In 2011, the Philippines introduced a means-tested social pension. The programme is restricted to older people who have disabilities, are frail or in poor health, who have no regular source of income, no pension and no regular support from family. This has left millions of older Filipinos barred from enrolling in the programme.
Four years after the social pension was launched, an assessment1 of the programme by HelpAge global network member Coalition of Services of the Elderly (COSE), HelpAge International, and the Demographic Research and Development Foundation found that while the social pension had a meaningful impact on the income and expenditure of recipients, there were still major issues concerning eligibility.
Strict criteria meant that only a person aged 77 or over who was disabled or frail and who had no income or support from family was eligible. A flawed targeting system, which calculated wealth as accumulated household assets, measured whether a person qualified as poor or not. This meant that some of the poorest, oldest people were left out, as the method did not consider current income. And although the criteria were narrow, they were not specific enough to avoid high levels of subjectivity and politicisation, where individuals at the local level were identifying those who were eligible.