The effective tax rates on labour income in 2022 calculated for the eight model household types are presented in Tables 3.1 to 3.13 and Figures 3.1 to 3.7. The household types vary by marital status, number of children and economic status. For each household type, the chapter presents different indicators for the average rates (tax wedge, personal tax rate, net personal tax rate, personal income tax rate and employee social security contribution rate) and marginal rates (tax wedge and net personal tax rate). The results for two measures of tax progressivity are also considered: tax elasticity on gross earnings and labour costs.
Taxing Wages 2023
3. Effective tax rates on labour income in 2022
Abstract
Average tax rates
Table 3.11 and Figure 3.1 show the average tax wedge for 2022, which combines personal income tax, employee and employer social security contributions (SSCs) while also taking into account cash benefits to which each household type was entitled. Total taxes due minus transfers received are expressed as a percentage of labour costs, defined as gross wage plus employers’ SSCs (including payroll taxes). In the case of a single person on the average wage (AW), the tax wedge ranged from zero (Colombia) and 7.0% (Chile) to 47.8% (Germany) and 53.0% (Belgium). For a one-earner married couple with two children, at the average wage level, the tax wedge was lowest in Colombia (-4.8%) and highest in Finland and France (both at 39.2%). As stated in Chapter 1, the tax wedge tends to be lower for a married couple with two children at this wage level than for a single individual without children due to receipt of cash benefits and/or more advantageous tax treatment. The tax wedge for a single parent with two children, earning 67% of the AW, was negative in New Zealand (-16.1%) and Colombia (-7.2%). Negative tax wedges occur when the cash benefits received by families, plus any applicable non-wastable tax credits, exceed the sum of the total tax and social security contributions that are due.
Table 3.2 and Figure 3.2 combine personal income tax and employee SSCs in 2022, expressed as a percentage of gross wage earnings (the corresponding measures for income tax and employee contributions separately are shown in Tables 3.4 and 3.5). For single workers at the average wage level without children, the highest average levels of tax plus contributions were seen in Germany (38.0%) and Belgium (40.3%). The lowest average rates were in Colombia (0.0%), Chile (7.0%), Costa Rica (10.5%), Mexico (11.3%), Korea (15.8%), Estonia (18.4%), Switzerland (18.5%), Israel (19.1%) and the Czech Republic (19.6%).
Table 3.3 shows personal income tax and employee SSCs, reduced by the entitlement to cash benefits, for each household type in 2022. Figure 3.3 illustrates this for single individuals without children and one-earner married couples with two children, with both household types on average earnings. Comparing Table 3.2 and Table 3.3 the average tax rates for families with children (columns 4 -7) are lower in Table 3.3 because most countries support families with children through cash benefits.
Comparing Table 3.2 and Table 3.3 for single parents with two children earning 67% of the average wage shows that 33 countries provided cash benefits in 2022. In New Zealand and Denmark, these represented more than 25% of income (31.5% and 25.6%, respectively). Thirty-two countries provided cash benefits for a one-earner married couple with two children earning the average wage, although these were less generous relative to income, ranging up to 17.3% in Poland. The lower level of cash benefits for the married couple may be attributable to three factors: single parents may be eligible for more generous treatment; the benefits may be fixed in absolute amount; or the benefits may be subject to income testing.
Table 3.4 shows personal income tax due as a percentage of gross wage earnings in 2022. For single persons without children at the average wage (column 2), the income tax burden ranged from 0.0% (Chile, Colombia and Costa Rica) to 35.5% (Denmark). In most OECD countries, at the average wage level, the income tax burden for one-earner married couples with two children was lower than that for single persons (compare columns 2 and 5). These differences are illustrated in Figure 3.4. In eleven OECD countries, the income tax burden faced by a one-earner married couple with two children is less than half that faced by a single individual (Austria, the Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Luxembourg, Poland, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Switzerland and the United States). There was no difference in another eleven countries: Australia, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Finland, Lithuania, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden and Türkiye. In Chile, Colombia and Costa Rica, neither the single worker on the average wage nor the one-earner married couple at the average wage paid personal income taxes.
There were three OECD countries where the personal income tax rate including SSCs for a married average worker with two children was negative in 2022. This was due to the presence of non-wastable tax credits, whereby credits were paid in excess of the taxes otherwise due. This resulted in tax burdens of -3.0% in Poland and the Slovak Republic and -7.9% in the Czech Republic. Similarly, single parents with two children earning 67% of the average wage showed a negative tax burden in eight countries: Austria, the Czech Republic, Germany, Israel, Poland, the Slovak Republic, Spain and the United States. In three other countries – Chile, Colombia and Costa Rica– this household type paid no income tax.
Comparison of columns 5 and 6 in Table 3.4 demonstrates that if the second spouse had a job that paid 67% of the average wage, the income tax burden of the household (now expressed as 167% of the average wage) would be slightly higher in 21 countries, the largest differences being in the Czech Republic (8.3 percentage points) and Germany (9.7 percentage points). The income tax burden was lower in thirteen countries, the largest differences being in the Netherlands (-4.7 percentage points), Finland and Israel (both -3.1 percentage points). There was no impact on the tax burden in Chile, Colombia or Costa Rica.
An important consideration in the design of an income tax is the degree of progressivity – the rate at which the income tax burden increases with income. A comparison of columns 1 to 3 in Table 3.4 provides an insight into the progressivity of income tax systems of OECD countries. Comparing the income tax burden of single individuals at the average wage level with their counterparts at 167% of the average wage (columns 2 and 3), the lower-paid worker faced a lower tax burden in all countries except in Colombia and Hungary in 2022. In Colombia, neither the average single worker nor their counterparts at 167% of the average wage paid personal income tax. In Hungary, a flat tax rate was applied on labour income and all households without children paid the same percentage of income tax.
Comparing single individuals at 67% of the average wage level with their counterparts at the average wage level (columns 1 and 2), the lower-paid worker also faced a lower tax burden across all OECD countries, except Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica and Hungary. Finally, the burden faced by single individuals at 67% of the average wage level represented less than 25% of the burden faced by their counterparts at 167% in five OECD countries: Chile (0.0%), Colombia (0.0%), Costa Rica (0.0%), Greece (22.0%) and the Netherlands (21.4%).
The addition of SSCs to the average tax rate reduces this progressivity as well as the proportional tax savings (i.e. tax savings of the low-income workers relative to higher-income workers). When comparing Table 3.2 with Table 3.4, the OECD personal average tax rate including SSCs for single individuals at 67% of the average wage level was only 32.1% lower than their counterparts at 167%, compared to the OECD average tax savings of 48.1% for personal income taxes alone in 2022. The OECD average tax savings observed for one-earner married couples with two children at the average wage level relative to the average single worker fell from 32.7% for the personal income tax to 19.8% for the personal average tax rate including SSCs. These lower figures reflect that there is little variation in SSC rates across household types, as shown in Table 3.5.
Table 3.5 shows employee SSCs as a percentage of gross wage earnings in 2022. For a single worker without children at the average wage (column 2), the contribution rate varied between zero (Australia, Colombia, Denmark and New Zealand) and 22.1% (Slovenia). Australia, Denmark and New Zealand did not levy any employee SSCs paid to general government. In Colombia, most of the SSCs are paid to funds outside the general government and are considered to be non-tax compulsory payments. Therefore, they are not counted as SSCs in the Taxing Wages calculations. There were three other countries with very low rates: Iceland (0.1%), Mexico (1.4%) and Estonia (1.6%).
SSCs are usually levied at a flat rate on all earnings, i.e. without any exempt threshold. In a number of OECD member countries, a ceiling applies. However, this ceiling usually applies to wage levels higher than 167% of the AW. The flat rates result in a constant average burden of SSCs for most countries between 67% and 167% of average wage earnings. A constant proportional burden for employee SSCs for the eight model household types was observed in Slovenia (22.1%), Lithuania (19.5%), Hungary (18.5%), Poland (17.8%), Türkiye (15.0%), Greece (14.0%), the Slovak Republic (13.4%), the Czech Republic and Portugal (both 11.0%), Latvia and Costa Rica (both 10.5%), Norway (8.0%), the United States (7.7%), Chile (7.0%), Spain and Switzerland (both 6.4%), Ireland (4.0%) and Estonia (1.6%).
In addition, at the average wage level, Germany and the Netherlands imposed different levels of SSCs on employees according to their family status (see Figure 3.5).
Marginal tax rates
Table 3.6 and Figure 3.6 show the percentage of the marginal increase in labour costs that was deducted through the combined effect of increasing personal income tax, employee and employer SSCs (including payroll taxes) and decreasing cash transfers in 2022. It is assumed that the gross earnings of the principal earner rise by 1 currency unit. This is the marginal tax wedge.
In most cases, the marginal tax wedge absorbed 25% to 55% of an increase in labour costs for single individuals on average wage without children in 2022. However, in seven OECD countries, these individuals faced marginal wedges above 55%: Finland (56.1%), Luxembourg (58.5%), Germany (58.4%), France (57.7%), Austria (59.5%), Italy (62.7%) and Belgium (68.7%). By contrast, Chile (7.0%) had the lowest marginal tax wedge in 2022. For Colombia, no income tax was paid at the average wage level in 2022 while SSCs are considered as non-tax compulsory payments and are thus not included in the Taxing Wages calculations.2
In twenty-six OECD member countries, the marginal tax wedge for one-earner married couples at average earnings with two children was either the same as that for single persons at average wage with no children or within 5 percentage points thereof. The marginal tax wedge was more than 5 percentage points lower for one-earner married couples in eight countries: France (16.4 percentage points), Luxembourg (12.5 percentage points), the Czech Republic (11.2 percentage points), the United States (9.3 percentage points), Poland (8.9 percentage points), Slovenia (6.7 percentage points), Germany (6.5 percentage points) and Switzerland (6.2 percentage points). In contrast, the marginal rate for one-earner married couples with two children was more than 5 percentage points higher than it was for single workers with no children in Canada (5.5 percentage points), the Netherlands (5.6 percentage points), Iceland (9.0 percentage points) and New Zealand (27.0 percentage points). These higher marginal rates arise because of the phase-out of income-tested tax reliefs and/or cash benefits. When an income-tested measure is phased out, the reduction in the relief or benefit compounds the increase in the tax payable. These programmes are set out in greater detail in the relevant country chapters in Part II of the Report.
Table 3.7 and Figure 3.7 show the incremental change to personal income tax and employee SSCs less cash benefits when gross wage earnings increased at the margin in 2022. As in the case of the tax wedge, in most cases personal income tax and employee SSCs absorb 25% to 55% of a worker’s pay rise for single individuals without children at the average wage level. The marginal tax rate for the average worker was higher than 60% only in Belgium (60.2%) and lower than 25% in Chile (7.0%), Costa Rica (10.5%), Mexico (19.5%) and Korea (23.4%). As previously mentioned, no income tax was paid in Colombia at the average wage while SSCs are considered as non-tax compulsory payments.
In twenty-six OECD member countries, the net personal marginal tax rate for one-earner married couples with two children at the average wage level was either the same as or within 5 percentage points of that for single persons with no children. The marginal rate was more than 5 percentage points lower for the one-earner married couples in nine countries: France (22.4 percentage points), the Czech Republic (15.0 percentage points), Luxembourg (14.2 percentage points), Poland (10.4 percentage points), the United States (10.0 percentage points), Slovenia and Germany (both 7.8 percentage points), Switzerland (6.6 percentage points) and Portugal (5.5 percentage points). In contrast, the marginal rate for one-earner married couples with two children was more than 5 percentage points higher than it was for single persons with no children in Canada (5.7 percentage points), the Netherlands (6.2 percentage points), Iceland (9.6 percentage points) and New Zealand (27.0 percentage points). Similar to the marginal tax wedges, these higher marginal rates arise because of the phase-out of income-tested tax reliefs and/or cash transfers.
Table 3.8 shows the percentage increase in net income relative to the percentage increase in gross wages when the latter increased by 1 currency unit in 2022, i.e. the elasticity of after-tax income.3 Under a proportional tax system, net income would increase by the same percentage as the increase in gross earnings, in which case the elasticity is equal to 1. The more progressive the system is – at the income level considered – the lower this elasticity will be. In the case of the one-earner married couples with two children at the average wage (column 5 of Table 3.8), the most progressive systems of income tax plus employee SSCs in 2022 were found in New Zealand (0.43), Belgium (0.56), Italy (0.57), Austria (0.58) and Ireland (0.59). In contrast, France (0.97) and Mexico (0.91) either implemented or were close to a proportional system of income tax plus employee SSCs for this household type. For Colombia (0.95), Chile and Costa Rica (both 1.0), no income tax was paid at that level of earnings. In Colombia, SSCs are considered as non-tax compulsory payments and not included in the Taxing Wages calculations. However, the household’s cash benefit payment remained fixed while the gross wage increased. As a result, the percentage increase in net income was slightly less than the percentage increase in gross wage.
Table 3.9 provides a different elasticity measure: the percentage increase in net income relative to the percentage increase in labour costs (i.e. gross wage earnings plus employer SSCs and payroll taxes) when the latter rose by 1 currency unit in 2022.4 In this case, taxes and SSCs paid by employers are also part of the analysis. In twenty OECD countries, the value of this elasticity lay between 0.50 and 0.97 for the eight selected household types. This elasticity was below 0.50 for single parents earning 67% of the average wage level in New Zealand (0.48), the Netherlands (0.46), Luxembourg and Belgium (both 0.45), Australia (0.42), France and the United Kingdom (both 0.32), Ireland (0.29) and Canada (0.25) and for one-earner married couples at the average wage level with two children in New Zealand (0.43). In contrast, the elasticity was between 0.98 and 1.0 for most household types in Costa Rica and Chile and some household types in Canada, Colombia, Hungary and Mexico, and one household type in Estonia and Lithuania for the single worker earning 167% of the AW (1.0). Using this elasticity measure, the income tax system was regressive for a single individual at 167% of the AW in Germany (1.06) and Austria (1.1).
Table 3.10 and Table 3.11 set out gross wage earnings and net income for the eight household types in 2022, after all amounts have been converted into U.S. dollars with the same purchasing power. Single workers with the average wage took home over USD 50 000 in eleven countries: Switzerland (USD 77082), Luxembourg (USD 56 104), the Netherlands (USD 55 373), Iceland (USD 53 060), Norway (USD 51 384), Korea (USD 50 569), Ireland (USD 50 473) and Australia (USD 50 403)) (Table 3.10 column 4). The lowest levels (less than USD 20 000) were in Mexico (USD 13 489) and Colombia (USD 14 644). In the case of a one-earner married couple with two children at the average wage level, families took home over USD 60 000 in Austria, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Netherlands and Switzerland; with the lowest level again being in Colombia and Mexico (Table 3.11). With the exception of Chile, Costa Rica and Mexico, the one-earner married couple in OECD countries took home more than the single individual (with both household types at the average wage level) due to the favourable tax treatment of this household and/or the cash transfers to which they were entitled.
Table 3.12 and Table 3.13 show the corresponding figures to Table 3.10 and Table 3.11 for labour costs and net income in 2022. Thus, the ‘net’ columns in Table 3.10 and Table 3.11 are identical to those in Table 3.12 and Table 3.13, respectively. Usually, labour costs are significantly higher than gross wages, because any employer SSCs (including payroll taxes) are taken into account. If measured in US dollars with equal purchasing power, labour costs for single workers earning the average wage level (see Table 3.12) were highest (more than USD 80 000) in the Netherlands (USD 85 828), Luxembourg (USD 94 100) and Switzerland (USD 100 655), and lowest (less than USD 30 000) in Colombia (USD 14 644) and Mexico (USD 13 489). Annual labour costs are equal to annual gross wage in Chile, Colombia, Denmark and New Zealand. In those countries, neither compulsory employer SSCs nor payroll taxes paid to general government are levied on wages. However, employers in Chile, Colombia and Denmark are subject to non-tax compulsory payments.
Table 3.1. Income tax plus employee and employer contributions less cash benefits, 2022
As % of labour costs, by household type and wage level
Single no children 67 (% AW) |
Single no children 100 (% AW) |
Single no children 167 (% AW) |
Single 2 children 67 (% AW) |
Married 2 children 100-0 (% AW) |
Married 2 children 100-67 (% AW)1 |
Married 2 children 100-100 (% AW)1 |
Married no children 100-67 (% AW)1 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Australia |
21.2 |
26.9 |
33.1 |
0.8 |
20.2 |
24.6 |
26.9 |
24.6 |
Austria |
41.9 |
46.8 |
50.5 |
19.2 |
30.2 |
36.1 |
39.5 |
45.0 |
Belgium |
46.5 |
53.0 |
59.1 |
29.6 |
37.8 |
45.5 |
48.8 |
50.4 |
Canada |
30.0 |
31.9 |
35.4 |
7.5 |
21.8 |
28.9 |
30.9 |
31.1 |
Chile |
7.0 |
7.0 |
8.3 |
6.1 |
7.0 |
6.6 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
Colombia |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
-7.2 |
-4.8 |
-5.7 |
-4.8 |
0.0 |
Costa Rica |
29.2 |
29.2 |
31.3 |
29.2 |
29.2 |
29.2 |
29.2 |
29.2 |
Czech Republic |
37.4 |
39.8 |
41.8 |
17.5 |
22.7 |
33.8 |
35.6 |
38.9 |
Denmark |
32.9 |
35.5 |
41.2 |
5.6 |
26.0 |
31.0 |
32.7 |
34.5 |
Estonia |
34.5 |
39.0 |
41.2 |
21.8 |
30.6 |
33.1 |
35.6 |
37.2 |
Finland |
36.8 |
43.1 |
49.4 |
27.3 |
39.2 |
38.2 |
41.2 |
40.6 |
France |
40.7 |
47.0 |
53.9 |
20.2 |
39.2 |
40.7 |
44.1 |
44.3 |
Germany |
43.7 |
47.8 |
50.0 |
28.4 |
32.9 |
40.8 |
43.2 |
46.0 |
Greece |
32.5 |
37.1 |
42.2 |
25.5 |
33.7 |
35.7 |
37.5 |
36.2 |
Hungary |
41.2 |
41.2 |
41.2 |
23.7 |
30.0 |
34.5 |
35.6 |
41.2 |
Iceland |
28.7 |
32.5 |
37.8 |
18.1 |
21.2 |
30.2 |
32.5 |
31.0 |
Ireland |
25.5 |
34.7 |
43.0 |
10.3 |
20.8 |
27.7 |
32.0 |
31.0 |
Israel |
16.9 |
23.6 |
33.4 |
3.8 |
18.3 |
15.3 |
17.6 |
20.5 |
Italy |
40.1 |
45.9 |
53.8 |
26.1 |
34.9 |
37.4 |
41.4 |
43.6 |
Japan |
31.2 |
32.6 |
35.6 |
17.2 |
27.4 |
29.6 |
30.6 |
32.1 |
Korea |
21.1 |
24.2 |
27.3 |
16.0 |
20.4 |
20.9 |
22.5 |
23.0 |
Latvia |
37.2 |
40.6 |
42.8 |
19.9 |
29.0 |
32.3 |
34.8 |
39.2 |
Lithuania |
33.8 |
38.2 |
40.6 |
20.7 |
29.5 |
31.2 |
33.8 |
36.5 |
Luxembourg |
32.2 |
40.4 |
47.0 |
13.9 |
20.1 |
29.9 |
34.4 |
35.6 |
Mexico |
19.4 |
20.4 |
23.4 |
19.4 |
20.4 |
20.0 |
20.4 |
20.0 |
Netherlands |
27.9 |
35.5 |
40.8 |
6.0 |
29.6 |
28.0 |
31.7 |
32.4 |
New Zealand |
14.7 |
20.1 |
25.3 |
-16.1 |
7.9 |
18.0 |
20.1 |
18.0 |
Norway |
32.4 |
35.7 |
41.7 |
22.6 |
32.3 |
32.4 |
34.0 |
34.4 |
Poland |
31.3 |
33.6 |
35.5 |
3.3 |
11.9 |
22.2 |
24.9 |
32.7 |
Portugal |
38.0 |
41.9 |
47.7 |
25.7 |
31.6 |
37.5 |
39.7 |
40.2 |
Slovak Republic |
39.5 |
41.6 |
43.6 |
25.0 |
26.8 |
34.3 |
36.2 |
40.7 |
Slovenia |
39.7 |
42.8 |
45.8 |
16.1 |
28.9 |
35.6 |
38.7 |
41.5 |
Spain |
36.0 |
39.5 |
44.0 |
25.5 |
34.4 |
36.6 |
38.2 |
38.1 |
Sweden |
39.5 |
42.4 |
50.3 |
32.2 |
37.5 |
38.3 |
39.9 |
41.2 |
Switzerland |
20.4 |
23.4 |
28.0 |
6.5 |
11.6 |
17.7 |
20.3 |
23.2 |
Türkiye |
32.0 |
37.2 |
41.5 |
32.0 |
37.2 |
35.1 |
37.2 |
35.1 |
United Kingdom |
26.6 |
31.5 |
38.4 |
17.7 |
27.2 |
27.3 |
29.6 |
29.6 |
United States |
27.8 |
30.5 |
34.7 |
13.7 |
19.8 |
24.7 |
27.3 |
28.5 |
Unweighted average |
||||||||
OECD-Average |
30.7 |
34.6 |
39.0 |
16.6 |
25.6 |
29.4 |
31.6 |
33.0 |
OECD-EU 22 |
36.8 |
41.2 |
45.7 |
20.2 |
29.9 |
34.6 |
37.2 |
39.4 |
1. Two-earner couple.
Table 3.2. Income tax plus employee contributions, 2022
As % of gross wage earnings, by household type and wage level
Single no children 67 (% AW) |
Single no children 100 (% AW) |
Single no children 167 (% AW) |
Single 2 children 67 (% AW) |
Married 2 children 100-0 (% AW) |
Married 2 children 100-67 (% AW)1 |
Married 2 children 100-100 (% AW)1 |
Married no children 100-67 (% AW)1 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Australia |
17.0 |
23.0 |
29.6 |
17.0 |
23.0 |
20.6 |
23.0 |
20.6 |
Austria |
27.5 |
33.2 |
38.3 |
15.6 |
24.3 |
26.4 |
29.4 |
30.9 |
Belgium |
32.5 |
40.3 |
48.1 |
27.0 |
28.9 |
35.6 |
38.9 |
37.1 |
Canada |
22.4 |
25.6 |
31.3 |
16.6 |
22.4 |
24.3 |
25.6 |
24.3 |
Chile |
7.0 |
7.0 |
8.3 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
Colombia |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Costa Rica |
10.5 |
10.5 |
13.1 |
10.5 |
10.5 |
10.5 |
10.5 |
10.5 |
Czech Republic |
16.3 |
19.5 |
22.1 |
-0.7 |
3.1 |
11.4 |
13.8 |
18.2 |
Denmark |
33.0 |
35.5 |
41.2 |
31.2 |
31.9 |
34.5 |
35.5 |
34.5 |
Estonia |
12.3 |
18.4 |
21.3 |
9.6 |
14.4 |
14.8 |
17.5 |
16.0 |
Finland |
23.4 |
31.1 |
38.7 |
23.4 |
31.1 |
28.0 |
31.1 |
28.0 |
France |
23.5 |
27.7 |
33.5 |
20.8 |
21.0 |
23.3 |
25.6 |
25.6 |
Germany |
33.3 |
38.0 |
42.5 |
14.9 |
20.0 |
29.7 |
32.4 |
35.8 |
Greece |
17.3 |
23.0 |
29.2 |
16.4 |
23.5 |
21.3 |
23.5 |
22.0 |
Hungary |
33.5 |
33.5 |
33.5 |
22.2 |
25.9 |
29.0 |
29.7 |
33.5 |
Iceland |
24.1 |
28.2 |
33.8 |
24.1 |
22.3 |
26.6 |
28.2 |
26.6 |
Ireland |
17.3 |
27.5 |
36.7 |
12.8 |
18.2 |
23.4 |
27.5 |
23.4 |
Israel |
12.8 |
19.1 |
29.1 |
4.5 |
16.0 |
12.2 |
14.1 |
16.1 |
Italy |
21.2 |
28.8 |
39.3 |
21.2 |
26.7 |
25.8 |
28.8 |
25.8 |
Japan |
20.6 |
22.3 |
26.3 |
20.6 |
20.9 |
21.6 |
22.3 |
21.6 |
Korea |
12.4 |
15.8 |
20.0 |
10.4 |
14.0 |
13.7 |
15.2 |
14.5 |
Latvia |
22.4 |
26.5 |
29.3 |
11.7 |
19.4 |
20.6 |
22.9 |
24.8 |
Lithuania |
32.6 |
37.1 |
39.5 |
32.6 |
37.1 |
35.3 |
37.1 |
35.3 |
Luxembourg |
22.8 |
32.1 |
39.7 |
18.2 |
19.9 |
26.7 |
30.8 |
26.7 |
Mexico |
8.6 |
11.3 |
15.8 |
8.6 |
11.3 |
10.2 |
11.3 |
10.2 |
Netherlands |
19.1 |
27.7 |
36.1 |
12.6 |
27.4 |
21.7 |
25.5 |
24.3 |
New Zealand |
15.4 |
20.1 |
25.3 |
15.4 |
20.1 |
18.2 |
20.1 |
18.2 |
Norway |
23.6 |
27.3 |
34.2 |
21.0 |
27.3 |
25.8 |
27.3 |
25.8 |
Poland |
20.1 |
22.8 |
24.9 |
13.3 |
14.8 |
19.9 |
21.2 |
21.7 |
Portugal |
23.3 |
28.1 |
35.3 |
15.0 |
18.5 |
22.7 |
25.4 |
26.0 |
Slovak Republic |
21.5 |
24.3 |
26.9 |
10.6 |
10.4 |
17.9 |
19.9 |
23.1 |
Slovenia |
30.0 |
33.6 |
37.1 |
24.6 |
26.2 |
28.7 |
30.7 |
32.1 |
Spain |
16.9 |
21.4 |
27.2 |
3.2 |
14.8 |
17.6 |
19.8 |
19.6 |
Sweden |
20.5 |
24.3 |
34.7 |
20.5 |
24.3 |
22.8 |
24.3 |
22.8 |
Switzerland |
15.3 |
18.5 |
23.5 |
9.4 |
11.9 |
16.0 |
18.2 |
18.3 |
Türkiye |
20.1 |
26.2 |
31.2 |
20.1 |
26.2 |
23.8 |
26.2 |
23.8 |
United Kingdom |
19.2 |
23.6 |
30.5 |
19.2 |
23.1 |
21.8 |
23.6 |
21.8 |
United States |
21.7 |
24.8 |
29.5 |
6.5 |
13.3 |
18.5 |
21.4 |
22.6 |
Unweighted average |
||||||||
OECD-Average |
20.3 |
24.7 |
29.9 |
15.5 |
19.8 |
21.3 |
23.3 |
22.9 |
OECD-EU 22 |
23.6 |
28.8 |
34.3 |
17.1 |
21.9 |
24.4 |
26.9 |
26.7 |
1. Two-earner couple.
Table 3.3. Income tax plus employee contributions less cash benefits, 2022
As % of gross wage earnings, by household type and wage level
Single no children 67 (% AW) |
Single no children 100 (% AW) |
Single no children 167 (% AW) |
Single 2 children 67 (% AW) |
Married 2 children 100-0 (% AW) |
Married 2 children 100-67 (% AW)1 |
Married 2 children 100-100 (% AW)1 |
Married no children 100-67 (% AW)1 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Australia |
17.0 |
23.0 |
29.6 |
-4.5 |
15.9 |
20.6 |
23.0 |
20.6 |
Austria |
25.7 |
32.0 |
37.7 |
-3.4 |
10.7 |
18.2 |
22.6 |
29.6 |
Belgium |
32.5 |
40.3 |
48.1 |
11.2 |
21.0 |
30.9 |
34.9 |
37.1 |
Canada |
22.4 |
25.6 |
31.3 |
-2.5 |
14.6 |
21.9 |
24.5 |
24.3 |
Chile |
7.0 |
7.0 |
8.3 |
6.1 |
7.0 |
6.6 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
Colombia |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
-7.2 |
-4.8 |
-5.7 |
-4.8 |
0.0 |
Costa Rica |
10.5 |
10.5 |
13.1 |
10.5 |
10.5 |
10.5 |
10.5 |
10.5 |
Czech Republic |
16.3 |
19.5 |
22.1 |
-10.3 |
-3.4 |
11.4 |
13.8 |
18.2 |
Denmark |
32.9 |
35.5 |
41.2 |
5.6 |
26.0 |
31.0 |
32.7 |
34.5 |
Estonia |
12.3 |
18.4 |
21.3 |
-4.6 |
7.2 |
10.5 |
13.9 |
16.0 |
Finland |
23.4 |
31.1 |
38.7 |
11.9 |
26.4 |
25.2 |
28.8 |
28.0 |
France |
23.5 |
27.7 |
33.5 |
-2.9 |
17.0 |
20.9 |
23.7 |
25.6 |
Germany |
32.5 |
37.4 |
42.1 |
14.1 |
19.5 |
29.0 |
31.9 |
35.2 |
Greece |
17.3 |
23.0 |
29.2 |
8.9 |
18.9 |
21.3 |
23.5 |
22.0 |
Hungary |
33.5 |
33.5 |
33.5 |
13.8 |
20.9 |
25.9 |
27.2 |
33.5 |
Iceland |
24.1 |
28.2 |
33.8 |
12.9 |
16.2 |
25.8 |
28.2 |
26.6 |
Ireland |
17.3 |
27.5 |
36.7 |
0.4 |
12.0 |
19.7 |
24.4 |
23.4 |
Israel |
12.8 |
19.1 |
29.1 |
-0.9 |
13.6 |
10.7 |
12.9 |
16.1 |
Italy |
21.2 |
28.8 |
39.3 |
2.7 |
14.3 |
17.6 |
22.9 |
25.8 |
Japan |
20.6 |
22.3 |
26.3 |
4.4 |
16.3 |
18.8 |
20.0 |
21.6 |
Korea |
12.4 |
15.8 |
20.0 |
6.8 |
11.6 |
12.2 |
14.0 |
14.5 |
Latvia |
22.4 |
26.5 |
29.3 |
1.0 |
12.2 |
16.3 |
19.4 |
24.8 |
Lithuania |
32.6 |
37.1 |
39.5 |
19.3 |
28.2 |
30.0 |
32.7 |
35.3 |
Luxembourg |
22.8 |
32.1 |
39.7 |
2.0 |
9.1 |
20.2 |
25.4 |
26.7 |
Mexico |
8.6 |
11.3 |
15.8 |
8.6 |
11.3 |
10.2 |
11.3 |
10.2 |
Netherlands |
19.1 |
27.7 |
36.1 |
-5.4 |
21.1 |
19.3 |
23.6 |
24.3 |
New Zealand |
14.7 |
20.1 |
25.3 |
-16.1 |
7.9 |
18.0 |
20.1 |
18.0 |
Norway |
23.6 |
27.3 |
34.2 |
12.5 |
23.6 |
23.6 |
25.5 |
25.8 |
Poland |
20.1 |
22.8 |
24.9 |
-12.5 |
-2.5 |
9.5 |
12.6 |
21.7 |
Portugal |
23.3 |
28.1 |
35.3 |
8.1 |
15.4 |
22.7 |
25.4 |
26.0 |
Slovak Republic |
21.5 |
24.3 |
26.9 |
2.8 |
5.1 |
14.7 |
17.2 |
23.1 |
Slovenia |
30.0 |
33.6 |
37.1 |
2.5 |
17.4 |
25.3 |
28.8 |
32.1 |
Spain |
16.9 |
21.4 |
27.2 |
3.2 |
14.8 |
17.6 |
19.8 |
19.6 |
Sweden |
20.5 |
24.3 |
34.7 |
10.9 |
17.8 |
18.9 |
21.1 |
22.8 |
Switzerland |
15.3 |
18.5 |
23.5 |
0.6 |
6.0 |
12.4 |
15.2 |
18.3 |
Türkiye |
20.1 |
26.2 |
31.2 |
20.1 |
26.2 |
23.8 |
26.2 |
23.8 |
United Kingdom |
19.2 |
23.6 |
30.5 |
9.4 |
18.8 |
19.3 |
21.5 |
21.8 |
United States |
21.7 |
24.8 |
29.5 |
6.5 |
13.3 |
18.5 |
21.4 |
22.6 |
Unweighted average |
||||||||
OECD-Average |
20.2 |
24.6 |
29.9 |
3.8 |
14.1 |
18.5 |
21.1 |
22.8 |
OECD-EU 22 |
23.5 |
28.8 |
34.3 |
3.6 |
15.0 |
20.7 |
23.9 |
26.6 |
1. Two-earner couple.
Table 3.4. Income tax, 2022
As % of gross wage earnings, by household type and wage level
Single no children 67 (% AW) |
Single no children 100 (% AW) |
Single no children 167 (% AW) |
Single 2 children 67 (% AW) |
Married 2 children 100-0 (% AW) |
Married 2 children 100-67 (% AW)1 |
Married 2 children 100-100 (% AW)1 |
Married no children 100-67 (% AW)1 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Australia |
17.0 |
23.0 |
29.6 |
17.0 |
23.0 |
20.6 |
23.0 |
20.6 |
Austria |
9.5 |
15.2 |
22.1 |
-2.4 |
6.3 |
8.4 |
11.4 |
12.9 |
Belgium |
18.9 |
26.4 |
34.2 |
13.4 |
15.0 |
21.9 |
25.1 |
23.4 |
Canada |
14.4 |
19.2 |
27.4 |
8.5 |
16.0 |
17.3 |
19.2 |
17.3 |
Chile |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Colombia |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Costa Rica |
0.0 |
0.0 |
2.6 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Czech Republic |
5.3 |
8.5 |
11.1 |
-11.7 |
-7.9 |
0.4 |
2.8 |
7.2 |
Denmark |
33.0 |
35.5 |
41.2 |
31.2 |
31.9 |
34.5 |
35.5 |
34.5 |
Estonia |
10.7 |
16.8 |
19.7 |
8.0 |
12.8 |
13.2 |
15.9 |
14.4 |
Finland |
13.2 |
20.8 |
28.4 |
13.2 |
20.8 |
17.8 |
20.8 |
17.8 |
France |
12.1 |
16.2 |
22.5 |
9.5 |
9.5 |
11.9 |
14.2 |
14.2 |
Germany |
13.0 |
17.7 |
26.6 |
-5.1 |
0.0 |
9.7 |
12.4 |
15.5 |
Greece |
3.4 |
9.0 |
15.2 |
2.4 |
9.5 |
7.3 |
9.5 |
8.0 |
Hungary |
15.0 |
15.0 |
15.0 |
3.7 |
7.4 |
10.5 |
11.2 |
15.0 |
Iceland |
24.0 |
28.1 |
33.7 |
24.0 |
22.2 |
26.4 |
28.1 |
26.4 |
Ireland |
13.3 |
23.5 |
32.7 |
8.8 |
14.2 |
19.4 |
23.5 |
19.4 |
Israel |
6.4 |
10.9 |
19.3 |
-1.9 |
7.8 |
4.6 |
5.8 |
8.6 |
Italy |
12.5 |
20.1 |
29.8 |
12.5 |
18.0 |
17.1 |
20.1 |
17.1 |
Japan |
6.2 |
7.9 |
12.7 |
6.2 |
6.5 |
7.2 |
7.9 |
7.2 |
Korea |
3.2 |
6.6 |
11.8 |
1.1 |
4.7 |
4.4 |
5.9 |
5.2 |
Latvia |
11.9 |
16.0 |
18.8 |
1.2 |
8.9 |
10.1 |
12.4 |
14.3 |
Lithuania |
13.1 |
17.6 |
20.0 |
13.1 |
17.6 |
15.8 |
17.6 |
15.8 |
Luxembourg |
10.6 |
19.8 |
27.3 |
6.0 |
7.6 |
14.4 |
18.5 |
14.4 |
Mexico |
7.4 |
9.9 |
14.3 |
7.4 |
9.9 |
8.9 |
9.9 |
8.9 |
Netherlands |
5.7 |
16.1 |
26.8 |
4.1 |
16.0 |
11.2 |
15.5 |
11.9 |
New Zealand |
15.4 |
20.1 |
25.3 |
15.4 |
20.1 |
18.2 |
20.1 |
18.2 |
Norway |
15.6 |
19.3 |
26.2 |
13.0 |
19.3 |
17.8 |
19.3 |
17.8 |
Poland |
2.3 |
4.9 |
7.1 |
-4.6 |
-3.0 |
2.0 |
3.4 |
3.9 |
Portugal |
12.3 |
17.1 |
24.3 |
4.0 |
7.5 |
11.7 |
14.4 |
15.0 |
Slovak Republic |
8.1 |
10.9 |
13.5 |
-2.8 |
-3.0 |
4.5 |
6.5 |
9.7 |
Slovenia |
7.9 |
11.5 |
15.0 |
2.5 |
4.1 |
6.6 |
8.6 |
10.0 |
Spain |
10.5 |
15.0 |
20.9 |
-3.2 |
8.5 |
11.3 |
13.4 |
13.2 |
Sweden |
13.5 |
17.3 |
29.8 |
13.5 |
17.3 |
15.8 |
17.3 |
15.8 |
Switzerland |
8.9 |
12.1 |
17.1 |
3.0 |
5.5 |
9.6 |
11.8 |
11.9 |
Türkiye |
5.1 |
11.2 |
16.2 |
5.1 |
11.2 |
8.8 |
11.2 |
8.8 |
United Kingdom |
11.5 |
14.3 |
23.0 |
11.5 |
13.8 |
13.2 |
14.3 |
13.2 |
United States |
14.1 |
17.2 |
21.9 |
-1.2 |
5.7 |
10.9 |
13.7 |
15.0 |
Unweighted average |
||||||||
OECD-Average |
10.7 |
15.0 |
20.6 |
6.0 |
10.1 |
11.7 |
13.7 |
13.2 |
OECD-EU 22 |
11.6 |
16.9 |
22.8 |
5.3 |
9.9 |
12.5 |
15.0 |
14.7 |
1. Two-earner couple.
Table 3.5. Employee contributions, 2022
As % of gross wage earnings, by household type and wage level
Single no children 67 (% AW) |
Single no children 100 (% AW) |
Single no children 167 (% AW) |
Single 2 children 67 (% AW) |
Married 2 children 100-0 (% AW) |
Married 2 children 100-67 (% AW)1 |
Married 2 children 100-100 (% AW)1 |
Married no children 100-67 (% AW)1 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Australia |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Austria |
18.0 |
18.0 |
16.2 |
18.0 |
18.0 |
18.0 |
18.0 |
18.0 |
Belgium |
13.6 |
14.0 |
13.9 |
13.6 |
13.8 |
13.8 |
13.7 |
13.8 |
Canada |
8.0 |
6.4 |
3.8 |
8.0 |
6.4 |
7.0 |
6.4 |
7.0 |
Chile |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
Colombia |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Costa Rica |
10.5 |
10.5 |
10.5 |
10.5 |
10.5 |
10.5 |
10.5 |
10.5 |
Czech Republic |
11.0 |
11.0 |
11.0 |
11.0 |
11.0 |
11.0 |
11.0 |
11.0 |
Denmark |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Estonia |
1.6 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
Finland |
10.2 |
10.3 |
10.3 |
10.2 |
10.3 |
10.2 |
10.3 |
10.2 |
France |
11.3 |
11.4 |
11.0 |
11.3 |
11.4 |
11.4 |
11.4 |
11.4 |
Germany |
20.3 |
20.3 |
15.9 |
20.0 |
20.0 |
20.0 |
20.0 |
20.3 |
Greece |
14.0 |
14.0 |
14.0 |
14.0 |
14.0 |
14.0 |
14.0 |
14.0 |
Hungary |
18.5 |
18.5 |
18.5 |
18.5 |
18.5 |
18.5 |
18.5 |
18.5 |
Iceland |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Ireland |
4.0 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
Israel |
6.4 |
8.3 |
9.8 |
6.4 |
8.3 |
7.5 |
8.3 |
7.5 |
Italy |
8.7 |
8.7 |
9.5 |
8.7 |
8.7 |
8.7 |
8.7 |
8.7 |
Japan |
14.5 |
14.5 |
13.6 |
14.5 |
14.5 |
14.5 |
14.5 |
14.5 |
Korea |
9.3 |
9.3 |
8.3 |
9.3 |
9.3 |
9.3 |
9.3 |
9.3 |
Latvia |
10.5 |
10.5 |
10.5 |
10.5 |
10.5 |
10.5 |
10.5 |
10.5 |
Lithuania |
19.5 |
19.5 |
19.5 |
19.5 |
19.5 |
19.5 |
19.5 |
19.5 |
Luxembourg |
12.2 |
12.3 |
12.4 |
12.2 |
12.3 |
12.3 |
12.3 |
12.3 |
Mexico |
1.3 |
1.4 |
1.5 |
1.3 |
1.4 |
1.3 |
1.4 |
1.3 |
Netherlands |
13.4 |
11.7 |
9.3 |
8.5 |
11.4 |
10.4 |
10.0 |
12.4 |
New Zealand |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Norway |
8.0 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
Poland |
17.8 |
17.8 |
17.8 |
17.8 |
17.8 |
17.8 |
17.8 |
17.8 |
Portugal |
11.0 |
11.0 |
11.0 |
11.0 |
11.0 |
11.0 |
11.0 |
11.0 |
Slovak Republic |
13.4 |
13.4 |
13.4 |
13.4 |
13.4 |
13.4 |
13.4 |
13.4 |
Slovenia |
22.1 |
22.1 |
22.1 |
22.1 |
22.1 |
22.1 |
22.1 |
22.1 |
Spain |
6.4 |
6.4 |
6.4 |
6.4 |
6.4 |
6.4 |
6.4 |
6.4 |
Sweden |
7.0 |
7.0 |
4.9 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
Switzerland |
6.4 |
6.4 |
6.3 |
6.4 |
6.4 |
6.4 |
6.4 |
6.4 |
Türkiye |
15.0 |
15.0 |
15.0 |
15.0 |
15.0 |
15.0 |
15.0 |
15.0 |
United Kingdom |
7.6 |
9.3 |
7.5 |
7.6 |
9.3 |
8.6 |
9.3 |
8.6 |
United States |
7.7 |
7.7 |
7.7 |
7.7 |
7.7 |
7.7 |
7.7 |
7.7 |
Unweighted average |
||||||||
OECD-Average |
9.6 |
9.7 |
9.3 |
9.5 |
9.6 |
9.6 |
9.6 |
9.7 |
OECD-EU 22 |
12.0 |
12.0 |
11.5 |
11.8 |
11.9 |
11.9 |
11.9 |
12.0 |
1. Two-earner couple.
Table 3.6. Marginal rate of income tax plus employee and employer contributions less cash benefits, 2022
As % of labour costs, by household type and wage level
Single no children 67 (% AW) |
Single no children 100 (% AW) |
Single no children 167 (% AW) |
Single 2 children 67 (% AW) |
Married 2 children 100-0 (% AW) |
Married 2 children 100-67 (% AW)1 |
Married 2 children 100-100 (% AW)1 |
Married no children 100-67 (% AW)1 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Australia |
39.2 |
40.7 |
42.1 |
58.2 |
40.7 |
40.7 |
40.7 |
40.7 |
Austria |
54.3 |
59.5 |
45.7 |
36.5 |
59.5 |
59.5 |
59.5 |
59.5 |
Belgium |
68.5 |
68.7 |
67.8 |
68.5 |
65.0 |
67.8 |
67.8 |
67.8 |
Canada |
41.9 |
31.9 |
44.5 |
77.0 |
37.4 |
37.4 |
37.4 |
31.9 |
Chile |
7.0 |
7.0 |
10.2 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
Colombia |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Costa Rica |
29.2 |
29.2 |
36.5 |
29.2 |
29.2 |
29.2 |
29.2 |
29.2 |
Czech Republic |
44.7 |
44.7 |
44.7 |
44.7 |
33.5 |
44.7 |
44.7 |
44.7 |
Denmark |
38.7 |
48.6 |
55.5 |
36.9 |
48.6 |
48.6 |
48.6 |
48.6 |
Estonia |
41.2 |
49.5 |
41.2 |
41.2 |
49.5 |
49.5 |
49.5 |
49.5 |
Finland |
56.1 |
56.1 |
59.0 |
56.1 |
56.1 |
56.1 |
56.1 |
56.1 |
France |
64.6 |
57.7 |
60.0 |
74.5 |
41.2 |
50.0 |
57.7 |
47.3 |
Germany |
54.1 |
58.4 |
47.0 |
52.8 |
51.9 |
56.1 |
55.8 |
56.3 |
Greece |
45.2 |
46.6 |
50.8 |
45.2 |
46.6 |
46.6 |
46.6 |
46.6 |
Hungary |
41.2 |
41.2 |
41.2 |
41.2 |
41.2 |
41.2 |
41.2 |
41.2 |
Iceland |
40.2 |
40.2 |
47.7 |
49.3 |
49.3 |
45.6 |
40.2 |
40.2 |
Ireland |
35.6 |
53.6 |
56.8 |
74.2 |
53.6 |
53.6 |
53.6 |
53.6 |
Israel |
36.8 |
36.8 |
50.7 |
40.9 |
36.8 |
36.8 |
36.8 |
36.8 |
Italy |
56.1 |
62.7 |
63.7 |
56.1 |
62.7 |
62.7 |
62.7 |
62.7 |
Japan |
33.1 |
37.3 |
38.0 |
52.5 |
37.3 |
37.3 |
37.3 |
37.3 |
Korea |
30.3 |
31.0 |
33.0 |
23.3 |
31.0 |
31.0 |
31.0 |
31.0 |
Latvia |
47.4 |
47.4 |
44.5 |
47.4 |
47.4 |
47.4 |
47.4 |
47.4 |
Lithuania |
47.2 |
44.1 |
40.6 |
47.2 |
44.1 |
44.1 |
44.1 |
44.1 |
Luxembourg |
53.2 |
58.5 |
56.5 |
60.9 |
45.9 |
58.5 |
58.5 |
58.5 |
Mexico |
17.4 |
25.2 |
28.4 |
17.4 |
25.2 |
25.2 |
25.2 |
25.2 |
Netherlands |
51.0 |
51.0 |
51.1 |
56.5 |
56.5 |
51.0 |
51.0 |
51.0 |
New Zealand |
17.5 |
33.0 |
33.0 |
44.5 |
60.0 |
33.0 |
33.0 |
33.0 |
Norway |
41.6 |
49.9 |
52.6 |
41.6 |
49.9 |
49.9 |
49.9 |
49.9 |
Poland |
38.3 |
38.3 |
38.3 |
29.4 |
29.4 |
38.3 |
38.3 |
38.3 |
Portugal |
46.7 |
51.1 |
58.0 |
46.7 |
46.7 |
49.5 |
51.1 |
49.5 |
Slovak Republic |
45.9 |
45.9 |
49.1 |
41.4 |
45.9 |
45.9 |
45.9 |
45.9 |
Slovenia |
43.6 |
50.3 |
55.0 |
43.6 |
43.6 |
43.6 |
43.6 |
50.3 |
Spain |
44.3 |
47.9 |
53.8 |
44.3 |
47.9 |
47.9 |
47.9 |
47.9 |
Sweden |
46.2 |
49.3 |
65.9 |
46.2 |
49.3 |
49.3 |
49.3 |
49.3 |
Switzerland |
26.7 |
32.5 |
39.5 |
20.8 |
26.3 |
31.1 |
36.7 |
32.8 |
Türkiye |
47.8 |
47.8 |
47.8 |
47.8 |
47.8 |
47.8 |
47.8 |
47.8 |
United Kingdom |
41.3 |
41.3 |
50.0 |
73.6 |
41.3 |
41.3 |
41.3 |
41.3 |
United States |
31.5 |
40.8 |
42.7 |
52.3 |
31.5 |
31.5 |
40.8 |
31.5 |
Unweighted average |
||||||||
OECD-Average |
40.7 |
43.6 |
45.9 |
45.4 |
42.5 |
43.1 |
43.6 |
42.9 |
OECD-EU 22 |
48.4 |
51.4 |
52.1 |
49.6 |
48.5 |
50.5 |
50.9 |
50.7 |
Note: It is assumed that gross earnings of the principal earner in the household rise. The outcome may differ if the wage of the spouse goes up, especially if partners are taxed individually.
1. Two-earner couple.
Table 3.7. Marginal rate of income tax plus employee contributions less cash benefits, 2022
As % of gross wage earnings, by household type and wage level
Single no children 67 (% AW) |
Single no children 100 (% AW) |
Single no children 167 (% AW) |
Single 2 children 67 (% AW) |
Married 2 children 100-0 (% AW) |
Married 2 children 100-67 (% AW)1 |
Married 2 children 100-100 (% AW)1 |
Married no children 100-67 (% AW)1 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Australia |
36.0 |
37.5 |
39.0 |
56.0 |
37.5 |
37.5 |
37.5 |
37.5 |
Austria |
41.5 |
48.2 |
42.0 |
18.7 |
48.2 |
48.2 |
48.2 |
48.2 |
Belgium |
55.6 |
60.2 |
59.0 |
55.6 |
55.6 |
59.0 |
59.0 |
59.0 |
Canada |
35.4 |
29.7 |
43.4 |
74.4 |
35.4 |
35.4 |
35.4 |
29.7 |
Chile |
7.0 |
7.0 |
10.2 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
Colombia |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Costa Rica |
10.5 |
10.5 |
19.7 |
10.5 |
10.5 |
10.5 |
10.5 |
10.5 |
Czech Republic |
26.0 |
26.0 |
26.0 |
26.0 |
11.0 |
26.0 |
26.0 |
26.0 |
Denmark |
38.7 |
48.6 |
55.5 |
36.9 |
48.6 |
48.6 |
48.6 |
48.6 |
Estonia |
21.3 |
32.4 |
21.3 |
21.3 |
32.4 |
32.4 |
32.4 |
32.4 |
Finland |
46.8 |
46.8 |
50.4 |
46.8 |
46.8 |
46.8 |
46.8 |
46.8 |
France |
32.6 |
42.2 |
42.2 |
51.6 |
19.8 |
31.7 |
42.2 |
28.0 |
Germany |
45.0 |
50.1 |
47.0 |
43.3 |
42.3 |
47.3 |
47.0 |
47.5 |
Greece |
32.9 |
34.6 |
39.8 |
32.9 |
34.6 |
34.6 |
34.6 |
34.6 |
Hungary |
33.5 |
33.5 |
33.5 |
33.5 |
33.5 |
33.5 |
33.5 |
33.5 |
Iceland |
36.4 |
36.4 |
44.4 |
46.0 |
46.0 |
42.2 |
36.4 |
36.4 |
Ireland |
28.5 |
48.5 |
52.0 |
71.4 |
48.5 |
48.5 |
48.5 |
48.5 |
Israel |
32.0 |
32.0 |
47.0 |
36.4 |
32.0 |
32.0 |
32.0 |
32.0 |
Italy |
42.3 |
51.0 |
52.2 |
42.3 |
51.0 |
51.0 |
51.0 |
51.0 |
Japan |
22.8 |
27.7 |
34.1 |
45.2 |
27.7 |
27.7 |
27.7 |
27.7 |
Korea |
22.6 |
23.4 |
28.6 |
14.9 |
23.4 |
23.4 |
23.4 |
23.4 |
Latvia |
34.9 |
34.9 |
31.4 |
34.9 |
34.9 |
34.9 |
34.9 |
34.9 |
Lithuania |
46.3 |
43.1 |
39.5 |
46.3 |
43.1 |
43.1 |
43.1 |
43.1 |
Luxembourg |
46.8 |
52.7 |
50.5 |
55.4 |
38.5 |
52.7 |
52.7 |
52.7 |
Mexico |
12.1 |
19.5 |
22.9 |
12.1 |
19.5 |
19.5 |
19.5 |
19.5 |
Netherlands |
45.2 |
45.2 |
51.1 |
51.4 |
51.4 |
45.2 |
45.2 |
45.2 |
New Zealand |
17.5 |
33.0 |
33.0 |
44.5 |
60.0 |
33.0 |
33.0 |
33.0 |
Norway |
34.0 |
43.4 |
46.4 |
34.0 |
43.4 |
43.4 |
43.4 |
43.4 |
Poland |
28.2 |
28.2 |
28.2 |
17.8 |
17.8 |
28.2 |
28.2 |
28.2 |
Portugal |
34.0 |
39.5 |
48.0 |
34.0 |
34.0 |
37.5 |
39.5 |
37.5 |
Slovak Republic |
29.9 |
29.9 |
34.0 |
24.0 |
29.9 |
29.9 |
29.9 |
29.9 |
Slovenia |
34.6 |
42.4 |
47.8 |
34.6 |
34.6 |
34.6 |
34.6 |
42.4 |
Spain |
27.6 |
32.4 |
40.0 |
27.6 |
32.4 |
32.4 |
32.4 |
32.4 |
Sweden |
29.2 |
33.4 |
55.2 |
29.2 |
33.4 |
33.4 |
33.4 |
33.4 |
Switzerland |
22.0 |
28.1 |
36.0 |
15.7 |
21.5 |
26.7 |
32.6 |
28.5 |
Türkiye |
38.7 |
38.7 |
38.7 |
38.7 |
38.7 |
38.7 |
38.7 |
38.7 |
United Kingdom |
32.7 |
32.7 |
42.7 |
69.7 |
32.7 |
32.7 |
32.7 |
32.7 |
United States |
26.3 |
36.3 |
38.3 |
48.6 |
26.3 |
26.3 |
36.3 |
26.3 |
Unweighted average |
||||||||
OECD-Average |
31.2 |
35.3 |
38.7 |
36.6 |
33.8 |
34.6 |
35.2 |
34.5 |
OECD-EU 22 |
36.4 |
41.1 |
43.0 |
38.0 |
37.4 |
40.0 |
40.5 |
40.2 |
Note: It is assumed that gross earnings of the principal earner in the household rise. The outcome may differ if the wage of the spouse goes up, especially if partners are taxed individually.
1. Two-earner couple.
Table 3.8. Percentage increase in net income relative to percentage increase in gross wages, 2022
After an increase of 1 currency unit in gross wages, by household type and wage level
Single no children 67 (% AW) |
Single no children 100 (% AW) |
Single no children 167 (% AW) |
Single 2 children 67 (% AW) |
Married 2 children 100-0 (% AW) |
Married 2 children 100-67 (% AW)1 |
Married 2 children 100-100 (% AW)1 |
Married no children 100-67 (% AW)1 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Australia |
0.77 |
0.81 |
0.87 |
0.42 |
0.74 |
0.79 |
0.81 |
0.79 |
Austria |
0.79 |
0.76 |
0.93 |
0.79 |
0.58 |
0.63 |
0.67 |
0.74 |
Belgium |
0.66 |
0.67 |
0.79 |
0.50 |
0.56 |
0.59 |
0.63 |
0.65 |
Canada |
0.83 |
0.95 |
0.82 |
0.25 |
0.76 |
0.83 |
0.86 |
0.93 |
Chile |
1.00 |
1.00 |
0.98 |
0.99 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Colombia |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
0.93 |
0.95 |
0.95 |
0.95 |
1.00 |
Costa Rica |
1.00 |
1.00 |
0.92 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Czech Republic |
0.88 |
0.92 |
0.95 |
0.67 |
0.86 |
0.84 |
0.86 |
0.90 |
Denmark |
0.91 |
0.80 |
0.76 |
0.67 |
0.69 |
0.75 |
0.76 |
0.78 |
Estonia |
0.90 |
0.83 |
1.00 |
0.75 |
0.73 |
0.76 |
0.78 |
0.80 |
Finland |
0.69 |
0.77 |
0.81 |
0.60 |
0.72 |
0.71 |
0.75 |
0.74 |
France |
0.88 |
0.80 |
0.87 |
0.47 |
0.97 |
0.86 |
0.76 |
0.97 |
Germany |
0.81 |
0.80 |
0.92 |
0.66 |
0.72 |
0.74 |
0.78 |
0.81 |
Greece |
0.81 |
0.85 |
0.85 |
0.74 |
0.81 |
0.83 |
0.85 |
0.84 |
Hungary |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
0.77 |
0.84 |
0.90 |
0.91 |
1.00 |
Iceland |
0.84 |
0.89 |
0.84 |
0.62 |
0.64 |
0.78 |
0.89 |
0.87 |
Ireland |
0.86 |
0.71 |
0.76 |
0.29 |
0.59 |
0.64 |
0.68 |
0.67 |
Israel |
0.78 |
0.84 |
0.75 |
0.63 |
0.79 |
0.76 |
0.78 |
0.81 |
Italy |
0.73 |
0.69 |
0.79 |
0.59 |
0.57 |
0.60 |
0.64 |
0.66 |
Japan |
0.97 |
0.93 |
0.89 |
0.57 |
0.86 |
0.89 |
0.90 |
0.92 |
Korea |
0.88 |
0.91 |
0.89 |
0.91 |
0.87 |
0.87 |
0.89 |
0.90 |
Latvia |
0.84 |
0.89 |
0.97 |
0.66 |
0.74 |
0.78 |
0.81 |
0.87 |
Lithuania |
0.80 |
0.90 |
1.00 |
0.67 |
0.79 |
0.81 |
0.84 |
0.88 |
Luxembourg |
0.69 |
0.70 |
0.82 |
0.45 |
0.68 |
0.59 |
0.63 |
0.64 |
Mexico |
0.96 |
0.91 |
0.92 |
0.96 |
0.91 |
0.90 |
0.91 |
0.90 |
Netherlands |
0.68 |
0.76 |
0.76 |
0.46 |
0.62 |
0.68 |
0.72 |
0.72 |
New Zealand |
0.97 |
0.84 |
0.90 |
0.48 |
0.43 |
0.82 |
0.84 |
0.82 |
Norway |
0.86 |
0.78 |
0.81 |
0.75 |
0.74 |
0.74 |
0.76 |
0.76 |
Poland |
0.90 |
0.93 |
0.96 |
0.73 |
0.80 |
0.79 |
0.82 |
0.92 |
Portugal |
0.86 |
0.84 |
0.80 |
0.72 |
0.78 |
0.81 |
0.81 |
0.85 |
Slovak Republic |
0.89 |
0.93 |
0.90 |
0.78 |
0.74 |
0.82 |
0.85 |
0.91 |
Slovenia |
0.93 |
0.87 |
0.83 |
0.67 |
0.79 |
0.88 |
0.92 |
0.85 |
Spain |
0.87 |
0.86 |
0.83 |
0.75 |
0.79 |
0.82 |
0.84 |
0.84 |
Sweden |
0.89 |
0.88 |
0.68 |
0.79 |
0.81 |
0.82 |
0.84 |
0.86 |
Switzerland |
0.92 |
0.88 |
0.84 |
0.85 |
0.83 |
0.84 |
0.80 |
0.88 |
Türkiye |
0.77 |
0.83 |
0.89 |
0.77 |
0.83 |
0.80 |
0.83 |
0.80 |
United Kingdom |
0.83 |
0.88 |
0.82 |
0.33 |
0.83 |
0.83 |
0.86 |
0.86 |
United States |
0.94 |
0.85 |
0.88 |
0.55 |
0.85 |
0.90 |
0.81 |
0.95 |
Unweighted average |
||||||||
OECD-Average |
0.86 |
0.85 |
0.87 |
0.66 |
0.77 |
0.80 |
0.82 |
0.84 |
OECD-EU 22 |
0.83 |
0.82 |
0.86 |
0.64 |
0.74 |
0.76 |
0.78 |
0.81 |
Note: Net income is calculated as gross earnings minus personal income tax and employees' social security contributions plus family benefits. The increase reported in the Table represents a form of elasticity. In a proportional tax system the elasticity would equal 1. The more progressive the system at these income levels, the lower is the elasticity. The reported elasticities in Table 3.8 are calculated as (100 - METR) / (100 - AETR), where METR is the marginal rate of income tax plus employee social security contributions less cash benefits reported in Table 3.7 and AETR is the average rate plus employee social security contributions less cash benefits reported in Table 3.3.
1. Two-earner couple. Assumes a rise in the labour costs associated with the principal earner in the household.
Table 3.9. Percentage increase in net income relative to percentage increase in gross labour cost, 2022
After an increase of 1 currency unit in gross labour cost, by household type and wage level
Single no children 67 (% AW) |
Single no children 100 (% AW) |
Single no children 167 (% AW) |
Single 2 children 67 (% AW) |
Married 2 children 100-0 (% AW) |
Married 2 children 100-67 (% AW)1 |
Married 2 children 100-100 (% AW)1 |
Married no children 100-67 (% AW)1 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Australia |
0.77 |
0.81 |
0.87 |
0.42 |
0.74 |
0.79 |
0.81 |
0.79 |
Austria |
0.79 |
0.76 |
1.10 |
0.79 |
0.58 |
0.63 |
0.67 |
0.74 |
Belgium |
0.59 |
0.67 |
0.79 |
0.45 |
0.56 |
0.59 |
0.63 |
0.65 |
Canada |
0.83 |
1.00 |
0.86 |
0.25 |
0.80 |
0.88 |
0.91 |
0.99 |
Chile |
1.00 |
1.00 |
0.98 |
0.99 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Colombia |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
0.93 |
0.95 |
0.95 |
0.95 |
1.00 |
Costa Rica |
1.00 |
1.00 |
0.92 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Czech Republic |
0.88 |
0.92 |
0.95 |
0.67 |
0.86 |
0.84 |
0.86 |
0.90 |
Denmark |
0.91 |
0.80 |
0.76 |
0.67 |
0.69 |
0.75 |
0.76 |
0.78 |
Estonia |
0.90 |
0.83 |
1.00 |
0.75 |
0.73 |
0.76 |
0.78 |
0.80 |
Finland |
0.69 |
0.77 |
0.81 |
0.60 |
0.72 |
0.71 |
0.75 |
0.74 |
France |
0.60 |
0.80 |
0.87 |
0.32 |
0.97 |
0.84 |
0.76 |
0.95 |
Germany |
0.81 |
0.80 |
1.06 |
0.66 |
0.72 |
0.74 |
0.78 |
0.81 |
Greece |
0.81 |
0.85 |
0.85 |
0.74 |
0.81 |
0.83 |
0.85 |
0.84 |
Hungary |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
0.77 |
0.84 |
0.90 |
0.91 |
1.00 |
Iceland |
0.84 |
0.89 |
0.84 |
0.62 |
0.64 |
0.78 |
0.89 |
0.87 |
Ireland |
0.86 |
0.71 |
0.76 |
0.29 |
0.59 |
0.64 |
0.68 |
0.67 |
Israel |
0.76 |
0.83 |
0.74 |
0.61 |
0.77 |
0.75 |
0.77 |
0.79 |
Italy |
0.73 |
0.69 |
0.79 |
0.59 |
0.57 |
0.60 |
0.64 |
0.66 |
Japan |
0.97 |
0.93 |
0.96 |
0.57 |
0.86 |
0.89 |
0.90 |
0.92 |
Korea |
0.88 |
0.91 |
0.92 |
0.91 |
0.87 |
0.87 |
0.89 |
0.90 |
Latvia |
0.84 |
0.89 |
0.97 |
0.66 |
0.74 |
0.78 |
0.81 |
0.87 |
Lithuania |
0.80 |
0.90 |
1.00 |
0.67 |
0.79 |
0.81 |
0.84 |
0.88 |
Luxembourg |
0.69 |
0.70 |
0.82 |
0.45 |
0.68 |
0.59 |
0.63 |
0.64 |
Mexico |
1.02 |
0.94 |
0.94 |
1.02 |
0.94 |
0.94 |
0.94 |
0.94 |
Netherlands |
0.68 |
0.76 |
0.83 |
0.46 |
0.62 |
0.68 |
0.72 |
0.73 |
New Zealand |
0.97 |
0.84 |
0.90 |
0.48 |
0.43 |
0.82 |
0.84 |
0.82 |
Norway |
0.86 |
0.78 |
0.81 |
0.75 |
0.74 |
0.74 |
0.76 |
0.76 |
Poland |
0.90 |
0.93 |
0.96 |
0.73 |
0.80 |
0.79 |
0.82 |
0.92 |
Portugal |
0.86 |
0.84 |
0.80 |
0.72 |
0.78 |
0.81 |
0.81 |
0.85 |
Slovak Republic |
0.89 |
0.93 |
0.90 |
0.78 |
0.74 |
0.82 |
0.85 |
0.91 |
Slovenia |
0.93 |
0.87 |
0.83 |
0.67 |
0.79 |
0.88 |
0.92 |
0.85 |
Spain |
0.87 |
0.86 |
0.83 |
0.75 |
0.79 |
0.82 |
0.84 |
0.84 |
Sweden |
0.89 |
0.88 |
0.68 |
0.79 |
0.81 |
0.82 |
0.84 |
0.86 |
Switzerland |
0.92 |
0.88 |
0.84 |
0.85 |
0.83 |
0.84 |
0.80 |
0.88 |
Türkiye |
0.77 |
0.83 |
0.89 |
0.77 |
0.83 |
0.80 |
0.83 |
0.80 |
United Kingdom |
0.80 |
0.86 |
0.81 |
0.32 |
0.81 |
0.81 |
0.83 |
0.83 |
United States |
0.95 |
0.85 |
0.88 |
0.55 |
0.85 |
0.91 |
0.81 |
0.96 |
Unweighted average |
||||||||
OECD-Average |
0.85 |
0.85 |
0.88 |
0.66 |
0.77 |
0.80 |
0.82 |
0.85 |
OECD-EU 22 |
0.82 |
0.82 |
0.88 |
0.64 |
0.74 |
0.76 |
0.78 |
0.81 |
Note: Net income is calculated as gross earnings minus personal income tax and employees' social security contributions plus family benefits. The increase reported in the Table represents a form of elasticity. In a proportional tax system the elasticity would equal 1. The more progressive the system at these income levels, the lower is the elasticity. The reported elasticities in Table 3.9 are calculated as (100 - METR) / (100 - AETR), where METR is the marginal rate of income tax plus employee and employer social security contributions less cash benefits reported in Table 3.6 and AETR is the average rate plus employee and employer social security contributions less cash benefits reported in Table 3.1.
1. Two-earner couple. Assumes a rise in the labour costs associated with the principal earner in the household.
Table 3.10. Annual gross wage and net income, single person, 2022
In US dollars using PPP, by household type and wage level
Single no children 67 (% AW) |
Single no children 100 (% AW) |
Single no children 167 (% AW) |
Single 2 children 67 (% AW) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total gross earnings before taxes |
Net income after taxes |
Total gross earnings before taxes |
Net income after taxes |
Total gross earnings before taxes |
Net income after taxes |
Total gross earnings before taxes |
Net income after taxes |
|
Australia |
43 855 |
36 385 |
65 455 |
50 403 |
109 309 |
77 002 |
43 855 |
45 832 |
Austria |
46 365 |
34 457 |
69 202 |
47 090 |
115 567 |
71 969 |
46 365 |
47 929 |
Belgium |
49 763 |
33 598 |
74 273 |
44 305 |
124 037 |
64 389 |
49 763 |
44 191 |
Canada |
43 511 |
33 775 |
64 941 |
48 314 |
108 452 |
74 549 |
43 511 |
44 613 |
Chile |
17 902 |
16 648 |
26 719 |
24 848 |
44 620 |
40 924 |
17 902 |
16 811 |
Colombia |
9 812 |
9 812 |
14 644 |
14 644 |
24 456 |
24 456 |
9 812 |
10 514 |
Costa Rica |
18 873 |
16 891 |
28 169 |
25 211 |
47 042 |
40 873 |
18 873 |
16 891 |
Czech Republic |
24 395 |
20 428 |
36 411 |
29 319 |
60 806 |
47 371 |
24 395 |
26 912 |
Denmark |
46 861 |
31 458 |
69 941 |
45 104 |
116 802 |
68 666 |
46 861 |
44 229 |
Estonia |
22 846 |
20 031 |
34 099 |
27 828 |
56 945 |
44 827 |
22 846 |
23 901 |
Finland |
41 391 |
31 703 |
61 778 |
42 550 |
103 169 |
63 192 |
41 391 |
36 467 |
France |
39 828 |
30 487 |
59 445 |
43 006 |
99 273 |
66 021 |
39 828 |
40 994 |
Germany |
50 342 |
34 000 |
75 137 |
47 013 |
125 479 |
72 606 |
50 342 |
43 261 |
Greece |
23 967 |
19 813 |
35 772 |
27 550 |
59 739 |
42 292 |
23 967 |
21 845 |
Hungary |
26 493 |
17 618 |
39 542 |
26 296 |
66 036 |
43 914 |
26 493 |
22 837 |
Iceland |
49 511 |
37 558 |
73 897 |
53 060 |
123 407 |
81 685 |
49 511 |
43 141 |
Ireland |
46 648 |
38 593 |
69 624 |
50 473 |
116 272 |
73 550 |
46 648 |
46 475 |
Israel |
30 833 |
26 893 |
46 020 |
37 219 |
76 853 |
54 519 |
30 833 |
31 123 |
Italy |
35 844 |
28 232 |
53 498 |
38 087 |
89 342 |
54 270 |
35 844 |
34 869 |
Japan |
36 025 |
28 601 |
53 769 |
41 776 |
89 794 |
66 174 |
36 025 |
34 426 |
Korea |
40 260 |
35 254 |
60 090 |
50 569 |
100 350 |
80 254 |
40 260 |
37 520 |
Latvia |
21 349 |
16 575 |
31 864 |
23 416 |
53 212 |
37 645 |
21 349 |
21 139 |
Lithuania |
27 944 |
18 824 |
41 708 |
26 229 |
69 652 |
42 139 |
27 944 |
22 546 |
Luxembourg |
55 382 |
42 732 |
82 660 |
56 104 |
138 042 |
83 307 |
55 382 |
54 268 |
Mexico |
10 187 |
9 310 |
15 204 |
13 489 |
25 391 |
21 373 |
10 187 |
9 310 |
Netherlands |
51 345 |
41 514 |
76 635 |
55 373 |
127 980 |
81 765 |
51 345 |
54 127 |
New Zealand |
31 851 |
27 173 |
47 539 |
37 966 |
79 390 |
59 306 |
31 851 |
36 994 |
Norway |
47 387 |
36 202 |
70 726 |
51 384 |
118 113 |
77 748 |
47 387 |
41 457 |
Poland |
25 790 |
20 612 |
38 493 |
29 735 |
64 283 |
48 257 |
25 790 |
29 015 |
Portugal |
25 826 |
19 808 |
38 546 |
27 699 |
64 371 |
41 653 |
25 826 |
23 736 |
Slovak Republic |
19 237 |
15 101 |
28 711 |
21 748 |
47 948 |
35 045 |
19 237 |
18 706 |
Slovenia |
27 803 |
19 474 |
41 498 |
27 560 |
69 301 |
43 575 |
27 803 |
27 098 |
Spain |
31 503 |
26 184 |
47 019 |
36 962 |
78 522 |
57 134 |
31 503 |
30 505 |
Sweden |
38 479 |
30 584 |
57 432 |
43 496 |
95 911 |
62 672 |
38 479 |
34 277 |
Switzerland |
63 382 |
53 705 |
94 601 |
77 082 |
157 983 |
120 922 |
63 382 |
63 031 |
Türkiye |
19 655 |
15 705 |
29 336 |
21 639 |
48 991 |
33 686 |
19 655 |
15 705 |
United Kingdom |
42 970 |
34 737 |
64 134 |
48 972 |
107 104 |
74 441 |
42 970 |
38 948 |
United States |
43 476 |
34 028 |
64 889 |
48 793 |
108 365 |
76 360 |
43 476 |
40 666 |
Unweighted average |
||||||||
OECD-Average |
34 971 |
27 487 |
52 195 |
38 482 |
87 166 |
59 225 |
34 971 |
33 587 |
OECD-EU 22 |
35 427 |
26 901 |
52 877 |
37 134 |
88 304 |
56 648 |
35 427 |
34 060 |
Table 3.11. Annual gross wage and net income, married couple, 2022
In US dollars using PPP, by household type and wage level
Married 2 children 100-0 (% AW) |
Married 2 children 100-67 (% AW)1 |
Married 2 children 100-100 (% AW)1 |
Married no children 100-67 (% AW)1 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total gross earnings before taxes |
Net income after taxes |
Total gross earnings before taxes |
Net income after taxes |
Total gross earnings before taxes |
Net income after taxes |
Total gross earnings before taxes |
Net income after taxes |
|
Australia |
65 455 |
55 015 |
109 309 |
86 788 |
130 909 |
100 805 |
109 309 |
86 788 |
Austria |
69 202 |
61 802 |
115 567 |
94 526 |
138 404 |
107 159 |
115 567 |
81 350 |
Belgium |
74 273 |
58 674 |
124 037 |
85 653 |
148 547 |
96 636 |
124 037 |
78 011 |
Canada |
64 941 |
55 483 |
108 452 |
84 699 |
129 883 |
98 020 |
108 452 |
82 089 |
Chile |
26 719 |
24 848 |
44 620 |
41 659 |
53 437 |
49 697 |
44 620 |
41 497 |
Colombia |
14 644 |
15 347 |
24 456 |
25 861 |
29 289 |
30 694 |
24 456 |
24 456 |
Costa Rica |
28 169 |
25 211 |
47 042 |
42 102 |
56 337 |
50 422 |
47 042 |
42 102 |
Czech Republic |
36 411 |
37 643 |
60 806 |
53 884 |
72 821 |
62 775 |
60 806 |
49 746 |
Denmark |
69 941 |
51 751 |
116 802 |
80 548 |
139 883 |
94 194 |
116 802 |
76 563 |
Estonia |
34 099 |
31 651 |
56 945 |
50 945 |
68 197 |
58 743 |
56 945 |
47 859 |
Finland |
61 778 |
45 466 |
103 169 |
77 169 |
123 556 |
88 017 |
103 169 |
74 253 |
France |
59 445 |
49 325 |
99 273 |
78 520 |
118 890 |
90 758 |
99 273 |
73 849 |
Germany |
75 137 |
60 511 |
125 479 |
89 071 |
150 275 |
102 399 |
125 479 |
81 328 |
Greece |
39 349 |
31 921 |
65 713 |
51 730 |
78 698 |
60 219 |
65 713 |
51 288 |
Hungary |
39 542 |
31 289 |
66 036 |
48 908 |
79 085 |
57 585 |
66 036 |
43 914 |
Iceland |
73 897 |
61 912 |
123 407 |
91 601 |
147 793 |
106 119 |
123 407 |
90 618 |
Ireland |
69 624 |
61 251 |
116 272 |
93 394 |
139 248 |
105 226 |
116 272 |
89 113 |
Israel |
46 020 |
39 776 |
76 853 |
68 630 |
92 039 |
80 206 |
76 853 |
64 469 |
Italy |
53 498 |
45 846 |
89 342 |
73 588 |
106 996 |
82 541 |
89 342 |
66 320 |
Japan |
53 769 |
45 029 |
89 794 |
72 881 |
107 538 |
86 056 |
89 794 |
70 377 |
Korea |
60 090 |
53 113 |
100 350 |
88 068 |
120 180 |
103 384 |
100 350 |
85 823 |
Latvia |
31 864 |
27 980 |
53 212 |
44 555 |
63 728 |
51 396 |
53 212 |
39 992 |
Lithuania |
41 708 |
29 951 |
69 652 |
48 775 |
83 416 |
56 180 |
69 652 |
45 052 |
Luxembourg |
82 660 |
75 165 |
138 042 |
110 188 |
165 320 |
123 386 |
138 042 |
101 222 |
Mexico |
15 204 |
13 489 |
25 391 |
22 799 |
30 409 |
26 979 |
25 391 |
22 799 |
Netherlands |
76 635 |
60 463 |
127 980 |
103 313 |
153 269 |
117 172 |
127 980 |
96 888 |
New Zealand |
47 539 |
43 788 |
79 390 |
65 139 |
95 077 |
75 932 |
79 390 |
65 139 |
Norway |
70 726 |
54 069 |
118 113 |
90 271 |
141 453 |
105 453 |
118 113 |
87 586 |
Poland |
38 493 |
39 454 |
64 283 |
58 169 |
76 985 |
67 292 |
64 283 |
50 347 |
Portugal |
38 546 |
32 622 |
64 371 |
49 752 |
77 091 |
57 539 |
64 371 |
47 611 |
Slovak Republic |
28 711 |
27 250 |
47 948 |
40 881 |
57 423 |
47 527 |
47 948 |
36 849 |
Slovenia |
41 498 |
34 256 |
69 301 |
51 786 |
82 995 |
59 057 |
69 301 |
47 034 |
Spain |
47 019 |
40 051 |
78 522 |
64 668 |
94 038 |
75 445 |
78 522 |
63 146 |
Sweden |
57 432 |
47 189 |
95 911 |
77 773 |
114 864 |
90 685 |
95 911 |
74 080 |
Switzerland |
94 601 |
88 956 |
157 983 |
138 325 |
189 201 |
160 370 |
157 983 |
129 095 |
Türkiye |
29 336 |
21 639 |
48 991 |
37 344 |
58 672 |
43 277 |
48 991 |
37 344 |
United Kingdom |
64 134 |
52 074 |
107 104 |
86 446 |
128 268 |
100 681 |
107 104 |
83 710 |
United States |
64 889 |
56 250 |
108 365 |
88 291 |
129 778 |
102 040 |
108 365 |
83 838 |
Unweighted average |
||||||||
OECD-Average |
52 289 |
44 408 |
87 323 |
69 966 |
104 579 |
80 844 |
87 323 |
66 146 |
OECD-EU 22 |
53 039 |
44 614 |
88 576 |
69 445 |
106 079 |
79 633 |
88 576 |
64 355 |
1. Two-earner couple.
Table 3.12. Annual labour costs and net income, single person, 2022
In US dollars using PPP, by household type and wage level
Single no children 67 (% AW) |
Single no children 100 (% AW) |
Single no children 167 (% AW) |
Single 2 children 67 (% AW) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total gross labour costs before taxes |
Net income after taxes |
Total gross labour costs before taxes |
Net income after taxes |
Total gross labour costs before taxes |
Net income after taxes |
Total gross labour costs before taxes |
Net income after taxes |
|
Australia |
46 194 |
36 385 |
68 947 |
50 403 |
115 141 |
77 002 |
46 194 |
45 832 |
Austria |
59 328 |
34 457 |
88 550 |
47 090 |
145 506 |
71 969 |
59 328 |
47 929 |
Belgium |
62 801 |
33 598 |
94 362 |
44 305 |
157 585 |
64 389 |
62 801 |
44 191 |
Canada |
48 218 |
33 775 |
70 907 |
48 314 |
115 463 |
74 549 |
48 218 |
44 613 |
Chile |
17 902 |
16 648 |
26 719 |
24 848 |
44 620 |
40 924 |
17 902 |
16 811 |
Colombia |
9 812 |
9 812 |
14 644 |
14 644 |
24 456 |
24 456 |
9 812 |
10 514 |
Costa Rica |
23 874 |
16 891 |
35 633 |
25 211 |
59 508 |
40 873 |
23 874 |
16 891 |
Czech Republic |
32 641 |
20 428 |
48 717 |
29 319 |
81 358 |
47 371 |
32 641 |
26 912 |
Denmark |
46 861 |
31 458 |
69 941 |
45 104 |
116 802 |
68 666 |
46 861 |
44 229 |
Estonia |
30 568 |
20 031 |
45 624 |
27 828 |
76 192 |
44 827 |
30 568 |
23 901 |
Finland |
50 133 |
31 703 |
74 825 |
42 550 |
124 958 |
63 192 |
50 133 |
36 467 |
France |
51 380 |
30 487 |
81 140 |
43 006 |
143 251 |
66 021 |
51 380 |
40 994 |
Germany |
60 398 |
34 000 |
90 146 |
47 013 |
145 114 |
72 606 |
60 398 |
43 261 |
Greece |
29 334 |
19 813 |
43 783 |
27 550 |
73 117 |
42 292 |
29 334 |
21 845 |
Hungary |
29 937 |
17 618 |
44 683 |
26 296 |
74 620 |
43 914 |
29 937 |
22 837 |
Iceland |
52 655 |
37 558 |
78 589 |
53 060 |
131 244 |
81 685 |
52 655 |
43 141 |
Ireland |
51 803 |
38 593 |
77 318 |
50 473 |
129 121 |
73 550 |
51 803 |
46 475 |
Israel |
32 356 |
26 893 |
48 697 |
37 219 |
81 873 |
54 519 |
32 356 |
31 123 |
Italy |
47 163 |
28 232 |
70 393 |
38 087 |
117 556 |
54 270 |
47 163 |
34 869 |
Japan |
41 559 |
28 601 |
62 028 |
41 776 |
102 816 |
66 174 |
41 559 |
34 426 |
Korea |
44 690 |
35 254 |
66 702 |
50 569 |
110 387 |
80 254 |
44 690 |
37 520 |
Latvia |
26 393 |
16 575 |
39 389 |
23 416 |
65 774 |
37 645 |
26 393 |
21 139 |
Lithuania |
28 444 |
18 824 |
42 454 |
26 229 |
70 899 |
42 139 |
28 444 |
22 546 |
Luxembourg |
63 047 |
42 732 |
94 100 |
56 104 |
157 147 |
83 307 |
63 047 |
54 268 |
Mexico |
11 551 |
9 310 |
16 947 |
13 489 |
27 906 |
21 373 |
11 551 |
9 310 |
Netherlands |
57 566 |
41 514 |
85 828 |
55 373 |
138 104 |
81 765 |
57 566 |
54 127 |
New Zealand |
31 851 |
27 173 |
47 539 |
37 966 |
79 390 |
59 306 |
31 851 |
36 994 |
Norway |
53 547 |
36 202 |
79 921 |
51 384 |
133 468 |
77 748 |
53 547 |
41 457 |
Poland |
30 012 |
20 612 |
44 795 |
29 735 |
74 807 |
48 257 |
30 012 |
29 015 |
Portugal |
31 959 |
19 808 |
47 700 |
27 699 |
79 659 |
41 653 |
31 959 |
23 736 |
Slovak Republic |
24 950 |
15 101 |
37 239 |
21 748 |
62 189 |
35 045 |
24 950 |
18 706 |
Slovenia |
32 280 |
19 474 |
48 179 |
27 560 |
80 458 |
43 575 |
32 280 |
27 098 |
Spain |
40 922 |
26 184 |
61 078 |
36 962 |
102 000 |
57 134 |
40 922 |
30 505 |
Sweden |
50 570 |
30 584 |
75 477 |
43 496 |
126 047 |
62 672 |
50 570 |
34 277 |
Switzerland |
67 439 |
53 705 |
100 655 |
77 082 |
167 980 |
120 922 |
67 439 |
63 031 |
Türkiye |
23 095 |
15 705 |
34 470 |
21 639 |
57 565 |
33 686 |
23 095 |
15 705 |
United Kingdom |
47 302 |
34 737 |
71 544 |
48 972 |
120 761 |
74 441 |
47 302 |
38 948 |
United States |
47 123 |
34 028 |
70 174 |
48 793 |
116 976 |
76 360 |
47 123 |
40 666 |
Unweighted average |
||||||||
OECD-Average |
40 465 |
27 487 |
60 522 |
38 482 |
100 837 |
59 225 |
40 465 |
33 587 |
OECD-EU 22 |
42 659 |
26 901 |
63 896 |
37 134 |
106 467 |
56 648 |
42 659 |
34 060 |
Table 3.13. Annual labour costs and net income, married couple, 2022
In US dollars using PPP, by household type and wage level
Married 2 children 100-0 (% AW) |
Married 2 children 100-67 (% AW)1 |
Married 2 children 100-100 (% AW)1 |
Married no children 100-67 (% AW)1 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total gross labour costs before taxes |
Net income after taxes |
Total gross labour costs before taxes |
Net income after taxes |
Total gross labour costs before taxes |
Net income after taxes |
Total gross labour costs before taxes |
Net income after taxes |
|
Australia |
68 947 |
55 015 |
115 141 |
86 788 |
137 893 |
100 805 |
115 141 |
86 788 |
Austria |
88 550 |
61 802 |
147 878 |
94 526 |
177 100 |
107 159 |
147 878 |
81 350 |
Belgium |
94 362 |
58 674 |
157 163 |
85 653 |
188 725 |
96 636 |
157 163 |
78 011 |
Canada |
70 907 |
55 483 |
119 125 |
84 699 |
141 814 |
98 020 |
119 125 |
82 089 |
Chile |
26 719 |
24 848 |
44 620 |
41 659 |
53 437 |
49 697 |
44 620 |
41 497 |
Colombia |
14 644 |
15 347 |
24 456 |
25 861 |
29 289 |
30 694 |
24 456 |
24 456 |
Costa Rica |
35 633 |
25 211 |
59 508 |
42 102 |
71 267 |
50 422 |
59 508 |
42 102 |
Czech Republic |
48 717 |
37 643 |
81 358 |
53 884 |
97 435 |
62 775 |
81 358 |
49 746 |
Denmark |
69 941 |
51 751 |
116 802 |
80 548 |
139 883 |
94 194 |
116 802 |
76 563 |
Estonia |
45 624 |
31 651 |
76 192 |
50 945 |
91 248 |
58 743 |
76 192 |
47 859 |
Finland |
74 825 |
45 466 |
124 958 |
77 169 |
149 651 |
88 017 |
124 958 |
74 253 |
France |
81 140 |
49 325 |
132 520 |
78 520 |
162 280 |
90 758 |
132 520 |
73 849 |
Germany |
90 146 |
60 511 |
150 544 |
89 071 |
180 292 |
102 399 |
150 544 |
81 328 |
Greece |
48 161 |
31 921 |
80 429 |
51 730 |
96 322 |
60 219 |
80 429 |
51 288 |
Hungary |
44 683 |
31 289 |
74 620 |
48 908 |
89 366 |
57 585 |
74 620 |
43 914 |
Iceland |
78 589 |
61 912 |
131 244 |
91 601 |
157 178 |
106 119 |
131 244 |
90 618 |
Ireland |
77 318 |
61 251 |
129 121 |
93 394 |
154 635 |
105 226 |
129 121 |
89 113 |
Israel |
48 697 |
39 776 |
81 053 |
68 630 |
97 393 |
80 206 |
81 053 |
64 469 |
Italy |
70 393 |
45 846 |
117 556 |
73 588 |
140 785 |
82 541 |
117 556 |
66 320 |
Japan |
62 028 |
45 029 |
103 586 |
72 881 |
124 055 |
86 056 |
103 586 |
70 377 |
Korea |
66 702 |
53 113 |
111 392 |
88 068 |
133 404 |
103 384 |
111 392 |
85 823 |
Latvia |
39 389 |
27 980 |
65 782 |
44 555 |
78 777 |
51 396 |
65 782 |
39 992 |
Lithuania |
42 454 |
29 951 |
70 899 |
48 775 |
84 909 |
56 180 |
70 899 |
45 052 |
Luxembourg |
94 100 |
75 165 |
157 147 |
110 188 |
188 200 |
123 386 |
157 147 |
101 222 |
Mexico |
16 947 |
13 489 |
28 498 |
22 799 |
33 894 |
26 979 |
28 498 |
22 799 |
Netherlands |
85 828 |
60 463 |
143 395 |
103 313 |
171 657 |
117 172 |
143 395 |
96 888 |
New Zealand |
47 539 |
43 788 |
79 390 |
65 139 |
95 077 |
75 932 |
79 390 |
65 139 |
Norway |
79 921 |
54 069 |
133 468 |
90 271 |
159 842 |
105 453 |
133 468 |
87 586 |
Poland |
44 795 |
39 454 |
74 807 |
58 169 |
89 589 |
67 292 |
74 807 |
50 347 |
Portugal |
47 700 |
32 622 |
79 659 |
49 752 |
95 400 |
57 539 |
79 659 |
47 611 |
Slovak Republic |
37 239 |
27 250 |
62 189 |
40 881 |
74 477 |
47 527 |
62 189 |
36 849 |
Slovenia |
48 179 |
34 256 |
80 458 |
51 786 |
96 357 |
59 057 |
80 458 |
47 034 |
Spain |
61 078 |
40 051 |
102 000 |
64 668 |
122 156 |
75 445 |
102 000 |
63 146 |
Sweden |
75 477 |
47 189 |
126 047 |
77 773 |
150 954 |
90 685 |
126 047 |
74 080 |
Switzerland |
100 655 |
88 956 |
168 094 |
138 325 |
201 310 |
160 370 |
168 094 |
129 095 |
Türkiye |
34 470 |
21 639 |
57 565 |
37 344 |
68 940 |
43 277 |
57 565 |
37 344 |
United Kingdom |
71 544 |
52 074 |
118 846 |
86 446 |
143 087 |
100 681 |
118 846 |
83 710 |
United States |
70 174 |
56 250 |
117 297 |
88 291 |
140 349 |
102 040 |
117 297 |
83 838 |
Unweighted average |
||||||||
OECD-Average |
60 637 |
44 408 |
101 179 |
69 966 |
121 274 |
80 844 |
101 179 |
66 146 |
OECD-EU 22 |
64 095 |
44 614 |
106 887 |
69 445 |
128 191 |
79 633 |
106 887 |
64 355 |
1. Two-earner couple.
Notes
← 1. Tables 3.1 to 3.7 show figures rounded to the first decimal. Due to rounding, changes in percentage points that are presented in the text may differ by one-tenth of a percentage point relative to those in the Tables.
← 2. In Colombia, the general social security system for healthcare is financed by public and private funds. The pension system is a hybrid of two different systems: a defined-contribution, fully-funded pension system; and a pay-as-you-go system. Each of those contributions are mandatory and more than 50% of total contributions are made to privately managed funds. Therefore, they are considered to be non-tax compulsory payments (NTCPs) (further information is available in the country details in Part II of the report). In addition, in Colombia, all payments for employment risk are made to privately managed funds and are considered to be NTCPs. Other countries also have NTCPs (please see https://www.oecd.org/tax/tax-policy/tax-database/ ).
← 3. The reported elasticities in Table 3.8 are calculated as (100 - METR) / (100 - AETR), where METR is the marginal rate of income tax plus employee social security contributions less cash benefits reported in Table 3.7 and AETR is the average rate of income tax plus employee social security contributions less cash benefits reported in Table 3.3.
← 4. The reported elasticities in Table 3.9 are calculated as (100 - METR) / (100 - AETR), where METR is the marginal rate of income tax plus employee and employer social security contributions less cash benefits reported in Table 3.6 and AETR is the average rate of income tax plus employee and employer social security contributions less cash benefits reported in Table 3.1.