Table A B.1 below provides a mapping of existing initiatives focused on transition plans and compares them across several key components identified in Chapter 4 to ensure the credibility of transition plans.
OECD Guidance on Transition Finance
Annex B. Mapping of transition plan elements
Table A B.1. Mapping of key elements of existing initiatives focused on transition plans
Initiative |
L-T target |
Interim target |
Use of scenario analysis |
Consistency with 1.5 |
Scope 3 emissions |
Use of taxonomies |
Performance and progress measurement |
Information on use of carbon credits and offsets |
DNSH |
Just transition |
Financial plans and internal coherence; governance and accountability |
Transparency and verification |
Tailored approach for SMEs |
Policy engagement |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACT |
PA temperature goal |
N/A |
✓ |
No |
|
✓ |
✓ |
|
No |
No |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
CA100+ |
GHG targets by 2050 |
2025 and 2026-2035 targets |
✓ |
✓ |
|
Increase/ disclosure green revenues in line with EU taxonomy |
✓ |
No offsets where viable decarbonisation options exist |
No |
Under development |
✓ |
No |
No |
✓ |
CBI |
Net zero by 2050 |
3-5 year targets |
No |
✓ |
Upstream scope 3 emissions to be included in KPIs; downstream to be disclosed for stranded activities |
No |
✓ |
Should not be used |
No |
No |
✓ |
✓ |
No |
No |
CDP |
Net zero by 2050 |
Five-ten year interim |
✓ |
✓ |
Included in annual inventory |
No |
✓ |
No |
No |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
No |
✓ |
CPI |
Net zero by 2050 |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
For all companies including subsidiaries |
No |
Emission metrics in both absolute terms and intensity-based; to be updated annually |
|
Transparency on unavoidable trade-offs |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
CSL |
Net zero by 2050 |
2030 targets |
✓ |
✓ |
Included in targets when significant and data allows |
No |
✓ |
Use clear rules if using carbon offset |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
No |
No |
✓ |
EFRAG |
PA temperature goal |
5-year rolling targets and 2030 target |
✓ |
✓ |
To be disclosed |
Disclosure required by the EU Taxonomy (share of Taxonomy-compliant turnover, CapEx and OpEx or on their green asset ratio) |
✓ |
|
As per EU taxonomy |
Covered in the social standards |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Covered in the RBC standard |
GFANZ |
Net zero by 2050 |
To 2030 and earlier |
No |
✓ |
Net-zero commitments to cover Scope 3 emissions of companies in sectors that are significant climate change contributors or where Scope 3 emissions are material and data is available. |
✓ |
✓ |
Consider credits purchased by portfolio companies separately from their emissions and advocate for disclosure regarding type of credit and accounting methodology |
No |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
ICMA |
L-T GHG targets |
No |
Ideally |
Included in targets. Estimated on a 'best effort' basis for some sectors until calculation methodologies are developed. |
No |
Intensity and absolute |
No |
Yes |
Just transition reference |
✓ |
✓ |
No |
No |
|
IFRS/ISSB |
PA temperature goal |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
To be disclosed. If excluded, the reason for omission to be provided. |
No |
✓ |
Disclosure on: extent of reliance on offsets; verification/ certification; type and other factors/ assumptions |
No |
No |
✓ |
✓ |
No |
No |
IGCC |
Alignment with PA temperature goal and net zero by 2050. |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
To be included in net-zero targets if material. |
No |
✓ |
To be used only as a last resort. When used, disclosure needed on:
|
No |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
No |
✓ |
SBTi |
Net zero by 2050 |
5-10 year targets |
No |
✓ |
To be included in targets. For companies with scope 3 emissions that are at least 40% of total emissions at least 67% of scope 3 emissions must also be covered in near-term targets. |
No |
✓ |
Targets require long-term deep decarbonisation targets of 90-95% across all scopes before 2050. When a company reaches its net zero target, only a limited amount of residual emissions can be neutralised with high quality carbon removals (no more than 5‑10) |
Partially |
No |
No |
No |
✓ |
No |
TCFD |
Transparency on dates |
No |
✓ |
global temperature goal (e.g. 1.5) |
Transparency on scope of emissions considered |
No |
✓ |
Transparency on use of removals and offsets |
No |
No |
✓ |
✓ |
No |
No |
TPT |
Alignment with PA temperature goal, ideally 1.5 by 2050. |
✓ |
Sensitivity analysis |
No |
✓ |
No |
✓ |
Transparency on the reliance of offsets/carbon credits:
|
Partially |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Note: This mapping includes some initiatives which are in draft/proposal form, such as the ISSB Exposure Draft on Climate-related Disclosures, the draft EU Sustainability Reporting Standards and the UK Transition Plan Taskforce (TPT) Call for Evidence document. This mapping includes GFANZ Recommendations and Guidance on Financial Institution Net-zero Transition Plans, noting the Real-economy Transition Plans workstream is under development.
References
[1] ACT (2019), ACT Framework, https://actinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/pdf/act-framework-eng-2019-04-09.pdf (accessed on 1 May 2022).
[2] CA100+ (2021), Net Zero Company Benchmark, https://www.climateaction100.org/net-zero-company-benchmark/ (accessed on 29 April 2022).
[3] CBI (2021), Transition finance for transforming companies, https://www.climatebonds.net/files/files/Transition%20Finance/Transition%20Finance%20for%20Transforming%20Companies%20ENG%20-%2010%20Sept%202021%20.pdf (accessed on 29 April 2022).
[4] CDP (2021), Climate Transition Plan: Discussion Paper, https://cdn.cdp.net/cdp-production/cms/guidance_docs/pdfs/000/002/840/original/Climate-Transition-Plans.pdf?1636038499 (accessed on 29 April 2022).
[5] CPI (2022), What Makes a Transition Plan Credible? Considerations for financial institutions, https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Credible-Transition-Plans.pdf (accessed on 29 April 2022).
[6] CSL (2021), “The Good Transition Plan - Climate Action Strategy Development Guidance for Banks & Lending Institutions: COP26-version”, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5e0a586857ea746075c561a3/t/61fa7a928bf1444954619fa5/1643805346245/CSLN+Good+Transition+Report+01.22.pdf (accessed on 29 April 2022).
[7] EFRAG (2022), Exposure Draft ESRS E1 Climate Change, https://www.efrag.org/Assets/Download?assetUrl=%2Fsites%2Fwebpublishing%2FSiteAssets%2FED_ESRS_E1.pdf (accessed on 29 April 2022).
[8] GFANZ (2022), Financial Institution Net-zero Transition Plans, https://assets.bbhub.io/company/sites/63/2022/06/GFANZ_Recommendations-and-Guidance-on-Net-zero-Transition-Plans-for-the-Financial-Sector_June2022.pdf.
[9] ICMA (2020), Climate Transition Finance Handbook, https://www.icmagroup.org/assets/documents/Regulatory/Green-Bonds/Climate-Transition-Finance-Handbook-December-2020-091220.pdf (accessed on 30 April 2022).
[10] IFRS (2022), Draft IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures, https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/project/climate-related-disclosures/issb-exposure-draft-2022-2-climate-related-disclosures.pdf (accessed on 29 April 2022).
[11] IGCC (2022), Corporate Climate Transition Plans: A guide to investor expectations, https://igcc.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/IGCC-corporate-transition-plan-investor-expectations.pdf (accessed on 30 April 2022).
[12] SBTi (2021), SBTi Corporate Net-Zero Standard, https://sciencebasedtargets.org/resources/files/Net-Zero-Standard.pdf (accessed on 29 April 2022).
[13] TCFD (2021), Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures - Guidance on Metrics, Targets, and Transition Plans, https://assets.bbhub.io/company/sites/60/2021/07/2021-Metrics_Targets_Guidance-1.pdf (accessed on 4 April 2022).
[14] TPT (2022), A Sector-Neutral Framework for private sector transition plans - Call for Evidence, Transition Plan Taskforce (TPT), https://transitiontaskforce.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/TPT_Call_for_Evidence.pdf.