Steep rises in energy and commodity prices and disruptions in gas and oil markets linked to Russia’s aggression in Ukraine triggered a cost-of-living crisis and created a risk of energy shortages. Lower global growth, supply chain bottlenecks and higher uncertainty dampened activity and economic prospects. Monetary policy has been tightened to counter inflationary pressures and should remain tight. Supportive fiscal policy helped preserve jobs and incomes but has weakened a strong fiscal position. Pressures linked to population ageing call for structural measures to improve fiscal sustainability. The labour market has performed well but faces chronic labour and skills shortages. Making employment easier for mothers can help in this regard. Raising skills would boost productivity, which still lags behind the OECD average. The Czech economy remains highly energy intensive, relies heavily on coal and records high greenhouse gas emissions. The current energy crisis is an opportunity to strengthen the resolve to reach climate commitments.
OECD Economic Surveys: Czech Republic 2023
1. Key Policy Insights
Abstract
Introduction
The Czech economy was on track to recover from the COVID-19 crisis when, in early 2022, Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine brought new challenges. Steep rises in energy and commodity prices (Figure 1.1) and supply disruptions in gas and oil imports from Russia triggered a cost-of-living crisis and created a risk of energy shortages. Lower global growth, persistent constraints in global supply chains and higher uncertainty dampened activity. To counter steep and broadening inflationary pressures, and rising inflation expectations, the central bank raised policy interest rates in a timely way, tightening financing conditions. GDP growth slowed markedly (Figure 1.1).
Loose fiscal policy during the pandemic, measures to cushion the impact of high energy prices and unresolved structural issues linked with population ageing have worsened fiscal sustainability. The expansionary fiscal policy helped preserve jobs and incomes, but has led to a large deficit (Figure 1.2) and increased public debt. Several tax cuts have aggravated the structural budget balance and untargeted cash transfers to families with children and pensioners have continued (see Box 1.1). The Czech Republic has welcomed a large number of Ukrainian refugees. Yet, expenditures to cover the cost of basic services and income support to the refugees, together with commitments to increase defence spending add to the fiscal pressures. High core inflation, an overheated labour market and relatively high growth in household incomes over 2020-21 indicate that the accommodative overall macroeconomic policy stance contributed to domestic inflationary pressures. Monetary policy tightening started early, but fiscal policy has yet to initiate a firm consolidation path.
The labour market has performed well, also thanks to the substantial government support during the pandemic, with a very high employment rate and one of the lowest unemployment rates in the OECD. Yet, chronic labour (Figure 1.3) and skills shortages are set to become worse with ageing. Raising labour participation further - notably of underrepresented groups - could aid growth, incomes and equity. Reducing the sizable gender labour income gap and bringing more mothers to work will help in this regard. Increasing labour participation of older workers would limit growing imbalances in the pension system. Raising skills could also boost productivity, which after an impressive period of catch-up still lags behind the OECD average (Figure 1.3). More equitable provision of education and skills and effective lifelong learning would help tackle skills shortages and spur growth. The Czech Republic could also better attract and retain skilled foreign labour.
The current energy crisis is an opportunity to strengthen the resolve for climate commitments. The Czech economy is highly energy intensive, still heavily relies on coal and records high greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Figure 1.4). In addition, public support for the climate agenda is relatively weak - albeit growing. Steep rises in energy prices - notably gas - present genuine hardship for many households and companies, and the government has introduced measures to cushion their impact. However, incentives to encourage energy-saving behaviour and investments into alternative and renewable sources of energy should be maintained. The availability of considerable recovery funds at the EU level will be an opportunity to step up investments to decarbonise the economy. A stable policy environment, an improved investment climate and a lower regulatory burden can help boost investment and lift growth in a sustainable way.
Against this background, the main messages of this Survey are:
A tight macroeconomic policy is warranted until inflation and inflation expectations are firmly under control. While providing targeted support, steady fiscal consolidation is called for to rebuild buffers and contribute to the fight against inflation. An overdue reform of the pension system would help contain steep future rises in public expenditures due to population ageing.
Higher labour participation would help address chronic labour shortages and support growth. Lengthening the working lives of workers as well as bringing more mothers into employment could raise incomes. Stronger education and skills – notably of disadvantaged children and low-skilled adults – would raise productivity and make growth more equitable. Focusing immigration policy on welcoming high-skilled foreign labour and boosting retention would also raise workforce skills.
Policies to reduce the reliance on coal and greenhouse gas emissions would boost well-being. Once high market prices of energy abate, more ambitious and more equitable pricing of carbon should be pursued. Increased public funding and an improved business climate would boost investment in renewable energy sources and energy efficiency. At the same time, active labour market policies to support workers in job search and reskilling would aid green restructuring.
Box 1.1. Key government policy priorities
Following the general election in October 2021, a new five-party centre-right coalition government was formed. Its current priority is to steer the economy and society in the face of rising costs of living, an energy crisis, slowing economy and the remaining risks stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Key priorities of the current government include the following (as listed in its January 2022 Policy Statement):
Stabilisation of public finances: the need for responsible budgetary policy, including in the long term, by reforming and improving public spending without raising the tax burden on the economy.
Focus on the European Union and NATO: emphasis on stable partnerships with democracies around the world and the protection of human rights and democracy.
Pension reform: based on a society-wide consensus that would ensure economic safety in old age for all.
Education: improving education and skills of all, via effective teachers, improved teaching techniques and modern curricula.
Free market support: promoting small and medium-sized enterprises and fostering competition.
Environment: recognising the immediate need to tackle climate change and finding solutions to help protect the environment.
Housing: offering solutions to support owner-occupied and rented housing, including social housing, notably by accelerating building permit proceedings.
Science and research: building on the existing high-quality human capital and innovative potential to further support science and research.
Modern government and digitisation: making public administration modern, lean and flexible by bringing the best talent to provide high-quality services to citizens. Digitising state processes to make state administration more efficient and cheaper, and to deter corruption more effectively.
Responsibility to voters and political culture: improving political culture by relying on honest, competent and trustworthy individuals without conflict of interests; increasing the transparency of the political process.
The economic outlook has deteriorated
The economy has slowed and inflation has risen
The Czech Republic has been strongly affected by Russia’s war against Ukraine through lower global demand, rising energy prices, the risk of energy shortages and generally higher uncertainty. Before the war, virtually all natural gas was imported from Russia, contributing to roughly one third of heat and 8% of electricity production. Russia accounted for more than half of crude oil imports, some of which were delivered through the Druzhba pipeline, which has been exempted from the EU’s oil embargo. Total domestic gas reserves at end-2022 stood at 85% of the total capacity, a high level for the time of year. Through October-December 2022, Czechs consumed roughly 19% less gas compared to the same period over the last three years.
The economy has slowed markedly due to rising costs and weakening domestic demand. Russia’s war against Ukraine has added to pressures on energy and commodity prices. Rising consumer prices have squeezed real household incomes (Figure 1.5). High uncertainty related to the war and the looming energy crisis have contributed to a sharp drop in consumer and business sentiment (Figure 1.5), dampening household consumption and private investment. The services industries, such as accommodation and catering, which had rebounded in early 2022 following the removal of pandemic restrictions, have slowed due to weakened demand and rising input costs. On the other hand, exports – that were for a long time constrained by disruptions in the supply of raw materials and components – rebounded in the second half of 2022 (Figure 1.5), as supply chain bottlenecks started easing.
Inflation has risen to very high levels. Consumer price inflation peaked at 18% in September 2022, the highest level in almost 30 years (Figure 1.6). The labour market remains tight (Figure 1.7) and the unemployment rate - at 2.1% in 2022 Q4 – has been the lowest in the OECD. Like prior to the COVID-19 crisis, Czech companies in almost all sectors are once again experiencing labour shortages (Ministry of Finance, 2022a). Yet, nominal wages have risen more slowly than prices, and, in real terms, wages have fallen steeply (Figure 1.7). A large influx of Ukrainian refugees has eased labour market tightness slightly and with high labour demand, they found employment easily. More than a third of refugees of working age were employed as of end-February 2023.
Growth will remain moderate, with considerable risks
The economy entered a recession in the second half of 2022, on the back of high energy prices, the threat of energy shortages and continued high uncertainty due to Russia’s war against Ukraine. Annual GDP growth will be subdued in 2023, before picking up in 2024. Private consumption will remain weak due to elevated inflation and diminished household savings that had been accumulated during the coronavirus pandemic. Activity will pick up in 2024 amid eased global supply disruptions. Resuming growth in trading partners will spur exports and trade. In 2023, inflation will start falling from currently very high levels. Real wage growth will turn positive in 2024. Nonetheless, tight financing conditions and slowing public investment due to the transition to the European Union’s new multiannual financial framework will be a drag on GDP growth. The unemployment rate will remain below 3%.
Table 1.1. Macroeconomic indicators and projections
Annual percentage change, volume (2015 prices)
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
Estimates and projections |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current prices (billion CZK) |
2022 |
2023 |
2024 |
|||
Gross domestic product (GDP) |
5,793.9 |
-5.5 |
3.5 |
2.4 |
0.1 |
2.4 |
Private consumption |
2,712.0 |
-7.2 |
4.1 |
-0.9 |
-2.7 |
2.4 |
Government consumption |
1,134.5 |
4.2 |
1.4 |
0.7 |
3.0 |
1.2 |
Gross fixed capital formation |
1,568.2 |
-6.0 |
0.8 |
6.2 |
1.3 |
0.9 |
Final domestic demand |
5,414.7 |
-4.5 |
2.5 |
1.4 |
-0.3 |
1.7 |
Stockbuilding1 |
29.8 |
-0.9 |
4.8 |
0.9 |
-0.7 |
0.0 |
Total domestic demand |
5,444.5 |
-5.4 |
7.6 |
2.3 |
-1.0 |
1.6 |
Exports of goods and services |
4,284.6 |
-8.1 |
6.8 |
5.7 |
4.2 |
4.1 |
Imports of goods and services |
3,935.2 |
-8.2 |
13.2 |
5.7 |
2.9 |
3.0 |
Net exports1 |
349.4 |
-0.4 |
-3.6 |
0.2 |
0.9 |
0.8 |
Other indicators (growth rates, unless specified) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential GDP |
. . |
1.7 |
1.5 |
3.2 |
1.2 |
1.2 |
Output gap² |
. . |
-1.1 |
0.9 |
0.1 |
-0.9 |
0.2 |
Employment³ |
. . |
-1.3 |
-0.6 |
-0.5 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
Unemployment rate (% of labour force) |
. . |
2.5 |
2.8 |
2.3 |
2.6 |
2.8 |
GDP deflator |
. . |
4.3 |
3.3 |
8.4 |
9.1 |
4.2 |
Consumer price index |
. . |
3.2 |
3.8 |
15.1 |
13.0 |
4.1 |
Core consumer price index4 |
. . |
3.6 |
5.0 |
12.2 |
9.5 |
4.1 |
Household saving ratio, net (% of disposable income) |
. . |
14.7 |
14.8 |
8.3 |
7.9 |
7.6 |
Current account balance (% of GDP) |
. . |
2.0 |
-0.8 |
-5.9 |
-4.7 |
-5.1 |
General government financial balance (% of GDP) |
. . |
-5.8 |
-5.1 |
-3.8 |
-4.3 |
-3.7 |
Underlying government primary financial balance² |
. . |
-2.4 |
-3.5 |
-2.3 |
-1.8 |
-2.4 |
General government gross debt (% of GDP) |
. . |
47.0 |
48.5 |
51.0 |
54.0 |
56.5 |
General government gross debt (Maastricht, % of GDP) |
. . |
37.6 |
42.0 |
44.5 |
47.5 |
50.0 |
Three-month money market rate, average |
. . |
0.9 |
1.1 |
6.3 |
7.1 |
5.5 |
Ten-year government bond yield, average |
. . |
1.1 |
1.9 |
4.3 |
5.0 |
3.9 |
1. Contribution to changes in real GDP.
2. Percentage of potential GDP.
3. Following the 2021 Population and Housing Census, new demographic weights were applied in the LFS statistics starting in Q1 2022, leading to a substantial reduction in the number of employed and unemployed persons. Thus, there is a break in the time series and data are not directly comparable. Relative indicators (e.g., unemployment or participation rates) have not been affected by this change.
4. Consumer price index excluding food and energy.
Source: Calculations based on OECD Economic Outlook 112 database.
The outlook is clouded by very high uncertainty. Disruption in supply of energy, notably natural gas in case of depleted storages later in 2023, could restrict economic activity over the next two years. Unexpected further rises in commodity and energy prices, steep high depreciation of the koruna exchange rate and derailed inflation expectations could feed inflationary pressures and make inflation more persistent. A breakdown of trust among social partners could result in a wage-price spiral. Social unrest due to energy shortages and rising energy prices could prompt excessively loose fiscal policy, further fuelling inflation and destabilising public finances. In contrast, deeper recessions domestically and abroad and lower confidence would reduce inflationary pressures. Rising unemployment and higher interest rates could push some debtors in default and dampen demand. A new strain of the coronavirus could dampen growth should restrictive measures be required.
Table 1.2. Events that could lead to major changes in the outlook
Shock |
Possible impact |
---|---|
Global energy and food crisis |
An intensification of energy and food supply disruptions would further accelerate inflation and cause a contraction in global trade, leading to a deep recession. |
Further heightened geopolitical tensions |
Geopolitical instability would increase uncertainty and weaken both domestic and external demand, with negative budgetary repercussions. |
Major house price correction and sudden steep rises in interest rates |
A large correction in housing prices could expose vulnerabilities in the financial system, causing a crisis in the financial sector that could feed back to the real economy. In addition, sudden rises in interest rates would sharply increase debt-servicing costs for highly leveraged households and investors, raising the risk of defaults. |
Outbreak of a new vaccine-resistant COVID variant |
Further waves of infections could potentially lead to new containment measures and lower domestic and foreign demand (and supply). |
A tight macroeconomic policy stance is warranted
The policy stance fell short of containing inflation
Inflation has risen steeply and become entrenched. Steep rises in volatile prices of energy and food items from abroad only partly account for the take-off of inflation. Price rises have rapidly spread and become broad-based. Core inflation reached 14% in October 2022. The Czech Republic recorded the highest core inflation rates (HICP excluding energy, food, alcohol and tobacco) among EU economies between December 2021 and October 2022. According to the Czech National Bank (2022a), prices of more than two thirds of the items in the HICP basket rose by more than 10% year-on-year by June 2022, the highest share in the European Union (Figure 1.8). Moreover, the contribution of non-energy and non-food goods and services prices to headline HICP inflation has also been among the strongest in the EU (Figure 1.9).
In hindsight, the combined fiscal and monetary policy stance in 2020-21 was overly accommodative. This boosted demand over supply capacities, resulting in strong inflationary pressures, as manifested in broad-based and steeply rising core inflation and a very tight labour market. Despite an average annual fall in real GDP of 1% over 2020-21, Czech households recorded a 2.8% growth in real incomes (Figure 1.9), boosted by fiscal transfers and tax cuts. This contributed to demand pressures and enabled firms to pass on growing costs to consumers (Czech National Bank, 2022a).
Monetary policy should remain tight
Inflation expectations have increased markedly. Most households expect inflation to continue rising in the next 12 months (Figure 1.10). Surveys show that between June and January 2023, market analysts expected inflation of at least 2.5% at a three-year horizon - above the 2% target level (CNB, 2023, 2022b and 2022f). In contrast, corporations show greater doubts about the ability of the Czech National Bank (CNB) to control inflation, with expectations of inflation at around 7% in three-years’ time (Figure 1.10; CNB, 2022d).
Faced with rising prices and a risk of de-anchored inflation expectations, the CNB has rightly tightened monetary policy. Between June 2021 and June 2022, it raised the policy interest rate from 0.25% to 7%, after which it paused its hiking cycle. In August 2022, the CNB announced that its monetary policy decision was based on a 18-24 month horizon, half a year longer than before, and in November 2022 it based its monetary policy decision on a 15-21 month horizon. Shifting the horizon has been a temporary reaction of the Bank Board to uncertainty connected to the war in Ukraine and its repercussions. Consequently, the inflation target of 2% is now to be reached further away in the future compared with decisions made prior to August 2022.
The CNB has intervened on the foreign exchange market to reduce volatility and to stem depreciation pressures on the koruna. Interventions started in March 2022 and intensified between May and September 2022. In cumulative terms, between May and September, the CNB used 26 billion euros of its international reserves in foreign exchange trading.
The monetary policy stance should remain tight until inflation is firmly on course to decline towards the 2% target. Managing inflation expectations is of paramount importance to prevent costly re-anchoring of expectations. The CNB should continue to weigh carefully the mix of demand and supply pressures on inflation and the high risks surrounding the current outlook. It should reinforce communication about its stated policy goals and tools to achieve them, to give market participants clear and straightforward guidance. While inflation is high and inflation expectations rising, reforms to the central bank’s communication strategy or policy framework can be risky. Moreover, the key policy rate should remain the main monetary policy tool. Foreign exchange interventions should primarily be used to prevent excessive fluctuations of the koruna. Interventions are not a sustainable tool to stave off persistent depreciation pressures, particularly so given the expected narrowing of the interest rate differential with the rest of the world.
The financial sector is resilient but risks stemming from the housing market should be closely monitored
The Czech financial sector is stable and resilient overall. In 2021 and the first half of 2022, it saw solid growth in total assets and profitability. Banks are well capitalised and benefit from ample liquidity. This in part reflects favourable effects of the post-pandemic economic recovery on non-financial corporations and a very low corporate default rate in 2021 and early 2022. Stress tests of the CNB (2022c and 2022e) show that thanks to strong capital buffers the banking sector can absorb shocks and would comply with the regulatory limits on capital and leverage ratios even after a significant shock.
Housing prices continued rising steeply in early 2022 and residential property is increasingly overvalued. Year-on-year growth in residential property prices stood at 25% in Q1 2022. Housing prices doubled over the past six years and grew much faster than incomes (Figure 1.11). The CNB (2022e) estimates that apartments are 40-60% overvalued (Figure 1.11). Worsening affordability has bolstered demand for increasingly outsized loans to allow real estate acquisition. The total amount of new mortgage loans was high in 2021, while credit standards remained relatively relaxed between the second half of 2020 and April 2022. This occurred in part due to looser regulatory requirements on individual mortgage loans. These had been relaxed by the CNB at the start of the coronavirus crisis to support banks’ ability to provide credit. Over this period, the amount of mortgage loans with risky characteristics rose significantly (CNB, 2022c, ESRB, 2022).
The domestic banking sector has become increasingly concentrated on property financing loans over the years. Their share in loans to the private non-financial sector reached 63% at the end of 2021. At the same time, the implicit risk weights on housing loans used by banks reached record low levels (CNB, 2022c). Czech households are not highly indebted in international comparison. Yet, a sudden correction of real estate prices or a shock to household incomes would jeopardise their ability to repay and could therefore have a system-wide impact on regulatory capital buffers with potential spillovers to financial stability. With tightening financing conditions, lending to households for house purchase has started to slow significantly. The volume of pure new loans for house purchase fell by roughly 80% year on year in December 2022 (CNB, 2023). The previous high growth in residential property prices, a rising degree of overvaluation and slowing lending activity are creating potential for a significant price correction in the future.
To counter the build-up of systemic risks in the property sector, the CNB reintroduced and tightened limits on new mortgage loans. From April 2022, the basic LTV (loan-to-value) limit is set at 80%, the upper limit on the DTI (debt-to-income) ratio at 8.5 times net annual income and that on the DSTI (debt-service-to-income) ratio at 45% of net monthly income. Higher limits – an LTV of 90%, a DTI of 9.5 and a DSTI of 50% – apply to applicants under the age of 36. In addition, since the amendment to the CNB Act in 2021, the CNB now has legally binding powers to set these limits, as also recommended in the previous OECD Economic Survey (OECD, 2020a). Before, the CNB could only issue recommendations in this area. However, a general exception applies, where lenders can, in specific cases, approve loans that are not within the prescribed limits, but such loans cannot exceed 5% of the total volume of loans. To monitor and control risks in the property sector beyond what is prescribed under general legally binding provisions, the CNB still uses recommendations.
The CNB has also appropriately raised the countercyclical capital buffer rate to 2.5%, effective from April 2023. This follows the reduction of the countercyclical capital buffer to 0.5% at the onset of the pandemic (from 1.75% applicable at that time) to support bank credit activity. As credit growth resumed, the lower rate was no longer needed. Meanwhile, a deteriorated outlook and higher uncertainty have raised the potential for materialisation of credit risks which calls for higher capital buffers.
Risks stemming from the imbalances in the property market should be closely monitored and macroprudential measures and limits on mortgage loans appropriately adjusted, if needed. When setting the countercyclical buffer rate, the CNB considers the situation on the property market. However, the CNB has acknowledged that the downward trend in risk weights might not appropriately reflect the associated systemic risks (CNB, 2022c). This trend might reverse with the worsened economic outlook and as risks materialise. Also, tighter financing conditions are taking some steam out of the housing market (CNB, 2022e). But risk weights used by banks will rise only slowly. Should imbalances and the risks from the property market continue to grow, the CNB could consider applying the sectoral systemic risk buffer or setting minimum risk weights.
Imbalances also stem partly from a limited and inelastic supply of housing. As discussed in the previous Survey (OECD, 2020a), the process for obtaining construction permits is one of the slowest and most cumbersome in the OECD and among Central and Eastern European countries. Such delays in planning and issuing permits contribute to rising house prices by limiting the supply of residential housing. Furthermore, protracted processes slow down infrastructure investment - including green investment - with repercussions for the wider economy. To speed up and streamline the processes, the government is preparing a comprehensive overhaul of the legislation and regulations related to construction permits. Easier issuance of construction permits, together with reduced red tape, would help drive investment, unleash the entrepreneurial potential and lift productivity growth.
Returning to prudent fiscal policy
Expansionary fiscal policy, notably over 2020 and 2021, has weakened the public finance position. The fiscal balance of the general government went from a small surplus in 2019 to a large deficit of more than 5% of GDP in 2020 and 2021 (Figure 1.12). Public debt rose by 12 percentage points, to 42% of GDP in 2021, and is expected to grow further, to 50% in 2024. Fiscal expansion effectively aided the economy during the coronavirus pandemic by providing a needed fiscal impulse. However, not all measures were well-targeted or linked to the pandemic and, while the pandemic was temporary, some measures permanently worsened the fiscal balance. Most notably, a tax package (lowering personal income taxes and abolishing the real estate stamp duty) adopted in late 2020 permanently reduced tax revenues by close to 2 percentage points of GDP (Czech Fiscal Council, 2021).
In the current challenging situation, amid the war in Ukraine and rising costs of living, pressures on public spending have risen further. Reflecting NATO targets, the government has committed to raise defence spending more quickly, from the current 1.3% to 2% of GDP by 2024. Czech households are among the most exposed to high gas and electricity prices in Europe due to a high share of energy spending in total consumption (Ari et al., 2022). To counter high prices of energy (Figure 1.13), and high prices of other goods and services the government has introduced several support measures (Table 1.3). Most notably, it has boosted cash benefits and social transfers in kind to help vulnerable households. Additional income support to households and firms highly affected by rising energy prices has been introduced. Several price measures have also been introduced. The government has offered help with energy bills for households, it has eliminated the road tax, temporarily lowered excise tax rates on diesel and petrol and waived the renewable energy levy.
The Czech Republic faces high fiscal pressures in the medium to long term that threaten fiscal sustainability. Both the European Commission and the Czech Fiscal Council have expressed concerns about the fiscal situation (European Commission, 2022a; Czech Fiscal Council 2021 and 2022a). As in many other OECD economies, population ageing will result in steep rises in public spending on pensions, health, and long-term care. Whereas the debt-to-GDP ratio remains relatively benign in international comparison (Figure 1.12), it is set to rise dramatically in the future. Based on long-term OECD scenarios (Guillemette and Turner, 2021), without reform, government debt would rise to 170% of GDP in 2060 (Figure 1.14). In other words, a substantial increase in revenues would be required - - by up to 11 percentage points of GDP in 2060 - to counter the expected rise in expenditures and maintain a constant public debt ratio. Another option would be to cut other spending programmes with potentially adverse effects on equity, productivity, and climate.
With very high inflation and a worsened fiscal situation, fiscal policy should carefully balance the need to cushion living standards with the need to avoid further macroeconomic stimulus. The fiscal policy stance should tighten to support monetary policy in fighting inflation. The role of fiscal policy is to protect the most vulnerable rather than provide blanket support. However, recently introduced measures to counter high prices of energy have been poorly targeted. The tendency to hand out non-targeted cash transfers has continued. For instance, discretionary increases in pensions above statutorily prescribed levels have persisted. Despite already generous cash benefits for families, the government introduced in 2022 a one-off allowance of CZK 5 000 (EUR 200) per child under age 18 for families with children under a certain income threshold, covering 90% of families.
Table 1.3. The government’s policies to offset energy price increases
Measure |
Description |
Total amount (billion CZK) |
Waiving of VAT on electricity and gas |
Temporary waiving between November and December 2021. |
5.4 |
Aid to Households and Entrepreneurs Act |
Targeted assistance for those significantly affected by rising energy prices. Small and medium enterprises that have experienced increases of their energy bills of more than 100% are offered a state-backed guarantee with a 0% interest rate to meet the costs of their operational expenses. |
… |
Cash support to households |
One-off allowance CZK 5,000 per child for families with annual gross income up to CZK 1 million (covers about 90% of families). Increase in subsistence and subsistence minimum amounts by 10% from April 2022 and by 8.8% from July 2022. A further increase (by 5.2%) is planned in 2023. The government also increased the housing benefit and changed its parameters. In 2023, the child allowance will be increased by CZK 200. Foster care benefits will also increase. |
13.6 in 2022 and 7.8 in 2023 |
Reduced transport taxes and similar |
The government cancelled road taxes for cars, buses and trucks up to twelve tons for 2022. The obligation to add more expensive biofuels to gasoline and diesel was removed. Temporary reduction of duties on petrol and diesel by CZK 1.5 per liter (from June 1 to September 30, 2022). The temporary reduction on diesel was extended until the end of 2023. |
10.9 in 2022 and 13.8 in 2023 |
Liquidity lines |
CEZ, the largest utility company operating in the country, signed a credit agreement with the Ministry of Finance in July 2022 for up to EUR 3 billion, providing needed liquidity to the company. |
74 |
Energy Savings Tariff and other support |
The government has provided support to all households facing high energy prices from October to December 2022. That is, those who use electricity, gas and households that produce heat through domestic boiler rooms and through central heating. |
21.9 |
Waiver of renewable fees |
The government will waive fees for supported renewable energy sources (POZE). This is expected to generate savings of 599 CZK for every megawatt hour of electricity consumed by households and firms. |
4.6 in 2022 and 18.4 in 2023 |
Energy price cap |
Energy prices are capped for the year 2023. The cap applies to all households, small and medium-sized enterprises, government institutions, schools, providers of health and social services, operators of urban mass transit, and other entities. Electricity prices are capped at CZK 6.05/kWh, including VAT covering the total consumption for low voltage users (households, SMEs, the self-employed). For small and medium-sized enterprises connected to high and very high voltages, the capping applies to 80% of the highest monthly consumption for that specific month over the past five years (or 80% of the actual consumption in a month if higher than the reference consumption). Gas prices are capped at CZK 3.025/kWh, including VAT, for households and small-volume customers for up to 630 MWh/year. For all small and medium-sized enterprises, it applies only to 80% of their highest monthly consumption over the past five years in that specific month (or 80% of actual consumption if higher). The government has also introduced a price cap on electricity and gas for large enterprises and customers, which are not covered by the measures targeted to SMEs, for the year 2023. |
approx. 83 for households and SMEs and 40 for large energy-intensive enterprises |
Temporary electricity and gas support to companies |
Companies with gas supply contracts with an annual consumption of more than 630 MWh will be eligible. Companies that use high or very high voltages and are at an operating loss will also be eligible for support. However, at least fifty percent of the operating loss should be due to the increase in natural gas and electricity costs. Support will be provided from November 2022. |
30 |
The support to counter high energy prices should be better targeted to vulnerable households and price measures should be avoided. Such support can be very costly and tends to predominantly benefit high-income households that are the biggest consumers. In case price measures are introduced, they should be well designed so that they remain strictly temporary and contingent on market price developments. Moreover, price caps should be sufficiently high to preserve incentives for energy-saving behaviour and energy efficiency investments. Any support to firms should also be temporary, targeted to otherwise viable firms, and include incentives to reduce energy use. The Czech Republic should build institutional and statistical capacity to operate a sophisticated transfer and social welfare system that can target vulnerable populations based on several criteria. Besides income, additional criteria could include housing location and quality, household composition and access to public infrastructure (OECD, 2022f).
Measures on both the expenditure and revenue side should be considered to bring down the deficit. Reversing the recent structural cut in tax revenues, for example by making personal income taxes more progressive, would help close expected future gaps in public budgets. In addition, reducing high social security contributions and shifting towards real estate, consumption and environmental taxes would make the tax mix more supportive of inclusive and sustainable growth. The Ministry of Finance has proposed a temporary windfall tax – in line with EU guidelines – to tax excess profits of firms in energy supply and trading, and fossil fuels as well as large banks. Effective from January 2023 with a duration of three years, it will tax 60% of excess profits that are defined as profits higher than average taxable income over 2018-21, augmented by 20%. Taxing excessive windfall profits of energy producers can be acceptable, as long as it does not discourage investment or put further pressures on prices. However, it undermines tax certainty and might thus worsen the investment climate. Moreover, the commitment and incentives to diversify energy sources and raise investment into renewables should also continue.
Table 1.4. The fiscal position has deteriorated
General government, % of GDP
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total revenues |
41.4 |
40.5 |
41.3 |
40.5 |
40.5 |
41.5 |
41.3 |
41.5 |
41.4 |
Taxes |
20.1 |
19.5 |
19.8 |
20.3 |
20.4 |
20.4 |
20.3 |
19.9 |
19.2 |
Social contributions |
14.6 |
14.5 |
14.3 |
14.7 |
14.9 |
15.4 |
15.5 |
15.9 |
16.6 |
Other revenues |
6.6 |
6.6 |
7.2 |
5.5 |
5.2 |
5.6 |
5.5 |
5.6 |
5.6 |
Total expenditures |
42.7 |
42.6 |
41.9 |
39.8 |
39.0 |
40.6 |
41.1 |
47.2 |
46.5 |
Social protection |
13.8 |
13.4 |
12.9 |
12.7 |
12.3 |
12.4 |
12.5 |
14.3 |
13.6 |
Education and health |
12.1 |
12.1 |
11.9 |
11.4 |
11.5 |
12.1 |
12.4 |
14.4 |
14.9 |
General public services |
5.2 |
5.2 |
4.7 |
4.6 |
4.2 |
4.4 |
4.4 |
4.7 |
4.6 |
Economic affairs |
5.9 |
6.4 |
6.6 |
6.1 |
5.8 |
5.9 |
6.1 |
7.7 |
7.5 |
Other1 |
5.6 |
5.6 |
5.8 |
5.1 |
5.2 |
5.8 |
5.7 |
6.1 |
5.8 |
Net lending |
-1.3 |
-2.1 |
-0.6 |
0.7 |
1.5 |
0.9 |
0.3 |
-5.8 |
-5.1 |
Primary balance |
-0.2 |
-1.0 |
0.3 |
1.5 |
2.1 |
1.5 |
0.8 |
-5.2 |
-4.5 |
Gross debt |
56.1 |
55.0 |
51.7 |
47.5 |
43.3 |
40.1 |
37.8 |
47.0 |
48.5 |
Gross debt, Maastricht definition |
44.4 |
41.9 |
39.7 |
36.6 |
34.2 |
32.0 |
30.0 |
37.6 |
42.0 |
Net debt |
15.6 |
17.8 |
17.8 |
16.7 |
11.5 |
8.7 |
8.0 |
13.6 |
13.1 |
1. Defence; public order and safety; housing and community amenities; recreation, culture and religion; environment protection.
Source: OECD National Accounts database; Economic Outlook database.
On the expenditure side, priority should be given to targeted support to the vulnerable, raising skills, boosting labour participation, as well as productivity-enhancing and green investment. Substantial funding from the EU Recovery and Resilience Facility (2.9% of GDP, Box 1.2) is an opportunity to pursue a more ambitious consolidation without an overly negative growth impact. Stopping unwarranted cash benefits to pensioners and families could help contain rising public expenditures. There is also room to improve public spending efficiency. Reforms to the pension system and efforts to contain other ageing-related expenditures should be pursued. Based on the long-term OECD model, a structural increase in revenues coupled with later retirement would go a long way to slow the rise in public debt (Figure 1.14).
A more credible fiscal framework is also needed. Current medium-term plans of a structural deficit staying close to 3% until 2025 (Ministry of Finance, 2022c; Czech Fiscal Council, 2022b and 2022d) are not sufficiently ambitious, given the expected future deterioration of public finances. A credible framework to undertake meaningful fiscal consolidation has been lacking since the fiscal rules, described in more detail in the previous OECD Economic Survey (OECD, 2020a), were loosened in 2020. While the debt brake rule is still in place (with a debt-to-GDP limit of 55%, after deducting cash reserves), the structural deficit rule has been loosened and there is no firm requirement for the pace of fiscal consolidation (Czech Fiscal Council, 2022a; 2022c; Ministry of Finance, 2022c). The Czech economy would benefit from re-establishing the requirement of a 0.5 percentage point improvement per annum in the structural balance up to a predetermined objective (1% of GDP structural deficit as prior to the amendments to fiscal rules).
Box 1.2. EU funds to support a resilient recovery and the green and digital transition
The EU’s Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) was set up to support economic recovery after the pandemic and facilitate the green and digital transformation.
The Czech Republic is set to receive EUR 7 billion (2.9% of 2021 GDP) in grants, to be disbursed by 2026. In addition to supporting the climate and digital transitions as described below, several programmes are geared to reinforce economic and social resilience. The plan allocates EUR 222 million to improve the business environment. Reforms and investment of EUR 393 million will help foster equal access to education, notably through increasing access to affordable pre-school care, reinforced support for disadvantaged schools and additional tutoring for children at risk of failure. Investments of EUR 823 million will increase the resilience of healthcare services.
Climate objectives
42% of the RRF grants will support Czech climate objectives. Of this, EUR 1.4 billion will finance large-scale renovation programmes to increase the energy efficiency of residential and public buildings, including childcare and social care facilities. The RRF also supports the decarbonisation of transport through EUR 1.1 billion of investments in railway infrastructure and to promote electric charging stations and cycling pathways. Furthermore, EUR 480 million will be invested in installation of renewable energy sources for both businesses and households. EUR 141 million will be invested in the circular economy, including recycling infrastructure and support for circular economy solutions and water savings in businesses. Reforms in forestry management aim at increasing the sustainability of Czech forests.
The EU launched its REPowerEU Plan after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine to scale up renewable energy sources, boost energy efficiency measures and reduce dependence on Russian fossil fuels. The plan adds additional grants of EUR 20 billion (beyond the initial RRF allocation) to accelerate the implementation of the climate and energy saving plans of member states. The allocation of grants will take into account member states’ dependence on fossil fuels. However, the final allocation remains to be decided.
Digital transition
The Czech Republic will use 22% of the RRF grants for investments and reforms in skills, e-government, digital connectivity and digital transformation of businesses. EUR 585 million will be for digital equipment of schools, training for teachers, new higher education programmes in digital fields and upskilling and reskilling courses. In addition, EUR 585 million will support the digital transformation and cyber-security of public administration, the justice system and health care. EUR 650 million will be invested in the digital transformation of businesses, European digital innovation hubs, testing and experimentation facilities for Artificial Intelligence in manufacturing, very high-capacity networks and 5G networks.
Source: European Commission.
Box 1.3. Potential impact of reforms
Structural reforms can boost economic growth and incomes. Table 1.5 quantifies the impact on growth of some of the reforms recommended in this Survey (quantification is not feasible for all of them) based on the OECD long-term model and OECD estimates of relationships between reforms and total factor productivity, capital deepening and the employment (Égert, 2017). The analysis suggests that if the Czech Republic implemented the selected set of reforms (see below), per capita income could increase by about 6% in 10 years and up to 17% in 25 years. The estimates are illustrative.
Table 1.5. Potential impact of structural reforms on per capita GDP
10 years |
25 years (up to 2050) |
|
---|---|---|
Strengthen tax revenues, including through more progressive personal income taxation, shift towards real estate, consumption and environmental taxes, and reduce social security contributions. |
0.6% |
0.7% |
Reduce inequities in schools and modernise VET education. |
1.3% |
7.2% |
Improve investment climate and business environment (lower administrative burden, modernise construction permits). |
2.7% |
6.1% |
Boost active labour market policies. |
0.6% |
0.7% |
Keep expanding the supply of affordable and high-quality childcare facilities. |
0.4% |
0.6% |
Pension reform (increasing the age of retirement). |
0.4% |
2.0% |
Package of reforms |
6.0% |
17.3% |
Note: Simulations are based on the OECD Economics Department Long-term Model with a no policy change scenario used as the baseline. The following changes in policy/outcomes are assumed. The tax reform assumes a reduction in the average tax wedge by 2 percentage points of labour costs (the 2020 reform implied a 4-percentage point reduction, but here a partial reversal is assumed). Reform in education is assumed to be equivalent to an increase in average years of schooling by 0.7 years over 15 years (to close half of the gap with the current level in Germany). Improvement in the business environment assumes the PMR components "Simplification and Evaluation of Regulations" and "Administrative Burden on Start-ups" reach the average of the top five OECD performers over five years. Active labour market policies are boosted to reach the average of five top performers in the OECD (as % of GDP per capita per unemployed person). Expanding childcare is modelled as family benefits in kind (% of GDP) increased to OECD average. Pension reform: retirement age goes up to 67 for both men and women by 2037, and then by half of the expected gain in life expectancy thereafter.
Source: OECD calculations.
The estimates in Table 1.6 quantify the direct fiscal impact of selected recommendations included in the Survey, and do not seek to incorporate any dynamic effects. The estimates are illustrative.
Table 1.6. Illustrative direct fiscal impact of selected recommended reforms
Reform |
Fiscal impact (savings (+)/ costs (-)) (% of GDP) |
---|---|
Strengthen tax revenues, including through more progressive personal income taxation, shift towards real estate, consumption and environmental taxes, and reduce social security contributions. |
+2% |
Reduce inequities in schools and modernise VET education. |
-0.7% |
Improve investment climate and business environment (lower administrative burden, modernise construction permits). |
Negligible |
Boost active labour market policies. |
-0.2% |
Keep expanding the supply of affordable and high-quality childcare facilities. |
-0.4% |
Pension reform (increasing the age of retirement). |
+1.3% (by 2050) |
Investing in the green transition |
-1.3% to - 2.0% |
Total net effect of listed reforms |
+0.0% - +0.7% |
Note: The fiscal cost of the education reform is based on the estimated long-term increase in the cost of education from the 2022 Convergence programme of the Czech Republic. The fiscal cost of the green transition represents the low- to mid-point estimates in Ščasný et al. (2022) of the cost of investment up to 2030. The fiscal cost has been adjusted for the EU funds from the RRF and REPowerEU, as well as the anticipated increase in GDP. The fiscal dividend of the pension reform is computed by taking a difference between the required increase in government revenues to keep debt-to-GDP ratio stable in “baseline” and “pension reform” scenarios. Based on simulations of the OECD Economics Department Long-term Model.
Source: OECD calculations.
Safeguarding long-term fiscal sustainability
Strengthening public revenues
Efforts to bolster tax revenue should also aim to improve the tax mix. Tax revenue collection as a share of GDP is close to the OECD average. However, the Czech Republic relies significantly more on social security contributions (Figure 1.15) and less on personal income taxes (PIT) and property taxes than other OECD countries. The average tax wedge – the gap between the take-home pay of workers and their costs to employers – is high in international comparison due to elevated social security contributions (Figure 1.16). Evidence shows that high average tax wedges can raise costs for companies and slow growth (Arnold et al., 2011, Akgun et al., 2017). Lower reliance on social security contributions and higher revenues from property taxes and indirect taxes, including environmental taxes, could boost growth durably and reduce the exposure of government revenue to ageing. A lower tax wedge could also help ease labour market tightness by giving room to attract workers at the margins of the labour market.
The 2020 PIT tax reform - effective since January 2021 - has permanently reduced tax revenues. The concept of “supergross wage” (which included the social security contributions of employers) as a tax base for PIT from employment income was abandoned. Instead, the tax base is now determined based on gross income, with employment income taxed on gross wage. A previously flat PIT tax rate at 15% (and solidarity surcharge of 7% for very high incomes) was replaced with a progressive tax schedule, with marginal rates of 15% and 23%, with the second bracket starting at a gross income of four times the average wage (OECD, 2022). In addition, the general tax credit was raised in total by 24% and tax credits for the second child or more were raised by 15% (OECD, 2022a). As a result, for high-income persons, employment income is effectively taxed at the same rate as before the reform, while some types of non-employment income – capital gains and rental income – will now be taxed at a higher marginal rate of 23%. For most taxpayers, the tax burden has been reduced. Yet, the progressivity of the PIT remains low (Figure 1.17). The recent unfunded cut in the PIT should be reversed to raise revenues for expected rises in public spending. Higher collection of the PIT could be partly achieved by higher progressivity with a higher number of tax brackets and higher top marginal tax rates for high earners.
There is room to further improve VAT collection, notably by improving compliance and reversing exemptions and reductions granted in recent years. There has been good progress in tackling tax evasion but the VAT compliance gap at 11.9% remains above the EU average of 9.1% (Figure 1.18; European Commission, 2022c). The project of introducing the electronic registration of sales, whose roll-out was put on hold during the coronavirus pandemic, is to be fully abolished in 2023 due to reportedly poor results and a high administrative burden (Ministry of Finance, 2022b). However, efforts to improve compliance and fight tax evasion and fraud need to continue, including by taking on opportunities offered by digitalisation. According to the VAT Revenue Ratio indicator (OECD, 2020c and 2022g), in 2020, the Czech Republic lost a lower proportion (41%) of its potential VAT revenues than OECD countries on average (44%) due to VAT exemptions, reduced rates, weak enforcement or VAT non-compliance. However, the share has seen a slight increase over the last three years, due to an increasing number of items on reduced VAT rates. Reclassification to lower VAT rates of selected goods and services in 2020 (during the pandemic), including accommodation, sports and cultural events and ski lifts, should be reversed. Overall, the use of reduced VAT rates should be further diminished. International evidence shows that reduced VAT rates are poorly targeted as they benefit richer households proportionally more and are not effective in giving support (OECD, 2019a and 2020d).
High energy and fuel consumption drives revenues from environmental taxes, but relatively low rates do not effectively discourage polluting behaviour. There is no explicit carbon tax. The OECD (2021b and 2022h) estimates that in effective terms (taking into account emission trading schemes, fuel and other excise duties and carbon tax) the Czech Republic taxes only about 15% of its emissions from energy use at EUR 60 or higher per tonne of CO2. This is among the lowest shares in the OECD (Figure 1.19). As discussed in more detail in Chapter 2, a revised tax structure could better align economic and environmental objectives to help reach climate goals and alleviate air pollution. Implicit carbon prices are sufficient in the road sector (apart from temporary reductions in 2022 and 2023), but levies on diesel are lower than on gasoline, despite the former’s higher carbon content. Taxes on natural gas, coal and other solid fuels and electricity are low and are not adjusted for inflation. Exemptions are applied to various fuel uses that decrease end-use prices and reduce incentives to save energy or switch to cleaner fuels. For instance, exemptions apply for residential heating and in agriculture (OECD, 2018a). The Czech Republic should prepare a plan to phase out these exemptions once the current uncertainty abates.
Total revenue from property taxes in terms of GDP is one of the lowest in the OECD (Figure 1.20). Revenues have been reduced further by the abolition of the real estate acquisition tax from January 2021. As discussed in the previous OECD Economic Survey (OECD, 2020a), Czech municipalities could benefit from raising more revenue from the property tax. This tax is among the least distortive for growth, can better withstand population ageing and provides relatively stable revenues, which benefits local governments with largely non-cyclical spending (Arnold et al., 2011; Kim and Vammalle, 2012; Blöchliger, 2015; Colin and Brys, 2019). In the Czech Republic, the property tax comprises a land tax and a tax on buildings, and the calculation of the tax is based on the size of property rather than its value. The base rate is set at the central level, but municipalities can raise the rate up to five times the minimum threshold amount. Yet, most municipalities tend to set their local property tax rate at the low level, and many set exemptions, further reducing the tax base (Radvan, 2019). The tax evaluation should be based on regularly updated estimates of property value, as in Denmark, Estonia, Spain and the United Kingdom, among others, rather than size.
The self-employed continue to benefit from favourable tax treatment, raising concerns about sustainability and fairness. The tax code allows them to deduct between 30% and 80% (depending on occupation) of revenue as cost to derive net income, eliminating the need for cost accounting. A turnover threshold under which a flat rate deduction (instead of expenditures) can be used to narrow the tax base is quite generous, reducing revenues from personal income taxes. Furthermore, the assessment base for social security contributions is set at 50% of net income (with a minimum of 25% of the average wage), effectively lowering the overall contributions of self-employed workers compared to employees. The self-employed enjoy the same rights from the health care system as employees, but they contribute significantly less. They also contribute less towards pensions, resulting in lower benefits, but high solidarity within the pension system redistributes strongly in their favour. According to OECD estimates (2020b), a self-employed worker with net income equivalent to that of an average-wage worker can expect to receive 83% of the pension of the average-wage worker but pays only 67% of the contributions. As recommended by the OECD Pensions Review (OECD, 2020b), the contribution base for the self-employed should be closer to that of employees, for instance at around 75% of net income.
Addressing rising public costs of pensions
Due to rapid population ageing, without further reforms, pensions will exert high pressures on public spending from 2030 (Figure 1.21). The ratio of elderly people (65 and over) to the working-age population (20-64) is projected to rise from 34% to 56% between 2020 and 2050 (OECD, 2021a). Considering the increase in the statutory retirement age to 65 in the coming years, the economic dependency ratio (ratio of the population at and over the retirement age to the working-age population) will remain stable until 2035, before rising steeply until about 2060 (Figure 1.22). According to the simulations made with a cohort model (OECD, 2020b), pension spending will remain stable at around 8.5% of GDP until 2030. It will then increase progressively to peak at 11.9% of GDP in 2059 and then decline along with the size of the elderly population (Figure 1.21).
The Czech pension system is strongly redistributive. The old-age pension consists of a flat-rate component (basic pension) and an earnings-based component with strong caps on pensions of higher-earners, weakening the link between pension contributions and future benefits. The resulting benefit structure is highly compressed. Rates of poverty in old age are low (Figure 1.23). The net replacement rates are close to the OECD average (Figure 1.24) but are relatively high for low earners and low for high earners. To the latter, the system offers a very low internal rate of return to paid contributions (OECD, 2020b). In the Czech old-age pensions system, high earners (twice the average wage) have replacement rates well below average-wage earners (46% versus 65%), a large gap by international comparison (55% versus 62% for the OECD on average).
To increase replacement rates for high earners, the recent OECD Pension Review (OECD, 2020b) proposes to finance some of the redistributive part of the system (e.g., basic pensions) through general taxes, which could allow for higher accrual rates, in particular for higher earners. In the Czech Republic, redistribution takes place exclusively within the pension system as all pension revenues come from contributions levied on wages (except for transfers from the budget to cover any deficit in the system). In contrast, many countries finance part of pension spending through taxes. Financing parts of the system through taxes would help to strengthen the link between paid contributions and benefits. Furthermore, it could help to ease some of the burden of very high mandatory social security contributions.
Pensions are indexed to a combination of the consumer price index (or pensioners’ cost of living index, whichever is higher) and half of the real wage growth. The indexation is carried out once a year on 1st January. But if inflation reaches at least 5% since the end of the previous reference period, an extraordinary round of indexation during the year is triggered. However, pensions have been frequently increased beyond the statutory prescribed levels. For instance, it has been decided to give an additional CZK 1000 (around EUR 40) per month to all pensioners of age 85 and over, starting in 2019 (Ministry of Finance, 2019). In 2019, the flat-rate component of pension benefits was increased from 9% to 10% of the average wage, resulting in an overall increase of the average monthly pension by CZK 900 (EUR 37) in 2020. In addition, as a solidarity measure during the pandemic, all pensioners were given a one-time lump sum of CZK 5 000 (around EUR 200) at the end of 2020. The overall cost of the listed discretionary measures amounted to roughly 0.5% of GDP in 2020 (Ministry of Finance, 2020 and 2021), half of it with a permanent effect. Furthermore, while statutory indexation of pensions implied high increases due to high inflation, pensioners were given CZK 300 (EUR 12) per month from January 2022 on top of statutory indexation. From January 2023, pensioners - primarily women - will start receiving a benefit (CZK 500 per month) for each child raised, which will amount to an additional cost of roughly 0.3% of GDP.
Discretionary measures to increase pensions beyond the statutory indexation add to steep spending increases and hamper pension sustainability. To maintain pension adequacy, the focus should rather shift to prolonging working lives by increasing the statutory retirement age.
Czech workers retire too early. Currently, the effective age of labour market exit is among the lowest in the OECD (Figure 1.25). Employment – while high overall – falls sharply after the age of 60 to markedly below the OECD average (Figure 1.26). Rises in the statutory retirement age are already legislated. For men it will reach 65 in 2030. The Czech Republic is among the few OECD countries that still have gender-specific retirement ages, but the retirement age of women is also set to rise and will equal that of men in 2037, which is welcome. Yet almost one-third of people retire before the statutory retirement age (OECD, 2020b). Under current parameters, even once the statutory age of retirement will reach 65, early retirement will still be possible from age 60. The risk is that too many people might retire early, which would imply lower pensions.
Adjusting the retirement age further is key to limit increases in pension spending and help maintain adequacy of benefits. In 2017, the automatic mechanism for increasing the statutory retirement age was withdrawn and the ceiling at the age of 65 was introduced. Every five years, the Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs is tasked to prepare a report on life expectancy and to suggest a shift in the statutory retirement age, provided that on average people spend a quarter of their life in retirement. Following the first report in 2019, no change ensued, and the next round is scheduled for 2024. Under this mechanism, the retirement age may not be increased in a timely and sufficient manner to curtail long-term spending pressures. The Czech Republic should (re)introduce a tight and automatic link between retirement age and life expectancy as has already been done in Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Italy, the Netherlands and Portugal. For example, if about two-thirds of gains in life expectancy are transmitted to increasing the retirement age, the balance between the time spent working and in retirement would be stabilised (OECD, 2020b). Under a similar rule, the Czech Fiscal Council (2021) estimates that linking the statutory retirement age to life expectancy would improve the balance of the pension system by 1.1-1.4% of GDP from 2050 and lower the debt-to-GDP ratio by 45 percentage points in 2071.
The minimum age of early retirement should also be increased in line with the statutory age, reaching at least 62 in 2030, and then be linked to life expectancy. Given longer life expectancy, the age of 60 for the future eligibility to early retirement is too low. This age reference contributes to shaping social norms and influencing behaviours by both employees and employers about working at older ages and is not consistent with other efforts to enhance the labour supply of older workers (OECD, 2020b).
Policies to delay retirement should be accompanied by labour market policies that foster employability, labour demand and incentives to work longer (OECD, 2019g). Currently, penalties and bonuses within the old age pension system discourage early retirement and incentivise deferred retirement. Yet, many retire early and only a few defer retirement (OECD, 2020b). It is likely that high replacement rates for low earners combined with the fact that older workers are less skilled and earn less than prime-age workers reduce incentives to work longer. According to the OECD Older Worker Scoreboard 2021, full-time earnings of older workers (55-64) in the Czech Republic are 5% below earnings of prime age workers, while in the OECD on average older workers earn 6% more. Raising the skills of older workers, through targeted adult learning, as recommended in the previous OECD Economic Survey (OECD, 2020a) could help promote longer working lives.
Table 1.7. Past recommendations on strengthening fiscal sustainability and improving the tax mix
Recommendations in previous Surveys |
Action taken |
---|---|
Shift taxation from labour towards real estate, consumption and environmental taxes. |
In 2020 a reform of the personal income tax dropped the concept of supergross wage. Property transfer tax was abolished. As a result, tax revenues are lower in structural terms by 2 percentage points of GDP. The reform was unfunded and part of it goes against the OECD recommendation. Phasing in of the electronic registration of sales was stopped and the project abolished. |
Reduce the advantages of self-employment in terms of social contributions and personal income tax. |
No action taken. |
Take steps to secure an increasing effective retirement age. Link tightly retirement age to life expectancy. Continue to ensure that the indexation of pensions does not lead to old-age poverty problems. Consider options for diversifying income sources for pensioners. |
No action taken. Government has recently taken steps to improve the adequacy of pensions by raising pensions beyond statutory required levels without addressing sustainability concerns. Government is supposed to discuss every five years whether to raise the statutory pension age (which is currently gradually rising to reach 65 in 2030 for men and in 2037 for women). In 2019, the government decided not to raise the statutory retirement age and to discuss the issue again in five years. |
Introduce a carbon component in energy taxation for carbon emissions outside the EU system. |
No action taken. |
Realign the excise tax rate on all fossil energy sources and products, based on their carbon content and other environmental externalities, notably by increasing the relative taxation of diesel. Remove several excise tax reliefs on fuel use. |
No action taken. |
Raising the effectiveness of the public sector
Increasing the efficiency of public administration can help to improve fiscal sustainability and raise the quality of services provided to citizens. The size of the public sector in the Czech Republic has remained relatively moderate and stood below the OECD and EU averages in terms of general government expenditures (47% of GDP in 2020) and of employment (16.6% of total employment). However, despite its moderate size, the Czech public administration faces a number of challenges in modernising and improving its effectiveness. The Czech Republic has one of the most fragmented territorial and municipal administrations in the OECD (OECD, 2020a), undermining policy co-ordination between the national and subnational levels. The management of the COVID-19 crisis over 2020-21 also highlighted weaknesses in citizen engagement and in agility to respond to challenges.
The recent Public Governance Review done by the OECD in cooperation with the Czech government reports that the lack of strategic steering capacities and alignment from the centre have led to the multiplication of strategies and an absence of consistency and implementation across policies. Strategic decisions, regulations and policies are also insufficiently based on evidence. This calls for strengthening the strategic coordination of the Government Office and boosting analytical capacities across public administration.
The Czech Republic has initiated a number of important public administration reforms to enhance the effectiveness of public administration, increase citizen orientation and engagement, and develop capabilities to address crosscutting challenges, including crisis management and digitalisation. Efforts have been made to improve analytical capabilities notably through the creation of a Government Analytical Unit in the Government Office. To accelerate its digital transition, the government is implementing a new digital governance structure including through the creation of a Digital Agency. The current public administration reform (PAR) strategy (“Client-oriented public administration 2030”) aims to address a number of challenges. At the same time more could be done to align the PAR strategy with current government priorities, particularly on raising effectiveness of public administration, improving management and recruitment within the civil service and strengthening cooperation between central and local government levels.
Since 2020, the Czech Republic has been implementing spending reviews as a means to systematically analyse existing spending, align expenditure to changing priorities of the government and improve value for money. Significant progress has been made in setting up the framework and piloting one spending review. However, the Czech administration is facing some challenges to fully institutionalise and scale up the use of spending reviews. These include very limited access to performance data, weak programme and performance budgeting frameworks, capacity constraints and limited collaboration with line ministries. Such challenges are not unique to the Czech Republic and are commonly reported by many OECD countries (OECD, 2020e).
Moving forward, the Czech Republic should institutionalise spending reviews by improving data accessibility through the use of performance budgeting, expanding the piloting phase to refine the framework, strengthening capacity-building efforts, creating incentives to participate in spending reviews and establishing sound governance arrangements. Having a strong spending review framework that builds on OECD Best Practices for Spending Reviews (Tryggvadottir, 2022) will make the Czech administration better equipped to face emerging fiscal pressures in the medium and long run and will enable it to better respond to changing government priorities. In 2023, a unit within the Ministry of Finance was set up with a task to carry out several spending reviews each year to help build capacity, a welcome step in the right direction.
Addressing corruption to raise the effectiveness of public spending and investment
Improving governance and fighting corruption can improve the effectiveness of government spending and value-for-money of public investment. It is also vital for maintaining the Czech Republic’s attractiveness as a destination for foreign direct investment (OECD, 2016a; Blundell-Wignall and Roulet, 2017).
In accordance with the Government Anti-Corruption Strategy for 2018-22 (Government of the Czech Republic, 2018), and the Anti-Corruption Action Plan 2021-22 (Ministry of Justice, 2020) the authorities aim at reinforcing corruption prevention and addressing integrity risk areas where corruption is still perceived as a concern, such as lobbying and interconnections between business and politics, conflicts of interest, and protection of whistleblowers. The government plans to advance on prevention of excessive accumulation of political, economic and media power; enforcing rules on beneficial owners of companies receiving subsidies, investment incentives and public contracts; and establishing clear rules for media ownership and the use of public funds (Government of the Czech Republic, 2022).
Fighting corruption in the Czech Republic is well institutionalised and backed by governmental anti‑corruption documents at both high and operational levels. Overall, the quality of the strategic framework is good. Yet, deficiencies remain in the areas of financial sustainability and inclusiveness and transparency of public consultations. On financial sustainability, while implementing authorities do not report financing shortages, more forward-looking financial plans and better links with the medium-term expenditure framework would be expected. Moreover, more detail on estimated expenditures at the level of individual action plans would be beneficial. There is also room for improvement on making public consultation processes for public integrity strategies more inclusive and transparent. Notably, inter-governmental and public consultation processes should be made mandatory for all public integrity strategies and making draft strategies and all supporting material publicly available on the public consultation portal would increase transparency.
Indicators of control and perceived risks of corruption in the public sector suggest that the Czech Republic performs poorly compared to most OECD countries (Figure 1.27). Control of corruption improved from 2012 onwards, but this progress has stalled recently (Figure 1.27). According to a survey by the European Commission (2020), 87% of Czech citizens think that corruption is widespread, significantly above the EU average (71%), and they point to officials awarding public tenders, political parties and politicians at all levels of government as the most corrupt. Respondents further believe that there are not enough successful prosecutions to deter corruption and the majority perceive government efforts to combat corruption as ineffective.
The 2021 Rule of Law Report of the European Commission notes a lack of progress in the implementation of the Government Anti-Corruption Strategy 2018-22. Notably, the COVID-19 pandemic slowed down anti-corruption reforms in some areas, particularly in the healthcare sector (European Commission, 2021a). Numerous important reform initiatives, such as on lobbying and on whistleblower protection, are still pending in Parliament. As regards high-level corruption, investigation and audits at national and European level of the use of EU funds have recently found evidence of conflicts of interest at the top executive level that led to a case with the European Public Prosecutor’s Office. In a related EU subsidy fraud case, national investigators recently recommended indictment (European Commission, 2021a). More is therefore needed to address public integrity across all branches of government.
In its fourth evaluation round, the Council of Europe anti-corruption body, the Group of States against Corruption (GRECO, 2016), listed 14 recommendations to improve public integrity in the Czech Republic. In the follow-up report two years later (GRECO, 2018) it found the level of compliance with the recommendations “globally unsatisfactory”, and this assessment was confirmed two years later in an interim follow-up report (GRECO, 2020). Several recommendations aimed at improving integrity for members of parliament, but the implementation of the recommendations remains very slow. No measures have been taken to increase the transparency of the legislative process. The draft law on regulation of lobbying has been submitted to parliament but not yet adopted and a code of conduct for parliamentarians and accompanying implementing measures have still not been adopted. Efforts also need to continue to improve integrity and the independence of judges and public prosecutors.
Efforts to increase the detection, investigation and prosecution of foreign bribery should also be stepped up by implementing the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention (Figure 1.28). The Czech Republic is highly export-oriented, and its exports include high-risk sectors for bribery, such as machinery and defence materials, to destinations at high risk of corruption (OECD, 2017d). Despite this, only one case of foreign bribery has been prosecuted so far. Progress has been made, nevertheless. Following a recommendation by the OECD Working Group on Bribery, all judgements concerning foreign bribery will be automatically published (OECD, 2021g). Efforts have been underway to enhance detection of foreign bribery through certain key government agencies, in particular the Financial Intelligence Unit. The Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office published comprehensive guidance on corporate liability. On the other hand, further efforts are needed to guarantee greater independence to prosecutors so that political factors do not impact on foreign bribery investigations and prosecutions. Another area of concern is the lack of appropriate protection from discriminatory or disciplinary action of whistleblowers, both in the public and private sector (Dell and McDevitt, 2018; OECD, 2019f). A law has been adopted by the government reflecting the new EU standards on whistleblower protection, which is positive, but has not yet been passed by the parliament.
Tackling recurring labour and skills shortages
The Czech labour market is strong in many respects (Figure 1.29). The employment rate is comparatively high. The unemployment rate is one of the lowest in the OECD and has remained low even in times of crisis (Figure 1.30). As a result, job security is high. Only a very small minority of the working-age population live in relative poverty.
However, labour shortages have been a longstanding issue. After some easing during the COVID-19 crisis, the labour market has become tight again. Companies complain of labour shortages as a major obstacle to growth. Raising labour participation of disadvantaged groups (Figure 1.31), reducing the gender labour income gap and bringing more mothers to work can help in this regard. Moreover, attracting skilled foreign labour would lift growth as well as raise incomes. To attract skilled workers from abroad it is important to increase the relatively weak earnings quality (Figure 1.29) through increasing investment in innovation and R&D, improving the business environment and moving up the value chain.
Raising employment of mothers
The employment rate of mothers with young children is very low in the Czech Republic. Employment of women is high overall, but after childbirth, female employment falls for several years (Figure 1.32 and Figure 1.33). Long absences from the labour market during childbearing age impact women’s subsequent careers, and the gender wage gap is sizeable. Women also retire earlier than men. Shorter careers and the labour income gap contribute to a markedly higher risk of poverty in old age for women (Figure 1.34).
Very long parental leave and relatively generous associated family cash benefits and tax breaks (Figure 1.35) discourage women from returning to work. One parent – in the vast majority of cases the mother (Office of the Government of the Czech Republic, 2021) – can stay at home until the youngest child reaches three years of age without losing reintegration rights with their employer. Moreover, they can receive the parental allowance for a year longer. In addition, the dependent tax credit raises the marginal tax for second earners and provides a disincentive for parents to return to work. Evidence shows that overly long - longer than two years in particular - parental leave can have negative consequences for subsequent careers in terms of lower employment and lower wages (Thévenon and Solaz, 2013). Mothers on shorter leave end up in higher-skilled jobs later in their careers, presumably due to higher accumulated work-related skills and lower depreciation of human capital during their absence (Pertold-Gebicka, 2020). Bringing mothers back to work earlier would therefore ease labour shortages while reducing the gender income gap.
Over the years, more flexibility has been introduced to give parents a choice over the length of parental leave and to allow those receiving parental allowance to put their children in childcare, to be able to work. Yet, a relative lack of work flexibility and low availability of part-time work prevents mothers of young children from working. The Czech labour market has long had a smaller proportion of part-time work compared to other OECD economies, although the share of part-time workers has been on the rise, especially for women (Figure 1.36). Increasing the use of part-time work and incentivising employers to provide flexible work options suitable for mothers with pre-school children is one of the priorities set out in the government’s Gender Equality Strategy for 2021-30 (Office of the Government of the Czech Republic, 2021). In 2020, job sharing was legislated with the aim of encouraging a higher uptake of part-time work by mothers. In 2022, the government introduced further incentives for employers to create part-time jobs for selected groups of employees, including parents of children under nine. Higher flexibility of jobs, better enforcement of rights for part-time work and flexible teleworking arrangements can support the re-entry of women into the market. The expansion of work flexibility and teleworking during the COVID-19 pandemic has perhaps acted as a catalyst for change, but it is too early to say whether this will have a permanent and positive effect on the employment of mothers.
More could be done to encourage fathers to take active part in the care for small children. While parental leave and allowance are not gender specific, since 2010, the share of men among those receiving parental allowance has stayed between 1.5% and 2% (Office of the Government of the Czech Republic, 2021). The reasons cited are persistent gender stereotypes as well as financial concerns: two thirds of surveyed men reported having higher earnings than their wives (Office of the Government of the Czech Republic, 2021). In 2018, paternity leave - postpartum care benefit for fathers of up to seven calendar days - was introduced. Starting in 2022, it has been extended to two weeks. While a step in the right direction, total paternity and parental leave specific to fathers together remain almost eight weeks shorter than in the OECD on average (Figure 1.37). Yet, only about 40% of eligible fathers in the Czech Republic draw on this benefit and the share has not increased since its introduction (Office of the Government of the Czech Republic, 2021). Several OECD countries - Luxembourg, Sweden, Norway and Iceland - have reserved parts of parental leave for fathers of between 12 and 26 weeks at replacement rates (for average earners) from 73% to 96% (OECD, 2021c). In these countries, sufficiently generous replacement rates together with the loss of the leave entitlement for the couple if not taken by the father provide strong incentives for fathers to stay at home for a longer period.
The lack of childcare availability is another constraint hindering mothers’ return to work. Enrolment of children under three in early childhood education and care is among the lowest in the OECD (Figure 1.38). Supporting affordable, accessible and high-quality early childhood education and care services is one of the government’s priorities, and progress has been made in the number of available places. Children can stay either in kindergartens (under the Ministry of Education) or children’s groups (under the Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs). However, despite steady progress, there is demand for 71 000 places for children under the age of three in these facilities, but only about 80% can be placed in kindergartens (64%) or children’s groups (17%). Around 36 000 applications for a spot in kindergartens were rejected for the 2019/2020 school year, of which many applications were for children under the age of three (Office of the Government of the Czech Republic, 2021). While the number of applications does not equal the number of children, as parents can submit several applications for the same child, the Ministry of Education does not gather data on rejected children. The lack of data should be remedied, as offering an adequate supply of childcare capacities has been a clear strategic priority of the government.
Further expansion of childcare capacity should continue. At the same time, the duration of parental leave should be shortened and the amount of commensurate cash benefits reduced. Public spending on family support in the Czech Republic is tilted towards generous cash benefits for families with young children (Figure 1.35), which have increased further in recent years (OECD, 2020a). Total cash benefits accruing to families with young children - relative to the average wage - are the highest in the OECD (Figure 1.35). In contrast, public spending on services - childcare provision and support and early childhood education - is low. More spending could therefore be directed towards increasing childcare capacity, towards parental leave of fathers and transfers should be better targeted towards families in hardship.
Quality of early childhood education and care is also important. International evidence shows that early childhood education and care provides a crucial foundation for future learning and is important for success later in life (OECD, 2021d; 2018b; 2017a). Access to high quality early childhood education and care for everyone raises equality of opportunity. This is perhaps even more vital in the Czech Republic, where socio-economic factors have a strong effect on student performance and educational attainment (OECD, 2019b).
Growing numbers of early childhood education and care providers of different types can become a challenge with respect to ensuring quality. Notably, in the Czech Republic, kindergartens must follow a framework education programme prepared by the Ministry of Education, while children’s groups do not follow any centralised education programme, raising risks that the quality of provided services differs significantly. Furthermore, different parts of the sector fall under different ministries, adding to complexity. The authorities should ensure effective coordination and monitoring to safeguard quality across providers, including by making sure that children benefit from minimum standards of learning and development opportunities across various types of establishments. A further boost to the sector could be achieved by requiring a qualified workforce, while offering opportunities for professional development and career progression, to ensure quality and job satisfaction (OECD, 2019c and 2019d).
Table 1.8. Past recommendations on tackling labour shortages
Recommendations in previous Surveys |
Action taken |
---|---|
Keep expanding the supply of affordable childcare facilities. |
It is one of successive governments’ priorities.
|
Reduce the maximum duration of parental leave and incentivise fathers to take more of the parental leave. |
The duration of parental leave remains the same, but paternity leave - postpartum care benefit for fathers of up to seven calendar days - was introduced in 2018 and extended to two weeks, starting in 2022. |
Increase the flexibility of jobs by better enforcement of rights for part-time work, flexible teleworking and shared jobs. |
Job sharing was introduced in legislation in June 2020 to increase flexibility. |
Attracting and retaining skilled foreign workers
Recurring labour shortages and a tight labour market prompted Czech employers to look for workers from abroad and immigration has been rising steadily. Between 2014 and 2021, the number of foreigners with a residence permit (temporary and permanent) rose by 46% (Figure 1.39, Ministry of the Interior 2020; 2021). The number of first permits issued for employment grew rapidly. In 2019 it was more than three times higher than in 2015 and it is now rebounding quickly following the pandemic-related suspension of new entries (Figure 1.39). To fill labour shortages, employers in the Czech Republic have been increasingly looking to migrants from outside the European Union (third-country nationals). The number of third-country nationals in the Czech Republic with a work authorisation exceeded 150 000 in 2022, up from just 16 700 in 2015 (OECD, 2022b). Yet, despite rising skills needs, 96% of work-permit holders (normally with an up to 90-days visa) and 87% of Employee Card holders (work and residence permit) had contracts for low- to medium-skilled jobs in 2019 ((Figure 1.40, OECD, 2022c).
Slow revival of cross-border migration amid the post-pandemic economic recovery worsened labour and skills shortages. The war in Ukraine added further challenges. The Czech labour market has relied heavily on Ukrainian workers. In 2021, Ukrainians (all, not only those working) made up close to one third of all residence permit holders and 45% of residence permit holders among non-EU nationals (Ministry of the Interior, 2022a). Prior to the war, the Ukrainian labour force in the Czech Republic consisted mostly of low-skilled men, working in manufacturing, many of them as temporary workers on short-term 90-day visas. Once the general mobilisation prevented most men aged 18 to 60 from leaving Ukraine, the inflow of this type of workers stopped. Instead, the large inflow of Ukrainian refugees that followed consisted mostly of women and children (Box 1.4). While many have already found employment, they cannot substitute for migrant workers. Moreover, uncertainty remains about their willingness to stay and work in the Czech Republic in the long term.
Current permit conditions for workers coming to the Czech Republic are not geared towards attracting and retaining high skilled foreign workers. A select group of workers can benefit from priority processing, simultaneous processing of family applications, and reduced documentary requirements, determined by employer assessments and occupation skill level. However, the basic permit conditions (maximum duration, requirement to remain with employer, time allowed to find a new job in case of unemployment, residence period prior to eligibility to apply for permanent residence) are the same for all migrants. Permit durations are limited to two years for economic migrants of all skills levels, after which they must be renewed. Labour migrants can become eligible for permanent residence after five years.
The basic framework of the labour migration policy is a labour-market tested (i.e., allowing recruitment of third-country nationals only if resident/EU workers cannot fill the vacancy), employer-driven temporary migration system, with renewals subject to initial conditions and eventual eligibility for permanent residence. There is no general skill threshold and salaries must meet the national minimum. Employee Card holders must remain at least six months with the employer for which they were first approved to enter the Czech Republic. Changing employers is allowed after six months, although subject to a new labour market test and notification of the Ministry of Interior. For Employee Card holders, family reunification can be requested after a six-month residence, and once family members receive their residence permit for the purpose of family reunification, they enjoy free access to the labour market. Statutory processing time is up to 270 days for family members, reduced to 180 days for the family of Employee Card holders. The average processing time in 2022 was 100 days. Family members of migrants admitted in the Highly Qualified Worker Programme or the Key and Research Staff Programme have the right to apply immediately for a national long-stay visa for family-related purposes in order to accompany them. However, this does not grant labour market access. Family members are required to obtain a work permit from the labour office if they want to take up employment.
Conditions in terms of permit duration and labour market mobility in the Czech Republic for highly skilled workers are less favourable than in neighbouring and competing countries (Figure 1.41). Highly skilled workers are likely to choose destinations with more favourable conditions and where they can easily relocate with their family. Many countries offer the highest-skilled migrants permanent residence, if not immediately, at least at the end of the first temporary work permit or during the validity of the first renewal. Neighbours of the Czech Republic (Germany and Poland) and many other EU destinations (e.g., Estonia and the Netherlands) are already offering direct permanent residency, longer stay permits (up to five years), exemptions from labour market testing, simultaneous processing of family applications, immediate work rights for spouses, reduced documentary requirements, rapid processing and other benefits for the most talented migrants. In contrast, all vacancies for which employers seek economic migrants in the Czech Republic (both low and high skilled) must undergo initial labour market testing. This applies also for any subsequent job changes by a migrant. Moreover, all labour migrants must go through at least two permit renewals before they become eligible to apply for permanent residence (OECD, 2022b).
Longer duration permits and better family reunification conditions can aid in attracting and retaining high skilled migrant workers. Evidence suggests that economic migrants and their employers are interested in longer-term stays in the Czech Republic. Despite the short duration of the Employee Card and the EU Blue Card, 65% of permit holders stay over two years. Preliminary data from the Czech Labour Office indicate that almost half of work contracts for third country nationals holding Employee Cards are already open-ended (OECD, 2022b). A duration of stay of five years, for example, would create a direct link between the temporary stay of the migrant and the residency requirement for permanent residence. In addition, immediate temporary residence granting work rights for all accompanying family members will improve the support available to the primary highly skilled migrants and is likely to lead to better labour market integration and retention.
To be able to select and retain migrants with the highest potential for labour market and social integration over the long term, the Czech Republic should consider implementing the points-based system (PBS), as developed by the Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs, with support from the OECD and funding from DG Reform (OECD, 2022c). In this way, high levels of human capital (age, language, education, experience) and job characteristics (skill level and salary) can lead to advantageous permit conditions and reduce barriers to long-term stay. Several OECD countries use a PBS to successfully attract and retain high-skilled foreign workers. Australia, Canada and New Zealand offer immediate permanent residence, while Austria and Japan use the PBS to provide high-scoring migrants with favourable permit conditions.
The PBS is a sorting system which places migrants into categories according to their likelihood of successful integration into the labour market and Czech society. The system would award points to highly skilled, highly remunerated, highly educated migrants and offer advantages to migrants who have gained professional qualifications and experience in the Czech Republic. Functional Czech language skills also bring points. Younger migrants will also have an advantage in this system, since they are best placed to adapt to future changes and can contribute to taxes and social contributions over a longer working life, before retirement. Providing points to younger migrants also acts as a corrective mechanism, given that points for high salary and experience naturally select older workers. Similarly, additional points can be available for a small set of strategic occupations identified by the Czech authorities.
Together, the points earned by potential migrants help identify which migrants the Czech Republic should target for selection and retention. For instance, as discussed in OECD (2022c), high-scoring migrants could be eligible for five-year permits and medium-scoring migrants for three-year permits. Both types of migrants should also be allowed to sponsor their accompanying family from the outset, in their initial application, ensuring a seamless transition to living and working in the Czech Republic for the whole family unit. This said, any PBS requires continuous evaluation and adjustment, evolving in step with labour market needs and strategic priorities.
Box 1.4. The financial and labour market impact of Ukrainian refugees
Since the Russian aggression against Ukraine on February 24, 2022, the number of total international displacements from Ukraine approached 15.5 million by early 2023 (UNCHR). While not a neighbouring country, the Czech Republic experienced a large inflow of Ukrainian refugees. By early March 2023, it is estimated that in total close to 496 000 refugees have been registered for Temporary Protection (UNCHR), equivalent to about 4.7% of the total Czech population, the highest ratio in relative terms of all receiving countries (Figure 1.42). Some Ukrainian refugees have also already returned to their homes.
According to the data from the Ministry of the Interior (2022b), one third of the refugees given temporary protection are children (aged 0-17), and close to two thirds are adults of working age (18-64). Of these, 70% are women. The Ministry of Education estimates that slightly over 57 000 Ukrainian refugee children attended Czech schools at the end of September 2022, including kindergartens, primary and secondary schools. Furthermore, 5 500 Ukrainian students attended higher education.
European Union member states approved the implementation of the Temporary Protection Directive on March 4, 2022, to protect displaced persons from Ukraine. As a result, people fleeing from Ukraine enjoy a minimum set of basic rights, which include access to the labour market, education, health as well as minimum subsistence support and housing in all EU countries.
In the Czech Republic, Ukrainian refugees have access to health care, education and housing, with costs covered by the government. Refugees are also eligible for a financial subsidy enabling them to cover daily basic living expenses and to access accommodation, depending on their exact situation. For example, a typical refugee family - one adult and one child - in independent housing in the Czech Republic is eligible to receive roughly EUR 400 per month. Czech households hosting Ukrainian refugees are also entitled to financial support for a limited duration (EUR 120 per month per accommodated person). Under various assumptions, summing the estimated costs of financial and housing support with the estimated education and health costs, OECD (2022d) computed that the total budget cost of hosting Ukrainian refugees in 2022 would amount to EUR 1.96 billion in the Czech Republic, roughly 0.7% of GDP.
The Czech Republic will bear a high budgetary cost compared to other EU countries, but part of the cost will be covered by common EU sources. The EU Commission has proposed several financial measures to help mutualise the cost: funds redirected from European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF), the fund for European aid for the Most Deprived (FEAD) and the 2022 tranche of the EU recovery plan (EU_REACT). In total, an estimated EUR 17 billion will be made available to assist EU Member States in receiving refugees fleeing Ukraine. This compares to the total estimated budgetary cost for all European countries for 2022 at EUR 27 billion (OECD, 2022d). The common EU sources will cover roughly two thirds of the cost by members. However, the exact distribution across recipient countries has not yet been determined.
The Ukrainian refugees have the right to work in the Czech Republic. In total, 205 000 refugees found employment in the Czech labour market at some point in time between the start of the conflict and end-February. In late February 2023, roughly 98 000 refugees were employed, more than one third of Ukrainian refugees of working age (Labour Office of the Czech Republic, 2023).
The fact that the Czech labour market is very tight facilitates the absorption of the newly arrived refugees. A large existing Ukrainian diaspora can also act as a valuable resource for incoming refugees. Information available indicates that the share of incoming refugees who have tertiary education is higher than among other refugee groups and they are also more highly educated than the general Ukrainian population (OECD, 2022e). Nevertheless, psychological distress, the fact that most refugees are mothers with children, and the lack of knowledge about the labour market and of the local language can still hamper rapid labour market integration. Moreover, considerable uncertainty remains regarding the length of stay of these refugees in the Czech Republic.
Improving inclusiveness and adaptability of education and skills provision
Technological progress, changes in the labour market and shifts in the demand for skills present significant opportunities and challenges (OECD 2019e and 2017b). These trends have likely been accelerated by the shifting labour market requirements during the coronavirus outbreak. Like other OECD economies, the Czech Republic has experienced a rise in demand for high-skilled jobs and this is set to continue. Close to half of current jobs (Figure 1.43) face a high risk of automation or would be significantly changed by technology (Nedelkoska and Quintini, 2018). The KOMPAS project has shown there will be an increasing demand for higher educated workers in the mid to long term. The LEON, quantitative component of the KOMPAS project, predicts a 16% increase in the overall demand for tertiary educated workers over the next five years. Demand predicted by LEON in some occupations requiring high levels of education (e.g., civil engineering, natural sciences) is expected to grow by up to 26% (OECD, 2022b).
With time, occupations will increasingly require professional training and/or tertiary education. Moreover, over the span of their careers, Czech workers will likely change jobs and employers, and will need to reskill. Besides higher and more specialised skills, strong core skills such as information processing, problem solving and communication can ensure that individuals are resilient to change (OECD, 2017c and 2016b). It is therefore crucial that education and skills provision systems provide workers with the right skill sets and easy access to learning. In turn, higher attained education and improved skills will help raise productivity and move the Czech economy up the global value chains. Yet, a high share of Czech 15-year-old students still expect to work in occupations that are projected to decline in the future (Figure 1.44, OECD, 2021f).
The Czech Republic scores well on various measures of skills and quality of education. 15-year-old students perform well in PISA tests, and adult skills are above the OECD average in literacy, numeracy and problem solving in technology-rich environments (Figure 1.45). EU data also indicate high basic digital skills (European Commission, 2022b). Overall, education attainment is high, with 92% of 25-34-year-olds having at least upper secondary education, and school leaving rates are low (OECD, 2021e; European Commission, 2022b).
However, there are challenges to the flexible and effective provision of skills to match current and future labour market needs. The PISA tests point to a decline in performance in mathematics and science over the last 15 years (Figure 1.46). Furthermore, while overall educational attainment is high, tertiary attainment still lags significantly behind other OECD peers despite progress in recent years (Figure 1.47). Skills shortages in growing sectors remain large. Despite workers’ good basic digital skills, the economy lacks information and communication technology (ICT) specialists. According to Eurostat, 76% of Czech enterprises reported difficulties in finding ICT specialists, which is the highest percentage in the European Union. The share of female ICT specialists is the second lowest EU-wide (European Commission, 2022b). An OECD assessment of skills shortages found extensive shortages in technical knowledge areas such as engineering, mechanics and technology, mathematics, and computer and electronics (OECD, 2018c).
To strengthen the resilience of Czech workers’ skill sets and to help make skills provision more relevant to the labour-market, the 2030+ education strategy (Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports, 2020) puts a welcome emphasis on reforming the Vocational Education and Training (VET) sector. It aims at postponing specialisation and reducing the total number of study fields, modernising them, and making them more interdisciplinary. Professional and transferable competences will be strengthened. VET education will increasingly shift to modular curricula that are better adapted to adult learning. More (practical and theoretical) teaching will be carried out in cooperation with employers. Employers' organisations and business representatives will also be more involved in curriculum development and updates. Developing digital skills is also an important part of the 2030+ education strategy, with the aim to strengthen education and training on digital skills at all levels of education. The Czech Republic will draw on the available funds from the EU Recovery and Resilience Facility to provide digital equipment to schools, improve digital skills of teachers, revise the IT curriculum, and expand life-long learning in digital technologies. These efforts should continue.
Good overall scores in skills and education performance also mask persistent inequalities, whereby socio-economic status of parents has a strong impact on performance in school (Figure 1.48). This translates into weaker outcomes in terms of labour market performance and health later in life (OECD, 2021e). School drop-out rates vary substantially across regions, with the disadvantaged ones recording over twice the national rate (6.4%) of early school leavers (European Commission, 2022b). Moreover, 57% of Roma students left school early in 2016 (European Commission, 2022b). Inequalities in schools can be linked partly to the low attractiveness of the teaching profession. The teaching workforce lacks diversity, as teachers are quite old on average and predominantly female (OECD, 2021e). There is limited career progression and teacher salaries are low (Figure 1.49), although there have been rises in salaries in recent years (Ministry of Finance, 2021). Evidence reported in the OECD Skills Outlook (OECD, 2021f) indicates that teacher enthusiasm and teacher stimulation are inferior in disadvantaged schools (Figure 1.50). The proportion of teachers who have received training in teaching in a multicultural or multilingual setting or communicating with people from different cultures or countries is one of the lowest in the OECD (Figure 1.50). This is of concern, given the currently high inflow of Ukrainian refugees and the desire to attract more foreign workers and their families.
Reducing inequalities in education has been a longstanding priority. The introduction, in 2017, of compulsory participation in pre-primary education for one year prior to primary school will help in this regard. However, abolishing early tracking, reducing differences in the quality of schools and attracting better teachers to disadvantaged schools would go further in raising equality of opportunities for everyone.
Tracking into prestigious general education pathways in multi-year grammar schools (gymnasium) occurs very early, at age 11/12, when students can apply for a long academic track, the 8-year gymnasium. A second but much less significant tracking stage occurs at age 13/14 (6-year gymnasium). Students are selected into the different pathways by admission examinations and aptitude tests, and those with the strongest academic performance usually opt for general tracks such as gymnasium and lyceum. As discussed in the special chapter on education in the 2014 OECD Economic Survey (OECD, 2014), evidence suggests that family background matters more than academic ability in explaining access to the more prestigious academic tracks (Koucký et al., 2004; Münich, 2005). Moreover, early student selection has an adverse impact on students assigned to lower tracks and does not raise average performance (OECD, 2012). This is recognised as an issue also in the new 2030+ education strategy. Therefore, tracking should be postponed and combined with increased possibilities to transfer between different education tracks.
Inequalities could be further addressed by reducing differences in quality between schools that are related to high regional disparities (Shewbridge et al., 2016). Recent changes to funding of schools (primary and secondary) go some way towards this goal by funding based on the actual extent of education in a school, rather than per-student funding. In this way, small schools with fewer children are not penalised with lower funding. However, the highly fragmented territorial administration of the Czech Republic fosters the existence of many small schools, although many localities face a declining school-aged population and as such can hardly sustain school units of appropriate “size efficiency” (Shewbridge et al., 2016; OECD, 2020a). Further consolidation of the school network is therefore desirable and could raise efficiency and quality. For instance, small schools could be encouraged to cooperate by sharing resources and common services. Clusters of schools could be formed, that would come under the umbrella of common school leadership and a shared pool of administrative staff.
Funding formulae are the most commonly used basis for allocation of funding to educational institutions among OECD countries (OECD, 2021e). However, the Czech Republic is one of only six countries that do not use a funding formula. Funding formulae can be useful, as financing can be explicitly targeted towards important strategic areas, such as providing support for disadvantaged students or schools based on well-defined criteria. The latter can be based on student characteristics, school characteristics and/or population characteristics in the local area. Adding explicit and objective criteria in the funding formula for schools to target economic and other disadvantages could therefore help address the inequalities. For instance, since a recent reform in Australia, funding is based on a “standard” which comprises a base funding amount for every student plus six additional “loadings” that provide extra funding for disadvantage (disability, low English proficiency, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders, socio-educational disadvantage, school location and school size). The criteria and specific loadings can then evolve in step with strategic priorities of the government.
The uneven distribution of qualified teachers across schools is a concern. Disadvantaged schools are more likely to report shortages of qualified or competent teachers (Shewbridge et al., 2016; Schleicher, 2014). However, the Czech Republic does not have targeted programmes or incentives to motivate teachers to work in remote or regional areas (Shewbridge et al., 2016). The Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports should increase incentives for highly qualified teachers to work in remote areas to help reduce disparities in the quality of schooling. In this, both financial and non-financial factors are important in motivating teachers. Professional factors matter, such as opportunities to take on extra responsibilities and positions of influence, reforms and innovation, and developing strong leadership and collegiality in professional development (Mourshed et al., 2010; OECD, 2012; Rice, 2010). The Ministry should help create an environment where disadvantaged schools can attract the best teachers by offering meaningful careers, good working conditions and opportunities for reward. The overall reform to the career system of teachers - also part of the 2030+ education strategy - would be helpful and consistent with this approach.
Table 1.9. Past recommendations on education and skills
Recommendations in previous Surveys |
Action taken |
---|---|
Increase resources to education, skilling, reskilling and upskilling and better target disadvantage. |
Public funding for education has increased as a share of GDP. From 01/01/2020, funding of education is changed: per capita funding was replaced by a normative (amount) per educational worker, and schools will receive funds according to the number of lessons taught. |
Foster flexible courses for adult education, in particular targeted at low-skilled workers. |
The Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs is preparing an “employment package” including support for those employees who are threatened by job losses related to the introduction of new technologies or manufacturing processes. The project POVEZ II for the support of vocational training of employees is still ongoing (since 1/12/2015). The 2030+ education strategy puts emphasis on reforming the Vocational Education and Training (VET) sector. It aims at postponing specialisation and reducing the total number of study fields, modernising them, and making them more interdisciplinary. VET education will increasingly shift to modular curricula that are better adapted to adult learning. Employer organisations and business representatives will also be more involved in curriculum development and updates. |
Table 1.10. Recommendations
MAIN FINDINGS |
RECOMMENDATIONS (key recommendations in bold) |
|
---|---|---|
Weathering the economic slowdown without aggravating macroeconomic imbalances |
||
Inflation and inflation expectations have risen steeply. Inflation has become entrenched at high levels and is broad-based. The CNB has intervened on the foreign exchange market, to reduce excess fluctuation, but also to stem depreciation pressures on the koruna. Interventions started in January 2022 but intensified between May and September 2022. |
Maintain a tight monetary policy stance until inflation is firmly on the path towards the 2% target. Keep the key policy rate as the main monetary policy tool. Use foreign exchange operations primarily to dampen volatility in the forex market. |
|
Housing and residential property prices are high. Mortgage loans with risky characteristics have risen significantly. A sudden correction of real estate prices or a shock to household incomes can have system-wide impacts with potential spillovers to financial stability. |
Closely monitor risks stemming from the imbalances in the property market and adjust macroprudential measures and limits on mortgage loans appropriately. Consider setting minimum risk weights or applying the sectoral systemic risk buffer. |
|
Fiscal policy has been expansionary and macroeconomic policies are not sufficiently coordinated. |
Start fiscal consolidation while providing targeted support to households and firms if needed. |
|
Ensuring long-term fiscal sustainability |
||
High fiscal pressures in the medium to long term (including those related to population ageing) threaten sustainability. Without reform, the debt-to-GDP ratio is set to rise dramatically. |
Prepare a more ambitious and credible medium-term fiscal consolidation plan, including the path for improvements in the structural balance. |
|
The 2020 tax package - changes to the personal income tax and abolished real estate stamp duty - permanently reduced tax revenues. Personal income taxes are low and only weakly progressive. |
Strengthen tax revenues, including through more progressive personal income taxation. |
|
Revenues rely heavily on social security contributions and result in a high tax wedge. Lower reliance on direct taxation of labour and higher revenues from property and indirect taxes, including environmental taxes, could boost growth sustainably. |
Shift towards real estate, consumption and environmental taxes, and reduce social security contributions. |
|
The VAT compliance gap remains above the EU average and the share of forgone revenue is likely rising due to decreasing compliance and an increasing number of items with reduced VAT rates. Notably, a large variety of goods and services were reassigned to reduced rates during the pandemic in 2020. |
Gradually broaden the base for the VAT, including by reversing the VAT exemptions introduced during the pandemic. |
|
The self-employed benefit from tax advantages vis-à-vis employees, resulting in significantly lower social security contributions. |
Reduce tax advantages for the self-employed, including by increasing the assessment base for social security contributions. |
|
The population is ageing rapidly and age-related spending will rise steeply over the coming decades. Almost one-third of people retire before the statutory retirement age. Even when the statutory age rises to 65, under current provisions, the early retirement age will remain at 60. |
Continue to raise the statutory and minimum early retirement ages and link them to life expectancy. |
|
The Czech pension system is strongly redistributive with low poverty in old age. However, replacement rates for high earners are low and the link between paid contributions and future benefits is low, giving high earners a very low internal rate of return. |
Consider financing some redistributive components of the public pension system (e.g., basic pensions) through general taxes and lowering burdensome social security contributions. |
|
Increasing the efficiency of public administration can help to improve fiscal sustainability and raise the quality of services provided to citizens. The Czech Republic has one of the most fragmented territorial and municipal administrations in the OECD. There is a lack of strategic steering capacities and alignment from the centre. Strategic decisions, regulations and policies are also insufficiently based on evidence. |
Strengthen the strategic coordination role of the Government Office and boost analytical capacities across public administration levels. Enable the expansion of the use of spending reviews by building capacity and improving data accessibility. |
|
Tackling recurrent labour shortages |
||
Childbirth has a large impact on labour market activity of mothers. The gender wage gap is sizable. Family cash benefits and tax breaks are generous while public childcare support is low, particularly for children under the age of three. |
Keep expanding the supply of affordable and high-quality childcare facilities. Lower untargeted family cash benefits and gradually reduce the maximum duration of parental leave. |
|
It is almost exclusively women who stay at home on parental leave with young children, due to persistent gender stereotypes as well as financial concerns. Total paternity and parental leave specific for fathers together remain short in international comparison. |
Reserve part of parental leave for fathers at sufficiently generous replacement rates. |
|
Current permit conditions are restrictive and not geared towards attracting and retaining high-skilled foreign workers. Conditions in terms of permit duration and associated family reunification and labour market mobility for highly skilled workers are less favourable than in many OECD peers. |
Increase the duration of initial work permits to five years for highly skilled migrants and offer immediate temporary residence and work rights for accompanying family members. Consider implementing a points-based immigration system where high levels of human capital (age, language, education, experience) and job characteristics (skill level and salary) lead to advantageous permit conditions. |
|
Enhancing skills for higher growth |
||
Socio-economic factors have a large impact on student performance and attainment. Much of the inequality stems from variation between schools. Many schools are too small to provide education effectively. |
Introduce explicit and objective criteria (based on school, student or local area characteristics) in the funding formula for schools to further address inequalities and disadvantage. Consolidate the school network to ensure quality of education in all schools and encourage small schools to cooperate and share administrative resources. |
|
Tracking occurs very early (at age 11), and evidence shows that family background matters more than academic ability in explaining access to the more prestigious academic tracks. Moreover, early student selection has a negative impact on students assigned to lower tracks. |
Postpone education tracking and expand possibilities for transferring between different education tracks. |
|
Disadvantaged schools are more likely to have staff shortages and they employ the least experienced teachers. |
Offer better career paths to teachers and increase incentives for high-quality teachers to work in remote areas. |
|
Skills shortages in many technical fields remain large with a particular lack of ICT specialists. Besides higher and more specialised skills, strong core skills can ensure that workers are resilient to change. Education should provide workers with the right skill sets and easy access to learning, including for adults. |
Modernise VET education, as planned in the 2030+ education strategy, by modernising curricula, strengthening core skills, involving employers more closely and better adapting it to adult learning. |
|
Raising public integrity |
||
Indicators of control and perceived risks of corruption in the public sector suggest that the Czech Republic underperforms compared to OECD peers. Czech citizens tend to think that corruption is widespread. The 2021 Rule of Law Report of the European Commission noted a lack of progress. |
Continue efforts to fight corruption. |
|
Public integrity should be improved further. |
Adopt measures to strengthen the management and prevention of conflict of interest in Parliament. Improve integrity and transparency in lobbying. |
|
Exports include high-risk sectors for foreign bribery, such as machinery and defence materials. Only one case of foreign bribery has been prosecuted so far. |
Continue efforts to guarantee greater independence to prosecutors and enact appropriate protection to whistleblowers from discriminatory or disciplinary action. |
References
Akgun, O., B. Cournède and J. Fournier (2017), "The effects of the tax mix on inequality and growth", OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1447, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Ari, A., Arregui, N., Black, S., Celasun, O., Iakova, D., Mineshima, A., Mylonas, V., Parry, I., Teodoru, I., & Zhunussova, K. (2022), “Surging Energy Prices in Europe in the Aftermath of the War: How to Support the Vulnerable and Speed up the Transition Away from Fossil Fuels”, IMF Working Papers, 2022/152.
Arnold, J., B. Brys, C. Heady, Å. Johansson, C. Schwellnus and L. Vartia (2011), “Tax Policy for Economic Recovery and Growth”, The Economic Journal, Vol. 121, No. 550.
Blöchliger, H. (2015), “Reforming the tax on immovable property: taking care of the unloved”, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1205, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Blundell-Wignall, A. and C. Roulet (2017), “Foreign direct investment, corruption and the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention”, OECD Working Papers on International Investment, No. 2017/01, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Colin, C. and B. Brys (2019), "Population ageing and sub-central governments: Long-term fiscal challenges", OECD Working Papers on Fiscal Federalism, No. 30, OECD Publishing, Paris,
Czech Fiscal Council (2022a), Report on the Long-Term Sustainability of Public Finances, September 2022. The Czech Fiscal Council. [in Czech]
Czech Fiscal Council (2022b), Opinion Concerning the development of public sector finances and the set-up of fiscal and budgetary policy. Opinion of the Czech Fiscal Council, Number 6/2022.
Czech Fiscal Council (2022c), Report on compliance with the rules of budgetary responsibility for 2021, September.
Czech Fiscal Council (2022d), Opinion Concerning the development of public sector finances and the set-up of fiscal and budgetary policy. Opinion of the Czech Fiscal Council, Number 7/2022 of 8 December [in Czech].
Czech Fiscal Council (2021), Report on the Long-Term Sustainability of Public Finances, June.
Czech National Bank (2023), Monetary Policy Report – Winter 2023.
Czech National Bank (2022a), Monetary Policy Report – Summer.
Czech National Bank (2022b), Financial Market Inflation Expectations – 11/2022.
Czech National Bank (2022c), Financial Stability Report, Spring.
Czech National Bank (2022d), Monetary Policy Report – Autumn.
Czech National Bank (2022e),Financial Stability Report, Autumn.
Czech National Bank (2022f), Financial Market Inflation Expectations – 12/2022.
Dell, G., and A. McDevitt (2018), Exporting Corruption: Assessing enforcement of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, Transparency International.
Égert, B. (2017), “The quantification of structural reforms: Extending the framework to emerging market economies”, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1442, OECD Publishing, Paris.
ESRB (2022), Vulnerabilities in the Residential Real Estate Sectors of the EEA Countries, February, European Systemic Risk Board.
European Commission (2022a), Fiscal Sustainability Report 2021, Volume 2 – Country Analysis, Institutional Paper 171, April.
European Commission (2022b), 2022 Country Report - Czechia, SWD(2020) 605 final.
European Commission (2022c), VAT gap in the EU: report 2022, European Commission, Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union, Poniatowski, G., Bonch-Osmolovskiy, M., Śmietanka, A., et al., Publications Office of the European Union, 2022.
European Commission (2021a), 2021 Rule of law report - Communication and country chapter on the rule of law situation in Czechia.
European Commission (2020), “Corruption”, Special Eurobarometer, No.502, Fieldwork - December 2019, Publication – June 2020.
Government of the Czech Republic (2022), Policy Statement of the Government of the Czech Republic, Prague, January.
Government of the Czech Republic (2018), Government Anti-Corruption Strategy for 2018-2022 [In Czech].
GRECO (2020), Fourth Evaluation Round, Interim Compliance Report – Czech Republic; Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors, GrecoRC4 (2019)29.
GRECO (2018), Fourth Evaluation Round, Evaluation Report – Czech Republic; Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors, GrecoRC4 (2018)5.
GRECO (2016), Fourth Evaluation Round, Compliance Report – Czech Republic; Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors, GrecoEval4Rep (2016)4.
Guillemette, Y. and D. Turner (2021), "The long game: Fiscal outlooks to 2060 underline need for structural reform", OECD Economic Policy Papers, No. 29, OECD Publishing, Paris,
Kim, J. and C. Vammalle (eds.) (2012), Institutional and Financial Relations across Levels of Government, OECD Fiscal Federalism Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris,
Koucký, J. et al. (2004), “Učení pro život, Výsledky výzkumu OECD PISA 2003” (Learning for Life, Outcomes of OECD Survey PISA 2003), special annex to Učitelské noviny, Vol. 107, No. 46.
Labour Office of the Czech Republic (2023), Unemployment remained at 3.9% in February, the number of newly registered job seekers fell month-on-month [Nezaměstnanost v únoru zůstala na 3,9 %, meziměsíčně klesl počet nově evidovaných uchazečů o zaměstnání] in Czech. Press Release, 08.03.2023.
Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports (2020), Strategy for the Education Policy of the Czech Republic up to 2030+.
Ministry of Finance (2022a), Macroeconomic Forecast – August.
Ministry of Finance (2022b), Convergence Programme of the Czech Republic, April.
Ministry of Finance (2022c), Fiscal Outlook of the Czech Republic, November.
Ministry of Finance (2021), Fiscal Outlook of the Czech Republic, November.
Ministry of Finance (2020), Convergence Programme of the Czech Republic, Ministry of Finance of the Czech Republic, April.
Ministry of Finance (2019), Fiscal Outlook of the Czech Republic, November.
Ministry of the Interior (2022a), Annual Report on Migration and Integration of Foreigners in the Territory of The Czech Republic – 2021. [Zpráva o situaci v oblasti migrace a integrace cizinců na území České republiky – 2021] [In Czech].
Ministry of the Interior (2022b), Statistics in connection with the war in Ukraine, Numbers of persons granted a residence permit in connection with the war in Ukraine [in Czech]. Accessed 09-12-2022. Informative population numbers in municipalities - Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republic (mvcr.cz)
Ministry of the Interior (2021), Annual Report on Migration and Integration of Foreigners in the Territory of The Czech Republic – 2020. [Zpráva o situaci v oblasti migrace a integrace cizinců na území České republiky – 2020] [In Czech].
Ministry of the Interior (2020), Annual Report on Migration and Integration of Foreigners in the Territory of The Czech Republic – 2019. [Zpráva o situaci v oblasti migrace a integrace cizinců na území České republiky – 2019] [In Czech].
Ministry of Justice (2020), The Czech Republic’s Anti-Corruption Action Plan 2021-22 [in Czech]
Mourshed, M., C. Chijioke and M. Barber (2010), How the World’s Most Improved School Systems Keep Getting Better, McKinsey and Company, London.
Münich, D. (2005), Estimating the Impact of School Quality, Selection, and Supply on Student’s Achievements: Evidence from the Czech Nation-wide Testing of Youth, Charles University, Prague.
Nedelkoska, L. and G. Quintini (2018), “Automation, skills use and training”, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 202, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2022a), Taxing Wages 2022: Impact of COVID-19 on the Tax Wedge in OECD Countries, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2022b), An approach to points based migration for the Czech Republic. Working Party on Migration. Directorate for employment, labour and social affairs. Employment, Labour and Social Affairs Committee. ELSA/ELS/WP2 (2022)7, 16 June.
OECD (2022c), A Multicriterial Points-Based System for Managing Labour Migration to the Czech Republic. Final Report, September.
OECD (2022d), Can we assess the financial impact of the Ukrainian refugee crisis in Europe? An estimation of the total cost at national and European level. Working Party on Migration. Directorate for employment, labour and social affairs. Employment, Labour and Social Affairs Committee. Working Party on Migration. ELSA/ELS/WP2 (2022)17, 20 June.
OECD (2022e), The contribution of Ukrainian refugees to the labour force in European host countries. Working Party on Migration. Directorate for employment, labour and social affairs. Employment, Labour and Social Affairs Committee. Working Party on Migration. ELSA/ELS/WP2 (2022)20. 17 June.
OECD (2022f), “Why Governments Should Target Support Amidst High Energy Prices”, Policy Responses: Ukraine, 30 June.
OECD (2022g), Consumption Tax Trends 2022: VAT/GST and Excise, Core Design Features and Trends, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2022h), Pricing Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Turning Climate Targets into Climate Action, OECD Series on Carbon Pricing and Energy Taxation, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2021a), Pensions at a Glance 2021: OECD and G20 Indicators, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2021b), Effective Carbon Rates 2021: Pricing Carbon Emissions Through Taxes and Emissions Trading, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2021c), PF2.1. Parental leave systems. Updated: October 2021, OECD Family database.
OECD (2021d), Starting Strong VI: Supporting Meaningful Interactions in Early Childhood Education and Care, Starting Strong, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2021e), Education at a Glance 2021: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2021f), OECD Skills Outlook 2021: Learning for Life, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2021g), Czech Republic, Phase 4 - Additional Follow-Up Report. 2019 Two-year follow-up – updated 2021. Implementing the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention.
OECD (2020a), OECD Economic Surveys: Czech Republic 2020, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2020b), OECD Reviews of Pension Systems: Czech Republic, OECD Reviews of Pension Systems, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2020c), Consumption Tax Trends 2020: VAT/GST and Excise Rates, Trends and Policy Issues, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2020d), Tax Policy Reforms 2020: OECD and Selected Partner Economies, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2020e), OECD Spending Review Survey.
OECD (2019a), Tax Policy Reforms 2019: OECD and Selected Partner Economies, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2019b), PISA 2018 Results (Volume II): Where All Students Can Succeed, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2019c), Providing Quality Early Childhood Education and Care: Results from the Starting Strong Survey 2018, TALIS, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2019d), Good Practice for Good Jobs in Early Childhood Education and Care, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2019e), OECD Employment Outlook 2019. The Future of Work. OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2019f), Implementing the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, Czech Republic – Phase 4, Two-Year Written Follow–Up Report. Follow-Up to the Phase 4 Report
OECD (2019g), Working Better with Age, Ageing and Employment Policies, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2018a), OECD Environmental Performance Reviews: Czech Republic 2018, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2018b), Starting Strong. Engaging Young Children. Lessons from research about quality in early childhood education and care, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2018c), Skills for Jobs – Czech Republic country note. October.
OECD (2017a), Starting Strong 2017: Key OECD Indicators on Early Childhood Education and Care, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2017b), "How technology and globalisation are transforming the labour market", Chapter 3, Employment Outlook.
OECD (2017c), OECD Skills Outlook 2017: Skills and Global Value Chains, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2017d), Implementing the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, Czech Republic – Phase 4 Report.
OECD (2016a), Investing in Integrity for Productivity, OECD Working Party of Senior Public Integrity Officials [GOV/PGC/INT(2016)6].
OECD (2016b), “Skills for a Digital World: 2016 Ministerial Meeting on the Digital Economy Background Report”, OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 250, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2014), OECD Economic Surveys: Czech Republic 2014, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2012), Equity and Quality in Education: Supporting Disadvantaged Students and Schools, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Office of the Government of the Czech Republic (2021), Gender Equality Strategy for 2021 – 2030, February.
Pertold-Gebicka, B. (2020), “Parental leave length and mothers’ careers: what can be inferred from occupational allocation?”, Applied Economics, 52:9, 879-904.
Radvan, M. (2019), “Major Problematic Issues in the Property Taxation in the Czech Republic”, Center for Analyses and Studies of Taxation, Analyses and Studies No 2(8), p. 13-31.
Rice, S.M. (2010), “Getting our best teachers into disadvantaged schools: differences in the professional and personal factors attracting more effective and less effective teachers to a school”, Education Research and Policy Practice, 9(3), pp. 177-192.
Ščasný, M. et al. (2022), “Analýza Fit for 55. Hodnocení dopadů na ČR” (Analysis of Fit for 55. Impact Assessment for the Czech Republic). Study prepared by Charles University Environment Centre [in Czech].
Schleicher, A. (2014), Equity, Excellence and Inclusiveness in Education: Policy Lessons from Around the World, OECD Publishing, Paris,
Shewbridge, C. et al. (2016), OECD Reviews of School Resources: Czech Republic 2016, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Thévenon, O. and A. Solaz (2013), "Labour Market Effects of Parental Leave Policies in OECD Countries", OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 141, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Tryggvadottir, Á. (2022), “OECD Best Practices for Spending Reviews”, OECD Journal on Budgeting, Vol. 22/1.
UNCHR – Operational data portal. Ukraine refugee situation.