages of start-up development have been supported by a government agency, PARP, through incubation and accelerator programmes across the country. However, as the system has been maturing it will be important to make finance available for new companies at later stages. In this respect, PFR Ventures should continue its financial support of the Polish start-ups and expand into later stage financing up until the new firms’ initial public offerings.
One constraint facing small and young digital firms is access to bank funding. Intangible assets, such as intellectual property (IP) and software are not easily used as a collateral to access debt finance because they often do not have a market value, are not easily separable from the firm and often cannot be transferred without a loss. In order to support the digital take-up and ease credit for SMEs, several OECD countries have established new programmes to support IP-backed loan and IP valuations (Box 2.2). The government could consider creating a collateral registry to improve SME access to loans (OECD, 2021g). Estimating the creditworthiness of small firms is particularly difficult and costly, and the related uncertainty drives up interest rates and tightens lending conditions.
To complement private sector finance, Poland is also using public funds. In particular, it plans to rely on substantial financial support from EU funds to finance digitalisation. At least a third of its national Recovery and Resilience Plan (RRP), EUR 11.1bn or 1.9% of 2021 GDP, will go to digital projects (Figure 2.9). The funds will be allocated across a range of projects that aim to improve digital administration and e-services, encompassing infrastructure, public sector worker skills, administrative process efficiency and analytical capacity for decision-making. However, the plan focuses mostly on digital connectivity and the public sector and not enough on supporting digitalisation in the private sector. In addition, RRP funds have been delayed and there is significant uncertainty around their disbursement.
Box 2.2. Intellectual property (IP)-backed loans and IP valuation schemes for SMEs across the OECD
Several OECD countries have implemented programmes supporting intangible-intensive SMEs to get access to bank loans. Selected examples include:
The French public investment bank Bpifrance provides uncollateralised loans and bank loan guarantees to SMEs to support their digitalisation. Support is available for investment in intangibles, including intellectual property and software.
The Bavaria Digital (Germany) initiative provides digital SMEs with loans on favourable terms for a total amount of up to EUR 1 million. In order to reach more SMEs, the application process was streamlined to reduce the administrative burden and part of the application cost is covered by a grant from the State of Bavaria.
The Japan Patent Office and the country’s Financial Service Agency assess the value of intellectual property of SMEs. They finance and conduct IP evaluation reports of SMEs, which inform the lending decisions of banks.
The Korean Development Bank’s Techno Banking initiative provides loans to SMEs for purchasing, commercialising, and collateralising intellectual property. The Bank also established a collection fund for distressed intellectual property for the disposal of intangible assets. In addition, the public Korea Credit Guarantee Fund provides credit guarantee schemes, some of them supporting intangibles as collateral. As in Japan, the Korean Intellectual Property Office estimates the value of SMEs’ IP to facilitate loans by the Korea Development Bank and the Korea Credit Guarantee Fund.
Source: OECD (2019), Financing SMEs and Entrepreneurs 2019: An OECD Scoreboard.
Speeding up and upgrading the communications infrastructure
Reliable connectivity is essential for the digital transformation. The COVID-19 pandemic fueled demand for broadband communication services. Some operators have experienced as much as a 60% Internet traffic growth compared to before the crisis. Gigabit networks and 5G are likely to become the underlying connectivity behind the Internet of Things and artificial intelligence and for connected devices in critical contexts, including in health, energy or in transport sectors (OECD, 2020a). This underscores the need for ultra-reliable, low-latency networks (OECD, 2018). In the future, communication networks will also need to become more flexible and, in this sense, 5G may allow the same network to cater to objects with diverse quality features (OECD, 2019f).
Overall, the communications infrastructure in Poland is relatively good. The share of households and businesses with access to the internet has increased in 2021 and the rural-urban divide is small. Access to higher internet speeds has risen, but could improve further. Fixed broadband speeds and latencies are higher than the OECD average while mobile broadband speeds are below average. Prices for fixed and mobile broadband are among the lowest in the EU. However, internet usage is not as intense as in other countries. Broadband penetration as measured in terms of subscriptions is below the OECD average and the share of firms with fast broadband could be higher (Figure 2.10).
Work is ongoing to improve the infrastructure further. The authorities plan to draw on the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) to finance their future connectivity ambitions. The government estimates that both the RRF and the 2021-2027 ERDF will contribute around EUR 2 billion to the broadband inclusion of at least 1.5 million households in areas with no internet infrastructure, increasing the share of households with access to the internet to over 80% and boosting participation in the digital economy. The main goal of the Polish Digital Transformation Strategy for 2025 outlined in the National Broadband plan is to ensure universal internet access with downstream connection speed of at least 100 Mbps with the option to upgrade to gigabit speeds, providing at least 1Gbps for educational establishments, transport hubs and data-intensive companies, and 5G connectivity on all major communication routes and in major urban centres (EC, 2022b).
Deployment of 5G is planned for 2023. Some operators have rolled out 5G using existing infrastructure and without a dedicated 5G spectrum. This has resulted in some of the lowest 5G speeds in Central and Eastern Europe. In May 2020, the Polish government cancelled the auction of the 3.6 GHz band due to security concerns about adequate cybersecurity levels for the new network. The authorities decided to revise the legislation on the national cybersecurity system to address emerging new threats, including those coming from Poland’s eastern borders, and make its networks safer and more robust to cyber risk. The technical preparations for 5G auctions in 700MHz and 3.6GHz have been completed and the auctions can proceed once amendments to cybersecurity laws have been finalised. The government should accelerate the legislative process and conduct the 5G auctions in order to speed up the development of a dedicated 5G network.
Ensuring a good regulatory framework
A favourable business environment provides the foundations for digital diffusion and productivity growth (Sorbe et al., 2019; OECD, 2018). In general, Poland has a good business environment with business-friendly regulations and low barriers to trade. However, despite significant reforms over the past two decades, some of its administrative, tax and legal procedures can still present barriers as they take longer than in other OECD countries (OECD, 2022f).
Poland should continue to streamline market regulations to support the digital transition and boost productivity (Figure 2.11). Overall, regulatory barriers to competition are slightly above the OECD average. Government ownership is still relatively high and government involvement is above average. The administrative burden on start-ups is higher than in many OECD countries, making it more difficult to start digital businesses. However, the government has recently been easing the burden through reforms, such as simplifying reporting and tax obligations for smaller businesses.
In terms of restrictions on trade in services, Poland is slightly more restrictive than the OECD average and could benefit from more open markets in trade for services. For example, it could relax labour market tests and quotas that apply to natural persons seeking to provide services in the country on a temporary basis as intra-corporate transferees, contractual services suppliers, and independent services suppliers. These may be particularly important for attracting workers and know-how in the digital sector. Digital services barriers are also higher than the OECD average (Figure 2.12). Regulation that limits access to high quality communication services and measures that hinder the seamless transfer of data across borders should also be reviewed.
Online markets are becoming increasingly important in Poland. The use of online shopping is comparable to the OECD average and has grown strongly during the pandemic. There is a large domestic e-commerce platform, Allegro, competing with global e-commerce platforms such as Amazon. Trust in online payments is high and above the OECD average (OECD, 2022a).
Effective and independent regulation of digital markets is important to support their development. A salient feature of online markets are network effects, which imply that new users will be drawn to platforms that are already large thus leading to further increases in their size. This can be beneficial as it can increase efficiency of market matching and boost growth. But it can also be detrimental to markets as winner-take-all dynamics emerge and lead to a dominance of a few firms, weakening competition and resulting in rent extraction (OECD, 2019d). Competition authorities need to guard against such dynamics while, at the same time, supporting their development by ensuring fair and strong competition.
The Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (UOKiK) has actively pursued consumer infringement cases in online markets. It has also organised educational campaigns for schools such as ‘Konsument.edu.pl’ about safe online shopping behaviour. Such campaigns should be extended to a wider audience. Furthermore, UOKiK has developed recommendations around correcting tagging in influencer marketing. Effective monitoring of online markets requires understanding of new technologies such as algorithms and to this end ensuring sufficient qualified staff will be key. For example, in Japan, the Act on Improving Transparency and Fairness of Digital Platforms promotes transparency to ensure fair online participation in e-commerce (OECD, 2022e). In the field of digital financial services, the Polish Financial Supervision Authority (UKNF) offers regulatory and virtual sandboxes aimed at supporting new financial technology firms. These initiatives can be valuable and should be continued.
Active and timely anti-competition policy is key to ensuring well-functioning online markets. UOKiK works with the European Union to inform its approach and develop its capabilities. It has implemented the ECN+ Directive that will strengthen UOKiK’s independence and grant it more powers. The EU Digital Services Act, entering into force in 2024, will better regulate online platforms and digital services in the Single Market. While the authorities have been active in implementing evidence-based anti-trust regulations, it will be particularly important to guard against ‘killer’ acquisitions, in which larger companies acquire smaller ones for the purpose of reducing competition. For example, German regulatory authorities may require every company in an industry to notify an acquisition (OECD, 2022e). To help develop expertise in digital markets, the authorities could consider establishing a digital markets unit as has been done in the United Kingdom (OECD, 2022e).
Upgrading skills for a digital transition
Digital skills are key for a successful transition
Digital skills encompass a range of abilities to use digital devices, applications, and networks to access and manage information as well as to create new services. Basic digital skills allow for simple access and use of digital devices and online applications for personal and work purposes. They are viewed as a critical component of a new set of literacy skills along with traditional literacy abilities. Advanced digital skills enable the use of complex technologies such as artificial intelligence, machine learning and big data analytics to complement work and develop new applications. Effective digital skills are underpinned by strong literacy and numeracy skills, critical and innovative thinking, complex problem solving, collaborative and socio-emotional skills (OECD, 2016d).
Poland has made great progress in increasing formal educational attainment over time. The share of 25-64 year olds with tertiary education has risen to around 30% in 2021, having been 9% in 2000 and one of the lowest in the EU. During the same period the share of adults with education below upper secondary levels has halved to 13% (Eurostat, 2022b). This has been driven by strong growth in educational attainment among young adults. Since 2000, the share of adults aged 30-34 with tertiary education has more than tripled to around 45% and Poland now has some of the lowest shares of low-educated young adults in the EU (Eurostat, 2022b). Over the past two decades, PISA scores have increased significantly and Poland ranked among the top 10 countries in 2018 (OECD, 2019g).
Yet, a number of adults, particularly among older people, still have low general skills that are likely to limit their ability to learn new digital skills. This can be explained by education and age. Similar to other OECD countries, educational attainment seems to have the largest effect on literacy skills. In Poland, adults with a tertiary education have literacy proficiency scores about 55 points higher than those who have not attained an upper secondary qualification, after adjusting for other differences such as age and parents’ educational attainment (OECD, 2019a). Older adults are more likely to be less skilled than younger adults. For example, the share of adults aged 25-34 with tertiary education was 41% in 2021, near the EU average, but this was around 17% for adults aged 55-64.
Competency in digital skills reflects the general skills composition of the adult population. Basic digital skills among Poland’s adult population are below the EU average and decline with age. The share of young adults with basic or above basic overall digital skills was between 60-70% in 2021 but this declines to 40% for those aged 45-54 and falls further to 10% for 65-74 year-olds. Digital skills tend to increase with educational attainment. Differences by gender are relatively small in aggregate (Figure 2.13).
The use of digital skills in Poland tends towards basic and less intensive applications. Around three-quarters of adults use a computer over the year, similar to the EU average. But the proportion of those using the internet on a daily basis is around 60%, some 10 percentage points below the EU average (Eurostat, 2021a). Furthermore, the use of ICT is skewed towards more basic applications (Figure 2.14). For personal purposes, the most common uses are looking for information and using social media. At the same time, the use of some more complex services, such as online public services or e-banking, is much lower. For work purposes, the use of ICT is even lower. Around 40% use word processing software, 27% use software for creating presentations, while 13% use more advanced spreadsheet functions, all lower than the EU average. OIder and less educated adults are less likely to use advanced and intense ICT applications. However, data from the PIAAC survey suggests that problem-solving abilities in technology rich environments have been relatively low and below the OECD average for all age groups (Figure 2.15).
In order to use and benefit from new digital tools, people need to learn new skills. Around half of existing jobs are at risk of automation (Figure 2.16). Adults will need to upgrade their skills to adapt and benefit from evolving needs in the labour market, while some will need to re-skill. Without the requisite skills, digitalisation can reduce wages for some or lead to higher unemployment, potentially excluding and harming parts of society and exacerbating existing inequalities. The Integrated Skills Strategy 2030, adopted in 2019 and partly based on the OECD Skills Strategy for Poland (2019a), provides a national framework that guides skills development. The upcoming “Digital Competence Development Programme until 2030” will aim to increase the level of digital skills for work and personal applications.
Expanding digital skills in vocational education and training
Nearly half of young Poles possess vocational and education training (VET) qualifications, higher than the EU average with almost a half studying towards engineering, manufacturing, and construction qualifications. The level of digital skills among the young (16-24 years old) with upper secondary education is lower than in the best performing European countries such as Greece and Slovakia (Figure 2.17). To boost the level of digital skills among VET graduates, policies should focus on ICT teaching capacity and equipment. Teachers’ digital competencies are instrumental for their students’ capacity to make the most out of new technologies. There is a significant positive relationship between teachers’ problem-solving skills in technology-rich environments and students’ performance in computer problem solving and computer mathematics (OECD, 2019a). The pandemic has also highlighted the need for adequate ICT equipment in schools in order to teach digital skills and teach in a digital environment.
The role of local employers in the development of digital education could be further strengthened. Poland established sectoral skills councils that bring together educational sector representatives, employers, and other social partners. Their aim is to monitor, identify and define skills required in different sectors in order to help shape formal education curricula and market development services. This should make it easier for firms to hire skilled workers. For example, core curricula for ICT VET were developed in close cooperation with the ICT sector. Since 2019 a new qualification, “technical programmer”, is offered and schools teaching this programme receive additional funding. Overall, almost 20% of students (134,000) in technical upper secondary schools are studying towards ICT-specific qualifications. In addition, the skills councils advise authorities on skill gaps in the private sector, which then informs the design of training and advisory services programmes operated by PARP. The number of sectoral councils is to expand from 17 to 27 and they are financed by EU funds until 2027. Given their importance, funding should be ensured on a continuous basis. In addition, given they are relatively new, they should be evaluated with experiences and the different councils should share experience and best practices.
To boost digital skills the role of work-based learning in VET programmes could be expanded. Polish schools are legally obliged to cooperate with employers including on work-based learning. In principle, VET students training in the industry should have access to the latest technologies, which could help them develop more advanced and applied digital skills, complementing what they have learned in school. In Poland, most of the VET programmes are school-based although the latest statistics underestimate the importance of work-based learning, due to methodological issues (Figure 2.18). In countries with strong apprenticeship systems, such as Germany and Switzerland, around 90% of programmes combine school and work. Polish VET students that attend a mixed programme spend nearly half their time in industry. VET programmes could include more work placements in digitally advanced firms and the legal requirements for schools to cooperate with employers should encourage more work-based learnings. Monitored use of such work placements could boost students’ digital skills.
Poland has made progress in providing ICT education in VET and the wider school system. ICT equipment, online educational resources and teachers’ digital skills have been improved through the Active blackboard (“Aktywna tablica”) and Laboratories of the Future (“Laboratoria przyszłości”) projects, the Integrated Education Platform, and the Nationwide Education Network. This has been funded by EU and national budgets. The share of teachers taking digital education training doubled between March and September 2020, reaching 81% (NIK, 2021). However, some schools were still inadequately equipped. The Supreme Audit Office (NIK) found that in 2020/21, 25% of schools had average or poor ICT equipment. Half of teachers indicated that they used private equipment and internet access to teach remotely (Figure 2.19). When asked about improving digital education, two-thirds of teachers suggested that having a laptop with an internet connection would be useful. They also reported that better quality (31%) and greater availability (25%) of training on digital education and its integration in initial teacher education would help (EC, 2021b). Currently, two large projects, covering 105,000 teachers, are supporting the development of teachers’ digital skills and training in providing distance education. Poland should continue to increase its technical and teaching educational capacity in schools for ICT. VET teachers could also be given specific support to teach practical ICT skills. A good example is Denmark, where dedicated support centres have been established for VET teachers (see Box 2.3).
Skilled teachers are crucial for delivering high-quality education in this context. Poland has experienced teacher shortages while the appeal of the teaching profession remains low. In 2020/21, 46% of surveyed schools had problems with recruiting qualified teachers, mostly for physics, mathematics, chemistry, English and computer science. While vacancies accounted for 1% of all teaching jobs, the staffing needs were greater in larger cities. Shortages were addressed mostly through overtime work, employing retired teachers and people without the necessary qualifications (EC, 2021b). Polish teachers’ enthusiasm in teaching is among the lowest in the European Union (OECD, 2019a). The range of teachers’ salaries, adjusted for purchasing power, is similar in Hungary and Czech Republic but is below most EU countries (Eurydice, 2022). However, the authorities provide incentive payments and allowances for performance and starting salaries were increased by around 25% in 2022. To ensure high quality teaching capacity, the authorities should continue to ensure the attractiveness of the teaching profession.
Box 2.3. Specialised centres to promote technology use in VET in Denmark
The “Knowledge Centre for IT in Teaching” promotes the use of digital technologies in VET by supporting teachers in the use of IT across all subjects. The Danish government created two Knowledge Centres for Automation and Robot Technology, promoting innovation in education and industry and helping VET schools make use of advanced technologies. Each centre works with over a dozen nearby VET schools. They provide teachers with educational material, such as teaching tutorials or short courses in Industry 4.0 and robots. Specialised facilities are used to demonstrate the use of robots to teachers and students. The centres lend digital machinery to VET teachers, provide them with training materials and technical support, with the objective of enabling teachers to set up and operate these technologies and incorporate them into their teaching practice. The centres also provide technological resources for VET programmes in the areas of industrial automation, mechanics, electronics, welding, data and communication, and education. The centre also has a network of pedagogical staff and a network of school leaders to facilitate the exchange of ideas, practical and technical knowledge, and help identify solutions to common challenges.
Source: (OECD, 2021d).
Universities could provide more ICT specialists
The main constraint for the Polish economy appears to be the inadequate supply of ICT graduates. In 2019, only 3% of Polish university graduates (around 4,500) specialised in ICT. But the demand for jobs in the ICT sector was much stronger. In 2019, there were 7,500 ICT vacancies, accounting for around 2.2% of all employment in the ICT sector. By 2021, the number of vacancies had risen to 12,000 or 3.5% of all ICT jobs. This was the highest vacancy rate across all sectors (Figure 2.20). Demand for ICT specialists has risen due to a rapidly growing ICT sector, in which employment rose by 60% between 2012 and 2021. Salaries for ICT workers are 60-70% higher than the national average salary (Statistics Poland, 2021). The shortages will partly be addressed by new VET ICT programmes but universities could also raise the number of ICT graduates.
Universities can also boost digital skills through more flexible programmes. Dual degrees that combine ICT with other disciplines might increase the number of graduates with relevant ICT qualifications. Students in science, engineering and mathematics are well placed to also learn ICT skills. The Higher Education and Science Act allows higher education institutions to cooperate with professional industry bodies and employers in the development of new qualifications. This gives universities flexibility to adjust degrees in other areas such as business, which could offer ICT specialisations or recognised certificates. In general, universities could offer more certified programmes in ICT, which could be integrated into official programmes or offered as micro-credentials to adults who have already graduated (OECD, 2021a).
To increase the number of ICT graduates and to increase gender equality, Poland should encourage more women to study ICT. Within the EU, ICT employment remains dominated by men. The share of female ICT specialists in Poland is around 15%, similar to the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Hungary. However, it is below the EU average of 19% and almost twice as low as in Romania and Bulgaria (Figure 2.21). The Perspektywy Education Foundation has organised a national campaign called “Girls and Engineers!” and “Girls go Science” in cooperation with the Conference of Rectors of Polish Technical Universities. The campaigns involved 150,000 girls and promoted technical and engineering studies among high school girls. This boosted the share of women in STEM programmes from 29% to 37% (EIGE, 2022a). The Foundation also runs activities such as “Lean in STEM”, “Girls Go Start-Up! Academy”, “Girls to Learn!”, “IT for She”, and a scholarship programme for IT students, “New Technologies for Girls” (EIGE, 2022b). Poland has a number of active NGOs and professional organisations supporting women in ICT. To further boost the number of female ICT specialists similar targeted campaigns should be continued and expanded but aimed specifically at ICT. Even though university attendance is free, the government or businesses could offer additional scholarships to female ICT students.
Migration could help to increase the supply of ICT specialists relatively quickly. Polish ICT graduates have strong incentives to emigrate to other EU countries. Despite the ICT sector paying the highest salaries, Polish ICT salaries are below the EU average and considerably lower than in neighbouring Germany. However, Poland has become an attractive country to work in, which is illustrated by an increase in immigration since 2014 (Figure 2.22). This was mostly driven by Ukraine but also by immigration from Belarus, Moldova, and Georgia. To attract ICT professionals, the government launched a new programme “Poland. Business Harbour” to draw in ICT entrepreneurs and specialists from Belarus and later expanding to Armenia, Georgia, Moldova, Russia and Ukraine. The programme has now been extended globally. Polish companies must be approved before they can sponsor ICT workers and currently 200 firms can do so. The challenge for the government is to increase the number of firms that can hire migrant ICT specialists and ensure there is sufficient technical capacity to process higher numbers of migrant worker visas. In this regard, the government could focus its resources on key countries, such as India.
Lifelong and life-wide learning can address digital skill gaps among adults
Targeted and relevant adult learning can address many of the digital skill gaps in Poland associated mainly with older adults. This learning should be lifelong, accessible to everyone at any age, and life-wide, encompassing learning outside of formal education systems, which is the main mode of learning for adults aged over 25. Adult lifelong and life-wide learning can take different forms and occur in various environments. Effective adult learning systems are crucial for developing and updating skills in response to digitalisation (OECD, 2019a).
Participation in adult learning is relatively low. In Poland, most learning during the course of adults’ lives is non-formal. According to the latest Adult Education Survey (AES), only 4.4% of adults participated in formal training in 2016, which is learning that leads to a qualification, broadly in line with the EU average. More adults learned non-formally and 23% learned through on-the-job training, other forms of work-based learning, workshops, seminars and organised distance learning as well as through social involvement. Around 30% of Polish adults learned informally from colleagues, family or by themselves. More recent Labour Force Survey data show that adult participation in formal learning has remained low in 2022, relative to other EU countries (Figure 2.23). National BKL survey data, based on broader definitions of adult learning, points to higher rates of participation as most adults aged 25-64 develop their skills through non-formal and informal learning.
Low demand, rather than limited supply, is holding back adult participation in organised training. In Poland, as in other OECD countries, low levels of motivation to learn lead to low demand for training. According to the AES, around 60% of adults reported that they did not participate, and do not want to participate, in formal and/or non-formal education. A further 15% reported they did participate but did not want to participate more. Overall, the share of adults uninterested in formal and/or non-formal education is around the EU average. But few adults report that there is a lack of suitable learning opportunities or that distance was an obstacle to training (OECD, 2019a). According to the BKL, less than 10% of adults indicated that relevant organised training was not available close to them, and a few per cent said that the existing training offers were not useful to them (BKL, 2020).
The main reason holding back demand for participation in organised adult learning is an absence of a perceived need for further training (BKL, 2022a). For those working adults who wanted to participate but did not, the most commonly cited obstacles were family responsibilities and scheduling issues (Figure 2.24). The cost of education was also frequently cited as an obstacle. The interest in developing professional competence declines with skill levels. For example, 70-80% of those in managerial and professional occupations show interest in training. In contrast, only 40% of service and sales workers reported any interest in further education and this fell to 26% among unskilled workers. Older adults with low levels of education see little incentives to continue learning (BKL, 2022a).
Policy needs to reduce informational frictions that lead to perceptions of low returns to learning, improve matching the supply of adult education and training to demand, and effectively support the development of general digital skills, especially among those less skilled. Many Polish workers and firms perceive that the return to investing in digital skills is lower than the cost of the investment, despite high returns in terms of wages and employment. Various policies such as awareness campaigns, engagement with social partners to promote learning and targeted guidance, can be effective in motivating adults to participate in education and training (EC, 2015). These take different forms across OECD countries (OECD, 2019a). In-depth case studies suggest that raising awareness of the benefits of adult learning can increase participation and boost workers’ earnings (EC, 2015).
To reduce informational frictions, OECD countries have used awareness campaigns (Table 2.1). Poland carried out a comprehensive nationwide campaign called Edurośli in 2019. This involved around 300 events spanning from conferences, seminars, workshops, open days, and meetings to shows, competitions and webinars and covered a range of topics. The campaign brought together different stakeholders such as government ministries, NGOs, schools, sports clubs, museums, libraries, community centres and local activists (MoES, 2019). The goal of the campaign was to emphasise the importance of continuous education and foster positive attitudes about lifelong learning as well as to increase participation in adult education. However, a lack of formal evaluation makes it unclear to what extent this was achieved. It also appears that such campaigns are organised ad hoc. To raise the level of digital skills, smaller, sustained and targeted campaigns that include social partners might be more effective in reaching those adults who stand to benefit and whose jobs could be at risk due to digitalisation (OECD, 2019a).
Table 2.1. Public awareness campaigns and their focus in selected OECD countries
Focus |
Name |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
General Adult Learning |
Specific Programmes |
Specific Target Groups |
Basic Skills |
High-demand Skills |
Firms |
||
Estonia |
X |
X |
X |
X |
Jälle Kooli (Back to school again) |
||
Germany |
X |
X |
X |
X |
Zukunftsstarter (Future starter) Nur Mut (Courage) |
||
Hungary |
X |
Hivatások éjszakája (Night of Vocations) |
|||||
Ireland |
X |
X |
X |
X |
Take the first step |
||
Korea |
X |
X |
X |
Vocational skill month |
|||
Portugal |
X |
X |
X |
Qualifica |
|||
Slovenia |
X |
X |
X |
X |
Lifelong learning week |
||
Switzerland |
X |
X |
X |
Simplement mieux (Simply better) |
Source: OECD (2019), Getting Skills Right: Future-Ready Adult Learning Systems https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264311756-en.
To improve matching of the supply of and demand for adult education, better coordination is needed. The responsibility for supplying adult education and training is spread across several institutions and should be coordinated. At the national level, the ministries responsible are the Ministry of Education and Science (MEiN), the Ministry of Family and Social Policy (MRiPS), the Ministry of Economic Development and Technology (MRiT), and Digital Affairs at the Chancellery of the Prime Minister. At the sub-national level, regions (voivodeships), and counties (powiat) have responsibility for formal educational facilities (OECD, 2019a). To maximise the impact of education policy, there should be effective coordination and information sharing. Social partners are also important for that process. Chambers of commerce and trade unions disseminate information, organise and support adult education and training for their members. Social partners participate in discussions and co-ordination of adult learning sectoral skills council and the Program Council on Competences (OECD, 2019a).
Regular and thorough evaluation of learning should be standard across all modes and providers. Formal and non-formal education is delivered by a diverse range of formal public education and training institutions and thousands of private providers of adult education and training. Informal learning is less structured and often self-taught. Learning methods also vary widely from teaching in classrooms to online learning and practical learning in the workplace from colleagues, family, and friends. More thorough and rigorous evaluation of education and training provision might identify effective ways of upskilling and re-skilling. Poland has already set up a graduate tracking portal (ELA) that provides additional information on the labour market outcomes of graduates from different disciplines in formal education. A similar tracking portal was developed in 2021 for Vocational Education and Training (VET) graduates. PARP regularly monitors and evaluates the Database of Development Services (BUR) that offers training to firms. However, there appears to be little rigorous analysis of the impact of adult training on labour market outcomes. Such analysis would help adults better choose their training and would better inform public funding and support for adult training programmes.
Digital skills may also provide a pathway to better employment for disengaged adults. However, they may be unable or unwilling to use public employment support services, or they can be overwhelmed by the range of training on offer. Guidance and counselling can be helpful (OECD, 2021f). Public employment services at the county (powiat) level are major providers of guidance services for the unemployed. Centres for information and career planning in regional (voivodeship) labour offices provide services to all adults. Employment agencies (Agencje zatrudenienia) provide jobseekers and employees with employment support and counselling while voluntary labour corps (Ochotnicze Hufce Pracy) make provisions for (disadvantaged) young people. Adults can receive guidance from education institutions directly as well as from non-governmental or private organisations (OECD, 2019a).
Counselling and guidance in Poland could be more extensive, detailed and proactive. The number of career advisers available to adults is low (OECD, 2019a). In 2017, there were 2,144 career advisers in the public employment service which equated to one adviser for 505 unemployed people. This declined in 2021 to fewer than 1700 advisers, increasing the number of jobless per adviser to 536 on average. In the past, career advisers did not fully assess and identify adult learning needs (Euroguidance, 2018). Such guidance should also be proactive and reach out to adults whose skills are most at risk of becoming obsolete. Some programmes do, however, reach out to adults to motivate them to learn (Box 2.4). While such projects are welcome, it is important that they are thoroughly evaluated.
Box 2.4. Reaching and training adults from disadvantaged backgrounds in Poland
The ‘Lokalne Ośrodki Wiedzy i Edukacji’ or LOWE (Centres of knowledge and education) is a project that aims to reach parents and other adults in local communities in disadvantaged areas with difficult access to education in order to help them develop basic skills and other key competences to boost their prospects in the labour market, in the community and in their families. Equally important to encourage various institutions and organisations to increase adult training partly by developing methods and tools used by educators to work with adults. It is a collaboration between schools and local communities designed to offer non-formal education to adults in a variety of ways teaching many different competences, including digital skills.
LOWE supports adult education through finance and operational support. Five experienced organisations and institutions from Białystok, Bydgoszcz, Lublin, Krakow and Poznań were selected through a competition as organizers of 15-20 LOWE. The selected local educational organisations manage schools and support them with financial grants including substantive support such as a diagnosis of skills needs that forms the basis for educational offers. The programme conducts an assessment of the social environment, skills gaps and educational capabilities in each local area and provides organisational support to each LOWE centre through helping with management, training staff, communication, and promotional activities. Each selected organisation can receive a grant up to PLN 250,000 or around EUR 52,000 (LOWE, 2022).
LOWE has expanded over time. In 2016-18, a pilot programme of 50 centres across 13 regions managed to successfully get 3700 adults to attend organised training, who previously did not participate or did so infrequently. The programme was then repeated in 2019-22 with 100 centres spread across all regions. It was financed jointly by Polish schools and the EU social funds.
Firms need to develop workers’ digital skills
The returns to increasing skills can considerably boost wages and productivity. A higher level of skills and a more intensive use of skills within firms is associated with higher wages. Firms can play a key role in developing and using these skills. The highest increase in wages is associated with more use of reading skills at work. More intense use of ICT is complementary to basic skills and boosts wages the more it is used at work (Figure 2.25). This could be particularly beneficial for older workers and less educated workers.
The level of training provided by Polish firms, including digital training, has risen but it remains relatively low. In 2015, 12% of all Polish firms provided training to their employees. This increased to 18% in 2019, similar to Austria, Latvia, and Estonia and just below the EU average (Figure 2.26). However, the prevalence of training provision declines with firm size. Among large firms, 70% have provided training, broadly in line with the EU average, but only 13% of small firms reported providing any training to their staff. However, more generic on-the-job training is relatively common in Poland with one in three employees participating in this type of training, a share comparable with the EU average (Eurofound, 2019). Nonetheless, a culture of firms actively supporting training for employees could be strengthened – 32% of firms had a training budget in 2021. Only one in three firms conducts an assessment of skills deficits among employees systematically while 44% do so occasionally. Around a fifth of firms did not offer any training to staff in 2021 with most of those firms reporting a lack of need to upgrade skills (BKL, 2022b).
The government supports training in firms through three main channels. At the national level, one of the main government agencies for providing support to employers and entrepreneurs is PARP. For over twenty years, PARP has been contributing to the creation and effective implementation of policies related to enterprise development, innovation, and human capital development in enterprises. It targets primarily small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), with funding coming from the state budget and European funds. The second main source of support is the National Training Fund (Krajowy Fundusz Szkoleniowy, KFS). The KFS is a separate part of the Labour Fund that is financed by public funds and employer contributions. It is intended for co-financing the education and training of employees that is undertaken on the initiative of, or with the consent of, the employer. Its role is to prevent loss of employment because of the lack of adequate competences required in a dynamically changing economy. The third channel of support is made up of regional operational programmes that co-finance training in companies, partly funded by the EU. Increasing investment in human resources should improve the position of both companies and employees in a competitive labour market (OECD, 2019a).
Poland should increase awareness of training support programmes among firms, broaden their coverage and increase their funding. The uptake of the KFS has been limited in the past by its size. Around a third of applications in 2017 were unsuccessful due to a lack of funds. For the approved applications, the average amount received was below the maximum. Survey evidence suggested that low awareness and administrative complexity led to low participation by firms (Grabowski and Janiszewski, 2016; Szymańska and Ostrogórska, 2015). This suggests that reaching out to firms, specifically SMEs, could be productive in raising firms’ demand for training. Furthermore, the size of the KFS could be increased and the authorities are planning to increase funding in the coming years. A larger KFS should be used to widen the range of firms that benefit from training support but any public training should be careful not to crowd out private courses.
Recognition of prior learning (RPL) could raise the efficiency of training. Recognising prior learning can support upskilling and reskilling opportunities by fostering shorter training times and enabling personalised learning pathways for adults. Recognising a person’s knowledge and skills within a formal and established framework can better determine future learning needs. The Higher Education and Science Act gives higher education institutions some flexibility to recognize prior learning when admitting students to regular programmes. However, recognition of prior learning is not yet widespread or standardised in Poland. While some sectors have specific well-developed systems, there is no single coherent system. So far, the Integrated Qualifications System (Zintegrowany System Kwalifikacji,) is the main system and the Educational Research Institute has designed tools such as a database of good recognition practices and a tool to help adults organise their achievements in order to more easily communicate them to employers and educational institutions. This will enhance recognition of prior learning in Poland but should be developed further in collaboration with stakeholders. More broadly, efforts to introduce a functional national system should be accelerated (OECD, 2019a).
Digital education should be more flexible and modular
In general, the lack of flexibility of adult education in formal and non-formal education is one of the obstacles preventing higher participation in adult learning. Within VET, Poland had previously tried to develop modular courses for many occupations but despite their good quality they were not popular since they required changes in the teaching paradigm, new teaching methods and teacher training. Since then, short vocational courses kwalifikacyjny kurs zawodowy (KKZ) and kurs umiejętności zawodowych (KUZ) have been developed. KKZ is a course for adults outside of schools that allows them to participate in the same exams for vocational qualifications as graduates of initial VET schools. KUZ is a course that covers part of a vocational programme to supplement adults’ prior learning. In addition, the Centre for Education Development (Ośrodek Rozwoju Edukacji (ORE)), a national teacher training institution, supports the development and implementation of distance learning in education and training institutions. ORE runs an online database consisting of almost 170 VET courses. In 2019, ORE started a project entitled ‘Creating e-resources for vocational education and training’ (Tworzenie e-zasobów do kształcenia zawodowego), with the main aim of increasing the use of ICT in VET. However, only some of Poland’s educational programmes are modular (Figure 2.27). Denmark offers potentially useful examples of flexible vocational education for adults (Box 2.5). More flexible learning goes hand-in-hand with individualised learning pathways (Eurydice, 2021).
Flexibility within higher education could improve further. Higher education institutions deliver a relatively high number of part-time courses and the share of students in part-time programmes is among the highest in the OECD at 30% (OECD, 2017). The Higher Education and Science Act provides some scope for higher and vocational education and research institutes to conduct shorter and specialised courses although the decision to do so depends on the educational entity. But modular programmes are non-existent in higher education, which prevents adult learners from studying in a flexible manner towards a qualification. Nonetheless, there has recently been considerable progress in expanding online courses (MOOCs). The national education platform, Navoica, has gone from offering five online courses in 2019 to over 150 in 2022. It offers flexible and modular courses ranging from introductory to advanced courses. MOOCs, however, tend to be used more frequently by higher skilled adults.
Box 2.5. Flexible formal education for adults: the Danish labour market training centres
The Danish adult learning system offers a high degree of flexibility. The adult vocational training programmes provided by labour market training centres (Arbejdsmarkedsuddannelse, AMU) are geared to equip low-skilled and skilled workers resident in Denmark who are currently in employment, with flexible training provision to accommodate working schedules.
The centres offer learners the freedom to select courses individually from a catalogue of 3 000 adult vocational training programmes, and to combine courses from the 200 single-subject courses in the general education system. Moreover, students can combine courses from non-formal education programmes in independent institutions and across different subjects. As these courses are short term, ranging from half a day to six weeks, with an average of three days, they can easily be combined to meet individual needs.
The flexibility of training courses extends to the learning environment. Training can take place in a traditional classroom, in open workshops, through distance learning or in the workplace. Although many training programmes take place during working hours, weekday evenings and weekends are also available. Once a course is completed, an AMU certificate is issued and can be included in an assessment of prior learning for credit transfer to a mainstream VET programme in the same field. Such a high degree of flexibility in formal education lowers barriers to adult learning.
Source: OECD (2019), Getting Skills Right: Future-Ready Adult Learning Systems, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264311756-en; Ministry of Children and Education (2018), Adult vocational training, www.eng.uvm.dk/adult-education-and-continuing-training/adult-vocationaltraining.
Adult education for basic and digital skills outside of formal institutions should be supported through public funds. Adult learning funding in Poland is largely directed to institutions which, in turn, reduces fees. Some ‘non-school courses’ that teach general skills courses charge fees, although these can be limited and reduced for low-income adults (Eurydice, 2021). Most of the adult education providers are private and charge fees. However, the main challenge for raising adult participation in adult learning seems to be on the demand side (OECD, 2019a). More demand-side funding that supports individuals’ ability to pay, complemented with effective quality assurance, information and guidance, can be effective. There is scope to make more use of direct financial incentives even though support, such as subsidies and training leave, exists.
Individual training accounts, such as those introduced in France in 2015, could be an effective way to facilitate adult learning. They are specific to each adult and can help facilitate learning throughout an individual’s career (OECD, 2019b). For example, in 2017 the pilot scheme “Loans for Education” targeted adults who wanted to learn and train. The scheme provided interest-free loans with a three-year repayment period but 20% of the loan could be reduced if the course was completed (ARRS, 2019). Financial support, particularly for those on lower incomes, is important as they tend to participate less in adult learning than those on higher incomes (Figure 2.28).
Active labour market programmes (ALMPs) should increasingly focus on training, including digital skills. ALMPs are an important tool for managing the transition back into employment. However, Poland’s expenditure on ALMPs is relatively low. In particular, the share of ALMP expenditure on training is among the lowest in the OECD, even though overall spending on training for each individual is relatively high (Figure 2.29) (OECD, 2019a). The coverage of ALMPs should be widened to include more jobseekers and the overall spending on training should be increased. The training should partly also focus on digital skills to ensure jobseekers are also digitally competent. This could be combined with expanded career guidance services to maximise job search success.
Boosting managerial skills
The limited number of highly skilled managers is considered one of the main barriers to the growth of Polish firms, and the lack of management support is a barrier to innovation (Zadura-Lichota, 2015). The Study of Human Capital found that Polish managers often do not have adequate levels of a variety of skills (Górniak, 2018). This is also reflected in the quality of management perceived by workers. According to the 2019 European Company Survey, most workers viewed management positively, although overall levels of management quality were below the EU average and below best performers like Denmark (Figure 2.30). There seem to be many domestic companies with management practices that are significantly below average (World Bank, 2021). In contrast, management quality in foreign multinationals in Poland is higher and at a similar level to other countries (Bloom et al., 2016).
Digitalisation generally requires changing business processes for which good management skills are crucial. Good managerial skills are associated with higher digital adoption. A shortage of managerial skills reduces the productivity gains from adoption (Andrews, Nicoletti and Timiliotis, 2018; Gal et al., 2019). Implementation of high-performance work practices that emphasise teamwork, autonomy, task discretion, mentoring, job rotation and applying new learning are key. Bonus pay, training provision and flexible working hours provide incentives for workers to more intensively apply their skills (OECD, 2016c). These practices can increase firms’ internal flexibility to adapt to technological change (OECD, 2016c; Andrews et al., 2018).
Multiple programmes exist to improve managerial skills through new initiatives to support management training in SMEs (Box 2.6). Nonetheless, these could be enhanced by providing more flexible and modular training to increase accessibility including online courses such as the PARP Academy. The quality and relevance of the training offer should be regularly reviewed. Previous evaluation results suggested that more individual and customised training for management, potentially combined with coaching, could improve its effectiveness (OECD, 2019a). Financing support could be increased to further encourage participation in training for managers, particularly from SMEs. The National Training Fund (KFS) supports the training of higher skilled managers to a limited extent and the total available funding is unlikely to be sufficient to support wider management training needs. Raising awareness will be important through sectoral skills councils, more extensive involvement of chambers of commerce and other industry organisations. The level of management training in public administrations and in numerous government-owned firms should also be increased as the positive benefits of better management skills can potentially spill over to the private sector (OECD, 2019e).
Box 2.6. Programmes that support management skills
The Polish Agency for Enterprise Development (PARP) is responsible for creating a business-friendly environment in Poland by creating and effectively implementing the state policy related to enterprise, innovation, and staff adaptability. PARP offers a range of programmes that can improve manager skills.
The Innovation Manager Academy
The Innovation Manager Academy is a programme administrated by PARP that aims to increase the skills and expertise of companies in the field of developing and implementing innovations. The programme’s budget for 2018-23 is EUR 3.1 million and supports 470 managers dealing with innovation processes.
The Digital Manager Academy
The Digital Manager Academy, launched in 2021, co-finances training and advisory support for managerial staff in SMEs in the field of digitalisation. Firms receive a digital maturity assessment that provides a strategic analysis in terms of digital transformation and management competences. The budget for 2021-23 is EUR 14 million providing support to 3,620 employees.
SME Manager Academy
Launched in 2018, the SME Manager Academy is a programme administrated by PARP that finances training and advisory support for managerial staff in SMEs, in the area of business management, including HR. Financial support provided covers up to 80% of the project, while the remaining 20% is covered by the SME. The budget for 2018-23 is EUR 30 million including firms representing around 10,000 employees.
The Early Warning system
The aim of the project is to implement an early warning system for entrepreneurs who experience periodic difficulties in running a business. Support is provided for diagnosing the causes of emerging difficulties, training, consulting and mentoring tailored to the individual needs of the company. The budget for 2021-23 is EUR 11 million. Support will be provided to 2,000 companies.
PARP Academy
The PARP Academy, launched in 2006, is an e-learning platform that offers free-of-charge online training sessions, tailored towards SMEs, in areas related to setting up and running a business. Courses in e-commerce, digital marketing or social media are emphasised. There are 133,000 registered users and an average of 900 certificates are issued each week. The annual budget is around EUR 320,000.
The database of Development Services for education and training offers (BUR)
The BUR portal, managed by PARP since 2017, has become Poland’s main online portal on adult learning opportunities. It contains a growing coverage of training courses and counselling for managers and employees of SMEs to improve their skills. There are almost 7,000 training providers in the database and 834,000 subscriptions to specific courses. The annual budget is around EUR 1 million.
Source: Polish Agency for Enterprise Development website, https://en.parp.gov.pl/.
Digital government can facilitate and support the transition
Governments can facilitate digitalisation within a country by digitalising their own processes and the services they offer to citizens. The benefits are increased efficiency, higher transparency and lower costs and it may encourage greater digitalisation in the economy. However, cybersecurity risks have become more important and need to be managed.
The overall level of digitalisation of Polish government services is among the lowest in the European Union (Figure 2.31). According to the EU Digital Economy and Society Index, Poland has made rapid progress in digitalising government services in recent years but so have other countries. In 2021, 79% of government services were online and 85% accepted electronic ID logins. More than 15 million people used eID profiles. Digital government services are mobile-friendly and there is good user support (EC, 2022c). The use of digital government services increased during the pandemic. For example, the use of e-prescriptions in healthcare was particularly popular. However, online public services in transport and legal domains remain limited. Poland will need to make more progress as it aims towards the Digital Decade target of providing 100% of key public services online. Furthermore, transparency around how services are delivered and designed as well as how personal data is used is low. Cross-border digital public services, relevant to adults and businesses from other EU member states, are relatively undeveloped. The Biznes.gov.pl portal has launched a new English version in January 2022 but more could be done.
To maximise the benefits of digital government, Poland should aim to increase the use of its services. Currently, 55% of internet users use online government services. This is lower than the 65% EU average and below best performing countries like Denmark and Estonia, where 90% of internet users engage with online government services. In line with the digital skills mentioned earlier, high engagement levels are common around those adults with tertiary education but are very low for adults with low or no formal education as they are also unlikely to possess basic digital skills (Figure 2.32). To increase the uptake of online government services, Poland should gradually make online the default mode of interaction for those who are able to use them. To this end, it is also important to coordinate activities of central and local governments to ensure efficient and effective digital government services.
The public sector is one of the most data-intensive sectors in the economy. As the public sector both produces and consumes large amounts data, there is significant potential for governments to use digital technologies to innovate. The public sector can also drive innovation by enhancing access to public sector data. Firms have much to gain from open government data. They can use public data to better inform their business decisions. Some studies also suggest that opening up access to government data fosters the development of new start-ups.
Poland is a leader in opening its public data for wider use. According to the Open Data Maturity index, Poland ranked second in the EU in 2022, just behind France and ahead of Estonia (Figure 2.33). Otwarte Dane, the national one-stop-shop portal for open data, gained significantly in popularity and received international recognition. One of the best illustrations of the use of open data by the citizens was the CzyNaCzas application, which shows public transport buses and trams on the map in real time. During the health pandemic, another portal, SwiatPrzychodni, was widely used to search for public healthcare facilities with the shortest queues to doctors. Building on these successes, the government is continuing to implement its ‘Open Data Programme’ prompting public bodies to increase the number of datasets available and making the administration use the standards that allow for the opening of data (EC, 2021). The challenge for Poland is to maintain this momentum by continuing to update and expand available public datasets and through encouraging more private sector firms to use the data.
Cybersecurity is increasingly important as governments digitalise and systemically important systems go online. There has been a 60% increase in cyber attacks in 2020 and following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine the overall threat level has risen. The government has been implementing the 2019-2024 Cybersecurity Strategy. The strategy includes both legislative and organisational changes, such as setting up operational cybersecurity centres at various levels – regional, sectoral and industrial. Poland ranks relatively well in terms of cybersecurity but there is clear room to improve resilience and safety. It should continue efforts to do so with the public sector. Estonia’s X-road, the communication and encryption protocol underpinning its digital government, could offer useful insights for bolstering Poland’s digital security (Box 2.7).
Box 2.7. Digital government in Estonia: E-Estonia
Estonia’s success in e-government depends crucially on two features, which to this day are missing in some OECD countries: one (or more) secure digital ID(s), commonly accepted by service providers, and a secure, commonly accepted communication protocol, such as Estonia’s X-Road (Figure 2.33). In 1994, the Information Policy Law was passed and the Data Protection Department created. A following major milestone was the Digital Signatures Act in 2000, which allowed a number of government services requiring a signature to go online. The same year marked the start of digital tax filing and paperless cabinet meetings. E-filing of personal income tax returns reached 95% as early as in 2013, ranking among the top third in the OECD. An even greater share of corporate income taxes and VAT were filed online and today all are paperless. In 2002 the e-ID card was introduced, which simplified considerably the way Estonians interact with the government. The e-health system was established in 2008, and two years later e-prescriptions became available.
Data security is achieved by state-of-the-art technologies outsourced to the private sector through procurement contracts. Personal data in Estonia are not stored on a single server but at various data registry points, interlinked through the X-Road (introduced in 2001), a platform for secure data sharing, with all incoming and outgoing transactions authenticated and encrypted. X-Road does not build on blockchain technology, but, like blockchain, it secures traceability through a distributed ledger, meaning that any transaction or information access will be recorded in several places. Citizens can monitor the time and access point of their data files through the government service portal www.esti.ee.
A major principle of the system is single sourcing of data, for instance, the population registry is in charge of recording home addresses and all such queries will end up there. The use of digital signatures in Estonia is estimated to save 2% of GDP every year relative to using paper-based processes (e-Estonia, 2019). The cost of e-voting, for instance, is a mere EUR 2 per vote, versus EUR 6 in the case of paper-based voting.
Source: E-Estonia Guide (2018) and OECD (2015).
MAIN FINDINGS |
RECOMMENDATIONS (key recommendations in bold) |
---|---|
Fostering greater adoption of digital technologies in firms |
|
Poland has delayed 5G deployment due to cybersecurity concerns. |
Accelerate the legislative process and conduct the 5G auctions in order to speed up the development of a dedicated 5G network. |
The adoption of digital technologies is relatively low among SMEs. |
Expand consultancy services that offer expert technical advice to facilitate investment in digital technologies among SMEs. |
ICT innovation is too low. |
Increase direct funding for ICT R&D. Incentivise universities and research institutes to pursue more collaboration with industry when undertaking R&D and strengthen the role of technology transfer and commercialisation efforts. |
Finance for intangible (ICT) investment can be difficult to access for young and small firms. |
Provide continued financial support to new digital firms including finance and development at later stage. Create a collateral registry to improve SMEs access to loans. |
Upgrading skills for a digital transition |
|
Digital skills among graduates with upper secondary or below education could be higher. |
Provide ICT equipment in schools and training for VET teachers to teach digital skills. Increase the share of VET programmes that include carefully selected work placements. Further strengthen the involvement of local employers in the development of digital education by expanding their role and representation in subnational councils. |
There is a shortage of specialised ICT workers. |
Consider dual and flexible degrees to allow potential students in other disciplines to study ICT. Effectively implement the newly created global immigration programmes to attract more skilled ICT specialists from abroad. |
The share of women in ICT is 15%, below the EU average of 19%. |
Continue increasing the number of women studying ICT through targeted awareness campaigns and scholarships. |
Digital skills are low among adults, particularly among older adults. |
Expand modular training, making use of recognition of prior learning and micro-credentials. Adopt individual training accounts, making training rights portable from job to job. Promote lifelong learning, particularly among the unemployed and workers on temporary contracts. Expand the use of guidance and counselling and widen the coverage of active labour market policies to include digital skills training. Conduct continued and targeted awareness campaigns to provide information on the benefits of digital skills to adults and SMEs. |
Managerial skills, which are key to advancing digitalisation, are often lacking. |
Provide more flexible and modular training to increase accessibility and take up, including to online courses. Increase the level of management training in public administrations and in numerous government-owned firms. |
Digital government |
|
The level of government digitalisation is relatively low. Some services are not yet digitalised and usage is below the EU average. |
Digitalise the remaining government services, increase transparency and boost the use of online public services. |
Poland has been leading in opening up its public data and enabling related innovation. |
Continue to update and expand available public datasets and encourage more private sector firms to use the data. |
Cyber threat levels have risen since Russias invasion of Ukraine. |
Ensure a resilient and robust digital government infrastructure to address increased cyber risks. |
References
Adrjan, P. et al. (2021), “Will it stay or will it go? Analysing developments in telework during COVID-19
using online job postings data”, OECD Productivity Working Papers, No. 30, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Andrews, D., G. Nicoletti and C. Timiliotis (2018), “Digital technology diffusion: A matter of capabilities,
incentives or both?”, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1476, OECD Publishing, Paris.
ARRS (2019), “Invest in development – loans for education”, Agencja Rozwoju Regionalnego w
Starachowicach.
Bailin Rivares, A. et al. (2019), “Like it or not? The impact of online platforms on the productivity
of incumbent service providers”, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1548, OECD Publishing, Paris.
BKL (2020), “Bilans Kapitału Ludzkiego (Human Capital Study)”, Polish Agency for Enterprise
Development (PARP), Warsaw.
BKL (2022a), “Bilans Kapitału Ludzkiego – Rozwój kompetencji” [Human Capital Study – Development of
competences], Polish Agency for Enterprise Development (PARP), Warsaw.
BKL (2022b) “Bilans Kapitału Ludzkiego – raport z badania pracodawców” [Human Capital Study –
Report on the survey of firms], Polish Agency for Enterprise Development (PARP), Warsaw.
Bloom, N., Sadun, R, and J. van Reenen (2016), “Management as a Technology”, CEPR
Discussion Papers, No. 11312.
Cadestin, C. et al. (2019), "Multinational enterprises in domestic value chains", OECD Science,
Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 63, OECD Publishing, Paris.
CASE (2020), “Digitalisation of Poland's post-COVID economy – how to make the best use of the EU
Recovery Fund?”, Center for Economic and Social Research, Warsaw.
Criscuolo, C., Nicoletti, G., Gal, P. and T. Leidecker (2020), “Productivity gains from teleworking in the
post COVID-19 era: How can public policies make it happen?”, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Data.Europea.EU (2022), “EU Open Data Maturity Index”, European Commission, Brussels (accessed
on September 10, 2022).
EC (2015), “An in-depth analysis of adult learning policies and their
effectiveness in Europe”, European Commission, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
EC (2017), “Peer Review of Polish Higher Education and Science System”, European Commission
Brussels.
EC (2021a), “Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI), Country Report
Poland”, European Commission, Brussels (accessed on June 15, 2022).
EC (2021b), “Education and Training Monitor 2021”, European Commission, Brussels (accessed on June
28, 2022).
EC (2022a), “Poland sets targets for procurement of R&D and innovative solutions”, European
Commission, Brussels.
EC (2022b), “Broadband in Poland”, European Commission, Brussels (accessed on September 4, 2022).
EC (2022c), “eGovernment Benchmark 2022”, European Commission, Brussels (accessed on
September 20, 2022).
EC (2022d), “European Innovation Scoreboard”, European Commission, Brussels (accessed on June 30,
2022).
ECB (2021), “Key factors behind productivity trends in EU countries”, Occasional Paper Series, No. 268,
European Central Bank, Frankfurt.
E-Estonia Guide (2018), “E-Estonia Guide”, Tallinn (accessed on September 4, 2022).
E-Estonia (2019), “Estonia to share its e-governance know-how”, Tallinn.
EIGE (2022a), “Gender Equality in Academia and Research”, European Institute for Gender Equality,
Vilnius.
EIGE (2022b), “Girls as Engineers and Girls go Science! Motivation and support for girls in IT and
STEM”, European Institute for Gender Equality, Vilnius.
Eurofound (2019), “European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS) 2015”, Publications Office of the
European Union, Luxembourg.
Eurostat (2021a), “Digital economy and society”, European Commission (database), Brussels (accessed
on May 20, 2022).
Eurostat (2022a), “European Labour Force Survey data”, European Commission (database), Brussels
(accessed on September 3, 2022).
Eurostat (2022b), “Population by educational attainment level, sex and age (%) - main indicators”,
European Commission (database), Brussels (accessed on September 3, 2022).
Eurydice (2021), “EU Council Recommendation of 19 December 2016 on Upskilling Pathways: New
Opportunities for Adults”, OJ C 484/1, 24.12.2016.
Eurydice (2022), “Teachers’ and School Heads’ Salaries and Allowances in Europe – 2020/21”,
Publications Office of the European Union.
Euroguidance (2018), “Guidance System in Poland”, Euroguidance Network.
EY (2021), “Poland: New Tax Incentives Package for investments in Poland from 1 January 2022”, Ernst
& Young, Warsaw.
Gal, P. et al. (2019), “Digitalisation and productivity: In search of the holy grail – Firm-level empirical
evidence from EU countries”, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1533, OECD
Publishing, Paris.
Grabowski, J. and A. Janiszewski (2016), “Raport z badania dotyczącego wsparcia
finansowanego z Krajowego Funduszu Szkoleniowego w województwie dolnośląskim” [Support Study Report financed from the National Training Fund in Lower Silesian Voivodeship], Lower Silesian Voivodeship Labour Office.
Grundke, R. et al. (2018), “Which skills for the digital era? Returns to skills analysis”, OECD Science,
Technology and Industry Working Papers, No. 2018/09, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Górniak, J. (2018), “Bilans Kapitalu Ludzkiego 2017”, Polish Agency for Enterprise Development (PARP,
Warsaw.
Guillemette, Y. and D. Turner (2021), "The long game: Fiscal outlooks to 2060 underline need for
structural reform", OECD Economic Policy Papers, No. 29, OECD Publishing, Paris.
ITU (2020), “Global Cybersecurity Index 2020”, International Telecommunication Union, Geneva.
Jankowska, B., E. Mińska-Struzik, M. Bartosik-Purgat, M. Götz and I. Olejnik (2022), “Industry 4.0
technologies adoption: barriers and their impact on Polish companies’ innovation performance”, European Planning Studies, Taylor and Francis.
Kamalski, J. and Plume A. (2013), “Comparative Benchmarking of European and US Research
Collaboration and Researcher Mobility”, SciVal Analytics, Elsevier.
Leśniewicz, F. and I. Święcicki (2021), “Czy pandemia przyśpieszyła robotyzację?” [Has the pandemic
accelerate robotisation?], Polish Institute of Economics, Warsaw.
Lewandowski, J. and J. Tomczak, (2017), “Nowoczesne technologie ICT szansą na rozwój
mikroprzedsiębiorstw” [Modern ICT technologies as an opportunity for development of micro enterprises], Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Łódzkiej, 1217(68): 123-141.
Lewiatan (2016), “Cyfryzacja polskiego sektora MŚP: wpływ digitalizacji na produktywność pracy i
konkurencyjność biznesu” [Digitisation of the Polish SME sector: the impact of digitisation on labour productivity and business competitiveness], Polish Confederation Lewiatan, Warsaw.
LOWE, (2022), “Lokalny Ośrodek Wiedzy i Edukacji” [Local Center of Knowledge and Education],
Małopolska Chamber fo Local Government Foundation, Cracow.
Melitz, M.J. (2003), “The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry
Productivity”, Econometrica, 71: 1695-1725.
Milasi, S., I. González-Vázquez et E. Fernández-Macías (2021), “Telework before the COVID-19
pandemic : Trends and drivers of differences across the EU”, OECD Productivity Working Papers, No. 21, OECD Publishing, Paris.
MoES (2019), “Dni uczenia się dorosłych” – dołącz do kampanii!” [Adult Learning Days], Ministerstwo
Edukacji i Nauki, Warsaw.
NIK (2021), “Organizacja pracy nauczyciel w szkolach publicznych (part 1 and 2)” [Organisation of
teachers’ work in public schools (part 1 and 2)], Najwyższa Izba Kontroli (NIK), Warsaw.
Nedelkoska, L. and G. Quintini (2018), "Automation, skills use and training", OECD Social, Employment
and Migration Working Papers, No. 202, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2015), “OECD Public Governance Reviews: Estonia and Finland: Fostering Strategic Capacity
across governments and Digital Services across Borders”, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2016a), “Employment and Skills Strategies in Poland, OECD Reviews on Local Job
Creation”, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2016b), “OECD Economic Surveys: Poland 2016”, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2016c), “Skills Matter: Further Results from the Survey of Adult Skills”, OECD Skills Studies,
OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2016d), “Skills for a Digital World: 2016 Ministerial Meeting on the Digital Economy Background
Report”, OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 250, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2017), “Education at a Glance 2017: OECD Indicators”, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2018), “Maintaining competitive conditions in era of digitalization”, OECD Publishing,
Paris.
OECD (2019a), “OECD Skills Strategy Poland: Assessment and Recommendations”, OECD Skills
Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2019b), “Individual Learning Accounts: Panacea or Pandora's Box?”, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2019c), OECD Skills Outlook 2019: Thriving in a Digital World, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2019d), Going Digital: Shaping Policies, Improving Lives, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2019e), "Digitalisation and productivity: A story of complementarities", OECD Economic
Outlook, Volume 2019 Issue 1, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2019f), “Measuring the Digital Transformation: A Roadmap for the Future”, OECD Publishing,
Paris.
OECD (2019g), “PISA 2018 Results (Volume III): What School Life Means for Students Lives”, OECD
Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2019h), “Financing SMEs and Entrepreneurs 2019: An OECD Scoreboard”, OECD Publishing,
Paris.
OECD (2020a), “OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2020”, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2020b), “OECD Economic Surveys: Poland 2020”, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2021a), “Quality and value of micro-credentials in higher education: Preparing for the
future”, OECD Education Policy Perspectives, No. 40, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2021b), “Incentives for SMEs to Invest in Skills: Lessons from European Good Practices”,
in Getting Skills Right, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2021c), “Teachers and Leaders in Vocational Education and Training, OECD Reviews of
Vocational Education and Training”, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2021d), “OECD Skills Outlook 2021: Learning for Life”, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2021e), “R&D Tax Incentives: Poland, 2021”, OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and
Innovation, Paris.
OECD (2021f), “Career Guidance for Adults in a Changing World of Work”, in Getting Skills Right,
OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2021g), “OECD Economic Surveys: Netherlands 2021”, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2022a), OECD Broadband Portal, OECD (database), Paris, accessed on September 1, 2022.
OECD (2022b), “OECD Education Statistics”, OECD (database), Paris, accessed on June 19,
2022.
OECD (2022c), “OECD Employment Outlook 2022”, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2022d), “Gross domestic spending on R&D”, OECD (database), Paris, accessed on June 24,
2022.
OECD (2022e), “G7 inventory of new rules for digital markets”, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2022f), “Indicators of Product Market Regulation”, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2023), “The OECD Going Digital Toolkit”, OECD (database), Paris, accessed on May 15, 2022.
Orłowska, R. and K. Żołądkiewicz (2018), “Ograniczenia digitalizacji mikro-, małych i średnich
przedsiębiorstw (MMŚP) w Polsce na podstawie badań w województwie pomorskim” [Limitations of micro, small and medium digitization enterprises (MSME) in Poland based on research in the Pomeranian Voivodeship], Studia Ekonomiczne, 372: 94-109, Katowice.
Pisu, M. and C. von Rüden (2021), “Spurring growth and closing gaps through digitalisation:
policies to LIFT all boats”, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, OECD Publishing, Paris.
PFR (2021), “Polish VC market outlook 2021”, PFR Ventures and Inovo, Warsaw.
Radziukiewicz, M. (2021), “Remote Work in Poland and its Perspectives”, Economic and Regional Studies,
14(4), pp.409-427.
Sorbe, S., Gal, P. Nicoletti, G. and C. Timiliotis (2019), "Digital dividend: policies to harness the
productivity potential of digital technologies", OECD Economic Policy Papers, No. 26.
Statistics Poland (2021), “Labour Market Statistics Yearbook”, Statistics Poland.
Szymańska, B. and E. Ostrogórska (2015), “Krajowy Fundusz Szkoleniowy” [National Training Fund],
Polish Agency for Enterprise Development (PARP), Warsaw.
Zadura-Lichota, P. (2015), “Innovative entrepreneurship: Revealed and hidden potential for innovation in
Poland”, Polish Agency for Enterprise Development (PARP), Warsaw.
World Bank (2021), “Paths of Productivity Growth in Poland: A Firm-Level Perspective”, World Bank
Group, Washington DC.
World Bank (2022), “Drivers of Productivity Growth in Poland: A Firm-Level Perspective on Technology
Adoption and Firm Capabilities”, World Bank Group, Washington DC.